Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. International Journal of Fashion Studies
  4. Volume 9, Issue 1
  5. Article
Special Section: Fashion Tales
  • ISSN: 2051-7106
  • E-ISSN: 2051-7114

Abstract

On 29 November 2018, Christopher Wylie – a former Ph.D. researcher in fashion trends and the whistleblower of Cambridge Analytica – delivered a speech ’s conference, detailing how the firm harvested the data of more than 87 million Facebook users and utilized fashion psychographic brand preferences as measurable and estimable data that could be manipulated to influence political opinion through targeted psychographic social media content. This article takes Cambridge Analytica as a point of departure to explore interstices between fashion brands and consumers, and entrenched surveillance, in a mediatized field of fashion and within the culture wars. Jodi Dean’s concept of communicative capitalism, in which consumer statements take the form of affective bursts disseminated into and captured via the network under a market logic, articulates how our desires and/as identities can be honed to alter democratic processes and outcomes. Extending an affect framework, I posit that formations of consumer or user affect characterize relations between fashion companies and consumers in a politicized climate. This paper issues a call to scrutinize issues of media ethics, discourse and surveillance that these cases raise via a fashion studies perspective that perceives aesthetic preference as formative and reflective of global politics.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00063_1
2022-04-01
2026-03-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Afriat, H.,, Dvir-Gvirsman, S.,, Tsuriel, K., and Ivan, L.. ( 2021;), ‘ “This is capitalism. It is not illegal”: Users’ attitudes toward institutional privacy following the Cambridge Analytica scandal. ’, The Information Society, 37:2, pp. 115–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Amer, K., and Noujaim, J.. ( 2019), The Great Hack, USA:: The Othrs;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Anon. ( 2018;), ‘ Cambridge Analytica controversy must spur researchers to update data ethics. ’, Nature, 555:7698, p. 29.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Anon. ( 2019;), ‘ Fashion in America: Bethann Hardison, K. Jean-Raymond, LaQuan Smith, P. Robinson | #BoFVOICES 2018: The Business of Fashion. ’, YouTube, 4 February, https://bit.ly/3vh90Ho. Accessed 25 September 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernstein, R.. ( 2009;), ‘ Dances with things: Material culture and the performance of race. ’, Social Text, 27:4, pp. 67–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bozdag, E.. ( 2013;), ‘ Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization. ’, Ethics & Information Technology, 15:3, pp. 209–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, A. J.. ( 2020;), ‘ “Should I stay or should I leave?”: Exploring (dis)continued Facebook use after the Cambridge Analytica scandal. ’, Social Media & Society, January–March, pp. 1–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cadwalladr, C.. ( 2018;), ‘ “I made Steve Bannon’s psychological warfare tool”: Meet the data war whistleblower. ’, The Guardian, 18 March, https://bit.ly/33UqZbd. Accessed 25 September 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cadwalladr, C., and Graham-Harrison, E.. ( 2018;), ‘ Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach. ’, The Guardian, 17 March, https://bit.ly/3hmu7Qh. Accessed 25 September 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Christians, C. G.. ( 2019), Media Ethics and Global Justice in the Digital Age, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Couldry, N., and Hepp, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ The continuing lure of the mediated centre in times of deep mediatization: Media Events and its enduring legacy. ’, Media, Culture & Society, 40:1, pp. 114–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Crepax, R.. ( 2018;), ‘ Digital fashion engagement through affect, personal investments and remix. ’, Australian Feminist Studies, 33:98, pp. 461–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Dean, J.. ( 2010a;), ‘ Affective networks. ’, MediaTropes, 2:2, pp. 19–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Dean, J.. ( 2010b), Blog Theory: Feedback and Capture in the Circuits of Drive, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Dean, J.. ( 2017;), ‘ Nothing personal. ’, in M. Pavlovskaya, and S. Schram. (eds), Rethinking Neoliberalism: Resisting the Disciplinary Regime, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 3–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dean, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ Communicative capitalism and revolutionary form. ’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 47:3, pp. 326–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. DeCarvalho, L. J., and Martínez-Carrillo, N. I.. ( 2021;), ‘ Crims and crooks: Automatization, communicative capitalism, fandom, and promotion for Wentworth. ’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 38:3, pp. 211–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Deleuze, G.. ( [1983] 2001), Cinema 1: The Movement Image, New York:: Continuum;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Ekdale, B., and Tully, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ African elections as a testing ground: Comparing coverage of Cambridge Analytica in Nigerian and Kenyan newspapers. ’, African Journalism Studies, 40:4, pp. 27–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Filippello, R.. ( 2018;), ‘ Thinking fashion photographs through queer affect theory. ’, International Journal of Fashion Studies, 5:1, pp. 129–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Gaugele, E.. ( 2019;), ‘ The new obscurity in style: Alt-right faction, populist normalization, and the cultural war on fashion from the far right. ’, Fashion Theory, 23:6, pp. 711–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Gerrie, V.. ( 2019;), ‘ The Diet Prada effect: “Call-out culture” in the contemporary fashionscape. ’, Clothing Cultures, 6:1, pp. 97–113.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Halliday, R.. ( 2021;), ‘ The alt-right and the mobilization of brand affect: New Balance and neo-Nazis’ athleisure affiliations. ’, ZoneModa, 11:1, pp. 1–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Halliday, R.. ( 2022), The Fashion Show Goes Live: Exclusive and Mediatized Performance, London and New York:: Bloomsbury;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hardt, M., and Negri, A.. ( 2000), Empire, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Harold, C.. ( 2009;), ‘ On Target: Aura, affect, and the rhetoric of “design democracy”. ’, Public Culture, 21:3, pp. 599–618.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Heawood, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ Pseudo-public political speech: Democratic implications of the Cambridge Analytica scandal. ’, Information Polity, 23:4, pp. 429–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Hinds, J.,, Williams, E. J., and Joinson, A. N.. ( 2020;), ‘ “It wouldn’t happen to me”: Privacy concerns and perspectives following the Cambridge Analytica scandal. ’, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 143, pp. 1–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Hu, M.. ( 2020;), ‘ Cambridge Analytica’s black box. ’, Big Data & Society, 7:2, pp. 1–6.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Isaak, J., and Hanna, M. J.. ( 2018;), ‘ User data privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and privacy protection. ’, Computer, 51:8, pp. 56–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Kanakia, H.,, Shenoy, G., and Shah, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ Cambridge Analytica: A case study. ’, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 12:29, pp. 1–5.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kansara, V. A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Cambridge Analytica weaponised fashion brands to elect Trump, says Christopher Wylie. ’, The Business of Fashion, 29 November, https://bit.ly/3snjz9N. Accessed 25 September 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Khan, A. I.. ( 2016;), ‘ A rant good for business: Communicative capitalism and the capture of anti-racist resistance. ’, Popular Communication, 14:1, pp. 39–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Kubitschko, S.. ( 2012;), ‘ Critical media studies in times of communicative capitalism: An interview with Jodi Dean. ’, PLATFORM: Journal of Media and Communication, 4:1, pp. 39–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Laterza, V.. ( 2018;), ‘ Cambridge Analytica, independent research and the national interest. ’, Anthropology Today, 34:3, pp. 1–2.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Lury, C.. ( 2004), Brands: The Logos of the Global Economy, London and New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Manokha, I.. ( 2018;), ‘ Surveillance: The DNA of platform capital: The case of Cambridge Analytica put into perspective. ’, Theory & Event, 21:4, pp. 891–913.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Mensitieri, G.. ( [2018] 2020), The Most Beautiful Job in the World: Lifting the Veil on the Fashion Industry, London and New York:: Bloomsbury; [original edition: ‘Le plus beau métier du monde’. Dans les coulisses de l’industrie de la mode, Paris: La Découverte] .
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Miller-Idriss, C.. ( 2017), The Extreme Gone Mainstream: Commercialization and Far Right Youth Culture in Germany, Princeton, NJ and Oxford:: Princeton University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Nash, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ Exploring how social media platforms influence fashion consumer decisions in the UK retail sector. ’, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 23:1, pp. 82–103.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Okonkwo, U.. ( 2007), Luxury Fashion Branding: Trends, Tactics, Techniques, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Peruzzi, A.,, Zollo, F.,, Quattrociocchi, W., and Scala, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ How news may affect markets’ complex structure: The case of Cambridge Analytica. ’, Entropy, 20:10, pp. 765–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Polański, P. P.. ( 2018;), ‘ Some thoughts on data portability in the aftermath of the Cambridge Analytica scandal. ’, Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 7:4, pp. 141–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Reynolds, C.. ( 2020;), ‘ “My zines, so far, aren’t as political as other works I’ve produced”: Communicative capitalism among queer feminist zinesters. ’, Communication, Culture and Critique, 13:1, pp. 92–110.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Richterich, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ How data-driven research fuelled the Cambridge Analytica controversy. ’, PACO PArtecipazione e COnflitto: The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies, 11:2, pp. 528–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Robinson, T.. ( 2021;), ‘ Digital video-based research in fashion: Visualizing affect and sartorial vitality. ’, International Journal of Fashion Studies, 8:1, pp. 105–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Rocamora, A.. ( 2017;), ‘ Mediatization and digital media in the field of fashion. ’, Fashion Theory, 21:5, pp. 505–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Schneble, C. O.,, Elger, B. S., and Shaw, D.. ( 2018;), ‘ The Cambridge Analytica affair and Internet-mediated research. ’, EMBO Reports, 19:8, p. e46579.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Smelik, A.. ( 2016;), ‘ Gilles Deleuze: Bodies-without-organs in the folds of fashion. ’, in A. Rocamora, and A. Smelik. (eds), Thinking Through Fashion: A Guide to Key Theorists, London and New York:: I.B. Tauris;, pp. 165–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Stahl, L.. ( 2018;), ‘ Aleksandr Kogan: The link between Cambridge Analytica and Facebook. ’, CBS News, 22 April, https://cbsn.ws/3vh9QE2. Accessed 25 September 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Tedesco, D.. ( 2021;), ‘ Curating political subjects: Fashion curation as affective methodology. ’, GeoHumanities, 7:1, pp. 1–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Timanta Tarigan, J., and Zamza, E. M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Post Cambridge Analytica fallout: Observing Facebook users awareness regarding data security. ’, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7:3.32, p. 123.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Venturini, T., and Rogers, R.. ( 2019;), ‘ “API-based research” or How can digital sociology and journalism studies learn from the Facebook and Cambridge Analytica data breach. ’, Digital Journalism, 7:4, pp. 532–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Ward, K.. ( 2018;), ‘ Social networks, the 2016 US presidential election, and Kantian ethics: Applying the categorical imperative to Cambridge Analytica’s behavioral microtargeting. ’, Journal of Media Ethics, 33:3, pp. 133–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Wickstrom, M.. ( 2006), Performing Consumers: Global Capital and Its Theatrical Seductions, London and New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Wissinger, E.. ( 2007;), ‘ Always on display: Affective production in the modeling industry. ’, in P. Ticineto Clough, and J. Halley. (eds), The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social, Durham and London:: Duke University Press;, pp. 231–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Wissinger, E.. ( 2015), This Year’s Model: Fashion, Media and the Making of Glamour, New York:: New York University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Wissinger, E.. ( 2017;), ‘ Wearable tech, bodies and gender. ’, Sociology Compass, 11:11, pp. 14–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Wissinger, E.. ( 2018;), ‘ Blood, sweat and tears: Navigating creepy versus cool in wearable biotech. ’, Information, Communication & Society, 21:5, pp. 779–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Wissinger, E.. ( 2020;), ‘ Click-click-gimme-gimme: Pleasures and perils of the “opt in” world of fashion tech. ’, in I. Pedersen, and A. Iliadis. (eds), Embodied Computing: Wearables, Implantables, Embeddables, Ingestibles, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;, pp. 187–209.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Woolhouse, M.. ( 2017;), ‘ L.L. Bean pleads: Don’t boycott us over Trump donation. ’, Boston Globe, 9 January, https://bit.ly/3hmQoNY. Accessed 25 September 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Wylie, C.. ( 2018;), ‘ Fashion models and cyber warfare. ’, The Business of Fashion VOICES Conference, 29 November, https://bit.ly/3hmvf6t. Accessed 25 September 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Wylie, C.. ( 2019), Mindf∗ck: Cambridge Analytica and the Plot to Break America, New York:: Random House;.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Zuboff, S.. ( 2019), The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, New York:: PublicAffairs;.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Halliday, Rebecca. ( 2022;), ‘ “Cyber warfare” in style: Cambridge Analytica and a mediatized ethics of fashion. ’, International Journal of Fashion Studies, 9:1, pp. 131–49, https://doi.org/10.1386/infs_00063_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00063_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): affect; Cambridge Analytica; communicative capitalism; fashion; mediatization; politics; psychographics; surveillance

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test