Love at first touch: A collaborative approach to tactile art explorations

References

1. Candlin, Fiona (2006), ‘The dubious inheritance of touch: Art history and museum access’, Journal of Visual Culture, 5:2, pp. 137–54.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Candlin, Fiona (2007), ‘Don’t touch! Hands off! Art, blindness and the conservation of expertise’, in E. Pye (ed.), The Power of Touch: Handling Objects in Museum and Heritage Context, London: Routledge, pp. 89–106.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Candlin, Fiona (2010), Art, Museums, and Touch, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Candlin, Fiona (2017), ‘Rehabilitating unauthorised touch or why museum visitors touch the exhibits’, The Senses and Society, 12:3, pp. 251–66.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cavazos Quero, Luis, Iranzo Bartolomé, Jorge and Cho, Jundong (2021), ‘Accessible visual artworks for blind and visually impaired people: Comparing a multimodal approach with tactile graphics’, Electronics, 10:3, https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10030297.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Christidou, Dimitra and Pierroux, Palmyre (2018), ‘Art, touch and meaning making: An analysis of multisensory interpretation in the museum’, Museum Management and Curatorship, 34:1, pp. 96–115.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Classen, Constance (2005), ‘Touch in the museum’, in C. Classen (ed.), The Book of Touch, London: Routledge, pp. 275–85.
   [Google Scholar]
8. d’Evie, Fayen and Kleege, Georgina (2018), ‘The gravity, the levity: Let us speak of tactile encounters’, Disability Studies Quarterly, 38:3, https://dsq-sds.org/index.php/dsq/article/view/6483/5090. Accessed 9 May 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Eardley, Alison, Mineiro, Clara, Neves, Joselia and Ride, Peter (2016), ‘Redefining access: Embracing multimodality, memorability and shared experience in museums’, The Museum Journal, 59:3, pp. 263–86.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Eardley, Alison, Thompson, Hannah, Fineman, Anna, Hutchinson, Rachel, Bywood, Lindsay and Cock, Matthew (2022), ‘Devisualizing the museum: From access to inclusion’, Journal of Museum Education, 47:2, pp. 150–65.
    [Google Scholar]
11. García Vizcaíno, María José (2024a), ‘Sharing access in art museums: From tactile “images” to tactile “experiences”’, II Congreso Internacional Traducción y Sostenibilidad Cultural: Retos y Nuevos Escenarios, Salamanca, 17–19 April.
    [Google Scholar]
12. García Vizcaíno, María José (2024b), ‘Experiencias con tacto en el arte de la escultura: De la descripción auditiva a la descripción háptica’, I Congreso Internacional sobre ‘Accesibilidad Audiovisual e Inclusión en el Ámbito Universitario’, Verona, 13–14 June.
    [Google Scholar]
13. García Vizcaíno, María José (2024c), ‘Access for the blind in the art setting: Tactile paintings as touching experiences?’, Museum Management and Curatorship, 1:15, https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2024.2408243.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hayes, Lauren and Rajko, Jessica (2017), ‘Towards an aesthetic of touch’, MOCO ’17: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing, London, UK, 28–30 June, New York: ACM Press, https://doi.org/10.1145/3077981.3078028.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Jay, Martin (1988), ‘The rise of hermeneutics and the crisis of ocularcentrism’, Poetics Today, 9:2, pp. 307–26.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kleege, Georgina (2021), ‘The art of touch: Lending a hand to the sighted majority’, Journal of Visual Culture, 20:2, pp. 433–51.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kleege, Georgina (2022a), ‘What’s it to you? Subjectivity and audio description’, lecture delivered at Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ, 24 February.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kleege, Georgina (2022b), ‘Touch tours for all!’, Tate Etc., 8 September, https://www.tate.org.uk/tate-etc/issue-56-autumn-2022/touch-tours-for-all. Accessed 9 May 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kleege, Georgina (2023), ‘Nydia, the Blind Flower Girl of Pompeii’, Perspectives, 10 July, https://www.metmuseum.org/perspectives/nydia-blind-flower-girl-pompeii. Accessed 9 May 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Mingus, Mia (2011), ‘Access intimacy: The missing link’, Leaving Evidence, 5 May, https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2011/05/05/access-intimacy-the-missing-link/. Accessed 9 May 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mingus, Mia (2017), ‘Access intimacy, interdependence and disability justice’, Leaving Evidence, 12 April, https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2017/04/12/access-intimacy-interdependence-and-disability-justice/. Accessed 9 May 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Neves, Joselia (2016), ‘Enriched descriptive guides a case for collaborative meaning-making in museums’, Cultus, 9:2, pp. 137–53.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Perttunen, Marketta (2003), ‘The tactile perception of art: A research project of the Art Education Department, JyVäskylä University, Finland’, in E. Salzhauer Axel and N. Sobol Levent (eds), Art Beyond Sight: A Resource Guide to Art, Creativity, and Visual Impairment, New York: AFB Press, pp. 209–13.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Reviers, Nina and Hanoulle, Sabien (2023), ‘Aesthetics and participation in accessible art experiences: Reflections on an action research project of an audio guide’, Journal of Audiovisual Translation, 6:2, pp. 99–121, https://doi.org/10.47476/jat.v6i2.2023.277.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Romero Fresco, Pablo (2024), ‘Access intimacy in media accessibility: The audio description of Where Memory Ends’, Journal of Audiovisual Translation, 7:2, http://dx.doi.org/10.47476/jat.v7i2.2024.299.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Romero Fresco, Pablo and Dangerfield, Kate (2022), ‘Accessibility as a conversation’, Journal of Audiovisual Translation, 5:2, pp. 15–34.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Sheets, Hilarie (2023), ‘Her guide dog inspired her art. Now the Lab stars in a museum show’, New York Times, 5 December, https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/05/arts/design/emilie-gossiaux-blind-queens-museum.html. Accessed 9 May 2024.
    [Google Scholar]