Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. International Journal of Fashion Studies
  4. Volume 11, Issue 1
  5. Article
B(l)ending Research Methods: Reimagining a Theoretical Turn in Fashion Scholarship
  • ISSN: 2051-7106
  • E-ISSN: 2051-7114

Abstract

Cripistemologies are ways of knowing that emerge from the embodied experiences of disabled bodyminds, while multi-sensory methods value knowledge produced through haptic, visual, auditory and other sensory forms. Drawing on these approaches, this article proposes a crip methodology for fashion studies by exploring the value of combining research methods to honour the knowledge of disabled people and their sensory engagement in the world. We reflect on the four phases of our project, ‘Cripping Masculinity’, and its entangled methodologies and methods. The project engaged 50 disabled, D/deaf and neurodivergent men and masculine people – who we refer to as collaborators – to examine how they produced masculinity and disability through their engagement with fashion and dress. Collaborators took part in wardrobe studies where they shared their experiences with their clothing; fashion hacking where they worked with design students to deconstruct and remake one of their existing garments to better support their bodyminds, and a fashion exhibition and fashion show where they co-produced events to disseminate their dress experiences and hacked clothing. Our analysis demonstrates that combining multi-sensory methods in one project recognizes the different ways that people inhabit the world as sources for generating and disseminating knowledge about the relationship between disability and fashion. While a crip methodology poses challenges for producing research in legible scholarly forms, it also urges fashion studies scholars to intervene into academic ableism through inclusive and expansive research methodologies and methods.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) (Award 435-2019-1231)
  • SSHRC Partnership (Award 895-2016-1024)
  • The New School General Research
  • The New School Student Assistant Research
© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00104_1
2024-04-29
2024-12-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barry, B. (2017), ‘Enclothed knowledge: The fashion show as a method of dissemination in arts-informed research’, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18:3, http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-18.3.2837.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Barry, B. and Christel, D. A. (eds) (2023), Fashion Education: The Systemic Revolution, Bristol: Intellect Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Barry, B. and Drak, D. (2019), ‘Intersectional interventions into queer and trans liberation: Youth resistance against right-wing populism through fashion hacking’, Fashion Theory, 23:6, pp. 679–709.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Barry, B., Evans, C. and Friedman, M. (2022), ‘Fattening fabulousness: The joys and risks of troubling gender through fat fashion’, Fat Studies, 11:3, pp. 301–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bone, K. M. (2017), ‘Trapped behind the glass: Crip theory and disability identity’, Disability & Society, 32:9, pp. 1297–314.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Burton, L. and Melkumova-Reynolds, J. (2019), ‘“My leg is a giant stiletto heel”: Fashioning the prosthetised body’, Fashion Theory, 23:2, pp. 195–218.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Butterwick, S., Carrillo, M. and Villagante, K. (2015), ‘Women’s fashion shows as feminist trans-formation’, The Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 27:2, pp. 79–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Calvey, D. (2021), ‘Sensory ethnography: A creative turn’, Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 10:3, pp. 346–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Chandler, E. (2018), ‘Disability art and re-worlding possibilities’, a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, 33:2, pp. 458–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chandler, E., Aubrecht, K., Ignagni, E. and Rice, C. (2021), ‘Cripistemologies of disability arts and culture: Reflections on the cripping the arts symposium’, Cripistemologies of Disability Arts and Culture, 15:2, pp. 171–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Chandler, E., Rice, C., Fisher, L., Tidgwell, T., LaMarre, A., Changfoot, N. and Dion, S. (2020), Vital Practices in the Arts, Guelph: Re•Vision: The Centre for Art and Social Justice, University of Guelph.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, M. Y. (2014), ‘Brain fog: The race for cripistemology’, Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 8:2, pp. 171–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Chong Kwan, S. (2020), ‘The ambient gaze: Sensory atmosphere and the dressed body’, in M. Liang and J. Willson (eds), Revisiting the Gaze: The Fashioned Body and the Dressed Politics of Looking, London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts, pp. 55–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Culhane, D. (2016), ‘Imaging: An introduction’, in D. Culhane and D. Elliott (eds), A Different Kind of Ethnography: Imaginative Practices and Creative Methodologies, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 1–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Davidson, H. (2019), ‘The embodied turn: Making and re-making dress as academic practice’, Fashion Theory, 23:3, pp. 329–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dokumaci, A. (2018), ‘Disability as method: Interventions in the habitus of ableism through media-creation’, Disability Studies Quarterly, 38:3, https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v38i3.6491.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Duncum, P. (2012), ‘An eye does not make an I: Expanding the sensorium’, Studies in Art Education, 53:3, pp. 182–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hamraie, A. (2017), Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hamraie, A. and Fritsch, K. (2019), ‘Crip technoscience manifesto’, Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 5:1, pp. 1–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Harper, D. (2002), ‘Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation’, Visual Studies, 17:1, pp. 13–26, https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Jenss, H. (2016), ‘Introduction locating fashion/studies: Research methods, sites and practices’, in H. Jenns (ed.), Fashion Studies: Research Methods, Sites and Practices, London: Bloomsbury, pp. 1–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnson, M. L. and McRuer, R. (2014), ‘Cripistemologies: Introduction’, Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 8:2, pp. 127–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kafai, S. (2021), Crip Kinship: The Disability Justice and Art Activism of Sins Invalid, Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kafer, A. (2013), Feminist, Queer, Crip, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Klepp, I. G. and Bjerck, M. (2014), ‘A methodological approach to the materiality of clothing: Wardrobe studies’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17:4, pp. 373–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Leavy, P. (2020), Method Meets Art: Arts-Based Research Practice, 3rd ed., New York: The Guilford Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Melkumova-Reynolds, J. (2023), ‘“Let me be your stimy toy’: Fashioning disability, cripping fashion’, in R. Mahawatte and J. Willson (eds), Dangerous Bodies: New Global Perspectives on Fashion and Transgression, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 35–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Milne, E.-J. and Muir, R. (2020), ‘Photovoice: A critical introduction’, in L. Pauwels and D. Mannay (eds), The Sage Handbook of Visual Research Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 282–96, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526417015.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Piepzna-Samarasinha, L. L. (2022), The Future Is Disabled: Prophecies, Love Notes and Mourning Songs, Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Pink, S. (2015), Doing Sensory Ethnography, London: Sage Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Pink, S. (2017), ‘From embodiment to emplacement: Re-thinking competing bodies, senses and spatialities’, in M. D. Giardina and M. K. Donnelly (eds), Physical Culture, Ethnography and the Body, New York: Routledge, pp. 82–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Price, M. (2015), ‘The bodymind problem and the possibilities of pain’, Hypatia, 30:1, pp. 268–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Ruggerone, L. (2017), ‘The feeling of being dressed: Affect studies and the clothed body’, Fashion Theory, 21:5, pp. 573–93, https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704X.2016.1253302.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Ruggerone, L. and Stauss, R. (2022), ‘The deceptive mirror: The dressed body beyond reflection’, Fashion Theory, 26:2, pp. 211–35, https://doi.org/10.1080/​1362704X.2020.1766228.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Sampson, E. (2018), ‘Entanglement, affect and experience: Walking and wearing (shoes) as experimental research methodology’, International Journal of Fashion Studies, 5:1, pp. 55–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Schalk, S. (2018), Bodyminds Reimagined: (Dis)ability, Race, and Gender in Black Women’s Speculative Fiction, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Secret Feminist Agenda (2020), ‘Bonus Episode: Season 3 Peer Review of Secret Feminist Agenda’, Canada, 7 April, https://secretfeministagenda.com/2020/04/07/bonus-episode-season-3-peer-review-of-secret-feminist-agenda/. Accessed 7 March 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Siebers, T. (2008), Disability Theory, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Skjold, E. (2018), ‘Making sense of dress: On sensory perspectives of wardrobe research’, Artifact, 5:1, pp. 4.1–4.15.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Starr, K. (2022), ‘Audio description for the non-blind’, in C. Taylor and E. Perego (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Audio Description, New York: Routledge, pp. 467–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Stokes, B. and Black, C. (2012), ‘Application of the functional, expressive and aesthetic consumer needs model: Assessing the clothing needs of adolescent girls with disabilities’, International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 5:3, pp. 179–86, https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2012.700735.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Taylor, C. and Perego, E. (2022), ‘Introduction’, in C. Taylor and E. Perego (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Audio Description, New York: Routledge, pp. 1–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Tullio-Pow, S. and Strickfaden, M. (2020), ‘Clothing taskscape as an approach toward assessment of user needs’, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 40:1, pp. 19–36, https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X20968818.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Von Busch, O. (2009), ‘Engaged design and the practice of fashion hacking: The examples of Giana Gonzalez and Dale Sko’, Fashion Practice, 1:2, pp. 163–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Von Busch, O. (2022), ‘Bullying and barren fashion: An affective perspective on the psychopolitics of dress’, in E. Paulicelli, V. Manlow and E. Wissinger (eds), The Routledge Companion to Fashion Studies, New York: Routledge, pp. 151–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Woodward, S. (2015), ‘Object interviews, material imaginings and “unsettling” methods: Interdisciplinary approaches to understanding materials and material culture’, Qualitative Research, 16:4, pp. 359–74.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00104_1
Loading
Multi-sensory methods: Toward a crip methodology in fashion studies
International Journal of Fashion Studies 11, 81 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1386/infs_00104_1
/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00104_1
/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00104_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): affect; arts-based research; disability; embodiment; fashion exhibition; fashion hacking; fashion show; wardrobe studies

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error