Valuing response art and its application in mixed methods research inquiry

References

1. Akter, Shahinoor, Rich, Jane L., Davies, Kate and Inder, Kerry J. (2022), ‘Reflexivity conducting mixed methods research on Indigenous women’s health in lower and middle-income countries: An example from Bangladesh’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, pp. 1–9, http://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221107514.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Allen, Patricia (1992), ‘Artist-in-residence: An alternative to “clinification” for art therapists’, Art Therapy, 9:1, pp. 22–29, http://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.1992.10758933.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Allen, Patricia (1995), Art is a Way of Knowing, New York: Shambhala.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Archibald, Mandy (2022), ‘Interweaving arts-based, qualitative and mixed methods research: Showcasing integration and knowledge translation through material and narrative reflection’, International Review of Qualitative Research, 15:2, pp. 168–98, http://doi.org/10.1177/19408447221097063.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Archibald, Mandy and Gerber, Nancy (2018), ‘Arts and mixed methods research: An innovative methodological merger’, American Behavioral Scientist, 62:7, pp. 956–77, https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218772672.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Aultman, Julie M. (2020), Utilizing a Concurrent Nested Design for Strengthening Mixed Methods Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, http://doi.org/10.4135/9781529715859.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bailey-Rodriguez, Deborah (2021), ‘Qualitatively driven mixed-methods approaches to counselling and psychotherapy research’, Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21:1, pp. 143–53, https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12383.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Baškarada, Saša and Koronios, Andy (2018), ‘A philosophical discussion of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research in social science’, Qualitative Research Journal, 18:1, pp. 2–21, https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-d-17-00042.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Beck, Malene, Martinsen, Bente, Missel, Malene, Simony, Charlotte, Engelke, Eileen and van Manen, Michael (2024), ‘Alongside: Exploring the meaningfulness of significant moments in others’ lives through observation and interview’, Qualitative Health Research, 34:8–9, pp. 707–16, https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323231210495.
   [Google Scholar]
10. de la Bellacasa, María P. (2012), ‘“Nothing comes without its world”: Thinking with care’, The Sociological Review, 60:2, pp. 197–216, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.2012.02070.x.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Betensky, Mala G. (1995), What Do You See? Phenomenology of Therapeutic Art Expression, London: Jessica Kingsley.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bragge, Anita and Fenner, Patricia (2009), ‘The emergence of the “interactive square” as an approach to art therapy with children on the autistic spectrum’, International Journal of Art Therapy, 14:1, pp. 17–28, https://doi.org/10.1080/17454830903006323.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Cain, Leia K., MacDonald, A. L., Coker, Jonathan M., Velasco, Juliana C. and West, Geoffrey D. (2019), ‘Ethics and reflexivity in mixed methods research: An examination of current practices and a call for further discussion’, International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 11:2, pp. 144–55, http://doi.org/10.29034/ijmra.v11n2a2.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Crane, Tess, Buultjens, Melissa and Fenner, Patricia (2021), ‘Art-based interventions during pregnancy to support women’s wellbeing: An integrative review’, Women and Birth, 34:4, pp. 325–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.08.009.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fenner, Patricia (2012), ‘What do we see? Extending understanding of visual experience in the art therapy encounter’, Art Therapy, 29:1, pp. 11–18, https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2012.648075.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Finlay, Linda (2008), Reflexivity a Practical Guide for Researchers in Health and Social Sciences, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Finlay, Linda (2013), ‘Unfolding the phenomenological research process: Iterative stages of “seeing afresh”’, The Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 53:2, pp. 172–201, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167812453877.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Finlay, Linda and Evans, Kenneth (2009), Relational-Centred Research for Psychotherapists: Exploring Meanings and Experience, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fish, Barbara J. (2008), ‘Formative evaluation research of art-based supervision in art therapy training’, Art Therapy, 25:2, pp. 70–77, https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2008.10129410.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fish, Barbara J. (2019), ‘Response art in art therapy: Historical and contemporary overview’, Art Therapy, 36:3, pp. 122–32, https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2019.1648915.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Fish, Barbara J. (2023), ‘Response art: A resource for practice and supervision, in person and online’, Journal of Applied Arts & Health, 14:1, pp. 73–84, https://doi.org/10.1386/jaah_00128_1.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Franklin, Michael A. (2012), ‘Know thyself: Awakening self-referential awareness through art-based research’, Journal of Applied Arts & Health, 3:1, pp. 87–96, https://doi.org/10.1386/jaah.3.1.87_1.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Frost, Nollaig A. and Bailey-Rodriguez, Deborah (2020), ‘Doing qualitatively driven mixed methods and pluralistic qualitative research’, in S. Bager-Charleson and A. McBeath (eds), Enjoying Research in Counselling and Psychotherapy: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Research, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 137–60.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Greene, Jennifer C. (2008), ‘Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology?’, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2:1, pp. 7–22, https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807309969.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Havsteen-Franklin, Dominik (2014), ‘Consensus for using an arts-based response in art therapy’, International Journal of Art Therapy, 19:3, pp. 107–13, https://doi.org/10.1080/17454832.2014.968598.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hesse-Biber, Sharlene N. (2010), Mixed Methods Research Merging Theory with Practice, New York: Guilford Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hesse-Biber, Sharlene N. (2015), ‘Mixed methods research: The “thing-ness” problem’, Qualitative Health Research, 25:6, pp. 775–88, https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315580558.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hyland Moon, Catherine (2002), Studio Art Therapy: Cultivating the Artist Identity in the Art Therapist, London: Jessica Kinglsey Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Jones, David S. and Podolsky, Scott H. (2015), ‘The history and fate of the gold standard’, The Lancet, 385:9977, pp. 1502–03, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60742-5.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Learmonth, Malcolm (1994), ‘Witness and witnessing in art therapy’, Inscape, 1, pp. 19–22.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lett, Warren, Fox, Kim and von der Borch, Danielle (2014), ‘Process as value in collaborative arts-based inquiry’, Journal of Applied Arts & Health, 5:2, pp. 209–17, https://doi.org/10.1386/jaah.5.2.209_1.
    [Google Scholar]
32. van Manen, Max (2016), Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
33. van Manen, Michael (2024), ‘Humility, textuality, and method in phenomenological research’, Qualitative Inquiry, pp. 1–7, http://doi.org/10.1177/10778004241265985.
    [Google Scholar]
34. McMorrow, Denise J. (2024), ‘Entering the womb house: Bringing visibility to women’s lived experience of pregnancy loss through an imaginal-hermeneutic method of research’, Qualitative Psychology, 11:1, pp. 165–90, https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000278.
    [Google Scholar]
35. McNiff, Shaun (1995), ‘Keeping the studio’, Art Therapy, 12:3, pp. 179–83, https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.1995.10759156.
    [Google Scholar]
36. McNiff, Shaun (1998), Art-Based Research, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
37. McNiff, Shaun (2018), ‘Doing art-based research: An advising scenario’, in R. W. Prior (ed.), Using Art as Research in Learning and Teaching: Multidisciplinary Approaches across the Arts, Bristol: Intellect Books, pp. 77–90.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Moon, Bruce L. (1999), ‘The tears make me paint: The role of responsive artmaking in adolescent art therapy’, Art Therapy, 16:2, pp. 78–82, https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.1999.10129671.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Morse, Janice M. (2017), Essentials of Qualitatively-Driven Mixed-Method Designs, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Nash, Gary (2020), ‘Response art in art therapy practice and research with a focus on reflect piece imagery’, International Journal of Art Therapy, 25:1, pp. 39–48, https://doi.org/10.1080/17454832.2019.1697307.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Nash, Gary (2023), ‘Placing art at the centre of art-based practice and research’, Journal of Applied Arts & Health, 14:3, pp. 379–90, https://doi.org/10.1386/jaah_00148_1.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Olaghere, Ajima (2022), ‘Reflexive integration of research elements in mixed-method research’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, pp. 1–12, http://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221093137.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Popa, Florin, Guillermin, Mathieu and Dedeurwaerdere, Tom (2015), ‘A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: From complex systems theory to reflexive science’, Futures, 65, pp. 45–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.02.002.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Shannon-Baker, Peggy and Edwards, Cherie (2018), ‘The affordances and challenges to incorporating visual methods in mixed methods research’, American Behavioral Scientist, 62:7, pp. 935–55, https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218772671.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Smith, Jonathan A., Flowers, Paul and Larkin, Michael (2022), Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research, London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Teoli, Laura A. (2020), ‘Art therapists’ perceptions of what happens when they create art alongside their clients in the practice of group therapy’, The Arts in Psychotherapy, 68, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2020.101645.
    [Google Scholar]