Skip to content
1981
Affiliative Fashion, Relational Analysis and Power
  • ISSN: 2051-7106
  • E-ISSN: 2051-7114

Abstract

This article explores how Disabled people develop social, relational and material structures, a framework I call crip fashion networks, to access clothing and cultivate fashion communities in response to their exclusion from the dominant fashion industry. Drawing on five representative narratives from wardrobe interviews with Disabled men and masculine people, I theorize crip fashion networks as systems where Disabled people collectively build alternative fashion worlds outside of mainstream industry structures. Within these networks, I identify three crip strategies that sustain and animate them: crip exchanges, where Disabled people swap and share clothing; crip hacks, where Disabled people exchange styling and dressing techniques that support their bodyminds; and crip confidence, where Disabled people affirm their fashioned identities through encounters and relationships. By mapping crip fashion networks, I extend past research in fashion studies that has primarily framed the relationship between fashion and disability through the lenses of industry or commodity. Instead, I conceptualize this relationship as a network generated through Disabled people’s everyday acts of creativity and collective care, acts that cultivate disability worlds rather than drive the growth of a capitalist industry.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00133_1
2025-10-24
2026-04-20

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Annett-Hitchcock, K. (2023), The Intersection of Fashion and Disability, London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Barry, B. (2019), ‘Fabulous masculinities: Refashioning the fat and disabled male body’, Fashion Theory, 23:2, pp. 275–307, https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704x.2019.1567064.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Barry, B. and Nesbitt, P. (2023), ‘Designing clothing for and from love’, in R. Filippello and I. Parkins (eds), Fashion and Feeling: The Affective Politics of Dress, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 99–119.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Barry, B., Nesbitt, P. and Strickfaden, M. (2024), ‘Multi-sensory methods: Toward a crip methodology in fashion studies’, International Journal of Fashion Studies, 11:1, pp. 81–109, https://doi.org/10.1386/infs_00104_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2019), ‘Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis’, Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11:4, pp. 589–97, https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2019.1628806.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N. and Terry, G. (2018), ‘Thematic analysis’, in P. Liamputtong (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, New York: Springer, pp. 843–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Buckley, C. and Clark, H. (2012), ‘Conceptualizing fashion in everyday lives’, Design Issues, 28:4, pp. 18–28, https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00172.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Campaign 2000 and Disability Without Poverty (2024), ‘Disability Without Poverty: 2024 Disability Report Card’, Campaign 2000, 3 December, https://campaign2000.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Disability-Poverty-Report-Card-2024-English.pdf. Accessed 17 March 2025.
  9. Chen, M. Y., Kafer, A., Kim, E. and Minich, J. A. (2023), Crip Genealogies, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Dokumaci, A. (2023), Activist Affordances: How Disabled People Improvise More Habitable Worlds, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Foster, J. (2021), ‘Framing disability in fashion’, in R. Brown, M. Maroto and D. Pettinicchio (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 213–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Garland-Thomson, R. (2016), ‘Becoming disabled’, New York Times, 14 April, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/21/opinion/sunday/becoming-disabled.html. Accessed 24 September 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Ginsburg, F. and Rapp, R. (2024), Disability Worlds, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Government of Canada (2023), ‘2SLGBTQI+ action plan survey results: 2SLGBTQI+ communities living with a disability’, Women and Gender Equality Canada, 9 May, https://www.canada.ca/en/women-gender-equality/free-to-be-me/federal-2slgbtqi-plus-action-plan/survey-findings/2slgbtqi-plus-communities-living-disability.html. Accessed 17 March 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hamraie, A. (2017), Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Hamraie, A. (2018), ‘Mapping access: Digital humanities, disability justice, and sociospatial practice’, American Quarterly, 70:3, pp. 455–82, https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2018.0031.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Inckle, K., Brighton, J. and Sparkes, A. C. (2023), ‘Who is “us” in “nothing about us without us?” Rethinking the politics of disability research’, Disability Studies Quarterly, 42:3–4, pp. 1–23, https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v42i3-4.7947.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Kafer, A. (2013), Feminist Queer Crip, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kitchen, R. (2000), ‘The researched opinions on research: Disabled people and disability research’, Disability & Society, 15:1, pp. 25–47, https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590025757.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Klepp, I. G. and Bjerck, M. (2014), ‘A methodological approach to the materiality of clothing: Wardrobe studies’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17:4, pp. 373–86, https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2012.737148.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Klepp, I. G. and Rysst, M. (2017), ‘Deviant bodies and suitable clothes’, Fashion Theory, 21:1, pp. 79–99, https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704X.2016.1138658.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Kulick, D. and Rydström, J. (2015), Loneliness and Its Opposite: Sex, Disability, and the Ethics of Engagement, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Mitchell, D. T. and Snyder, S. L. (2015), The Biopolitics of Disability: Neoliberalism, Ablenationalism, and Peripheral Embodiment, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Piepzna-Samarasinha, L. L. (2018), Care Work: Dreaming Disability Justice, Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Piepzna-Samarasinha, L. L. (2021), ‘How disabled mutual aid is different than abled mutual aid’, Disability Visibility Project, 3 October, https://disabilityvisibilityproject.com/2021/10/03/how-disabled-mutual-aid-is-different-than-abled-mutual-aid/. Accessed 6 September 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Price, M. (2015), ‘The bodymind problem and the possibilities of pain’, Hypatia, 30:1, pp. 268–84, https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12127.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Rana, Md. R. I., McBee-Black, K. and Swazan, I. S. (2024), ‘Adaptive apparel for people with disabilities: A systematic literature review and future research agenda’, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48:3, pp. 1–28, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.13057.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Smilges, J. L. (2023), Crip Negativity, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Spade, D. (2020), Mutual Aid: Building Solidarity during This Crisis (and the Next), London: Verso Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Sweeney, M. (2023), Mendings, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Webb, B. (2023), ‘Is fashion ready for an accessibility overhaul?’, Vogue Business, 29 November, https://www.voguebusiness.com/story/fashion/is-fashion-ready-for-an-accessibility-overhaul. Accessed 4 September 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Wilson, E. (2003), Adorned in Dreams: Fashion and Modernity, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Wong, A. (2020), Disability Visibility: First-Person Stories from the Twenty-First Century, New York: Vintage Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Wright, N. E. (2022), ‘“Functional fashions for the physically handicapped”: Disability and dress in postwar America’, Dress, 48:2, pp. 143–62, https://doi.org/10.1080/03612112.2022.2090724.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00133_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): adaptive fashion; crip theory; disability justice; everyday dress; fashion hacking; mutual aid; neurodiversity; queer and trans fashion

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test