Skip to content
1981
Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2635-1609
  • E-ISSN: 2635-1617

Abstract

Historically the most salient and recurrent context of luxury legislation is the imposition of sumptuary laws. This contextual salience and recurrence is no incidental feature but is embedded in human cultural life, understood as (historically manifest) ways of living, in which luxury consumption, alongside the need to control it, are an inextricable component. The focus is on European legislation from the Romans up to the eighteenth century and charts its evanescence as luxury became de-moralized. Despite contextual differences the laws exhibit three common dimensions, namely, moral, political and economic and this trio establish a motif that runs through the discussion.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ipol_00025_1
2024-06-05
2025-04-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arena, Valentina (2011), ‘Roman sumptuary legislation: Three concepts of liberty’, European Journal of Political Theory, 10:4, pp. 46389.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbon, Nicholas (1903), ‘A discourse on trade [1690]’, in J. Hollander (ed.), Reprint of Economic Tracts, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 543.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg, Elizabeth and Eger, Maxine (2003), ‘The rise and fall of the luxury debates’, in E. Berg and M. Eger (eds), Luxury in the Eighteenth Century, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 727.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bermejo, Saul (2008), ‘Beyond luxury: Sumptuary legislation in 17th-century Castile’, in G. Lottes (ed.), Making, Using and Resisting the Law in European History, Pisa: Pisa University Press, pp. 119.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Berno, Francesca (2023), Roman Luxuria: A Literary and Cultural History, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Berry, Christopher J. (1994), The Idea of Luxury: A Conceptual and Historical Investigation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Berry, Christopher J. (2008), ‘Hume and superfluous value (or the problem with Epictetus’ slippers)’, in C. Wennerlind and M. Schabas (eds), David Hume’s Political Economy, London: Routledge, pp. 4064.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Berry, Christopher J. (2020), ‘Out of the coffee house or how political economy pretended to be a science from Monchrétien to Steuart’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 37:1, pp. 1029.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Blunt, P. A. (1988), The Fall of the Roman Republic, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, Peter (1989), The Body and Society: Men, Women and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity, London: Faber and Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cicero (1913), De Officiis (trans. W. Miller), London: Loeb Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Clunas, Craig ([1991] 2004), Superfluous Things: Material Culture and Social Status in Early Modern China, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dauster, Molly (2003), ‘Roman republican sumptuary legislation 182–102’, in C. Deroux (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, vol. XI, Brussels: Editions Latomus, pp.6593.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Edwards, Catherine (1993), The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Eisenbart, Liselotte (1962), Kleiderordnungen der deutschen Städte zwischen 1350–1700, Göttingen: Musterschmidt.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fénelon, François (1962), Les Aventures de Télémaque (1699) (ed. J. Goré), Florence: Sansoni.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Galliani, Renato (1989), Rousseau, Le luxe et l’ideologie nobiliaire, Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Goody, Jack (1993), The Culture of Flowers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gruen, Erich (1993), Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome, London: Duckworth.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Harte, Negley (1976), ‘State control of dress and social change in pre-industrial England’, in D. C. Coleman and A. H. John (eds), Trade, Government and Economy in Pre-Industrial England, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, pp. 13265.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hayward, Maria (2009), Rich Apparel: Clothing and the Law in Henry VIII’s England, Farnham: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hont, Istvan (2016), ‘The early enlightenment debate on commerce and luxury’, in M. Goldie and R. Wokler (eds), The Cambridge History of Eighteenth Century Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 379418.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hughes, Diane (1983), ‘Sumptuary laws and social relations in Renaissance Italy’, in J. Bossy (ed.), Disputes and Settlements, Law and Human Relations in the West, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 6999.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hume, David (1894), History of England (1754–62), vol. 3, London: George Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hume, David ([1739–40] 1978), A Treatise of Human Nature (eds L. A. Selby-Bigge and P. H. Nidditch), Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hume, David ([1760] 1987), ‘Of refinement in the arts’ [1752 title ‘Of luxury’], in E. Miller (ed.), Essays Moral, Political and Literary, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics, pp. 26880.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hunt, Alan (1996), Governance of the Consuming Passions: A History of Sumptuary Law, London: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hurlock, Elizabeth (1965), ‘Sumptuary law’, in M. Roach and J. Eicher (eds), Dress, Adornment and Social Order, New York: Wiley, pp. 295301.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kovesi Killerby, Catherine (2002), Sumptuary Law in Italy 1200–1500, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Livy (1919), History of Rome (Ab Urbe Condita) (trans. E. Sage), London: Loeb Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Machiavelli, Niccolo ([1532] 1983), Discorsi sopra la Prima Deca di Tito Livio (ed. C. Vivanti), Torino: Einaudi.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mackenzie, George ([1711] 1716), ‘The moral history of frugality’, in J. Watson (ed.), Works, vol. 1, Edinburgh, pp. 14165.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Malynes, Gerald de (1622), Lex Mercatoria, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mandeville, Bernard (1988), Fable of the Bees (ed. F. B. Kaye), vols 2, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Misselden, Edward (1623), The Circle of Commerce, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Montaigne, Michael ([1685] 1700), ‘Of sumptuary laws’, in The Essays (trans. C. Cotton), London: Ward Lock, pp. 18384.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Mun, Thomas (1664), England’s Treasure by Forraign Trade. Rpt. in McCulloch, J. R. (ed.) (1954), Early English Tracts in Commerce, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Muzzarelli, Maria (2009), ‘Reconciling the privilege of the few with the common good: Sumptuary laws in medieval and early modern Europe, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 39:3, pp. 587617.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Muzzarelli, Maria and Campanini, Antonella (eds) (2003), Disciplinare il Lusso: La Legislazione Suntuaria Italiana, Rome: Carocci.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. North, Dudley ([1691] 1952), ‘Discourse on trade’, in J. McCulloch (ed.), Early English Tracts on Commerce, Cambridge: Economic History Society Reprint, pp. 51536.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Pajur, Astrid (2017), ‘The fabric of a corporate society: Sumptuary law, social order and propriety in early modern Tallinn’, in J. Ilmakunnas and J. Stobart (eds), A Taste for Luxury in Early Modern Europe, London: Bloomsbury, pp. 2138.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Petronius (1930), Satyricon, London: Loeb Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Reynell, Carew (1685), A Necessary Companion or the English Interest Discovered and Promoted, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Riello, Georgio and Rublack, Ulinka (eds) (2019), The Right to Dress: Sumptuary Laws in Global Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Roche, Daniel (1989), La Culture des Apparences, Paris: Fayard.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Rublack Ulinka (2010), Dressing Up: Cultural Identity in Renaissance Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Sallust (1931), De Coniuratione Catilinae (ed. W. Summers), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Seneca (1917), Epistulae Morales (trans. R. Gummere), London: Loeb Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Shaw, Frances (1979), ‘Sumptuary legislation in Scotland’, Juridical Review, 24, pp. 81115.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Shively, Donald H. (1964–65), ‘Sumptuary legislation and status in early Tokugawa Japan’, Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 25, pp. 12364.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Smith, Adam ([1776] 1981), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (eds R. Campbell and A. Skinner), Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. St. Lambert, Jean-François (1765), ‘Luxe’, in D. Diderot (ed.), Encyclopédie, vol. 9, Paris: Briasson, pp. 76370.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Stuard, Susan (2006), Gilding the Market: Luxury and Fashion in Fourteenth-Century Italy, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Tertullian (1954), ‘De Cultu Feminarum’, in Opera, Pt.I, Turnhout: Brepols.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Trentmann, Frank (2016), Empire of Things, London: Allen Lane.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Vigletti, Cristiano (2020), ‘“Frugality”, economy and society in archaic Rome’, in I. Gildenhard and C. Vigletti (eds), Roman Frugality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 12758.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Voltaire, François-Marie ([1736] 1909), Le Mondain (ed. A. Morizé), Paris: Didier.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew (2008), Rome’s Cultural Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Welch, Evelyn (2005), Shopping in the Renaissance, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Zanda, Emanuelle (2013), Fighting Hydra-Like Luxury: Sumptuary Regulation in the Roman Republic, London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ipol_00025_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): desire; history; law; trade; virtue; women
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test