Skip to content
1981
Volume 18, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1753-6421
  • E-ISSN: 1753-643X

Abstract

This article examines Martin Crimp’s play (2019), arguing that the obscurity of its protagonists’ relationship and the unintelligibility of their motives for engaging in an ambiguous sexual power-play that blurs the boundaries between consent and threat revives the controversy surrounding its source material, namely Samuel Richardson’s novel (1740). The debate as to whether Richardson’s heroine was indeed a virtuous character or a manipulative hypocrite acquires new currency in Crimp’s play, pointing to the difficulty of laying claim to the truth of one’s experience due to the barriers raised by established assumptions about gender roles. In this sense, the play aligns with the emphasis that the #MeToo movement placed on truth-telling as a means of exposing the menacing facets of imbalanced gender dynamics, yet also draws attention to the ways in which such an act may be compromised in a post-truth context that reinforces conventional power structures. The cryptic bond between its main characters, and the prospect of it resulting from harassment and in assault is never utterly discredited, illuminating the complexities of gender and sexual relations at a time that openly talks about but struggles to critically reflect on them.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jafp_00143_1
2026-03-21
2026-04-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Angelaki, Vicky (2015), ‘From history to “ourstories” in Martin Crimp’s metanarratives’, Journal of Contemporary Drama in English, 3:1, pp. 142–55, https://doi.org/10.1515/jcde-2015-0010.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Angelaki, Vicky (2022), Martin Crimp’s Power Plays: Intertextuality, Sexuality, Desire, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Angel-Perez, Elisabeth (2014), ‘Martin Crimp’s nomadic voices’, Contemporary Theatre Review, 24:3, pp. 353–62, https://doi.org/10.1080/10486801.2014.921054.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Armstrong, Nancy (1987), Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel, New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Babbage, Frances (2015), ‘Adaptation and storytelling in the theatre’, Critical Stages, 12, https://www.critical-stages.org/12/adaptation-and-storytelling-in-the-theatre/. Accessed 16 February 2026.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Billington, Michael (2019), ‘When We Have Sufficiently Tortured Each Other review: – It’s explicit but hardly shocking’, The Guardian, 24 January, https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2019/jan/24/when-we-have-sufficiently-tortured-each-other-review-enjoyable-not-shocking. Accessed 21 June 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Budgeon, Shelley (2021), ‘Making feminist claims in the post-truth era: The authority of personal experience’, Feminist Theory, 22:2, pp. 248–67, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700120988638.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Clapp, Susannah (2019), ‘The week in theatre: When We Have Sufficiently Tortured Each Other and more – review’, The Observer, 27 January, https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2019/jan/27/when-we-have-sufficiently-tortured-review-cate-blanchett-dear-elizabeth-war-of-the-worlds. Accessed 21 June 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Clarke-Vivier, Sara and Stearns, Clio (2019), ‘MeToo and the problematic valor of truth: Sexual violence, consent, and ambivalence in public pedagogy’, Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 34:3, pp. 55–75, https://doi.org/10.63997/jct.v34i3.827.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Corrigan, Lisa M. (2019), ‘The #MeToo movement: A rhetorical zeitgeist’, Women’s Studies in Communication, 42:3, pp. 264–68, https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2019.1652528.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Crimp, Martin (2019), When We Have Sufficiently Tortured Each Other: Twelve Variations on Samuel Richardson’s Pamela, London: Faber & Faber.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Darnell, Cyndi (2019), ‘Consent lies destroy lives: Pleasure as the sweetest taboo’, in B. Fileborn and R. Loney-Howes (eds), #MeToo and the Politics of Social Change, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 253–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Escoda Agustí, Carla (2013), Martin Crimp’s Theatre: Collapse as Resistance to Late Capitalist Society, Berlin: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Fenner, Lydia (2017), ‘Sexual consent as a scientific subject: A literature review’, American Journal of Sexuality Education, 12:4, pp. 451–71, https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2017.1393646.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Fileborn, Bianca and Loney-Howes, Rachel (2019), ‘Introduction: Mapping the emergence of #MeToo’, in B. Fileborn and R. Loney-Howes (eds), #MeToo and the Politics of Social Change, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Flint, Christopher (1989), ‘The anxiety of affluence: Family and class disorder in Pamela: Or, Virtue Rewarded’, Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, 29:3, p. 489, https://doi.org/10.2307/450652.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gilmore, Leigh (2017), ‘He said/she said: Truth-telling and #MeToo’, FORUM: University of Edinburgh Postgraduate Journal of Culture & the Arts, 25, https://doi.org/10.2218/forum.25.2559.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Gompertz, Will (2019), ‘Review of When We Have Sufficiently Tortured Each Other’, The BBC, 26 January, https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-46955023. Accessed 10 March 2025.
  19. Gooding, Richard (1995), ‘Pamela, Shamela, and the politics of the Pamela vogue’, Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 7:2, pp. 109–30, https://doi.org/10.1353/ecf.1995.0021.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Gurkin Altman, Janet (1982), Epistolarity: Approaches to a Form, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Hutcheon, Linda ([2006] 2013), A Theory of Adaptation, 2nd ed., Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Keymer, Thomas ([2001] 2008), ‘Introduction’, in T. Keymer (ed.), Pamela by Samuel Richardson, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. vii–xxxiv.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kinghorn, Shane (2020), ‘The echo chamber: Theater in a “post-truth” world’, in W. C. Boles (ed.), After In-Yer-Face Theatre: Remnants of a Theatrical Revolution, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 231–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Laera, Margherita (2014), ‘Introduction: Return, rewrite, repeat: The theatricality of adaptation’, in M. Laera (ed.), Theatre and Adaptation: Return, Rewrite, Repeat, London: Bloomsbury, pp. 1–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Lanser, Susan Sniader (1992), Fictions of Authority: Women Writers and Narrative Voice, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. McIntyre, Lee (2018), Post-Truth, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. McKee, Patricia (1985), ‘Corresponding freedoms: Language and the self in Pamela’, ELH, 52:3, p. 621, https://doi.org/10.2307/2873000.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Reilly, Kara (2018), ‘Introduction to contemporary approaches to adaptation’, in K. Reilly (ed.), Contemporary Approaches to Adaptation in Theatre, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. xxi–xxix.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Richardson, Samuel ([1740] 2008), Pamela; Or, Virtue Rewarded, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Richter, David H. (2017), Reading the Eighteenth-Century Novel, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Roulston, Christine (1998), Virtue, Gender, and the Authentic Self in Eighteenth-Century Fiction: Richardson, Rousseau and Laclos, Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Sabor, Peter (2013), ‘“Labors of the press”: The response to Pamela’, in J. A. Downie (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Eighteenth-Century Novel, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 205–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Sanders, Julie (2006), Adaptation and Appropriation, Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Sierz, Aleks ([2006] 2013), The Theatre of Martin Crimp, 2nd ed., London: Methuen Drama.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Sierz, Aleks (2019), ‘Martin Crimp’s When We Have Sufficiently Tortured Each Other at the national theatre’, The Theatre Times, 30 January, https://thetheatretimes.com/martin-crimps-when-we-have-sufficiently-tortured-each-other-at-the-national-theatre/. Accessed 21 June 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Tureman, Matt (2019), ‘London Theater Review: Cate Blanchett in When We Have Sufficiently Tortured Each Other’, Variety, 25 January, https://variety.com/2019/legit/reviews/when-we-have-sufficiently-tortured-each-other-review-cate-blanchett-1203117598/. Accessed 21 June 2024.
  37. Watt, Ian ([1957] 2015), The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding, London: The Bodley Head.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Williams, Holly (2019), ‘When We Have Sufficiently Tortured Each Other, national theatre review: Cate Blanchett shines in a play about an elaborate sex game’, The Independent, 24 January, https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/theatre-dance/reviews/cate-blanchett-play-review-when-we-have-sufficiently-tortured-each-othe%E2%80%A6. Accessed 10 March 2025.
  39. Wilson, Stuart (1973), ‘Richardson’s Pamela: An interpretation’, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 88:1, pp. 79–91, https://doi.org/10.2307/461328.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Wolf, Matt (2019), ‘Cate Blanchett’s S-and-M play is more tiresome than titillating’, The New York Times, 24 January, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/24/theater/cate-blanchett-london-when-we-have-sufficiently-tortured-each-other.html. Accessed 7 December 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jafp_00143_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): adaptation; communication; consent; gender roles; Pamelists vs. anti-Pamelists; subjectivity; truth-telling

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test