Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. International Journal of Fashion Studies
  4. Volume 11, Issue 1
  5. Article
B(l)ending Research Methods: Reimagining a Theoretical Turn in Fashion Scholarship
  • ISSN: 2051-7106
  • E-ISSN: 2051-7114

Abstract

This article explores the innovative method of patchwork ethnography, which was first introduced by Günel, Varma and Watanabe in 2020, and its applicability to the area of fashion studies. It elaborates on the features, qualities and limitations of the method. The article does so by reflecting on the ethnographic research I conducted for my Ph.D. thesis. In March–August 2019 and January–July 2021, I used a patchwork ethnography approach to participant observation, interviews, digital ethnography and visual analysis to study the trade and retail of Chinese-made garments and textiles in Mozambique. The article puts a special focus on the difficulties and restrictions arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, and how these can be offset by the specific characteristics of patchwork ethnography. Apart from discussing the issues relating to my positionality and privilege as an educated white female researcher in a cross-cultural Global South context, it also hopes to further push the ongoing decolonization of fashion studies. It therefore aims to show that the applicability and relevance of patchwork ethnography go beyond periods shaped by pandemic restrictions. More generally, this article emphasizes the necessity and benefit of an interdisciplinary mindset and creative, flexible, multi-method approaches to understand and tackle the great challenges of our time that relate to the production, trade and consumption of fashion products.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00107_1
2024-04-29
2024-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adalima, J., Carvalho, X. de, Florêncio, F., Jossias, E. and Meneses, M. P. (2023), ‘Introduction’, Anthropology Southern Africa, 46:2, pp. 77–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Adebayo, K. O. (2020), ‘Academic (im)mobility: Ecology of ethnographic research and knowledge production on Africans in China’, Journal of Higher Education in Africa, 18:1, pp. 1–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Almila, A.-M. (2016), ‘Fashion, anti-fashion, non-fashion and symbolic capital: The uses of dress among Muslim minorities in Finland’, Fashion Theory, 20:1, pp. 81–102.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Appadurai, A. (1997), ‘Discussion: Fieldwork in the era of globalization’, Anthropology and Humanism, 22:1, pp. 115–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Aspers, P. (2010), Orderly Fashion: A Sociology of Markets, Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Baczko, A. and Dorronsoro, G. (2020), ‘The ethical, epistemological, and conceptual need to resume fieldwork’, Social Science Research Council, 19 November, https://items.ssrc.org/covid-19-and-the-social-sciences/social-research-and-insecurity/the-ethical-epistemological-and-conceptual-need-to-resume-fieldwork/. Accessed 28 June 2022.
  7. Baizerman, S., Eicher, J. B. and Cerny, C. (1993), ‘Eurocentrism in the study of ethnic dress’, Dress, 20:1, pp. 19–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bisoka, A. N. (2020), ‘Disturbing the aesthetics of power: Why Covid-19 is not an “event” for fieldwork-based social scientists’, Social Science Research Council, 28 May, https://items.ssrc.org/covid-19-and-the-social-sciences/social-research-and-insecurity/disturbing-the-aesthetics-of-power-why-covid-19-is-not-an-event-for-fieldwork-based-social-scientists/. Accessed 7 November 2022.
  9. Blok, A. (2010), ‘Mapping the super-whale: Towards a mobile ethnography of situated globalities’, Mobilities, 5:4, pp. 507–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Burawoy, M. (2000), Global Ethnography: Forces, Connections, and Imaginations in a Postmodern World, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Caputo, V. (2000), ‘At “home” and “away”: Reconfiguring the field for late twentieth-century anthropology’, in V. Amit (ed.), Constructing the Field: Ethnographic Fieldwork in the Contemporary World, London: Routledge, pp. 19–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheang, S., Rabine, L. and Sandhu, A. (2022), ‘Decolonizing fashion [studies] as process’, International Journal of Fashion Studies, 9:2, pp. 247–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Chua, L. (2021), ‘Selfies and self-fictions: Calibrating co-presence in and of “the field”’, Social Analysis, 65:1, pp. 151–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Cirhuza, E. (2020), ‘Taken out of the picture? The researcher from the Global South and the fight against “academic neo-colonialism”’, GIC Network, 27 April, https://www.gicnetwork.be/taken-out-of-the-picture-the-researcher-from-the-global-south-and-the-fight-against-academic-neo-colonialism/. Accessed 7 November 2022.
  15. Coleman, S. and Collins, P. (eds) (2006), Locating the Field: Space, Place and Context in Anthropology, Oxford: Berg.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Craik, J. (1994), The Face of Fashion: Cultural Studies in Fashion, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. DeLuca, J. R. and Maddox, C. B. (2016), ‘Tales from the ethnographic field: Navigating feelings of guilt and privilege in the research process’, Field Methods, 28:3, pp. 284–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Deutsche Welle (2020), ‘Covid-19: Moçambique suspende voos internacionais’, 12 May, http://85.217.170.64/pt-002/covid-19-mo%C3%A7ambique-suspende-voos-internacionais/a-53418852. Accessed 5 November 2022.
  19. Drazin, A. (2021), Design Anthropology in Context: An Introduction to Design Materiality and Collaborative Thinking, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. England, K. V. L. (1994), ‘Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research’, The Professional Geographer, 46:1, pp. 80–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Freedland, J. (2020), ‘The magnifying glass: How Covid revealed the truth about our world’, The Guardian, 12 November, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/11/covid-upturned-planet-freedland. Accessed 11 July 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Freidberg, S. (2001), ‘On the trail of the global green bean: Methodological considerations in multi-site ethnography’, Global Networks, 1:4, pp. 353–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Freitag, U. and Oppen, A. von (eds) (2014), Translocality: The Study of Globalising Processes from a Southern Perspective, Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Gaugele, E. and Titton, M. (eds) (2019), Fashion and Postcolonial Critique, Berlin: Sternberg Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Gille, Z. and Riain, S. Ó. (2002), ‘Global ethnography’, Annual Review of Sociology, 28:1, pp. 271–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Góralska, M. (2020), ‘Anthropology from home: Advice on digital ethnography for the pandemic times’, Anthropology in Action, 27:1, pp. 46–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Griffiths, M. (2017), ‘From heterogeneous worlds: Western privilege, class and positionality in the south’, Area, 49:1, pp. 2–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Günel, G. and Watanabe, C. (2023), ‘Patchwork ethnography’, American Ethnologist, 51:1, pp. 131–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Günel, G., Varma, S. and Watanabe, C. (2020), ‘A manifesto for patchwork ethnography’, Society for Cultural Anthropology, 9 June, https://culanth.org/fieldsights/a-manifesto-for-patchwork-ethnography. Accessed 10 January 2023.
  30. Hannerz, U. (2003), ‘Being there… and there… and there! Reflections on multi-site ethnography’, Ethnography, 4:2, pp. 201–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Hansen, K. T. (2004), ‘The world in dress: Anthropological perspectives on clothing, fashion, and culture’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 33:1, pp. 369–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Hendry, J. (2003), ‘An ethnographer in the global arena: Globography perhaps?’, Global Networks, 3:4, pp. 497–512.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Hoog, T. van der (2020), ‘On the necessity of fieldwork during a pandemic’, Voices of Young Academics, 22 October, https://www.voicesyoungacademics.nl/articles/on-the-necessity-of-fieldwork-during-a-pandemic. Accessed 26 December 2022.
  34. Huisman, K. (2008), ‘Does this mean you’re not going to come visit me anymore? An inquiry into an ethics of reciprocity and positionality in feminist ethnographic research’, Sociological Inquiry, 78:3, pp. 372–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Hulme, A. (2015), On the Commodity Trail: The Journey of a Bargain Store Product from East to West, Abingdon and New York: Routledge and Taylor & Francis Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Hulme, A. (2017), ‘Following the (unfollowable) thing: Methodological considerations in the era of high globalisation’, Cultural Geographies, 24:1, pp. 157–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Jansen, M. A. (2020), ‘Fashion and the phantasmagoria of modernity: An introduction to decolonial fashion discourse’, Fashion Theory, 24:6, pp. 815–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Jarzabkowski, P., Bednarek, R. and Cabantous, L. (2015), ‘Conducting global team-based ethnography: Methodological challenges and practical methods’, Human Relations, 68:1, pp. 3–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Jennings, H. (2015), ‘A brief history of African fashion’, Nka Journal of Contemporary African Art, 37, pp. 44–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Jenss, H. (2016), ‘Locating fashion studies: Research methods, sites, and practices’, in H. Jenss (ed.), Fashion Studies: Research Methods, Sites and Practices, London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing, Plc, pp. 1–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Käihkö, I. (2020), ‘Conflict chatnography: Instant messaging apps, social media and conflict ethnography in Ukraine’, Ethnography, 21:1, pp. 71–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Kim, J. J., Williams, S., Eldridge, E. R. and Reinke, A. J. (2021), ‘Digitally shaped ethnographic relationships during a global pandemic and beyond’, Qualitative Research, 23:3, pp. 809–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Klepp, I. G. and Bjerck, M. (2014), ‘A methodological approach to the materiality of clothing: Wardrobe studies’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17:4, pp. 373–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Knowles, C. (2000), ‘Here and there: Doing transnational fieldwork’, in V. Amit (ed.), Constructing the Field: Ethnographic Fieldwork in the Contemporary World, London: Routledge, pp. 54–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Knowles, C. (2014), Flip-Flop: A Journey Through Globalisation’s Backroads, London: Pluto Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Kurotani, S. (2004), ‘Multi-sited transnational ethnography and the shifting construction of fieldwork’, in J. Mulcock and L. Hume (eds), Anthropologists in the Field: Cases in Participant Observation, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 201–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Latour, B. (2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Ling, W. and Segre Reinach, S. (eds) (2018), Fashion in Multiple Chinas: Chinese Styles in the Transglobal Landscape, London: I.B. Tauris.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Lobe, B., Morgan, D. and Hoffman, K. A. (2020), ‘Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, pp. 1–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. LSE Digital Ethnography Collective (2020), ‘LSE Digital Ethnography collective reading list’, January, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RaFQdQFdijQs6eQ_UlZRBuF30oD80uvisDyJXFjwuzw/edit. Accessed 11 January 2023.
  51. Lupton, D. (2021), ‘Doing fieldwork in a pandemic (crowd-sourced document), revised version’, 5 July, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZCl8/edit. Accessed 14 January 2023.
  52. Manning, J. (2016), ‘Constructing a postcolonial feminist ethnography’, Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 5:2, pp. 90–105.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Marcus, G. E. (1995), ‘Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 24:1, pp. 95–117.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Markham, A. N. (2013), ‘Fieldwork in social media: What would Malinowski do?’, Qualitative Communication Research, 2:4, pp. 434–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Mayorga-Gallo, S. and Hordge-Freeman, E. (2017), ‘Between marginality and privilege: Gaining access and navigating the field in multiethnic settings’, Qualitative Research, 17:4, pp. 377–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Meneses, M. P. (2023), ‘Doing anthropology in uncertain contexts: Patchwork ethnography in Mozambique’, Anthropology Southern Africa, 46:2, pp. 121–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Mentges, G. (2019), ‘Reviewing orientalism and re-orienting fashion beyond Europe’, in E. Gaugele and M. Titton (eds), Fashion and Postcolonial Critique, Berlin: Sternberg Press, pp. 128–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Miller, D. (2020), ‘How to conduct an ethnography during social isolation’, YouTube, 3 May, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSiTrYB-0so. Accessed 18 November 2023.
  59. Moors, A. and Tarlo, E. (2007), ‘Introduction’, Fashion Theory, 11:2–3, pp. 133–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Moosavi, L. (2020), ‘The decolonial bandwagon and the dangers of intellectual decolonisation’, International Review of Sociology, 30:2, pp. 332–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Murphy, A. K., Jerolmack, C. and Smith, D. (2021), ‘Ethnography, data transparency, and the information age’, Annual Review of Sociology, 47:1, pp. 41–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Ndjio, B. (2022), ‘Looking east: Boharaba vogue and the sinonization of fashion and beauty in Douala’, in K. Pinther, K. Kastner and B. Ndjio (eds), Fashioning the Afropolis: Histories, Materialities and Aesthetic Practices, London: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Niessen, S. (2003), ‘Afterword: Re-orienting fashion theory’, in S. Niessen (ed.), Re-orienting Fashion: The Globalization of Asian Dress, Oxford: Berg, pp. 234–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Pinheiro-Machado, R. (2017), Counterfeit Itineraries in the Global South: The Human Consequences of Piracy in China and Brazil, Abingdon: Routledge and Taylor & Francis Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Rabine, L. W. (2002), The Global Circulation of African Fashion, Oxford: Berg.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Rao, Y. (2021), ‘Feeling digital and reimagining fieldwork during COVID times’, Feeling Digital, https://www.feelingdigital.org/about. Accessed 8 December 2022.
  67. Reyes, V. (2018), ‘Ethnographic toolkit: Strategic positionality and researchers’ visible and invisible tools in field research’, Ethnography, 21:2, pp. 220–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Rofel, L. and Yanagisako, S. J. (2019), Fabricating Transnational Capitalism: A Collaborative Ethnography of Italian-Chinese Global Fashion, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Rovine, V. L. (2004), ‘Fashionable traditions: The globalization of an African textile’, in J. M. Allman (ed.), Fashioning Africa: Power and the Politics of Dress, Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press, pp. 189–211.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Schulte-Römer, N. and Gesing, F. (2022), ‘Online, offline, hybrid: Methodological reflection on event ethnography in (post-)pandemic times’, Qualitative Research, 23:6, pp. 1620–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Skovgaard-Smith, I. (2021), ‘Transnational life and cross-border immobility in pandemic times’, Global Networks, 23:1, pp. 59–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Slade, T. and Jansen, M. A. (2020), ‘Letter from the editors: Decoloniality and fashion’, Fashion Theory, 24:6, pp. 809–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Smith, D. A. (2017), ‘Globalizing social problems: An agenda for the twenty-first century’, Social Problems, 64:1, pp. 1–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Sylvanus, N. (2007), ‘The fabric of Africanity: Tracing the global threads of authenticity’, Anthropological Theory, 7:2, pp. 201–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Teodoro, A. and Rodriguez, L. (2020), ‘Textile and garment supply chains in times of COVID-19: Challenges for developing countries’, UNCTAD Transport and Trade Facilitation Newsletter, 86, 29 May, https://unctad.org/news/textile-and-garment-supply-chains-times-covid-19-challenges-developing-countries. Accessed 18 December 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Tilley, E. and Kalina, M. (2021), ‘“My flight arrives at 5 am, can you pick me up?”: The gatekeeping burden of the African academic’, Journal of African Cultural Studies, 33:4, pp. 538–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Tse, H.-L. T. (2015), ‘An ethnographic study of glocal fashion communication in Hong Kong and greater China’, International Journal of Fashion Studies, 2:2, pp. 245–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Tsuda, T., Tapias, M. and Escandell, X. (2014), ‘Locating the global in transnational ethnography’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43:2, pp. 123–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Verne, J. (2012), ‘“Le terrain, c’est moi?” Reflections on the emergence of the field in translocal research’, Annales de géographie, 687–688:5–6, pp. 561–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. von Pezold, J. (2022), ‘Co-constructing fashion in a South-South context: Selling Chinese-made garments and textiles in Mozambique’, Critical African Studies, 15:1, pp. 73–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. von Pezold, J. (2023), ‘Global China and everyday mediation in the Global South: Selling Chinese fashion in Mozambique via WhatsApp’, Global Media and China, online first, https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364231222971.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Waisbord, S. and Mellado, C. (2014), ‘De-westernizing communication studies: A reassessment’, Communication Theory, 24:4, pp. 361–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Wood, E. J. W., Rovers, D., Sivaramakrishnan, K. and Almeling, R. (2020), ‘Resuming field research in pandemic times’, Social Science Research Council, 21 May, https://items.ssrc.org/covid-19-and-the-social-sciences/social-research-and-insecurity/resuming-field-research-in-pandemic-times/. Accessed 23 December 2022.
  84. Zhao, J. (2013), The Chinese Fashion Industry: An Ethnographic Approach, London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00107_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): China; COVID-19; decolonization; ethnographic fieldwork; international trade; Mozambique; research methods

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error