Skip to content
1981
Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2634-4726
  • E-ISSN: 2206-5857

Abstract

Authoritarian governments seem to use the same methods of coercion the world over. Recent developments in Belarus and Zimbabwe resonate with this observation. President Alexander Lukashenko prevailed in a deeply flawed and controversial election which his opponents claimed was rigged in July 2020, triggering massive countrywide protests by the opposition supporters. In Zimbabwe, corruption over COVID-19 procurement, coupled with a dire economic situation, pushed citizens to organize demonstrations. Both Belarus and Zimbabwean security personnel employed a heavy-headed approach to thwart demonstrations, committing gross human rights abuses under the cover of darkness or under face masks. Although digital activism has received so much credit as a formidable force to challenge power, its success in dismantling oppressive regimes and systems is a subject of debate. In light of this debate, this qualitative article employed counterpublics as a theoretical lens to explore Twitter and digital tools that allow ordinary citizens and activists to counter human rights abuses in authoritarian environments, making future quests for justice possible.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jacm_00119_2
2024-02-29
2025-02-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akpojivi, U. (2020), ‘We are not all #ZumaMustFall: Further reflections’, Social Identities, 26:5, pp. 64259.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Akpojivi, U. (2023), Social Movements and Digital Activism in Africa, Cham: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aljazeera (2020), ‘Belarus expels journalists, withdraws accreditation in crackdown’, 29 August, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/8/29/belarus-expels-journalists-withdraws-accreditation-in-crackdown/. Accessed 13 December 2020.
  4. Amnesty International (2020), ‘Zimbabwe authorities thwart anti-corruption protest launch with witch-hunt against activists’, 31 July, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/07/zimbabwe-authorities-thwart-anti-corruption-protests-launch-a-witchhunt-against-activists/. Accessed 25 October 2020.
  5. Bauman, Z. and Lyon, D. (2013), Liquid Surveillance: A Conversation, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brennen, J. S., Simon, F. M., Howard, P. N. and Kleis Nielsen, R. K. (2020), ‘Types, sources, and claims of Covid-19 misinformation’, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 7 April, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-04/Brennen%20-%20COVID%2019%20Misinformation%20FINAL%20%283%29.pdf Accessed 21 July 2023 Accessed 15 July 2020.
  7. Bromberg, N. B. (2013), ‘Digital activism: Passive participation and divergence of ideas in online social movements’, Master’s thesis, Auckland: Auckland University of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bruns, A., Highfield, T. and Lind, R. A. (2012), ‘Blogs, Twitter and breaking news: The produsage of citizen journalism’, in R. A. Lind (ed.), Produsing Theory in a Digital World: The Intersection of Audiences and Production in Contemporary Theory, vol. 80, Bern: Peter Lang Publishing, pp. 1532.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chadha, K. and Steiner, L. (2015), ‘The potential and limitations of citizen journalism initiatives’, Journalism Studies, 16:5, pp. 70618.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chitanana, T. (2020), ‘From Kubatana to #ThisFlag: Trajectories of digital activism in Zimbabwe’, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 17:2, pp. 130145.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chiumbu, S. (2004), ‘Redefining the national agenda media and identity: Challenges of building a new Zimbabwe’, Telematics and Informatics, 30:3, pp. 24246.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chuma, W. (2010), ‘Reforming the media in Zimbabwe: Critical reflection’, in D. Moyo and W. Chuma (eds), Changing Southern Africa: Critical Reflections on Media Reforms in the Global Age, Pretoria: Unisa Press, pp. 90107.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Clement, T. J. (2023), ‘Global social networks ranked by number of users 2020’, Statista, 27 October, https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users. Accessed 24 January 2024.
  14. Congressional Research Services (2020), ‘Belarus: An overview’, Updated 6 December 2023, https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/IF10814.pdf. Accessed 24 January 2024.
  15. Couldry, N. (2003), Media Rituals: A Critical Approach, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Diamond, L. (2010), ‘Liberation technology’, Journal of Democracy, 21:3, pp. 6983.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Downing, J. (2008), ‘Social movement theories and alternative media: An evaluation and critique – Communication, culture and critique’, Global Media Journal, 1:1, pp. 116.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Downey, J. and Fenton, N. (2003), ‘New media, counter publicity and the public sphere’, New Media & Society, 5, pp. 185202, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444803005002003.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Eldridge II, S. (2019), ‘Where do we draw the line? Interlopers, (Ant)agonists, and an unbounded journalistic field’, Media and Communication, 7:4, pp. 818, https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i4.2295.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Favarel-Garrigues, G., Tanner, S. and Trottier, D. (2020), ‘Introducing digital vigilantism’, Global Crime, 21:3&4, pp. 17.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fekete, E. and Warf, B. (2013), ‘Information technology and the “Arab Spring”’, The Arab World Geographer, 16:2, pp. 21027.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fraser, N. (1990), ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy’, Social Text, 25:26, pp. 5680, http://www.jstor.org/stable/466240?origin=JSTOR-pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Garrett, R. K. (2006), ‘Protest in an information society: A review of literature on social movements and new ICTs’, Information, Communication and Society, 9:2, pp. 20224.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Giustozzi, A. (2001), Koran, Kalishnikov, and Laptop: The Neo-Taliban Insurgency in Afghanistan, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Harlow, S. (2012), ‘Social media and social movements: Facebook and an online Guatemalan justice movement that moved offline’, New Media & Society, 14:2, pp. 22543.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hauer, T. (2017), ‘Technological determinism and new media’, International Journal of English, Literature and Social Science, 2:2, pp. 14.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Heilbroner, R. (1994), ‘Technological determinism revised’, in M. R. Smith and L. Marx (eds), Does Technology Drive History?, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 6578.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Howard, P. N. (2011), The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Information Technology and Political Islam, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Howard, P. N., Agarwal, S. and Hussain, M. (2011), ‘When do states disconnect their digital networks: Regime responses to political uses of social media’, The Communication Review, 14:3, pp. 21632.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kademaunga, M. (2019), ‘Civic engagement in the post-Mugabe era’, Carnegie Europe, 24 October, https://carnegieeurope.eu/2019/10/24/civic-activism-in-post-mugabe-era-pub-80146. Accessed 11 May 2022.
  31. Kubin, E. and von Sikorski, C. (2021), ‘The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review’, Annals of the International Communication Association, 45:3, pp. 188206, https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Leon, H. (2020), ‘The 13 high-tech tools used by protesters and cops in their escalating battle’, Observer, 4 June, https://observer.com/2020/06/surveillance-technology-fueling-cops-vs-protestor-battle/. Accessed 1 December 2020.
  33. Malone, T. (2020), ‘The silicon insider podcast: Technology as the great equalizer’, Silicon Valley Business Journal, 6 June, https://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2020/06/06/podcast-silicon-insider-54.html. Accessed 10 November 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mare, A. (2020), ‘State-ordered internet shutdowns and digital authoritarianism in Zimbabwe’, International Journal of Communication, 14, pp. 423363.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. McKone, K., Stehan, M. J. and Dickover, N. (2015), ‘Using technology in non-violent activism against repression’, Special report 357, Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, https://www.usip.org/. Accessed 21 May 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Moyo, L. (2011), ‘Blogging down a dictatorship: Human rights, citizen journalists and the right to communicate in Zimbabwe’, Sage Journal of Journalism, 12:6, pp. 74560.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Mututwa, W. T., Oluinka, O. and Mututwa, B. (2019), ‘Facebook image making in Zimbabwe’s 2018 election campaigns: Social media and emerging trends in political marketing’, Journal of African Elections, 18:2, pp. 93111.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Nielsen, R. K. (2012), ‘Ten years that shook the media world: Big questions and big trends in international media developments’, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 4 October, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2017-09/Nielsen%20-%20Ten%20Years%20that%20Shook%20the%20Media_0.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Noyes, A. H. (2020), A New Zimbabwe? Assessing Continuity and Change After Mugabe, Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Obach, B. K. (2004), Labor and the Environmental Movement: The Quest for Common Ground, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Olaniyan, A. (2002), ‘From Iwe Irohin to Saharareporters.com: Hardcoding citizen journalism in Nigeria’, Ph.D. thesis, Johannesburg: Media Studies Department, University of the Witwatersrand.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Okoro, N., Diri, C. T. and Odii, C. (2013), ‘Citizen journalism in Nigeria: Possibilities and Challenges’, New Media and Mass Communication, 11, pp. 17, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234652363.pdf. Accessed 8 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Oser, J., Grinson, A., Boulianne, S. and Halperin, E. (2022), ‘How political efficacy relates to online and offline political participation: A multilevel meta-analysis’, Political Communication, 39:5, pp. 60733.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Pigou, P. (2017), ‘Zimbabwe’s very peculiar coup’, International Crisis Group, 16 November, https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/southern-africa/zimbabwe/zimbabwes-very-peculiar-coup. Accessed 15 October 2020.
  45. Powell, C. (2022), ‘The promise of digital activism – and its dangers’, Council on Foreign Relations, 21 March, https://www.cfr.org/blog/promise-digital-activism-and-its-dangers-0. Accessed 5 March 2023.
  46. Rácz, A., Gherasimov, C. and Nič, M. (2020), ‘For scenarios for the crisis in Belarus’, DGAP policy brief No. 15, Berlin: DGAP, https://dgap.org/en/research/publications/four-scenarios-crisis-belarus/. Accessed 3 December 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Raftopoulos, B. and Mlambo, A. (2009), Becoming Zimbabwe, Harare: Weaver Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Raharjo, A., Saefudin, Y. and Fidiyani, R. (2018), ‘The influence of technology determinism in influencing criminal act of legislation’, EDP Sciences, 73, pp. 15.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Reichardt, A. and Stępniewski, T. (2020), Crisis in Belarus: How Should the West Respond?, Lublin: Institute of Central Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Reporters Without Borders (2016), ‘World Press Freedom Index (2020)’, 25 January, https://rsf.org/en/2020-world-press-freedom-index-entering-decisive-decade-journalism-exacerbated-coronavirus. Accessed 25 June 2020.
  51. Rheingold, N. (1993), The Virtual Community: Homesteading on Electronic Frontier, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Roller, M. R. and Lavrakas, P. J. (2015), Applied Qualitative Research Design: A Total Quality Framework Approach, New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Samorukov, M. (2020), ‘The Kremlin and the protests in Belarus: What’s Russia’s next move?’, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2 September, https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/09/02/kremlin-and-protests-in-belarus-what-s-russia-s-next-move-pub-82639. Accessed 1 February 2024.
  54. Saunders, R. (2000), Never the Same Again: Zimbabwe’s Growth Towards Democracy, Harare: Edwina Spicer Productions.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Stever, G. S. and Lawson, K. (2013), ‘Twitter as a way to communicate with fans: Implications for parasocial interaction’, North American Journal of Psychology, 15:2, pp. 33954.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Tandoc, E. C. Jr. and Oh, S. (2017), ‘Small departures, big continuities?’, Journalism Studies, 18:8, pp. 9971015.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Toepfl, F. and Piwoni, E. (2018), ‘Targeting dominant publics: How counterpublic commenters align their efforts with mainstream news’, New Media & Society, 20:5, pp. 1127.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Trottier, D. (2017), ‘Digital vigilantism as weaponisation of visibility’, Philosophy & Technology, 30:1, pp. 5572.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Uwalaka, T. and Nwala, B. (2023), ‘Examining the role of social media and mobile social networking applications in socio-political contestations in Nigeria’, Communication and the Public, 8:3, pp. 17590, https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473231168474.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Wagner, K. M. and Gainous, J. (2013), ‘Digital uprising: The internet revolution in the Middle East’, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10:3, pp. 26175, https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2013.778802.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Waisbord, S. (2020), ‘Mob censorship: Online harassment of US journalists in times of digital hate and populism, Digital Journalism, 8:8, pp. 103046, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1818111.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Ziccardi, G. (2013), Resistance, Liberation Technology and Human Rights in the Digital Age: Law, Governance and Technology Series, 7, New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Ziccardi, G. (2018), ‘Digital resistance, digital liberties and digital transparency’, in P. Casanovas and G. Sartor (eds), Resistance, Liberation Technology and Human Rights in the Digital Age, London: Springer, pp. 2772.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jacm_00119_2
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jacm_00119_2
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test