Stitching together: Ethical dimensions and innovative approaches to participatory textile making

References

1. Clarke, N. A.. ( 2020;), ‘ Exploring the role of sewing as a leisure activity for those aged 40 years and under. ’, TEXTILE, 18:2, pp. 118–44.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Corkhill, B.,, Hemmings, J.,, Maddock, A., and Riley, J.. ( 2014;), ‘ Knitting and well-being. ’, TEXTILE, 12:1, pp. 34–57.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Dupre, F.. ( 2008;), ‘ Making stuff. ’, in L. Gibson. (ed.), Dialogue, London:: Axis;, http://axiswebmedia.blob.core.windows.net/www/usermedia/103684/work/204094/vvwxlsvouqgj46xenikhw.pdf. Accessed 16 September 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Freeman, J.. ( 1997;), ‘ Revering things or cherishing people: Some professional and popular approaches to constructing craft communities. ’, in T. Harrod. (ed.), Obscure Objects of Desire: Reviewing the Crafts in the Twentieth Century, University of East Anglia, 10–12 January, London:: Crafts Council;, pp. 267–74.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Goodson, L., and Phillimore, J.. (eds) ( 2012), Community Research for Participation: From Theory to Method, Bristol:: Policy Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Hackney, F.,, Maughan, H., and Desmarais, S.. ( 2016;), ‘ The power of quiet: Re-making affective amateur and professional textiles agencies. ’, Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice, 4:1, pp. 33–62.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hamalainen, M., and Karjalainen, J.. ( 2017;), ‘ Social manufacturing: When the maker movement meets interfirm production networks. ’, Business Horizons, 60:6, pp. 795–805.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Harrison, K., and Ogden, C. A.. ( 2020;), ‘ “Knit ‘n’ natter”: A feminist methodological assessment of using creative “women’s work” in focus groups. ’, Qualitative Research, 31 July, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1468794120945133. Accessed 12 October 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Kara, H.. ( 2018), Research Ethics in the Real World, Bristol:: Policy Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Kettley, S.,, Sadkowska, A., and Lucas, R.. ( 2016;), ‘ Tangibility in e-textile participatory service design with mental health participants. ’, in P. Lloyd, and E. Bohemia. (eds), Proceedings of DRS2016: Design + Research + Society - Future-Focused Thinking, Vol. 2, Brighton:: University of Brighton;, 27–30 June, pp. 3121–32, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/55ca3eafe4b05bb65abd54ff/t/5752cfa08a65e246000b79e8/1465044897471/488+Kettley.pdf. Accessed 16 September 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Lindström, K., and Ståhl, A.. ( 2010;), ‘ Threads – a mobile sewing circle: Making private matters public in temporary assemblies. ’, in T. Robertson,, K. Bødker,, T. Bratteteig, and D. Loi. (eds), PDC’10, Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, Sydney, Australia, November, New York, NY:: Association for Computing Machinery;, pp. 121–30.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Nickell, K.. ( 2015;), ‘ “Troubles textiles”: Textile responses to the conflict in Northern Ireland. ’, TEXTILE, 13:3, pp. 234–51.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Pajaczkowska, C.. ( 2005;), ‘ On stuff and nonsense: The complexity of cloth. ’, TEXTILE, 3:3, pp. 220–49.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Shercliff, E., and Twigger Holroyd, A.. ( 2016;), ‘ Making with others: Working with textile craft groups as a means of research. ’, Studies in Material Thinking, 14, https://www.materialthinking.org/sites/default/files/papers/0176_SMT_V14_P07_FA.pdf. Accessed 16 September 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Shercliff, E., and Twigger Holroyd, A.. ( 2020;), ‘ Stitching Together: Participatory textile making as an emerging methodological approach to research. ’, Journal of Arts & Communities, 10:1&2, pp. 5–18.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Shercliff, Emma, and Twigger Holroyd, Amy. ( 2020;), ‘ Stitching together: Ethical dimensions and innovative approaches to participatory textile making. ’, Journal of Arts & Communities, 11:1&2, pp. 3–11, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jaac_00011_1
    [Google Scholar]