Skip to content
1981
2-3: Artistic Epistemologies: Black Cinema and the Idea of Africa
  • ISSN: 1754-9221
  • E-ISSN: 1754-923X

Abstract

The article examines the documentary (2010) and the narrative film (1996) for similarities in depicting Zimbabwean orphans and vulnerable children. The article uses these two case studies to discuss intra-genre possibilities in documentary and fiction cinema’s approaches to filmmaking. It shows that while the actual events filmed are different, and the films belong to different genres, they share similarities in their organizing idea, storytelling techniques and characterization. The article tries to make sense of the films’ comparable verisimilitude to the historical realities of childhood and the HIV pandemic in Zimbabwe. In doing so, it demonstrates the need to rethink genre, not necessarily by dismissing existing conventions but by examining what intra-diegetic commonalities may exist at the levels of realism and verisimilitude, organizing ideas and subject matter.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jac_00121_1
2025-05-07
2026-04-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ansell, N. (2002), ‘Using films in teaching about Africa’, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 26:3, pp. 355–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Boswell, J., Corbett, J. and Rhodes, R. A. W. (2019), The Art and Craft of Comparison, New York: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bricca, J. (2023), How Documentaries Work, New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. California Newsreel (n.d.), ‘Everyone’s child’, https://newsreel.org/video/EVERYONES-CHILD. Accessed 10 October 2024.
  5. Chandler, D. (1997), ‘An introduction to genre theory’, Visual Memory, http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/intgenre/chandler_genre_theory.pdf. Accessed 15 November 2023.
  6. Currie, G. (1990), The Nature of Fiction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Dangarembga, T. (1996), Everyone’s Child, Zimbabwe: Media for Development Trust.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Diang’a, R. (2016), ‘Message films in Africa: A look into the past’, Cogent Arts and Humanities, 3:1, pp. 1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Eitzen, D. (1995), ‘When is a documentary? Documentary as a mode of reception’, Cinema Journal, 35:1, pp. 81–102.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Fisher, A. (2010), ‘Funding, ideology and the aesthetics of the development film in postcolonial Zimbabwe’, Journal of African Cinemas, 2:2, pp. 111–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Friend, S. (2021), ‘Falsehoods in film: Documentary vs fiction’, Studies in Documentary Film, 15:2, pp. 151–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Garcia-Carpintero, M. (2021), ‘Documentaries and the fiction/nonfiction divide’, Studies in Documentary Film, 15:2, pp. 163–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Gecau, K. (2001), ‘Audience responses to a film in rural Zimbabwe’, Journal of Social Development in Africa, 16:1, pp. 45–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Germann, S. E. (2006), ‘An exploratory study of quality of life and coping strategies of orphans living in child-headed households in an urban high HIV-prevalent community in Zimbabwe, Southern Africa’, Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 1:2, pp. 149–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hopkins, R. (2008), ‘What do we see in film?’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 66:2, pp. 149–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee, C. J. (2006), ‘Desperately seeking Tsitsi: A conversation with Tsitsi Dangarembga’, Project Muse: Scholarly Journals Online, Transition Issue 96, 13:2, pp. 128–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Lehtisalo, A. (2011), ‘As if alive before us: The pleasures of verisimilitude in biographical fiction films’, New Readings, 11, pp. 100–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Lund, G. (1999), ‘Harmonizing the nation: Women’s voices and development in Zimbabwean cinema’, City & Society, 11:1–2, pp. 213–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Maushe, F. and Mugumbate, J. (2015), ‘“We are on our own”: Challenges facing child headed households (CHH), a case of Seke rural area in Zimbabwe’, African Journal of Social Work, 5:1, pp. 33–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. McLane, B. (2012), A New History of Documentary, New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Metz, C. (1977), The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Mhiripiri, N. A. (2013), ‘(Auto)biographical and cinematographic exposition of Dambudzo Marechera on documentary film and video’, Journal of African Cinemas, 5:1, pp. 99–121.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Mhiripiri, N. A. and Ureke, O. (2018), ‘Theoretical paradoxes of representation and the problems of media representations of Zimbabwe in crisis’, Critical Arts, 32:5–6, pp. 87–103.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Mignolo, W. (2009), ‘Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom’, Theory, Culture and Society, 26:7, pp. 159–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Mushongah, J. (2012), ‘Dimensions of vulnerability: The impact of HIV/AIDS on livelihoods in Southern Zimbabwe, 1986–2007’, Journal of Southern African Studies, 38:3, pp. 551–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Neumann, J. (2010), Zimbabwe’s Forgotten Children, UK: True Vision.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Nichols, B. (1991), Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Nichols, B. (2001), Introduction to Documentary, Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Pinney, C. (2012), ‘Seven theses on photography’, Thesis Eleven, 113:1, pp. 141–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Platinga, C. R. (1997), Rhetoric and Representation in Nonfiction Film, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Platinga, N. (2005), ‘What a documentary is, after all’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 63:2, pp. 105–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Rhodes, G. D. and Springer, J. P. (eds) (2006), ‘Introduction’, Docufictions: Essays on Intersection of Documentary and Fictional Filmmaking, London: McFarland and Co., pp. 1–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Rizvi, W. R. (2014), ‘Politics, propaganda and film form: Battleship Potemkin (1925) and Triumph of the Will (1935)’, Journal of International Communication, 20:1, pp. 77–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Rosch, E. (1978), ‘Principles of categorisation’ in E. Roach and B. B. Lloyd (eds), Cognition and Categorization, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Rotha, P. (1993), Documentary Film, New York: Norton.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Samhungu, F. J., Lloyd-Laney, M., Masendeke, A., Mpofu, N. N., Mwanyisa, G. and Mbozi, P. (n.d.), ‘Everyone’s Child evaluation report in Zimbabwe’, CommsConsult, https://www.commsconsult.org/portfolio/evaluation-of-the-feature-film-everyones-child/. Accessed 20 October 2024.
  37. Sanchez-Escalonilla, A. (2013), ‘Verisimilitude and film story: The links between screenwriter, character and spectator’, Communication and Society, 26:2, pp. 79–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Shetty, A. K. and Powell, G. (2003), ‘Children orphaned by AIDS: A global perspective’, Seminars in Pediatric Infectious Diseases, 14:1, pp. 25–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Slugan, M. (2021), ‘Textualism, extratextualism, and the fiction/nonfiction distinction in documentary studies’, Studies in Documentary Film, 15:2, pp. 114–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Slugan, M. and Terrone, E. (2021), ‘The fiction/nonfiction distinction: Documentary studies and analytic aesthetics in conversation’, Studies in Documentary Film, 15:2, pp. 107–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Splawn, P. J. (2019), ‘Homosocial desire in Tsitsi Dangarembga’s Everyone’s Child’, Wagadu: A Journal of Transnational Women’s & Gender Studies, 20:1, pp. 114–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Stegmueller, D. (2011), ‘Apples and oranges? The problem of equivalence in comparative research’, Political Analysis, 19:4, pp. 471–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. True Vision (n.d.), ‘True Vision: About us’, https://www.truevisiontv.com/about. Accessed 16 February 2024.
  44. Thompson, K. D. (2013), Zimbabwe’s Cinematic Arts: Language, Power, Identity, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Ureke, O. (2018), ‘Introducing the “‘drasofi”: A genre of convenience and context in Zimbabwean film production’, Journal of African Cinemas, 10:1, pp. 147–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Walton, K. L. (1990), Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Zulu, B (1995), Mwanasikana, Zimbabwe: Media For Development Trust.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jac_00121_1
Loading
Cross-genre aesthetics in Zimbabwe’s HIV orphans cinema: Realism, ideation and subject matter in fiction and documentary filmmaking
Journal of African Cinemas 16, 203 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1386/jac_00121_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jac_00121_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jac_00121_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): children; feature; genre; mimesis; non-fiction; verisimilitude

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test