Making HUGs: Crafting well-being benefits through social manufacturing | Intellect Skip to content
1981
‘Stitching Together’ Part Two
  • ISSN: 1757-1936
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1944

Abstract

New approaches to manufacturing that engage groups of individuals in collaborative making have the potential not only to generate economic benefit, but also to enhance the well-being of those involved. This article describes a small investigation into the well-being benefits expressed by a group of women who participated in a textile-based social manufacturing project in their local community. Outcomes include a small run of textile products and delivery of training for participants in small batch textile production. The purpose of the project – to manufacture a small batch of soft textile objects to be used in dementia care – is described. A small study is presented that utilizes data collected during this project. It evidences how social manufacturing can extend creative and social skills of participants, build resilience and enhance well-being. The participants in the study include a ‘self-reliant group’ of aspiring entrepreneurs from an economically deprived community and a university team comprising researchers, industry specialists and textile experts. Grounded practical theory and qualitative research methods inform the study. Data gathered using semi-structured video-recorded interviews and simple questionnaires is presented. Findings reveal individual and community benefits to participants from engaging in the project, including self-reported improvements in mental health and increased confidence. The study also reveals ways in which social manufacturing has the potential to build community cohesion and reduce social isolation. This work contributes to research concerning new types of sustainable manufacturing models. It presents an alternative to industrial manufacturing within socially disadvantaged communities and reveals ways in which social manufacturing has the potential to enhance individual and community well-being.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Welsh Government SMARTExpertise European Regional Development (Award 2018/COL/012/80839)
  • Arts and Humanities Research Council (Award AH/M005607/1)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jaac_00013_1
2020-12-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aked, J.,, Marks, N.,, Corrina, C., and Thompson, S.. ( 2008), Five Ways to Wellbeing: The Evidence, New Economics Foundation (NEF);, https://neweconomics.org/uploads/files/8984c5089d5c2285ee_t4m6bhqq5.pdf. Accessed 25 September 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, C.. ( 2013), Makers: The New Industrial Revolution, New York:: Random House Business;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Braun, V., and Clarke, V.. ( 2006;), ‘ Using thematic analysis in psychology. ’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3:2, pp. 77101.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Craig, R., and Tracey, K.. ( 2014;), ‘ Building grounded practical theory in applied communication research: Introduction to the special issue. ’, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42:3, pp. 22943.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dewey, J.. ( 1938), Experience and Education, New York:: Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hamalainen, M., and Karjalainen, J.. ( 2017;), ‘ Social manufacturing: When the maker movement meets interfirm production networks. ’, Business Horizons, 60:6, pp. 795805.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hatch, M.. ( 2017), The Maker Revolution: Building a Future on Creativity and Innovation in an Exponential World, Hoboken, NJ:: Wiley;.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kenning, G., and Treadaway, C.. ( 2017;), ‘ Conversations at the edge of play. ’, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 31:4, pp. 113.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kuznetsov, S., and Paulos, E.. ( 2010;), ‘ Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures. ’, in NordiCHI ’10 Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, Reykjavik, 16–20 October, New York, NY:: Association for Computing Machinery;, pp. 295304.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. National Assembly for Wales ( 2014;), ‘ Welsh index of multiple deprivation (WIMD) 2014. ’, 12 August, https://2014.wimd.gov.wales/. Accessed 23 November 2020.
  11. Pöllänen, H. S.. ( 2015;), ‘ Crafts as leisure-based coping: Craft makers’ descriptions of their stress-reducing activity. ’, Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 31:2, pp. 83100.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Purple Shoots ( 2019;), ‘ Home page. ’, Purple Shoots , http://www.purpleshoots.org/. Accessed 25 September 2019.
  13. Seligman, M. E. P., and Csikszentmihalyi, M.. ( 2000;), ‘ Positive psychology: An introduction. ’, American Psychologist, 55:1, pp. 514.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Taylor, N.,, Hurley, U., and Connolly, P.. ( 2016;), ‘ Making community: The wider role of makerspaces in public life. ’, in CHI’16 Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, 7–12 May, New York, NY:: Association for Computing Machinery;, pp. 141525.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Treadaway, C.. ( 2007;), ‘ Using empathy to research creativity: Collaborative investigations into distributed digital textile art and design practice. ’, in Creativity and Cognition Conference Proceedings, Washington, DC, 13–15 June, New York:: ACM;, pp. 6374.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Treadaway, C.. ( 2018;), ‘ LAUGH improves wellbeing, happiness and quality of life of people living with advanced dementia. ’, Research Features, 31 January, 122, https://researchfeatures.com/laugh-improves-wellbeing-happiness-advanced-dementia/. Accessed 24 November 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wellbeing of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015 ( 2015;), Section 4. , pp. 78, https://futuregenerations.wales/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/WFGAct-English.pdf. Accessed 25 September 2019.
  18. Yin, R.. ( 2013), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage;.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Taylor, Aidan,, Treadaway, Cathy,, Fennell, Jac, and Davies, Menai Sian. ( 2020;), ‘ Making HUGs: Crafting well-being benefits through social manufacturing. ’, Journal of Arts & Communities, 11:1&2, pp. 3549, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jaac_00013_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jaac_00013_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jaac_00013_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): community; craft; making; social manufacturing; textiles; well-being
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error