Far-right virtual communities: Exploring users and uses of far-right pages on social media | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 7, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2634-4726
  • E-ISSN: 2206-5857

Abstract

The role of social media in facilitating far-right networks and propagating far-right narratives is increasingly documented. However, research tends to focus on far-right pages on social media, thus leaving the users of these pages understudied. Relying on interviews with users of the Facebook page of the radical right organization La Meute in Canada, this study investigates individuals’ motivations and practices when using far-right pages on social media, as well as the interplay between their use of these pages and their view of themselves and society. It shows that users of La Meute’s Facebook page perceive (to varying degrees) that mainstream media are biased and do not represent their views nor address their concerns about immigration issues. As such, they seek meaning by using far-right pages on social media, either as their main source of information or to complement mainstream media. On these pages, they encounter a virtual community of like-minded people, which is conceived in opposition to the rest of society who would not be critical enough of mainstream media and immigration. Boundaries delineating the virtual community tend to be particularly pronounced among individuals who use far-right pages on social media as their main source of information.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Award 752-2019-1012)
  • Canadian Network for Research on Terrorism, Security and Society
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jacm_00108_1
2023-05-16
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams, Josh and Roscigno, Vincent J. (2005), ‘White supremacists, oppositional culture and the world wide web’, Social Forces, 84:2, pp. 75978.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Åkerlund, Mathilda (2020), ‘The importance of influential users in (re)producing Swedish far-right discourse on Twitter’, European Journal of Communication, 35:6, pp. 61328.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Atton, Chris (2006), ‘Far-right media on the internet: Culture, discourse and power’, New Media & Society, 8:4, pp. 57387.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Stephanie Alice (2022), ‘Alt. health influencers: How wellness culture and web culture have been weaponised to promote conspiracy theories and far-right extremism during the COVID-19 pandemic’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 25:1, pp. 324.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Berntzen, Lars Erik and Weisskircher, Manès (2016), ‘Anti-Islamic PEGIDA beyond Germany: Explaining differences in mobilisation’, Journal of Intercultural Studies, 37:6, pp. 55673.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bliuc, Ana-Maria, Betts, John, Vergani, Matteo, Iqbal, Muhammad and Dunn, Kevin (2019), ‘Collective identity changes in far-right online communities: The role of offline intergroup conflict’, New Media & Society, 21:8, pp. 177086.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Busher, Joel (2016), The Making of Anti-Muslim Protest: Grassroots Activism in the English Defence League, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chadwick, Andrew (2017), The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Donovan, Joan, Lewis, Becca and Friedberg, Brian (2019), ‘Parallel ports: Sociotechnical change from the alt-right to alt-tech’, in M. Fielitz and N. Thurston (eds), Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right: Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US, Transcript Verlag: Bielefeld, pp. 4965.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ekman, Mattias (2014), ‘The dark side of online activism: Swedish right-wing extremist video activism on YouTube’, MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 30:56, pp. 7999.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ekman, Mattias (2018), ‘Anti-refugee mobilization in social media: The case of Soldiers of Odin’, Social Media + Society, 4:1, pp. 111.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ekman, Mattias (2019), ‘Anti-immigration and racist discourse in social media’, European Journal of Communication, 34:6, pp. 60618.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellinas, Antonis A. (2021), ‘The interview method in comparative politics: The process of interviewing far-right actors’, Government and Opposition, pp. 121.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Figenschou, Tine Ustad and Ihlebæk, Karoline Andrea (2019), ‘Challenging journalistic authority’, Journalism Studies, 20:9, pp. 122137.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Forchtner, Bernhard and Kølvraa, Christoffer (2017), ‘Extreme right images of radical authenticity: Multimodal aesthetics of history, nature, and gender roles in social media’, European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 4:3, pp. 25281.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gagnon, Audrey (2020), ‘Far-right framing processes on social media: The case of the Canadian and Quebec chapters of soldiers of Odin’, Canadian Review of Sociology, 57:3, pp. 35678.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gaudette, Tiana, Scrivens, Ryan, Davies, Garth and Frank, Richard (2020), ‘Upvoting extremism: Collective identity formation and the extreme right on reddit’, New Media & Society, 23:12, pp. 3491508.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gerbaudo, Paolo (2018), ‘Social media and populism: An elective affinity?’, Media, Culture & Society, 40:5, pp. 74553.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gualda, Estrella (2021), ‘Metaphors of invasion: Imagining Europe as endangered by Islamisation’, in A. Önnerfors and A. Krouwel (eds), Europe: Continent of Conspiracies, London: Routledge, pp. 5375.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Haller, André and Holt, Kristoffer (2019), ‘Paradoxical populism: How PEGIDA relates to mainstream and alternative media’, Information, Communication & Society, 22:12, pp. 166580.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hameleers, Michael (2020), ‘Populist disinformation: Exploring intersections between online populism and disinformation in the US and the Netherlands’, Politics and Governance, 8:1, pp. 14657.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hameleers, Michael (2021), ‘They are selling themselves out to the enemy! The content and effects of populist conspiracy theories’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33:1, pp. 3856.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hameleers, Michael (2022), ‘Empowering the people’s truth through social media? (De)legitimizing truth claims of populist politicians and citizens’, Politics and Governance, 10:1, pp. 21019.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Holt, Kristoffer (2018), ‘Alternative media and the notion of anti-systemness: Towards an analytical framework’, Media and Communication, 6:4, pp. 4957.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jackob, Nikolaus Georg Edmund (2010), ‘No alternatives? The relationship between perceived media dependency, use of alternative information sources, and general trust in mass media’, International Journal of Communication, 4:0, p. 18.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jasser, Greta, McSwiney, Jordan, Pertwee, Ed and Zannettou, Savvas (2021), ‘“Welcome to #GabFam”: Far-right virtual community on Gab’, New Media & Society, pp. 118.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kisić Merino, Pasko and Kinnvall, Catarina (2023), ‘Governing emotions: Hybrid media, ontological insecurity and the normalisation of far-right fantasies’, Alternatives, 48:1, pp. 5473.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Klein, Ofra and Muis, Jasper (2019), ‘Online discontent: Comparing Western European far-right groups on Facebook’, European Societies, 21:4, pp. 54062.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Koster, Willem De and Houtman, Dick (2008), ‘Stormfront is like a second home to me’, Information, Communication & Society, 11:8, pp. 115576.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Krämer, Benjamin (2017), ‘Populist online practices: The function of the internet in right-wing populism’, Information, Communication & Society, 20:9, pp. 1293309.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Krämer, Benjamin, Fernholz, Tobias, Husung, Tobias, Meusel, Julia and Voll, Magdalena (2021), ‘Right-wing populism as a worldview and online practice: Social media communication by ordinary citizens between ideology and lifestyles’, European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 8:3, pp. 23564.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mattoni, Alice and Ceccobelli, Diego (2018), ‘Comparing hybrid media systems in the digital age: A theoretical framework for analysis’, European Journal of Communication, 33:5, pp. 54057.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Mills, Jane, Bonner, Ann and Francis, Karen (2006), ‘The development of constructivist grounded theory’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5:1, pp. 2535.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mudde, Cas (2004), ‘The populist zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition, 39:4, pp. 54163.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Mudde, Cas (2007), Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Mudde, Cas (2019), The Far Right Today, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Müller, Philipp and Schulz, Anne (2021), ‘Alternative media for a populist audience? Exploring political and media use predictors of exposure to Breitbart, Sputnik, and Co.’, Information, Communication & Society, 24:2, pp. 27793.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Noppari, Elina, Hiltunen, Ilmari and Ahva, Laura (2019), ‘User profiles for populist counter-media websites in Finland’, Journal of Alternative & Community Media, 4:1, pp. 2337.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Nouri, Lella and Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria (2019), ‘Investigating reclaim Australia and Britain first’s use of social media: Developing a new model of imagined political communities online’, Journal for Deradicalization, 18, March, pp. 137.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Perry, Barbara and Scrivens, Ryan (2019), Right-Wing Extremism in Canada, Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Pilkington, Hilary (2016), Loud and Proud: Passion and Politics in the English Defence League, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Potvin, Maryse (2017), ‘Discours racistes et propagande haineuse: Trois groupes populistes identitaires au Québec’, Diversité urbaine, 17, pp. 4972.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Rauch, Jennifer (2007), ‘Activists as interpretive communities: Rituals of consumption and interaction in an alternative media audience’, Media, Culture & Society, 29:6, pp. 9941013.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Robertson, David G. and Amarasingam, Amarnath (2022), ‘How conspiracy theorists argue: Epistemic capital in the QAnon social media sphere’, Popular Communication, 20:3, pp. 193207.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Schulze, Heidi (2020), ‘Who uses right-wing alternative online media? An exploration of audience characteristics’, Politics and Governance, 8:3, pp. 618.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Schwarzenegger, Christian (2021), ‘Communities of darkness? Users and uses of anti-system alternative media between audience and community’, Media and Communication, 9:1, pp. 99109.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Scrivens, Ryan and Amarasingam, Amarnath (2020), ‘Haters gonna “like”: Exploring Canadian far-right extremism on Facebook’, in M. Littler and B. Lee (eds), Digital Extremisms: Readings in Violence, Radicalisation and Extremism in the Online Space, Palgrave Studies in Cybercrime and Cybersecurity, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 6389.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Stier, Sebastian, Kirkizh, Nora, Froio, Caterina and Schroeder, Ralph (2020), ‘Populist attitudes and selective exposure to online news: A cross-country analysis combining web tracking and surveys’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25:3, pp. 42646.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Sunstein, Cass R. (2007), Republic.Com 2.0, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Tanner, Samuel and Campana, Aurélie (2020), ‘“Watchful citizens” and digital vigilantism: A case study of the far right in Quebec’, Global Crime, 21:3&4, pp. 26282.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Thorbjørnsrud, Kjersti and Figenschou, Tine Ustad (2022), ‘The alarmed citizen: Fear, mistrust, and alternative media’, Journalism Practice, 16:5, pp. 101835.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Urman, Aleksandra and Katz, Stefan (2022), ‘What they do in the shadows: Examining the far-right networks on telegram’, Information, Communication & Society, 25:7, pp. 90423.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Valaskivi, Katja and Robertson, David G. (2022), ‘Introduction: Epistemic contestations in the hybrid media environment’, Popular Communication, 20:3, pp. 15361.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Volk, Sabine (2020), ‘Wir Sind Das Volk!”: Representative claim-making and populist style in the PEGIDA movement’s discourse’, German Politics, 29:4, pp. 599616.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Wahlström, Mattias and Törnberg, Anton (2021), ‘Social media mechanisms for right-wing political violence in the 21st century: Discursive opportunities, group dynamics, and co-ordination’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 33:4, pp. 76687.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Gagnon, Audrey (2022), ‘Far-right virtual communities: Exploring users and uses of far-right pages on social media’, Journal of Alternative & Community Media, 7:2, pp. 11735, https://doi.org/10.1386/jacm_00108_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jacm_00108_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error