Skip to content
1981
image of The dialectical relationship between the authorial and the collaborative in contemporary documentary: Perspectives from three case studies

Abstract

This article discusses the intersections between authorial and collaborative work in the scope of ethnographic documentary departing from three case studies: two research projects and one citizen collective of participatory media. All case studies were developed in Porto, Portugal, between 2013 and 2020, focusing on the city’s invisibilities and everyday experiences, searching for alternative narratives to the mainstream media when portraying its people and places. This article aims to reflect on how authorial documentary work, followed by self-criticism and self-reflection, can be incorporated into participatory media frameworks in productive ways. The challenges faced by the three cases are intrinsically related and have influenced each other throughout this period, addressing issues related to the representational crisis; the legitimation of subjectivity and the exploration of different styles within documentary; as well as the relationships between the filmmaker, the camera, the subject/character portrayed and the audience. These themes are explored through a series of first-person field reports and the study of authors and directors in the field of documentary filmmaking.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), I.P. (Award UIDB/04059/2020)
  • FCT Doctoral Program (Award PD/00048/2012)
This article is Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The CC BY licence permits commercial and noncommercial reuse. To view a copy of the licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jacm_00129_1
2024-07-02
2024-11-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1386/jacm_00129_1/JOACM_FT_art_Roberti_etal.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/jacm_00129_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Anon. (2015), ‘Reabilitação da Ilha da Bela Vista’, Porto, 5 November, http://www.porto.pt/noticias/comecou-a-reabilitacao-da-ilha-da-bela-vista. Accessed 13 May 2024.
  2. Atton, Chris (2015), The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakshi, Anita (2020), ‘Documenting urban neighborhoods and claiming the right to the city’, in K. Zlatan and D. Stevenson (eds), The Routledge Companion to Urban Media and Communication, New York: Routledge, pp. 35363.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonotto, André and Sotomaior, Gabriel de Barcelos (2008), ‘What’s at stake for the documentary enterprise? Conversation with Michael Renov’, Doc On-line, 4, August, pp. 16679.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bradbury, Judd D. and Rosanna, Guadagno (2020), ‘Documentary narrative visualization: Features and modes of documentary film in narrative visualization’, Information Visualization, 19:4, pp. 33952.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brandão, Daniel (2011), ‘Museum of ransom: Towards a system for the aggregation and interpretation of contemporary participatory video as contextual cultural heritage’, Ph.D. dissertation, Porto: University of Porto.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Breda-Vázquez, Isabel and Conceição, Paulo (2015), ‘Ilhas’ do Porto: Levantamento e Caracterização, Porto: Município do Porto.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Câmara Municipal do Porto (1937–71), ‘Projeto de um núcleo de 115 moradias económicas a construir na Rua do Duque de Saldanha’, http://gisaweb.cm-porto.pt/units-of-description/documents/646273/. Accessed 12 June 2024.
  9. Castañeda, Quetzil E. (2006), ‘The invisible theatre of ethnography: Performative principles of fieldwork’, Anthropological Quarterly, 79:1, pp. 75104.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Citadocs (2015), ‘Citadocs: Documentários sobre, para e por cidadãos’, https://citadocsblog.wordpress.com. Accessed 13 May 2024.
  11. Citadocs Lab (2016), ‘Teaser of an uncertain film’, YouTube, 27 October, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNQpt33A1js. Accessed 13 May 2024.
  12. Citadocs Lab (2017), ‘Doc under the block’, YouTube, 25 October, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__VA59RFvtM. Accessed 13 May 2024.
  13. CitaDocs Documentários sobre, para, por cidadãos (2015a), ‘Joaquina - Ilha do Américo das Balanças’, YouTube, 24 October, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L05pGWCTdnI. Accessed 13 May 2024.
  14. CitaDocs Documentários sobre, para, por cidadãos (2015b), ‘Franklin Freitas’, YouTube, 24 October, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsSBHDKB3u0. Accessed 13 May 2024.
  15. Colusso, Enrica (2017), ‘The space between the filmmaker and the subject: The ethical encounter’, Studies in Documentary Film, 11:2, pp. 14156.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Couldry, Nick (2015), ‘Alternative media and voice’, in C. Atton (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Debord, Guy (1958), ‘Théorie de la derive’, Internationale situationniste, 2, pp. 1923.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Eco, Umberto ([1962] 1989), The Open Work, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ellis, John (2021), ‘How documentaries mark themselves out from fiction: A genre-based approach’, Studies in Documentary Film, 15:2, pp. 14050.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fernandes, José A., Carvalho, Luís, Chamusca, Pedro and Pinto, Jorge R. (2018), ‘Gentrification in Porto: Problems and opportunities in the past and in the future of an internationally open city’, Geography and Spatial Planning Journal, 15, pp. 17798.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fernandes, Luís (2002), ‘Um Diário de Campo nos Territórios Psicotrópicos’, in T. Caria (ed.), A Experiência Etnográfica em Ciências Sociais, Porto: Afrontamento, pp. 2341.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Friedman, P. Kerim (2020), ‘Defining ethnographic film’, in P. Vannini (ed.), The Routledge International Handbook of Ethnographic Film and Video, Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 1529.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Futureplaces (2008), ‘Futureplaces media lab for citizenship’, http://futureplaces.org/. Accessed 13 May 2024.
  24. Futureplaces (n.d.), ‘All projects: Citadocs’, http://futureplaces.org/projects/citadocs. Accessed 13 May 2024.
  25. Hall, Edward T. ([1966] 1986), A Dimensão Oculta (trans. M. Pereira), Lisbon: Relógio D’água.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Henley, Paul (2020), L’Aventure du réel: Jean Rouch et la pratique du cinéma ethnographique, Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hicks, J. Jeremy (2007), Dziga Vertov: Defining Documentary Film, London and New York: I. B. Tauris.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Krajina, Zlatan and Stevenson, Deborah (eds) (2019), The Routledge Companion to Urban Mediaand Communication, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lefebvre, Henry ([1974] 2000), A produção do espaço (trans. D. B. Pereira and S. Martins), Paris: Éditions Anthropos.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Macdonald, Kevin and Scott, Ridley (2021), ‘Life in a Day: Official documentary’, YouTube, 6 February, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcsSc2iksC0. Accessed 13 May 2024.
  31. MacDougall, David (2022a), The Art of the Observer: A Personal View of Documentary, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. MacDougall, David (2022b), ‘Seven types of collaboration’, Studies in Documentary Film, 16:1, pp. 1837.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. McLuhan, Marshall (1994), Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. McLuhan, Marshall, Fiore, Quentin and Agel, Jerome (1967), The Medium Is the Massage, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Nichols, Bill (2010), Introdução ao Documentário (trans. M. Martins), Campinas: Papirus Editora.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Önen, Ufuk (2021), ‘The voice as a narrative element in documentary films’, Resonance, 2:1, pp. 618.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Pettit, Jethro, Salazar, Juan F. and Dagron, Alfonso G. (2009), ‘Citizens’ media and communication’, Development in Practice, 19:4–5, pp. 44352.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pink, Sara, Fors, Vaike, Lanzeni, Debora, Duque, Melissa, Sumartojo, Shanti and Strengers, Yolande (2022), Design Ethnography: Research, Responsibilities, and Futures, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Roberti, Ana Clara, Davanzo, Priscila and Santos, Tiago (2014), Manuel e Júlia, Portugal: Citadocs.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Roberti, Ana Clara (2015a), Caiu um Homem Ali no Quintal, Porto: Portugal.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Roberti, Ana Clara (2015b), ‘Fixos no Transitrio: A decifração da permeabilidade entre o público e o privado nas escadarias do centro do Porto por meio de um estudo imagético e sonoro’, Ph.D. dissertation, Porto: University of Porto.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Roberti, Ana Clara and Brandão, Daniel (2016), ‘Observação documental: O registro imagético e sonoro da vivência nas escadarias do centro do Porto’, Doc On-line, 19, pp. 24768.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Roberti, Ana Clara, Brandão, Daniel and Rodrigues, Vanessa (2016), ‘An uncertain film’, http://futureplaces.org/labs/an-uncertain-film. Accessed 13 May 2024.
  44. Roberti, Ana Clara, Brandão, Daniel and Rodrigues, Vanessa (2017), ‘Doc under the block’, http://futureplaces.org/labs/doc-under-the-block. Accessed 13 May 2024.
  45. Roberti, Ana Clara (2020), ‘Cidade Ilha: o documentário etnográfico autoral como alternativa à exotização, a partir da cidade do Porto’, Ph.D. dissertation, Porto: University of Porto.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Roberti, Ana Clara, Santos, Helena and Brandão, Daniel (2023), ‘The ethnographic film as a way of thinking: Responsibilities of the encounter with the other’, Visual Ethnography, 12:2, pp. 723.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Rodríguez, Clemencia (2008), ‘Citizens’ media’, in W. Donsbach (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication, Oxford and Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 49395.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Ruby, Jay ([1991] 2008), ‘Speaking for, speaking about, speaking with, or speaking alongside: An anthropological and documentary dilemma’, Visual Anthropology Review, 7:2, pp. 5067.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Schmid, Christian (2022), Henri Lefebvre and the Theory of the Production of Space, London: Verso Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Terry, Mark (2020), ‘Methods and approaches to documentary influence’, in M. Terry (ed.), The Geo-Doc: Geomedia, Documentary Film, and Social Change, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 5787.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Trier, James (2019), Guy Debord, the Situationist International, and the Revolutionary Spirit, Leiden: Brill/Sense.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Uygun, Zeynep M. (2020), ‘Negotiating boundaries in a hybrid climate: The story of a trans-disciplinary documentary film research’, Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture, 11:1, pp. 7586.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Vertov, Dziga (1929), Man with a Movie Camera, Soviet Union (USSR): All-Ukrainian Photo Cinema Administration and Dovzhenko Film Studios.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Wintonick, Peter (wr.) and Cox, Kirwan (dir.) (2000), Cinéma Vérité: Defining the Moment, Canada: National Film Board of Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jacm_00129_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jacm_00129_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error