Skip to content
1981
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2635-1609
  • E-ISSN: 2635-1617

Abstract

This article explores the emerging intersection of synthetic biology and luxury fashion, examining how living, responsive materials could transform our relationship with clothing and accessories. Through speculative design methodologies, the author presents three distinct scenarios for biosynthetic luxury: Living Second Skin, Symbiotic Brand Integration and Regenerative Circular Luxury. Drawing on archaeological evidence of humanity’s ancient co-evolutionary relationship with clothing and contemporary advances in bioengineering, the article analyses the philosophical, ethical and economic implications of this paradigm shift. The investigation reveals a fundamental ‘biosynthetic luxury paradox’ where living products simultaneously reinforce luxury’s promise of distinction while subverting traditional notions of ownership and permanence. Critical examination of human autonomy, environmental risk and moral consideration for engineered organisms illuminates the complex challenges accompanying these technological possibilities. The work contributes to emerging discourses on xenobiology, speculative design and sustainable luxury by analysing how ancient human–garment relationships might be reconceptualized through cutting-edge biotechnology while navigating unprecedented ethical territories.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ipol_00042_1
2025-11-14
2026-04-16

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bleecker, J. (2009), Design Fiction: A Short Essay on Design, Science, Fact and Fiction, Los Angeles, CA: Near Future Laboratory.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Budisa, N., Kubyshkin, V. and Schmidt, M. (2020), ‘Xenobiology: A journey towards parallel life forms’, ChemBioChem, 21:16, pp. 2228–31, https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202000141.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Callewaert, C., Knödlseder, N., Karoglan, A., Güell, M. and Paetzold, B. (2021), ‘Skin microbiome transplantation and manipulation: Current state of the art’, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 19, pp. 624–31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.01.001.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. D’Itria, E. and Colombi, C. (2022), ‘Biobased innovation as a fashion and textile design must: A European perspective’, Sustainability, 14:1, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010570.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Donaldson, S. and Kymlicka, W. (2011), Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Dunne, A. and Raby, F. (2013), Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Fromm, E. (1976), To Have or To Be?, New York: Harper & Row.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Gilligan, I., d’Errico, F., Doyon, L., Wang, W. and Kuzmin, Y. V. (2024), ‘Paleolithic eyed needles and the evolution of dress’, Science Advances, 10:26, pp. 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adp2887.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Haraway, D. J. (2016), Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaebnick, G. E. (2009), ‘Should moral objections to synthetic biology affect public policy?’, Nature Biotechnology, 27:12, pp. 1106–08, https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1209-1106.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Lyrhem, C. (2024), Regenerate the Economic Machine, Stockholm: Sircular, https://webapp.sebgroup.com/mb/mblib.nsf/alldocsbyunid/2F019DDF02AF7080C1258A690031A22B/$FILE/Regenerate_the_Economic_Machine.pdf. Accessed 22 January 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Mundell, I. (2022), ‘Fashion industry collaboration to create lab-grown fur’, Imperial College London, 25 July, https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/238531/fashion-industry-collaboration-createlab-grown/. Accessed 22 January 2025.
  13. Nguyen, P. Q., Dorval Courchesne, N.-M., Duraj-Thatte, A., Praveschotinunt, P. and Joshi, N. S. (2018), ‘Engineered living materials: Prospects and challenges for using biological systems to direct the assembly of smart materials’, Advanced Materials, 30:19, p. e1704847, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201704847.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Pedroso-Roussado, C. (2023), ‘The fashion industry needs microbiology: Opportunities and challenges’, mSphere, 8:2, https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00681-22.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Pine, B. J. and Gilmore, J. H. (1999), The Experience Economy: Work Is Theater & Every Business a Stage, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Sandel, M. J. (2012), What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Schmidt, M. and Budisa, N. (2018), ‘Alternative biofacts: Life as we don’t (yet) know it’, in E. Berger, K. Maki-Reinikka, K. O’Reilly and M. Bello (eds), Art as We Don't Know It, Espoo: Aalto ARTS Books, pp. 20–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Scott, J. (2023), ‘Living textiles’, Research Directions: Biotechnology Design, 1:e6, pp. 1–2, https://doi.org/10.1017/btd.2022.7.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Veblen, T. (1899), The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions, New York: Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Yusoff, K. (2018), A Billion Black Anthropocenes or None, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Gilligan, I. (2023), ‘When did clothing originate?’, Smithsonian Magazine, 25 April, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/when-did-clothing-originate-180982030/. Accessed 20 January 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Taylor, P. W. (1986), Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ipol_00042_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): aesthetic transgression; bioethics; biosynthetic luxury paradox; future luxury economics; human–organism symbiosis; material culture evolution; speculative design; synthetic biology

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test