Participatory Research through Gastronomy Design: A designerly move towards more playful gastronomy | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2056-6522
  • E-ISSN: 2056-6530

Abstract

Socialization, eating and play are core activities that make us human. While they are often brought together, play theory suggests that their combination has unexplored potential in the context of gastronomy. Our research also indicates that a chef’s desire to control the meal may be a key impediment to developing dining experiences in which the diner’s playful engagement impacts taste, texture and flavour combination. We investigate if combining participatory research through design and play theory might better situate chefs to diversify their approach to playful gastronomy. Using experimental design methods, we interviewed a chef, a maître d’, a professional gastronomist, two food enthusiasts and a novice, to identify overlooked opportunities to extend play in gastronomy. We then conducted a series of dinners – designed with and for experts, enthusiasts and novices – to explore these opportunities, and tested the resulting method through a workshop with student chefs and game designers. We present the method: Participatory Research through Gastronomy Design (PRGD), using the case of its development to explicate its characteristics. Our research suggests that PRGD supports the design of playful gastronomic experiences that appeal to a range of diners, affords exploration of play’s impact on social dynamics and can productively inform concrete design choices. It also – crucially – supports chefs to partially transfer control of how a meal unfolds, without diluting their sense of controlling the overall experience. PRGD thus addresses a key impediment to extending play in gastronomy. Gastronomy that responds to diners’ needs and desires for play are currently limited. We propose PRGD as an exciting – and viable – approach to address this limitation.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article as long as the author is attributed, the article is not used for commercial purposes and the work is not modified or adapted in any way.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ijfd.4.1.3_1
2019-04-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijfd/4/1/ijfd.4.1.3.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/ijfd.4.1.3_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adrià, F.,, Blumenthal, H.,, Keller, T., and McGee, H.. ( 2006;), ‘ Statement on the “new cookery”. ’, The Guardian, 10 December, https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2006/dec/10/foodanddrink.obsfoodmonthly. Accessed 19 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Adrià, F.,, Soler, J., and Adrià, A.. ( 2005), El Bulli: 1998-2002, Roses:: ElBulli Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alinea ( n.d;.), ‘ Edible balloon. ’, https://alinearestaurant.com/site/portfolio/edible-balloon/. Accessed 16 January 2019.
  4. Altarriba Bertran, F., and Wilde, D.. ( 2018;), ‘ Playing with food: Reconfiguring the gastronomic experience through play. ’, in R. M Carrilho Bonacho,, A. Pinheiro de Sousa,, C. Viegas,, J. P. Martins,, M. J. Pires, and S. V. Estêvão. (eds), Experiencing Food: Designing Dialogues, Leiden:: CRC Press;, pp. 36.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Caillois, R.. ( [1961] 2001), Man, Play and Games, Champaign, IL:: University of Illinois Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Carulla, A.., El Celler de Can Roca and Harbisson, N.. ( 2016;), ‘ Music to the tastebuds. ’, Andreu Carulla Industrial Design;, http://www.acid-studio.com/works/tocaplats. Accessed 16 January 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Celler Can Roca ( n.d;.), ‘ The planets of the Roca universe. ’, http://www.cellercanroca.com/planetes/planetes_a.html. Accessed 16 January 2019.
  8. Clatworthy, S.,, Oorschot, R., and Lindquister, B.. ( 2014;), ‘ How to get a leader to talk: Tangible objects for strategic conversations in service design. ’, in ServDes 2014 Service Future: Proceedings of the Fourth Service Design and Service Innovation Conference, Lancaster University, United Kingdom, 9–11 April, Linköping:: Linköping University Electronic Press;, pp. 27080.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Clay, X.. ( 2015;), ‘ The Fat Duck re-opens: First taste of the new menu. ’, The Telegraph, 16 October, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/food-and-drink/restaurants/the-fat-duck-first-taste-of-the-new-menu/. Accessed 16 January 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Coyne, R.. ( 1995), Designing Information Technology in the Postmodern Age, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Creative Tastebuds ( 2017;), ‘ Creative tastebuds: Thorsten Schmidt case introduction, substance and sociality part 5/6. ’, Creative Tastebuds Symposium, Aarhus Teater;, 4–5 September, YouTube , https://youtu.be/M1hvDi83g2U. Accessed 16 January 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cross, N.. ( 1982;), ‘ Designerly ways of knowing. ’, Design Studies, 3:4, pp. 22127.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Douglas, M.. ( 1972;), ‘ Deciphering a meal. ’, Daedalus, 101:1, pp.6181.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. elBulli Foundation ( n.d;.), ‘ Feeding creativity. ’, http://www.elbullifoundation.com/en/. Accessed 16 January 2019.
  15. Fällman, D.. ( 2003;), ‘ Design-oriented human-computer interaction. ’, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘03), New York, NY:: ACM;, pp. 22532.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Frayling, C.. ( 1993;), ‘ Research in art and design. ’, Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1:1, pp. 15.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gaver, W.. ( 2002;), ‘ Designing for homo ludens. ’, I3 Magazine, 12: June, pp. 26.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gaver, W.. ( 2012;), ‘ What should we expect from research through design?. ’, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘12), Austin, Texas , 5–10 May, New York, NY:: ACM;, pp. 93746.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Guixé, M., and Knolke, I.. ( 2010), Food Designing, Mantova:: Corraini Edizioni;.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hillier, B., and Leaman, A.. ( 1974;), ‘ How is design possible?. ’, Journal of Architectural Research, 3:1, pp. 411.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Huizinga, J.. ( 1950), Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture, Boston, MA:: Beacon Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jolonch, C.. ( 2012;), ‘ La Masia, el refugio creativo de los Roca. ’, La Vanguardia;, http://www.lavanguardia.com/ocio/20150123/54423913921/masia-refugio-creativo-roca.html. Accessed 16 January 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jonas, W.. ( 2007;), ‘ Design research and its meaning to the methodological development of the discipline. ’, in R. Michel. (ed.), Design Research Now, Basel:: Birkhäuser;, pp. 187206.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Jones, J. C.. ( 1970), Design Methods, New York, NY:: Van Nostrand Reinhold;.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kostelanetz, R.. ( 1971), John Cage, London:: Allen Lane;.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lucero, A.,, Karapanos, E.,, Arrasvuori, J., and Korhonen, H.. ( 2014;), ‘ Playful or gameful?: Creating delightful user experiences. ’, Interactions, 21:3, pp. 3439.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mäkelä, M.. ( 2006;), ‘ Framing (a) practice led research project. ’, in M. Mäkelä, and S. Routarinne. (eds), The Art of Research, Helsinki:: University of Art and Design;, pp. 6085.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Malling and Schmidt, T.. ( 2012), Malling & Schmidt: Tilblivelsen, Copenhagen:: Ehrhorn Hummerston;.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. McGonigal, J.. ( 2011), Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World, New York, NY:: Penguin Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Moore, B.. ( 2018;), ‘ Ferran Adria – Bio of the world’s greatest chef – El Bulli restaurant Barcelona Catalonia. ’, The Spruce Eats;, http://gourmetfood.about.com/od/chefbiographi2/p/ferranadriabio.htm. Accessed 16 January 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ochs, E., and Shohet, M.. ( 2006;), ‘ The cultural structuring of mealtime socialization. ’, New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 111, pp. 3549.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Raynor, J.. ( 2011;), ‘ Molecular gastronomy is dead. Heston speaks out. ’, The Guardian, http://observer.guardian.co.uk/foodmonthly/futureoffood/story/0,,1969722,00.html. Accessed 16 January 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Regol, P.. ( 2009;), ‘ Los maestros de la cocina sacan de la chistera sus abracadabras comestibles.! Playfood. ’, Vino y gastronomía, 229, pp. 618.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rittel, H., and Webber, M.. ( 1973;), ‘ Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. ’, Policy Science, 4, pp. 15569.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sanders, E. B. N., and Stappers, P. J.. ( 2008;), ‘ Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. ’, CoDesign, 4:1, pp. 518.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sanders, E. B. N., and Stappers, P. J.. ( 2012), Convivial Design Toolbox: Generative Research for the Front End of Design, Amsterdam:: BIS;.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Schön, D.. ( 1983), The Reflective Practitioner, New York, NY:: Basic Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Shklovsky, V.. ( [1917] 1965), Art as Technique: Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays, Lincoln, NE:: University of Nebraska Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sicart, M.. ( 2014), Play Matters, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sproedt, H.. ( 2012;), ‘ Play. Learn. Innovate.. ’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sutton-Smith, B.. ( 1997), The Ambiguity of Play, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Ulla, G.. ( 2012;), ‘ Ben Shewry on Attica’s experimental Tuesdays and his new test kitchen. ’, Eater;, 21 August, https://www.eater.com/2012/8/21/6553121/ben-shewry-on-atticas-experimental-tuesdays-and-his-new-test-kitchen. Accessed 16 January 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Vogelzang, M.. ( 2008), Eat Love: Food Concepts by Eating-Designer Marije Vogelzang, Amsterdam:: BIS Publishers;.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Warde, A., and Martens, L.. ( 2000), Eating Out: Social Differentiation, Consumption and Pleasure, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Warner Bros ( 2001), Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, USA:: Warner Bros Entertainment Inc;.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Wilde, D.. ( 2015;), ‘ Embodying material ideation. ’, Proceedings of the Participatory Innovation Conference 2015 (PINC2015), The Hague:: The Hague University;, pp. 38697, http://pin-c.sdu.dk/assets/embodying-material-ideation---danielle-wilde---386-393---pinc-2015.pdf. Accessed 16 January 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Yin, J., and Miike, Y.. ( 2008;), ‘ A textual analysis of fortune cookie sayings: How Chinese are they?. ’, The Howard Journal of Communications, 19:1, pp. 1843.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Zimmerman, J.,, Stolterman, E., and Forlizzi, J.. ( 2010;), ‘ An analysis and critique of research through design: Towards a formalization of a research approach. ’, in Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, New York:: ACM Press;, pp. 31019.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Wilde, D., and Altarriba Bertran, F.. ( 2019;), ‘ Participatory Research through Gastronomy Design: A designerly move towards more playful gastronomy. ’, International Journal of Food Design, 4:1, pp. 337, doi: 10.1386/ijfd.4.1.3_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/ijfd.4.1.3_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/ijfd.4.1.3_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error