Skip to content
1981
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2634-4726
  • E-ISSN: 2206-5857

Abstract

This article develops contextually adapted ethnographic methodologies for studying community radio and local governance relationships in rural African contexts. The research advances three methodological innovations: household-based media ethnography revealing collective consumption practices invisible to individualistic research paradigms; institutional ethnography mapping informal political networks operating through cultural logics and collaborative translation methodologies maintaining epistemological integrity across Indigenous and academic knowledge systems. Drawing from four months of fieldwork in northern Ghana, this study demonstrates how conventional survey methods systematically obscure relationships between media practices and democratic participation. The research employed multi-method ethnographic design combining household observation, in-depth interviews, broadcast monitoring and Radio Listener Club ethnography. These methodological adaptations generate transferable analytical frameworks applicable to community media research across postcolonial contexts characterized by linguistic diversity, traditional governance structures and hybrid institutional formations. Findings reveal that contextually sensitive ethnographic methods uncover critical dimensions including local language broadcasting’s role in political identity formation and complex participation negotiations in mediated public spheres. This methodological framework provides a blueprint for culturally responsive research on community media and governance relationships in marginalized communities.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jacm_00146_1
2026-01-31
2026-04-17

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahwoi, K. (2010), Local Government and Decentralization in Ghana, Accra: Unimax Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnstein, S. R. (1969), ‘A ladder of citizen participation’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35:4, pp. 21624, https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ayee, J. R. A. (2008), Reforming the African Public Sector: Retrospect and Prospects, Dakar: CODESRIA.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Backhaus, B. (2021), Polyphony: Listening to the Listeners of Community Radio, New Delhi: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Banda, F. (2003), Community radio broadcasting in Zambia: A Policy Perspective, Pretoria: University of South Africa.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Barber, B. (1984), Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bosch, T. (2003), ‘Radio, community and identity in South Africa: A rhizomatic study of Bush Radio in Cape Town’, doctoral dissertation, Athens, OH: Ohio University.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Carpentier, N. (2011), Media and Participation: A Site of Ideological-Democratic Struggle, Bristol: Intellect.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chilisa, B. (2012), Indigenous Research Methodologies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (eds) (2001), Participation: The New Tyranny?, London: Zed Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Crawford, G. (2004), ‘Democratic decentralization in Ghana: Issues and prospects’, Polis working paper no. 9, Leeds: School of Politics and International Studies, Leeds University.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Essel, E. and Govender, E. (2023), ‘Vernacular radio and the practice of resistance: Community radio as a cultural tool to engage on health and social identities among marginalized communities in Ghana’, Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 30:1, pp. 99118, https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2022.2142230.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Forde, S. (2011), ‘Community broadcasting audiences (Australia)’, in J. D. Downing (ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Movement Media, London: Sage Publications, pp. 11011, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412979313.n57.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Freire, P. (1970), Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ginsburg, F. (2008), ‘Rethinking the digital age’, in P. Wilson and M. Stewart (eds), Global Indigenous Media: Cultures, Poetics, and Politics, Atlanta, GA: Duke University Press, pp. 287305, https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388692.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ginsburg, F., Abu-Lughod, L. and Larkin, B. (eds) (2002), Media Worlds: Anthropology on New Terrain, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago, IL: Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Guo, L. (2017), ‘Exploring the link between community radio and the community: A study of audience participation in alternative media practices’, Communication, Culture & Critique, 10:1, pp. 11230, https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12141.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gyekye, K. (1997), Tradition and Modernity: Philosophical Reflections on the African Experience, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hammersley, M. (1992), What’s Wrong with Ethnography?, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Madison, D. S. (2011), Critical Ethnography: Method, Ethics, and Performance, Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Manyozo, L. (2012), Media, Communication and Development: Three Approaches, London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Mda, Z. (1993), When People Play People: Development Communication Through Theatre, London: Zed Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Meadows, M., Forde, S., Ewart, J. and Foxwell, K. (2007), Community Media Matters: An Audience Study of the Australian Community Broadcasting Sector, Brisbane: Griffith University.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Medrado, A. (2007), ‘Community media: Important but imperfect. A case study of a community television station in a Brazilian favela’, in N. Carpentier, P. Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, K. Nordenstreng, M. Hartmann, P. Vihalemm, H. Nieminen and B. Cammaerts (eds), Media Technologies and Democracy in an Enlarged Europe, Tartu: Tartu University Press, pp. 12336.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mtimde, L., Bonin, M. H., Maphiri, N. and Nyamaku, K. (1998), What Is Community Radio? A Resource Guide, Johannesburg and London: Panos and AMARC.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pateman, C. (1970), Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Pavarala, V. and Malik, K. K. (2007), Other Voices: The Struggle for Community Radio in India, London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Raghunath, P. (2020), Community Radio Policies in South Asia, Singapore: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rodriguez, C. (2001), Fissures in the Mediascape: An International Study of Citizens’ Media, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Smith, L. T. (1999), Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples, London: Zed Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Spitulnik, D. (1993), ‘Anthropology and mass media’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 22:1, pp. 293315, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.22.1.293.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Tacchi, J. (2003), ‘Nostalgia and radio sound’, in M. Bull and L. Back (eds), The Auditory Culture Reader, New York: New York University Press, pp. 28195.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Tacchi, J. (2015), ‘Ethnographic action research: Media, information and communicative ecologies for development initiatives’, in H. Bradbury (ed.), The Sage Handbook of Action Research, London: Sage Publications, pp. 22029.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Teer-Tomaselli, R. (2001), ‘Who is the “community” in community radio? A case study of community radio stations in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal’, in K. Tomaselli and H. Dunn (eds), Media, Democracy and Renewal in Southern Africa, Colorado Springs, CO: International Academic Publishers, pp. 23154.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. wa Thiong’o, N. (1986), Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature, London: James Currey.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. White, S. C. (1996), ‘Depoliticising development: The uses and abuses of participation’, Development in Practice, 6:1, pp. 615, https://doi.org/10.1080/0961452961000157564.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jacm_00146_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test