Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Horror Studies
  4. Volume 15, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 15, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2040-3275
  • E-ISSN: 2040-3283

Abstract

The article presents a post-humanist reading of John Carpenter’s (1982). At 40, the second adaptation of John Campbell’s Jr novella (1938) has recently undergone a revival of critical interest. However, this interest has only elicited – to date – new iterations of the traditional paradigm of ideological readings of the film. This article attempts to read outside the paradigm of ideology and human(ist) subjectivity, as per the formulation of Louis Althusser (2014), as well as to critique such paradigm. First, the article offers an analysis of the ideological components at work in various traditional readings of the film. Then it scrutinizes ways in which these traditional readings can be overcome. This opens the possibility of a post-humanist interpretation of the film, an interpretation in which the Thing is not just a manifestation of otherness, but a material and effective realization of life seen from a non-humanist perspective. This reading arises after dispensing with the subject–object relationship enforced in Althusser’s ideological structures. Outside these structures, the article then ponders on the materiality of the Thing through Deleuze’s and Guattari’s concept of the Body without Organs (‘BwO’), which envisages the body as a material dimension for the flow of becoming, a dynamic force field free of fixed and normative pre-conceptions. Finally, the article explores the new sources of horror in the film, as well as the ethico-political implications this analysis brings to fore.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/host_00083_1
2024-04-19
2024-09-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Addison, H. (2013), ‘Cinema’s darkest vision: Looking into the void in John Carpenter’s The Thing (1982)’, Journal of Popular Film and Television, 41:3, pp. 154–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Althusser, L. ([1970] 2014), The Reproduction of Capitalism; Ideology and the Ideological State Apparatuses (trans. G. M. Goshgarian), London and New York: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin, M. ([1941] 1984), Rabelais and His World (trans. H. Iswoski), Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Billson, A. (1997), The Thing, London: British Film Institute.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Boumelha, P. ([1982] 1985), Thomas Hardy and Women: Sexual Ideology and Narrative Form, Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Braidotti, R. (2012), ‘Nomadic ethics’, in D. W. Smith and H. Somers-Hall (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Deleuze, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 170–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, B. (2001), ‘Thing theory’, Critical Inquiry, 28:1, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1344258?origin=JSTOR-pdf. Accessed 1 April 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, B. (2003), A Sense of Things: The Object Matter of American Literature, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cameron Menzies, W. ([1953] 2001), Invaders from Mars, USA: Twentieth Century Fox.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Campbell, J. W. (1938), Who Goes There?, London: Orioon/Hachette, ebook.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Carpenter, J. (1982), The Thing, USA: Universal Pictures.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Conrich, I. (2004), ‘Killing time… and time again: The popular appeal of Carpenter’s horrors and the impact of The Thing and Halloween’, in I. Conrich and D. Woods (eds), The Cinema of John Carpenter: The Technique of Terror, London: Wallflower Press, pp. 91–106.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Deleuze, G. ([1968] 2013), Difference and Repetition (trans. P. Patton), London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Deleuze, G. ([1969] 2021), The Logic of Sense (trans. C. V. Boundas, M. Lester and C. J. Stivale), London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. ([1972] 2021a), Anti-Oedipus (trans. R. Hurley, M. Seem and H. R. Lane), London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. ([1980] 2021b), A Thousand Plateaus (trans. B. Massumi), London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Freedgood, E. (2006), The Ideas in Things: Fugitive Meaning in the Victorian Novel, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Fudge, E. (2015), ‘Renaissance animal things’, in J. B. Landes, P. Y. Lee and P. Youngquist (eds), Gorgeous Beasts: Animal Bodies in Historical Perspective, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Fudge, E. (2017), ‘What was it like to be a cow? History and animal studies’, in L. Kalof (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Animal Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 258–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Guerrero, E. (1990), ‘AIDS as monster in science fiction and cinema’, Journal of Popular Film and Television, 18:3, pp. 86–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Hall, S. (2019), ‘Encoding and decoding in the television discourse’, in D. Morley (ed.), Essential Essays: Foundations of Cultural Studies, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 257–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Holland, E. W. (2012), ‘Deleuze and psychoanalysis’, in D. W. Smith and H. Somers-Hall (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Deleuze, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 307–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hurley, K. (1996), The Gothic Body: Sexuality, Materialism and Degeneration at the Fin de Siècle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kennedy, B. M. (2000), Deleuze and Cinema: The Aesthetics of Sensation, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Khairy, W. (2020), ‘Why the Thing is one of the most effective horror movies ever made’, Roger Eber, 1 April, https://www.rogerebert.com/far-flung-correspondents/why-the-thing-is-one-of-the-most-effective-horror-movies-ever-made. Accessed 1 April 2022.
  26. Korsgaard, C. M. (1996), The Sources of Normativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Malewitz, R. (2017), ‘Narrative disruption as animal agency in Cormac McCarthy’s The Crossing’, in C. Eagle (ed.), Philosophical Approaches to Cormac McCarthy: Beyond Reckoning, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 152–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Muir, J. K. (2000), The Films of John Carpenter, Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Mulvey-Roberts, M. (2004), ‘“A Spook Ride on Film”: Carpenter and the gothic’, in I. Concrich and D. Woods (eds), The Cinema of John Carpenter: The Technique of Terror, London: Wallflower Press, pp. 78–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Nyby, C. (1951), The Thing from Another World, USA: Winchester Pictures and RKO Radio Pictures.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Powell, A. (2002), Deleuze and Horror Film, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Prince, S. (2004), ‘Dread, taboo, and The Thing: Toward a social theory of the horror film’, in S. Prince (ed.), The Horror Film, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 118–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Protevi, J. (2012), ‘Deleuze and life’, in D. W. Smith and H. Somers-Hall (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Deleuze, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 239–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Sartre, J. P. ([1943] 2005), Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology (trans. H. E. Barnes), London and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Siegel, D. (1956), Invasion of the Body Snatchers, USA: Walter Wanger Productions, Allied Artists.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Thiele, K. (2012), ‘The world with(out) others, or how to unlearn the desire for the other’, in L. Burns, B. M. Kaiser (eds), Postcolonial Literatures and Deleuze: Colonial Pasts, Differential Futures, London and New York: Palgrave, pp. 55–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Thomas, A. (2022), Writing Plague: Language and Violence from the Black Death to COVID-19, London: Palgrave.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Williams, T. (2004), ‘From Elvis to L.A.: Reflections on the Carpenter-Russell films’, in I. Conrich and D. Woods (eds), The Cinema of John Carpenter: The Technique of Terror, London: Wallflower Press, pp. 118–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Wood, R. ([1986] 2003), Hollywood from Vietnam to Reagan …And Beyond, New York: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/host_00083_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Althusser; Deleuze; Guattari; ideology; John Carpenter; post-humanism; The Thing

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error