Skip to content
1981
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2040-2457
  • E-ISSN: 2040-2465

Abstract

Arts therapy interventions within health care produce positive outcomes for patients, staff and carers, though little rigorous evaluation of these activities is conducted using clinically accepted measures. Similarly, heritage-specific therapeutic interventions offer comparable potential to increase well-being. Although museums and galleries have significant capacity to contribute to health and social care, widespread implementation is impeded by lack of robust clinical data quantifying the impact of such interventions. Measurement scales for psychological well-being, quality of life and health status were reviewed for their suitability to evaluate well-being in hospital patients before and after 30-minute museum object handling sessions. Measures were short-listed using selection criteria of internal and external validity, practicality and sensitivity. Focus on usage in health care, breadth of application, ease of administration and degree of responsiveness informed the choice of optimum measures for preliminary research with female oncology patients (n=40). Findings indicated effectiveness of selected measures (Positive Affect Negative Affect Scale; PANAS and Visual Analogue Scale; VAS) for heritage-specific interventions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jaah.2.1.37_1
2011-04-08
2026-04-15

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jaah.2.1.37_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): health care; intervention; museum object; oncology; therapy; well-being
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test