Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. International Journal of Fashion Studies
  4. Volume 11, Issue 1
  5. Article
B(l)ending Research Methods: Reimagining a Theoretical Turn in Fashion Scholarship
  • ISSN: 2051-7106
  • E-ISSN: 2051-7114

Abstract

This article presents my reflections on a method that attempts to bridge a methodological divide in fashion studies by blending garment analysis and wardrobe interviews. In doing so it presents the ways in which we can consider evidence from the subject, the object and the subject–object assemblage. Garment analysis is a method rooted in dress history and fashion curation, whereas wardrobe interviews grew out of anthropology and sociology. While wardrobe interviews do to some extent offset the preference for language in interviews, what is missing was a systematic way of encouraging a deeper engagement with that garment. Interview techniques can provoke the wearers or owners of clothes to narrate their garments. With one method we consider the object, the other method the subject. My research gathers evidence from both the subject and the object by blending garment analysis with wardrobe interviews to uncover the meanings entangled in objects and memories, to interrogate what we can consider evidence from the subject, the object and the subject–object assemblage. My study explores how this methodological pluralism can allow movement between material, semiotic and affective interpretations of garments. I conclude by emphasizing the importance of both the physical garment and the embodied experience of wearing to fashion research and argue that ‘turns’ in the discipline should instead be considered as expansions that allow the coexistence of multiple approaches.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00102_1
2024-04-29
2024-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Almila, A. -M. and Zeilig, H. (2021), ‘In older men’s wardrobes: Creative tales of affect, style and constraint’, Fashion Theory, 26:5, pp. 651–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Banim, M. and Guy, A. (2001), ‘Dis/continued selves: Why do women keep clothes they no longer wear?’, in A. Guy, E. Green and M. Banim (eds), Through the Wardrobe: Women’s Relationship with their Clothes, Oxford: Berg, pp. 203–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Barry, B. and Nesbitt, P. (2023), ‘Self-fashioning queer/crip: Stretching and grappling with disability, gender and dress’, Fashion, Style & Popular Culture, 10:1, pp. 45–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Buse, C. and Twigg, J. (2016), ‘Materializing memories: Exploring the stories of people with dementia through dress’, Ageing & Society, 36:6, pp. 1115–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bye, E. and Mckinney, E. (2007), ‘Sizing up the wardrobe: Why we keep clothes that do not fit’, Fashion Theory, 11:4, pp. 483–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell, Colin (1996), ‘The meaning of objects and the meaning of actions: A critical note on the sociology of consumption and theories of clothing’, Journal of Material Culture, 1:1, pp. 93–105.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Cluver, B. G. (2008), ‘Consumer clothing inventory management’, Ph.D. thesis, Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cwerner, S. (2001), ‘Clothes at rest: Elements for a sociology of the wardrobe’, Fashion Theory, 5:1, pp. 79–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Entwistle, J. (2000), The Fashioned Body: Fashion, Dress and Modern Social Theory, London: Polity.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Errázuriz, T. and Müller, E. (2023), ‘“My cherished garment”: Rethinking fashion, attachment and durability’, Fashion Theory, 27:3, pp. 327–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Fleetwood-Smith, R., Hefferon, K. and Mair, C. (2019), ‘“It’s like… it’s me”: Exploring the lived experience of clothing attachment during wear’, International Journal of Fashion Studies, 6:1, pp. 41–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Fletcher, K. (2016), Craft of Use: Post-Growth Fashion, Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Fletcher, K. and Klepp, I. G. (eds) (2017), Opening Up the Wardrobe: A Methods Book, Oslo: Novus Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Granata, F. (2012), ‘Fashion studies in-between: A methodological case study and an inquiry into the state of fashion studies’, Fashion Theory, 16:1, pp. 67–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Gregson, N. and Vikki, B. (2004), ‘Wardrobe matter: The sorting, displacement and circulation of women’s clothing’, Geoforum, 35:6, pp. 689–700.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Hebrok, M., Klepp, I. G. and Turney, J. (2016), ‘Wool you wear it? Woollen garments in Norway and the United Kingdom’, Clothing Cultures, 3:1, pp. 67–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Heinze, L. (2021), ‘Wardrobe stories: Sustainability and the everyday aesthetics of fashion consumption’, Continuum, 35:6, pp. 853–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hertz, C. (2011), ‘Costuming potential: Accommodating unworn clothes’, Museum Anthropology Review, 5:1–2, pp. 14–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Ingold, T. (2007), ‘Materials against materiality’, Archaeological Dialogues, 14:1, pp. 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Jenss, Heike (ed.) (2016), Fashion Studies: Research Methods, Sites and Practices, London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Keane, W. (2005), ‘Signs are not the garb of meaning: On the social analysis of material things’, in D. Miller (ed.), Materiality, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 182–201.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Klepp, I. G. and Bjerck, M. (2014), ‘A methodological approach to the materiality of wardrobe studies’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17:4, pp. 373–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kopytoff, I. (1986), ‘The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process’, in A. Appadurai (ed.), The Social Life of Things, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. la Haye, A. de and Clark, J. (2008), ‘One object multiple interpretations’, Fashion Theory, 12:2, pp. 137–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Lövgren, K. (2015), ‘Squirrels and nostalgia: About wardrobe collections of older women’, in L. Karlsson, M. Liliequist, A. S. Lundgren, K. Lövgren and A. S. Landén (eds), Ageing, Culture and Identity, Umeå: Umeå University, pp. 95–120.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Mida, I. and Kim, A. (2015), The Dress Detective, London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Mikerina, D. (2016), ‘Re-thinking the place of semiotics in fashion studies’, X International Fashion Conference ‘Fashion on the Move: Rethinking Design’, Pamplona, Spain, 2–21 April, Pamplona: University of Navarra.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Miller, D. (1987), Material Culture and Mass Consumption, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Miller, D. (ed.) (2005), Materiality, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Petersson McIntyre, M. (2021), ‘Shame, blame, and passion: Affects of (un)sustainable wardrobes’, Fashion Theory, 25:6, pp. 735–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Prown, J. (1980), ‘Style as evidence’, Winterthur Portfolio, 15:3, pp. 197–210.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Prown, J. (1982), ‘Mind in matter: An introduction to material culture theory and method’, The Winterthur Portfolio, 17:1, pp. 1–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Pink, S. (2009), Doing Sensory Ethnography, London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Skjold, E. (2016), ‘Biographical wardrobes: A temporal view on dress practice’, Fashion Practice, 8:1, pp. 135–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Skjold, E. (2017), ‘Adorned in dreams: Reversing the gaze: From the look of fashion to the lens of the wardrobe’, Clothing Cultures, 4:1, pp. 13–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Skov, L. (2011), ‘Entering the space of the wardrobe’, working paper, Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Slater, A. (2014), ‘Wearing in memory: Materiality and oral histories’, Critical Studies in Fashion & Beauty, 5:1, pp. 125–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Smelik, A. (2018), ‘New materialism: A theoretical framework for fashion in the age of technological innovation’, International Journal of Fashion Studies, 5:1, pp. 33–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith, R. and Yates, J. (2018), ‘Flourishing fashion: An interpretive phenomenological analysis of the experience of wearing a happy outfit’, Fashion Studies, 1:1, pp. 1–39, https://www.fashionstudies.ca/flourishing-fashion/. Accessed 12 June 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Steele, V. (1998), ‘A museum of fashion is more than a clothes bag’, Fashion Theory, 2:4, pp. 327–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Taylor, L. (1998), ‘Doing the laundry? A reassessment of object-based dress history’, Fashion Theory, 2:4, pp. 337–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Taylor, L. (2002), The Study of Dress History, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Taylor, L. (2013), ‘Fashion and dress history: Theoretical and methodological approaches’, in S. Black, A. de la Haye, A. Rocamora, R. Root and H. Thomas (eds), The Handbook of Fashion Studies, London: Bloomsbury, pp. 41–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Tilley, C., Keane, W., Kuchler, S., Rowlands, M. and Spyer, P. (eds) (2013), Handbook of Material Culture, London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Tse, T. and von Pezold, J. (2023), ‘Memories reminisced, reconciled, renewed: Hong Kong male consumers’ wardrobes and their search for a congruent self’, Journal of Consumer Culture, 23:4, pp. 846–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Tseëlon, E. (2010), ‘Outlining a fashion studies project’, Critical Studies in Fashion & Beauty, 1:1, pp. 3–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Turney, J. (2017), ‘Editorial’, Clothing Cultures, 4:1, pp. 5–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Van der Laan, E. and Velthuis, O. (2016), ‘Inconspicuous dressing: A critique of the construction-through-consumption paradigm in the sociology of clothing’, Journal of Consumer Culture, 16:1, pp. 22–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Van Tienhoven, M. A. and Smelik, A. (2021), ‘The affect of fashion: An exploration of affective method’, Critical Studies in Fashion & Beauty, 12:2, pp. 163–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Whitson-Smith, J. (2018), ‘Motivations and barriers to the prolonged use of clothing’, Critical Studies in Fashion & Beauty, 9:1, pp. 109–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Wood, S. (2018a), in-person interview with Mark, London, July.
  52. Wood, S. (2018b), in-person interview with Phoebe, London, July.
  53. Woodward, S. (2007), Why Women Wear What They Wear, Oxford: Berg.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Woodward, S. (2015), ‘Object interviews, material imaginings and “unsettling” methods: Interdisciplinary approaches to understanding materials and material culture’, Qualitative Research, 16:4, pp. 359–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Woodward, S. and Fisher, T. (2014), ‘Fashioning through materials: Material culture, materiality and processes of materialization’, Critical Studies in Fashion & Beauty, 5:1, pp. 3–23.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00102_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): affect; everyday dress; material culture; materiality; methodology; semiotics; sustainability

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error