Skip to content
1981
B(l)ending Research Methods: Reimagining a Theoretical Turn in Fashion Scholarship
  • ISSN: 2051-7106
  • E-ISSN: 2051-7114

Abstract

Recent calls for decentring Eurocentric frameworks across fashion studies, alongside growing commitments to worker rights, calls for a circular economy, waste reduction and more sustainable materials draw attention to the complex and intractable social, environmental and political challenges facing the global sector. Here we point out how academic research is also implicated in reproducing inequalities, through practices of data collection, analysis and knowledge dissemination. Specifically, in the case of fashion, how worker representation, and indeed worker control over representations of their lived experiences, including labour activism, is lacking in academic research. In this article, we argue that DIY Academic Archiving can be utilized by academics, including fashion scholars, as a powerful tool for remaking fashion research. We propose unsettling usual practices around data management, as well as redirecting current moves for open research data. Turning instead to inspiration from radical archival theory and practice, we explore the potential for co-creating open-access digital archives of research data – here workers’ own stories – to open up possibilities for workers to be more involved in the creation of public narratives about fashion. While not a panacea for resolving all the ills of the fashion industry, we see research processes where workers have more control over their own stories, and how they are used, as a critical step in reimagining fashion scholarship.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00103_7
2024-04-29
2025-12-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acharya, A., Singh, S. K., Pereira, V. and Singh, P. (2018), ‘Big data, knowledge co-creation and decision making in fashion industry’, International Journal of Information Management, 42, pp. 90101.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anon. (2023a), ‘Fashion’s unseen stories: The homeworkers of Tirupur: In pictures’, Global Development, The Guardian, 15 September, https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/gallery/2023/sep/15/fashions-unseen-stories-the-homeworkers-of-tirupur-in-pictures. Accessed 31 October 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anon. (2023b), ‘Fast fashion: Why garment workers’ lives are still in danger 10 years after Rana Plaza’, Don’t Call Me Resilient, The Conversation, 13 April, https://theconversation.com/fast-fashion-why-garment-workers-lives-are-still-in-danger-10-years-after-rana-plaza-podcast-203122. Accessed 31 October 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ashwin, S., Kabeer, N. and Schüßler, E. (2020), ‘Contested understandings in the global garment industry after Rana Plaza’, Development and Change, 51:5, pp. 1296305.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brooks, E. C. (2007), Unraveling the Garment Industry: Transnational Organizing and Women’s Work, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brydges, T. and Hanlon, M. (2020), ‘Garment worker rights and the fashion industry’s response to COVID-19’, Dialogues in Human Geography, 10:2, pp. 19598, https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820620933851.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. von Busch, O. (2022), Making Trouble: Design and Material Activism (in Dark Times), London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheang, S., Rabine, L. and Sandhu, A. (2022), ‘Decolonizing fashion [studies] as process’, International Journal of Fashion Studies, 9:2, pp. 24755, https://doi.org/10.1386/infs_00070_2.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Clean Clothes Campaign (2023), ‘Home page’, Clean Clothes Campaign, https://cleanclothes.org/. Accessed 31 October 2023.
  10. Crewe, L. (2017), The Geographies of Fashion: Consumption, Space, and Value, London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. De Neve, G. (2009), ‘Power, inequality and corporate social responsibility: The politics of ethical compliance in the south Indian garment industry’, Economic and Political Weekly, 44:22, pp. 6372.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dengler, C. and Seebacher, L. M. (2019), ‘What about the Global South? Towards a feminist decolonial degrowth approach’, Ecological Economics, 157, pp. 24652.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Donaghey, J. and Reinecke, J. (2017), ‘When industrial democracy meets corporate social responsibility: A comparison of the Bangladesh accord and alliance as responses to the Rana Plaza disaster’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 56:1, pp. 1442.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fashion Revolution (2023), ‘Home page’, Fashion Revolution, https://fashionrevolution.org/. Accessed 31 October 2023.
  15. First Nations Media History Archive (2023), ‘Home page’, First Nations Media History Archive, https://archive.firstnationsmedia.org.au/. Accessed 31 October 2023.
  16. Fletcher, K. and Tham, M. (2019), Earth Logic Fashion Action Research Plan, London: The JJ Charitable Trust, https://earthlogic.info/. Accessed 31 October 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Garment Worker Diaries (2023), ‘Home page’, GWD, https://workerdiaries.org/. Accessed 31 October 2023.
  18. Giesen, B. (2004), Triumph and Trauma, New Haven, CT: Paradigm Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hanlon, M. (2019), ‘Fashioning labour rights? Understanding the efforts of transnational stakeholders in the responsible fashion and apparel (RFA) movement post-Rana Plaza, Bangladesh’, Ph.D. thesis, Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Haraway, D. (1988), ‘Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’, Feminist Studies, 14:3, pp. 57599.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Haraway, D. (2016), Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, London: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jansen, M. A. (2020), ‘Fashion and the phantasmagoria of modernity: An introduction to decolonial fashion discourse’, Fashion Theory, 24:6, pp. 81536.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jungnickel, K. (2017), ‘Making things to make sense of things: DIY as research subject and practice’, in J. Sayers (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Media Studies and Digital Humanities, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 492502.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kabeer, N. (2000), The Power to Choose: Bangladeshi Women and Labour Market Decisions in London and Dhaka, London and New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Karels, M., Hanlon, M. and Moore, N. (2024), ‘DIY academic archiving: Mischievous disruptions of a new counter-movement’, Frontiers in Communication, 9, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1374663.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kaye, D. (2014), ‘Archiving justice: Conceptualizing the archives of the United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia’, Archival Science, 14:3–4, pp. 38196, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9229-x.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Labour behind the Label (2023), ‘Queer Labour behind the Label: A collection of sorties from LGBTQI+ garment workers from Cambodia and Indonesia’, Labour behind the Label, 17 May, https://labourbehindthelabel.org/queer-labour-behind-the-label-zine-online-launch/. Accessed 31 October 2023.
  28. Moore, N. (2018), ‘A cat’s cradle of feminist and other critical approaches to participatory research’, in K. Facer and K. Dunleavy (eds), Connected Communities Foundation Series, Bristol: University of Bristol/AHRC Connected Communities Programme.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Moore, N., Dunne, N., Karels, M. and Hanlon, M. (2021), ‘Towards an inventive ethics of careful risk: Unsettling research through DIY academic archiving’, Australian Feminist Studies, 36:108, pp. 18099.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Murkurtu (2023), ‘Home page’, Murkurtu, https://mukurtu.org/. Accessed 31 October 2023.
  31. Parkins, W. (ed.) (2002), Fashioning the Body Politic: Dress, Gender, Citizenship, Oxford: Berg Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Phung, K. and LeBaron, G. (2023), ‘Canada’s Modern Slavery Act is the start – not the end – of efforts to address the issue in supply chains’, The Conversation, 16 May, https://theconversation.com/canadas-modern-slavery-act-is-the-start-not-the-end-of-efforts-to-address-the-issue-in-supply-chains-199242. Accessed 31 October 2023.
  33. Prentice, R., De Neve, G., Mezzadri, A. and Ruwanpura, K. N. (2018), ‘Health and safety in garment workers’ lives: Setting a new research agenda’, Geoforum, 88, pp. 15760.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ruwanpura, K. N. (2016), ‘Garments without guilt? Uneven labour geographies and ethical trading: Sri Lankan labour perspectives’, Journal of Economic Geography, 16:2, pp. 42346.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Seidman, G. (2007), Beyond the Boycott: Labour Rights, Human Rights and Transnational Activism, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Siddiqi, D. M. (2009), ‘Do Bangladeshi factory workers need saving? Sisterhood in the post-sweatshop era’, Feminist Review, 91:1, pp. 15474.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Siddiqi, D. M. (2022), ‘Scandalising the supply chain’, Himal South Asian, 11 January, https://www.himalmag.com/scandalising-the-supply-chain-bangladesh-2022/. Accessed 31 October 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Smith, L. T. (2021), Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples, London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Stokes, J. (2021), How to Do Media and Cultural Studies, London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Thomson, R. and Berriman, L. (2023), ‘Starting with the archive: Principles for prospective collaborative research’, Qualitative Research, 23:2, pp. 23451, https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211023037.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. United Nations (n.d.), ‘“Conscious fashion and lifestyle network”: Department of Economic and Social Affairs: Sustainable Development’, United Nations, https://sdgs.un.org/partnerships/action-networks/conscious-fashion-and-lifestyle-network. Accessed 31 October 2023.
/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00103_7
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test