Skip to content
1981
Volume 11, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2051-7106
  • E-ISSN: 2051-7114

Abstract

The study explores motivations for second-hand clothing practices using wardrobe interviews with a limited sample of twelve higher-education students in Belgium. Three types of practices were identified: bargain hunters, uniqueness searchers and ethical and ecological buyers. The study reveals that despite the perceived sustainability of second-hand clothes, these practices often result in large volumes of clothing purchases, contradicting sustainability motivations. Ecological respondents experience ‘affective dissonance’ due to a disconnection between their sustainability beliefs and fashion practices. These uncomfortable emotions reveal an aspiration to engage in more sustainable fashion practices in the future. Despite this, all respondents evaluate their second-hand clothing practices by relying on the culturally prevalent discourses of the first-hand fashion industry. The study concludes by highlighting the implications for the development of alternative and more sustainable fashion practices when second-hand clothing practitioners reproduce the symbolic boundaries that govern the first-hand fashion industry, and the authors suggest pathways to address these implications in the future.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00118_1
2024-12-31
2026-04-17

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alcott, B. (2005), ‘Jevons’ paradox’, Ecological Economics, 54:1, pp. 921.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aldiabat, K. M. and Le Navenec, C. L. (2018), ‘Data saturation: The mysterious step in grounded theory methodology’, The Qualitative Report, 23:1, pp. 24561.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Austgulen, M. H. (2016), ‘Environmentally sustainable textile consumption: What characterizes the political textile consumers?’, Journal of Consumer Policy, 39:4, pp. 44166.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bagozzi, R. P., Verbeke, W. and Gavino, J. C., Jr (2003), ‘Culture moderates the self-regulation of shame and its effects on performance: The case of salespersons in the Netherlands and the Philippines’, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88:2, pp. 21933.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Barry, B. (2021), ‘How to transform fashion education: A manifesto for equity, inclusion and decolonization’, International Journal of Fashion Studies, 8:1, pp. 12330.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Boiger, M., Mesquita, B., Uchida, Y. and Barrett, L. F. (2013), ‘Condoned or condemned: The situational affordance of anger and shame in the United States and Japan’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39:4, pp. 54053.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bourdieu, P. and Delsaut, Y. (1975), ‘Le Couturier et sa griffe: contribution à une théorie de la magie’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 1:1, pp. 736.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brans, L. and Kuipers, G. (2023), ‘Fashion as “force for change”? How ideologization reshapes the work of intermediaries in the legitimation of culture’, Cultural Sociology, online first, pp. 124.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brooks, A. (2019), Clothing Poverty: The Hidden World of Fast Fashion and Secondhand Clothes, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Charmaz, K. and Thornberg, R. (2021), ‘The pursuit of quality in grounded theory’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18:3, pp. 30527.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Crouch, M. and McKenzie, H. (2006), ‘The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research’, Social Science Information, 45:4, pp. 48399.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Currid-Halkett, E. (2017), The Sum of Small Things: A Theory of the Aspirational Class, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Delanoeije, J. and Bachus, K. and CE Center, Circular Economy Policy Research Center (2020), Reuse: The Understudied Circular Economy Strategy, report no 13, Mechelen: Circular Flanders, https://ce-center.vlaanderen-circulair.be/en/publications/publication/13-reuse-the-understudied-circular-economy-strategy. Accessed 5 November 2024.
  14. DeLong, M., Heinemann, B. and Reiley, K. (2005), ‘Hooked on vintage!’, Fashion Theory, 9:1, pp. 2342.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dhont, J. (2020), ‘Aanschuiven voor tweedehandskleding op de Ajuinlei, PZC’, Het Laatste Nieuws, 20 June, https://www.pzc.nl/gent/aanschuiven-voor-tweedehandse-kleding-op-ajuinlei~a357d1a0/. Accessed 13 April 2022.
  16. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2017), A New Textiles Economy: Redesigning Fashion’s Future, Cowes: Ellen MacArthur Foundation, https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/a-new-textiles-economy. Accessed 11 April 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Evans, M. D. (2019), ‘What is consumption, where has it been going, and does it still matter?’, The Sociological Review, 67:3, pp. 499517.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Flanagan, O. (2021), How to Do Things with Emotions: The Morality of Anger and Shame Across Cultures, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Flanagan, C. A. and Sherrod, L. R. (1998), ‘Youth political development: An introduction’, Journal of Social Issues, 54:3, pp. 44756.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fletcher, K. (2012), ‘Durability, fashion, sustainability: The processes and practices of use’, Fashion Practice, 4:2, pp. 22138.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fletcher, K. (2016), Craft of Use, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fletcher, K. and Tham, M. (2019), Earth Logic: Fashion Action Research Plan, London: The JJ Charitable Trust.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Guiot, D. and Roux, D. (2010), ‘A second-hand shoppers’ motivation scale: Antecedents, consequences, and implications for retailers’, Journal of Retailing, 86:4, pp. 35571.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ha-Brookshire, J. E. and Hodges, N. N. (2009), ‘Socially responsible consumer behavior? Exploring used clothing donation behavior’, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 27:3, pp. 17996.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Heine, L. (2021), ‘Wardrobe studies: Sustainability and the everyday aesthetics of fashion consumption’, Continuum, 35:6, pp. 85369.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hur, E. (2020), ‘Rebirth fashion: Secondhand clothing consumption values and perceived risks’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 273:3, p. 122951.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jacquet, J. (2015), Is Shame Necessary? New Uses for an Old Tool, New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Jaeger-Erben, M. and Offenberger, U. (2014), ‘A practice theory approach to sustainable consumption’, GAIA: Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 23:3, pp. 16674.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kaiser, S. and Green, D. (2021), Fashion and Cultural Studies, London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kaiser, S. B., Nagasawa, R. H. and Hutton, S. S. (1995), ‘Construction of an SI theory of fashion: Ambivalence and change’, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 13:3, pp. 17283.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kawamura, Y. (2004), The Japanese Revolution in Paris Fashion, Oxford: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Klepp, I. and Bjerck, M. (2014), ‘A methodological approach to the materiality of clothing: Wardrobe studies’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17:4, pp. 37386.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lamont, M. (2010), How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgement, Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lamont, M. (2012), ‘Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation’, Annual Review of Sociology, 38:1, pp. 20121.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lamont, M. (2014), ‘Looking back at Bourdieu’, in E. Silva and A. Warde (eds), Cultural Analysis and Bourdieu’s Legacy: Settling Accounts and Developing Alternatives, London: Routledge, pp. 12841.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lamont, M. and Molnar, V. (2002), ‘The study of boundaries in the social sciences’, Annual Review of Sociology, 28:1, pp. 16795.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Maldini, I. (2019), ‘Can design confront consumerism?’, Ph.D. thesis, Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Mellander, E. and Petersson McIntyre, M. (2020), ‘Fashionable detachments: Wardrobes, bodies and the desire to let go’, Consumption Markets & Culture, 24:4, pp. 34356.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Mohr, I., Fuxman, L. and Mahmoud, A. B. (2022), ‘Fashion resale behaviours and technology disruption: An in-depth review’, in P. Keikhosrokiani (ed.), Handbook of Research on Consumer Behavior Change and Data Analytics in the Socio-Digital Era, Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 35173.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Palomera, J. and Vetta, T. (2016), ‘Moral economy: Rethinking a radical concept’, Anthropological Theory, 16:4, pp. 41332.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Petersson McIntire, M. (2019), ‘Shame, blame, and passion: Affects of (un)sustainable wardrobes’, Fashion Theory, 25:5, pp. 121.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Probyn, E. (2005), Blush: Faces of Shame, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Rocamora, A. (2002), ‘Fields of fashion: Critical insights into Bourdieu’s sociology of culture’, Journal of Consumer Culture, 2:3, pp. 34162.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Røpke, I. (2009), ‘Theories of practice: New inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption’, Ecological Economics, 68:10, pp. 249097.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Scheff, T. ([1994] 2018), Bloody Revenge: Emotions, Nationalism, and War, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Skov, L. (2011), ‘Entering the space of the wardrobe’, Copenhagen Business School, 58, pp. 125.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Smelik, A. and Kaiser, S. (2023), ‘Ambivalences, tensions and questions of im/materiality in fashion and beauty’, Critical Studies in Fashion & Beauty, 14:1, pp. 311.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Stevenson, C. (2022), ‘Radical pedagogies: Right here, right now’, Fashion Theory, 26:4, pp. 46573.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Strähle, J. and Klatt, L. M. (2017), ‘The secondhand market for fashion products’, in J. Strähle (ed.), Green Fashion Retail, Singapore: Springer Series in Fashion Business, pp. 11934.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Tse, T. and Von Pezhold, J. (2023), ‘Memories reminisced, reconciled and renewed: Hong Kong male consumers’ wardrobes and their search for congruent self’, Journal of Consumer Culture, 23:4, pp. 84667, https://doi.org/10.1177/14695405221149098.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Twigger Holroyd, A. (2017), Folk Fashion: Understanding Homemade Clothes, London: I.B. Tauris.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Van de Peer, A. (2022), ‘The politics of fashion criticism: How newspaper journalists’ evaluative criteria for fashion changed between 1949–2010’, in R. Findlay and J. Reponen (eds), Insights on Fashion Journalism, London: Routledge, pp. 2036.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Van de Peer, A. and Lefevere, M. (2021), ‘Little doubts everywhere’, Vestoj, 10, pp. 15970.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Warde, A. (2005), ‘Consumption and theories of practice’, Journal of Consumer Culture, Special Issue: ‘On Doubt’, 5:2, pp. 13153.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Warde, A. (2014), ‘After taste: Culture, consumption and theories of practice’, Journal of Consumer Culture, 14:3, pp. 279303.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Woodward, S. (2007), Why Women Wear What They Wear, London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Xu, Y., Chen, Y., Burman, R. and Zhao, H. (2014), ‘Secondhand clothing consumption: A cross-cultural comparison between American and Chinese young consumers’, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38:6, pp. 67077.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00118_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00118_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test