‘Stories of Access’: Tangled Art + Disability and cultural accessibility in action

References

1. Acton, Kelsie and Hamraie, Aimi (2022), ‘Life at a distance: Archiving disability cultures of remote participation’, Just Tech, 28 June, https://just-tech.ssrc.org/articles/life-at-a-distance-archiving-disability-cultures-of-remote-participation/. Accessed 15 October 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Benente, Michela and Minucciani, Valeria (2019), ‘Cultural accessibility as a multidimensional condition for a real sharing of cultural heritage’, World Heritage and Legacy: Culture, Creativity, Contamination: Proceedings of the XVII International Forum of Studies ‘Le Vie dei Mercanti’, Naples, Italy, 6–8 June, Rome: Gangemi Editore spa International, pp. 522–29.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Berne, Patty (2015), ‘Disability justice – a working draft’, Sins Invalid, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5bed3674f8370ad8c02efd9a/t/6329eb83b478e84b6a2502ba/1663691651875/Patty_Berne_DJ-Working-Draft.docx.pdf Accessed 15 April 2024.
4. Bernstein, Jay H. (2015), ‘Transdisciplinarity: A review of its origins, development, and current issues’, Journal of Research Practice, 11:1, https://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/510.html. Accessed 3 May 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cachia, Amanda (2013), ‘Disabling the museum: Curator as infrastructural activist’, Journal of Visual Art Practice, 12:3, pp. 257–89.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Campitiello, Lucia, Caldarelli, Aldo, Schiavo, Fabrizio, Marras, Arianna and Di Tore, Stefano (2023), ‘Augmented reality to promote cultural accessibility’, Journal of Inclusive Methodology and Technology in Learning and Teaching, 3:2, https://inclusiveteaching.it/index.php/inclusiveteaching/article/view/98/97. Accessed 15 April 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chandler, Eliza (2013), ‘Mapping difference: Critical connections between crip and diaspora communities’, Critical Disability Discourses, 5, pp. 39–65, https://cdd.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/cdd/article/view/37455. Accessed 18 August 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chandler, Eliza, East, Lisa, Rice, Carla and El Kadi, Rana (2023), ‘Misfits in the world: Culture shifting through crip cultural practics’, Revista Mundaú, 13, pp. 26–46, https://doi.org/10.28998/rm.2023.13.14022.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chandler, Eliza, Rice, Carla, Lee, Sean and Ferguson, Max (2022), ‘Curating together: A tangled, intergenerational, interdependent community of practice’, in A. Cachia (ed.), Curating Access: Disability Art Activism and Creative Accommodation, London: Routledge, pp. 206–18.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chen, Mel Y., Kafer, Alison, Kim, Eunjung, and Avril Minich, Julie (eds) (2023), Crip Genealogies, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. #CripRitual (2022), With, Tangled Art Gallery, Toronto, 21 January–1 April, https://cripritual.com/with/. Accessed 15 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dion Fletcher, Vanessa (2019), ‘About the “own your cervix” exhibit’, Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 8:1, pp. 164–69.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dion Fletcher, Vanessa and Ferguson, Max (2021), ‘Finding language: A word scavenger hunt (dispatch)’, Studies in Social Justice, 15:2, pp. 180–83.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ellcessor, Elizabeth (2016), Restricted Access: Media, Disability, and the Politics of Participation, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Goodley, Dan, Lawthom, Rebecca and Runswick Cole, Katherine (2014), ‘Posthuman disability studies’, Subjectivity, 7:4, pp. 342–61.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hamraie, Aimi (2017), Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hamraie, Aimi and Fritsch, Kelly (2019), ‘Crip technoscience manifesto’, Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 5:1, pp. 1–34, https://catalystjournal.org/index.php/catalyst/article/view/29607/24771. Accessed 15 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Ineese-Nash, Nicole (2020), ‘Disability as a colonial construct: The missing discourse of culture in conceptualizations of disabled indigenous children’, Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 9:3, pp. 28–51.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jaarsma, Ada S. (2020), ‘Critical disability studies and the problem of method’, in C. Taylor, J. Ulmer and C. Hughes (eds), Transdisciplinary Feminist Research: Innovations in Theory, Method and Practice, New York: Routledge, pp. 16–28.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Johnson, Megan A. (2022), ‘Infrastructural dramaturgy and the politics of disability art and performance’, Ph.D. thesis, Toronto: York University.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Johnson, Megan A., Chandler, Eliza and Rice, Carla (2024), ‘Resisting normality with cultural accessibility and slow technology’, Leonardo, 57:2, pp. 215–20.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kafai, Shayda (2016), ‘Creating community: Sins Invalid’s birthing, dying, becoming crip wisdom’, TheatreForum, 50, pp. 11–12.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kafer, Alison (2021), ‘After crip, crip afters’, South Atlantic Quarterly, 120:2, pp. 415–34.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kovačić, Sanja, Pivac, Tatjana, Solarević, Milica, Blešić, Ivana, Cimbaljević, Marija, Vujičić, Miroslav, Stankov, Ugljesa, Besermenji, Snežana and Ćurčić, Nevana (2024), ‘Let us hear the voice of the audience: Groups facing the risk of cultural exclusion and cultural accessibility in Vojvodina province, Serbia’, Universal Access in the Information Society, 23:4, pp. 1595–611.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Laaksonen, Annamari (2010), Making Culture Accessible: Access, Participation in Cultural Life and Cultural Provision in the Context of Cultural Rights in Europe, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
26. LaMarre, Andrea, Rice, Carla and Besse, Kayla (2020), Relaxed Performance Report Highlights: Exploring Accessibility in the Canadian Theatre Landscape, Guelph: British Council, https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/ca21be07-386a-4dad-947f-ee64cdfc8d2e/content. Accessed 3 May 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lazard, Carolyn (2019), Accessibility in the Arts: A Promise and a Practice, New York: Recess, https://promiseandpractice.art. Accessed 1 September 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
28. McRuer, Robert (2006), Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Mingus, Mia (2011), ‘Changing the framework: Disability justice’, Leaving Evidence, 12 February, https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/changing-the-framework-disability-justice/. Accessed 15 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Nicolescu, Basarab (2014), ‘Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity: Similarities and differences’, RCC Perspectives, 2, pp. 19–26.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Nicolescu, Basarb, Morin, Edgar and de Freitas, Lima (1994), ‘The charter of transdisciplinarity’, CIRET, 2–6 November, https://ciret-transdisciplinarity.org/chart.php. Accessed 1 August 2024.
32. Papalia, Carmen (2018), ‘An accessibility manifesto for the arts’, Canadian Art, 2 January, https://canadianart.ca/essays/access-revived. Accessed 29 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Papalia, Carmen (2022), ‘Open access: Accessibility as a temporary, collectively held space’, in A. Cachia (ed.), Curating Access: Disability Art Activism and Creative Accommodation, London: Routledge, pp. 267–77.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Piepzna-Samarasinha, Leah L. (2022), The Future Is Disabled: Prophecies, Love Notes and Mourning Songs, Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Pirrone, Maria, Centorrino, Marco, Galletta, Antonino, Sicari, Christian and Villari, Massimo (2023), ‘Digital humanities and disability: A systematic literature review of cultural accessibility for people with disability’, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 38:1, pp. 313–29.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Powell, Annette H. (2007), ‘Access(ing), habits, attitudes, and engagements: Re-thinking access as practice’, Computers and Composition, 24:1, pp. 16–35.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Rigolot, Cyrille (2020), ‘Transdisciplinarity as a discipline and a way of being: Complementarities and creative tensions’, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7:1, pp. 13–16, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00598-5.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Tatic, Damjan (2015), Access for People with Disabilities to Culture, Tourism, Sports and Leisure Activities: Towards Meaningful and Enriching Participation, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Tangled Art + Disability (n.d.), ‘About us’, https://tangledarts.org/about-us/. Accessed 29 April 2024.
40. Thomas, Aislinn (2021), Ongoing, collective effort, installation, https://aislinnthomas.ca/index.php/portfolio/ongoing-collective-effort/. Accessed 13 May 2024.
41. Touretteshero (2016), ‘Relaxed performances – The FAQs’, Touretteshero, 16 March, https://www.touretteshero.com/2016/03/16/relaxed-performances-the-faqs/. Accessed 3 May 2024.
42. Undeliverable (2021), Robert McLaughlin Gallery, Oshawa, 18 September 2021–13 February 2022, https://rmg.on.ca/exhibitions/undeliverable/. Accessed 13 May 2024.
43. Williamson, Bess (2019), Accessible America: A History of Disability and Design, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Critical Design Lab (n.d.), ‘The remote access archive’, Critical Design Lab, https://www.mapping-access.com/the-remote-access-archive. Accessed 17 May 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Hartblay, Cassandra, Hamraie, Aimi and Moesch, Jarah (2023), ‘About the exhibition’, CripRitual, https://cripritual.com/about-the-exhibition/. Accessed 15 April 2024.
46. Kafer, Alison (2021), ‘After crip, crip afters’, South Atlantic Quarterly, 120:2, pp. 415–34.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Morris, Lauren (2023), ‘Forward’, Access Anthology: Reflections on Disability Arts and Culture, 5 July, https://tangledarts.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Access-Anthology-July-5-2023-screedn-reader-friendly-RGB.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Williamson, Bess (2019), Accessible America: A History of Disability and Design, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]