Skip to content
1981
Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1757-2681
  • E-ISSN: 1757-269X

Abstract

As media enterprises steer a path through unprecedented economic upheaval, many are looking to consolidation as a means of achieving economies of scale that would, they argue, shore up their investment in journalism. There is therefore growing pressure on policy-makers to relax traditional ownership rules preventing undue concentration of media conglomerates. This poses a challenge to critical scholars traditionally opposed to such relaxation on the grounds of promoting pluralism and diversity in a democracy. This article argues that, rather than risk the rapid emasculation of original journalism, we should be thinking more creatively about how the public interest and journalistic diversity might be protected a policy of consolidation. Drawing on recent legislative initiatives in the United Kingdom, it proposes two possible approaches: first, inserting into merger legislation detailed public interest provisions rooted in normative values of professional journalism; and second, on the basis of clear evidence that ownership structures influence content, fostering different forms of ownership that move beyond the traditional privatepublic dichotomy to exploit online and not-for-profit opportunities.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/iscc.1.2.217_1
2010-12-01
2026-04-21

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/iscc.1.2.217_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test