Parallel-form reliability of the online Primary Measures of Music Audiation: A pilot study

References

1. Bacon, T. E. (2023), ‘Evaluating Gordon’s Primary Measures of Music Audiation with a national sample: An examination of its psychometric properties and usefulness (30245613)’, Ph.D. thesis, Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baird, J., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N. and Stobart, G. (2017), ‘Assessment and learning: Fields apart?’, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24:3, pp. 317–50, https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bennett, R. E. (2011), ‘Formative assessment: A critical review’, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18:1, pp. 5–25, https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Black, P. and William, D. (2018), ‘Classroom assessment and pedagogy’, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25:6, pp. 551–75, https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cohen, J. (1988), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Correia, A. I., Vincenzi, M., Vanzella, P., Pinheiro, A. P., Lima, C. F. and Schellenberg, E. G. (2022), ‘Can musical ability be tested online?’, Behavior Research Methods, 54:2, pp. 955–69, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01641-2.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Demorest, S. M. and Pfordresher, P. Q. (2015), ‘Singing accuracy development from K-adult: A comparative study’, Music Perception, 32:3, pp. 293–302, https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2015.32.3.293.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ellis, P. D. (2010), The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes: An Introduction to Statistical Power, Meta-analysis and the Interpretation of Research Results, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Feierabend, J. M. (2000), Conversational Solfege, Level 1 Teacher’s Edition, Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Florian, L. and Beaton, M. (2018), ‘Inclusive pedagogy in action: Getting it right for every child’, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22:8, pp. 870–84, https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1412513.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gordon, E. E. (1978), A Factor Analytic Description of Tonal and Rhythm Patterns and Objective Evidence of Pattern Difficulty Level and Growth Rate, Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gordon, E. E. (1979), ‘Developmental music aptitude as measured by the Primary Measures of Music Audiation’, Psychology of Music, 7:1, pp. 42–49, https://doi.org/10.1177/030573567971005.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gordon, E. E. (1982), Intermediate Measures of Music Audiation, Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gordon, E. E. (1986), Primary Measures of Music Audiation, Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gordon, E. E. (1991), Advanced Measures of Music Audiation, Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gordon, E. E. (1995), Music Aptitude Profile, Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gordon, E. E. (2002), Developmental and Stabilized Music Aptitudes: Further Evidence of the Duality, Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hanson, J. (2019), ‘Meta-analytic evidence of the criterion validity of Gordon’s music aptitude tests in published music education research’, Journal of Research in Music Education, 67:2, pp. 193–213, https://www.jstor.org/stable/48595376. Accessed 12 February 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Henry, M. (2015), ‘Vocal sight-reading assessment: Technological advances, student perceptions, and instructional implications’, Journal of Research in Music Education, 33:2, pp. 58–64, https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123314547908.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Ji, Y. (2012), ‘Usability of the Primary Measures of Music Audiation (PMMA) and the Intermediate Measures of Music Audiation (IMMA) with elementary school students in China (3541121)’, Ph.D. thesis, Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kostolányová, K., Šarmanová, J. and Tackás, O. (2011), ‘Adaptation of teaching process based on a students individual learning needs’, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 4:1, pp. 3–17, https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2012.050404.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Norton, D. (1997), ‘Interrelationships among music aptitude, IQ, and auditory conservation’, Journal of Research in Music Education, 28:4, pp. 207–17, https://doi.org/10.2307/3345029.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Pavlović, S. (2018), ‘The application of sight reading factory: Digitalization of sight singing and reading disciplines’, Artefact, 4:1, pp. 1–13, https://doi.org/10.5937/artefact4-18361.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Rasmussen, E. P. (2004), ‘Relationships between early childhood music experiences and music aptitude (3128566)’, Ph.D. thesis, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Romanik, M. J. (2016), ‘An investigation of the relationship between the home music environments and music aptitudes of kindergarten students (10109015)’, master’s thesis, East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Silas, S., Müllensiefen, D. and Kopiez, R. (2023), ‘Singing ability assessment: Development and validation of a singing test based on item response theory and a general open-source software environment for singing data’, Behavior Research Methods, 56:5, pp. 4358–84, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02188-0.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Strauss, H., Reiche, S., Dick, M. and Zentner, M. (2023), ‘Online assessment of musical ability in 10 minutes: Development and validation of the Micros-PROMS’, Behavioral Research Methods, 56:3, pp. 1968–83, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02130-4.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Ullén, F., Mosing, M. A., Holm, L., Eriksson, H. and Madison, G. (2014), ‘Psychometric properties and heritability of a new online test for musicality, the Swedish Musical Discrimination Test’, Personality and Individual Differences, 63, pp. 87–93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.057.
    [Google Scholar]
29. White, A. G. (2020), ‘The effects of feedback on sight-singing achievement (28156770)’, Ph.D. thesis, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Zentner, M. and Strauss, H. (2017), ‘Assessing musical ability quickly and objectively: Development and validation of the short-PROMS and the mini-PROMS’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1400:1, pp. 33–45, https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13410.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Zhang, L., Carter, R. A., Basham, J. D. and Yang, S. (2022), ‘Integrating instructional designs of personalized learning through the lens of universal design for learning’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38:6, pp. 1639–56, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12725.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Gordon, E. E. (2013), Music Learning Theory for Newborn and Young Children, Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Huck, S. W. (2012), Reading Statistics and Research, Boston, MA: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]