f B(l)ending research methods: Reimagining a theoretical turn in fashion scholarship

References

1. Almila, Anna-Mari and Inglis, David (2017), ‘What is “Fashion” really? The promise of an ecumenical analytic for fashion studies and beyond in a globalized world’, in Z. Delić’s (ed.), Epistemology and Transformation of Knowledge in Global Age, London: IntechOpen, pp. 63–83.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Almila, Anna-Mari and Zeilig, Hannah (2021), ‘In older men’s wardrobes: Creative tales of affect, style and constraint’, Fashion Theory, 26:5, pp. 651–72.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bal, Mieke (1999), ‘Introduction’, in M. Bal (ed.), The Practice of Cultural Analysis: Exposing Interdisciplinary Interpretation, Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press, p. 6.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cheang, Sarah, Rabine, Lesile and Sandhu, Arti (2022), ‘Decolonizing fashion [studies] as process’, International Journal of Fashion Studies, 9:2, pp. 247–55.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chen, Mel Y. (2014), ‘Brain fog: The race for cripistemology’, Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 8:2, pp. 171–84.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Crepax, Rosa (2018), ‘Street style, smelling and hanging out: Experimental methods of fashion research’, International Journal of Fashion Studies, 5:2, pp. 329–46.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Günel, Gökçe, Varma, Saiba and Watanabe, Chika (2020), ‘A manifesto for patchwork ethnography’, Member Voices, Fieldsights, 9 June, https://culanth.org/fieldsights/a-manifesto-for-patchwork-ethnography. Accessed 14 March 2024.
8. Jansen, Maria Angela (2020), ‘Fashion and the phantasmagoria of modernity: An introduction to decolonial fashion discourse’, Fashion Theory, 24:6, pp. 815–36.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Jenss, Heike (ed.) (2016), Fashion Studies: Research Methods, Sites, and Practices, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Johnson, Merri Lisa and McRuer, Robert (2014), ‘Cripistemologies: Introduction’, Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 8:2, pp. 127–47.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Kawamura, Yuniya (2020), Doing Research in Fashion and Dress: An Introduction to Qualitative Methods, London and New York: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Klepp, Ingun Grimstad and Bjerck, Mari (2014), ‘A methodological approach to the materiality of wardrobe studies’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17:4, pp. 373–86.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Medrado, Mi (2023), ‘Decolonial fashion ethnography: “Before Yesterday” method’, International Journal of Fashion Studies, 10:2, pp. 207–16.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Petersson McIntyre, Magdalena (2021), ‘Shame, blame, and passion: Affects of (un)sustainable wardrobes’, Fashion Theory, 25:6, pp. 735–55.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Riello, Giorgio (2011), ‘The object of fashion: Methodological approaches to the history of fashion’, Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 3:1, https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v3i0.8865.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Robinson, Todd (2021), ‘Digital video-based research in fashion: Visualizing affect and sartorial vitality’, International Journal of Fashion Studies, 8:1, pp. 105–20.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Sikarskie, Amanda (2020), Digital Research Methods in Fashion and Textile Studies, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Stokes, Jane (2021), How to Do Media and Cultural Studies, London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Tse, Tommy and von Pezold, Johanna (2023), ‘Memories reminisced, reconciled, renewed: Hong Kong male consumers’ wardrobes and their search for a congruent self’, Journal of Consumer Culture, 23:4, pp. 846–67.
    [Google Scholar]
20. van Tienhoven, Maaike A. and Smelik, Anneke (2021), ‘The affect of fashion: An exploration of affective method’, Critical Studies in Fashion & Beauty, 12:2, pp. 163–83.
    [Google Scholar]