The Muhammad cartoon controversy in New Zealand newspapers | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 14, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1751-9411
  • E-ISSN: 1751-942X

Abstract

This study examines the construction of the controversy surrounding the cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad, as it appeared in three New Zealand newspapers and discursively identifies how three New Zealand newspapers framed Islam and Muslims from an Orientalist perception. This study argues that these newspapers framed the issue of Muhammad cartoon controversial image in a way that reinforces the notion of a clash of culture between Islam and ‘the West’ and identified that Islam is a threat to the civilization. The metaphors employed, the visual texts incorporated, the terminologies they imposed appear to dehumanize Islam and Muslims, which also violates the philosophical stand of the freedom of expression. The news frame that these newspapers adopted in covering the controversial cartoon issue also supports an elite political agenda without respecting the religious norms of a minority group. However, the dehumanization of Islam and Orientalist perception of clash of cultures were mostly absent in their editorials. Therefore, the news frame conflicts with editorials’ construction of the issue in most cases. Furthermore, while one newspaper’s editorials dehumanized Islam and Muslims by espousing Orientalist perception of clash of cultures, the other two played a constructive role towards Islam and Muslims.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jammr_00028_1
2021-04-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexseev, M.. ( 2008;), ‘ Overcounting Russia’s Muslims implications for security and society. ’, PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, 27, pp. 17.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ammitzbøll, P., and Vidino, L.. ( 2007;), ‘ After the Danish cartoon controversy. ’, Middle East Quarterly, 41:1, pp. 311.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bagdikian, B.. ( 2004), The New Media Monopoly, Boston, MA:: Beacon;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Burns, A.,, Haberman, M., and Parker, A.. ( 2016;), ‘ Donald Trump’s confrontation with Muslim soldier’s parents emerges as unexpected flash point. ’, New York Times, 31 July, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/01/us/politics/khizr-khan-ghazala-donald-trump-muslim-soldier.html. Accessed 3 March 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Byng, M.. ( 2008;), ‘ Complex inequalities: The case of Muslim Americans after 9/11. ’, American Behavioural Scientist, 51:5, pp. 65974.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Camaj, L.. ( 2010;), ‘ Media framing through stages of a political discourse: International news agencies’ coverage of Kosovo’s status negotiations. ’, International Communication Gazette, 72:7, pp. 63553.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Corner, J.. ( 2004;), ‘ Freedom, rights and regulations. ’, Media, Culture and Society, 26:6, pp. 89399.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. d’Haenens, L., and Bink, S.. ( 2006;), ‘ Islam in the Dutch press: With special attention to the Algemeen Dagblad. ’, Media, Culture & Society, 29:1, pp. 13549.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dijk, T. A. van. ( 1991;), Racism and the Press. , London:: Routledge;
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Donsbach, W.. ( 2004;), ‘ Psychology of news decisions Factors behind journalists’ professional behaviour. ’, Journalism, 5:2, pp. 13157.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dyzenhaus, D.. ( 1992;), ‘ John Stuart Mill and the harm of pornography. ’, Ethics, 102:3, pp. 53451.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Emerson, T. I.. ( 1977;), ‘ Colonial intentions and current realities of the First Amendment. ’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 125, pp. 73760.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Entman, R. M.. ( 2004), Projections of Power: Framing News Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy, Chicago, IL:: The University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Entman, R. M.. ( 2007;), ' Framing bias: Media in the Distribution on Power. ', Journal of Communication, 57:1, pp. 16373.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Entman, R. M.. ( 2008;), ‘ Theorizing mediated public diplomacy: The U.S. case. ’, International Journal of Press/Politics, 13:2, pp. 87102.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ewart, J.,, Cherney, A., and Murphy, K.. ( 2017;), ‘ Trans-national challenge: News media coverage of Islam and Muslims in Australia: An opinion survey among Australian Muslims. ’, Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 37:2, pp. 14763.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fahmy, S.. ( 2010;), ‘ Image of war. ’, Media, War & Conflict, 3, pp. 35.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fairclough, N.. ( 1995), Media Discourse, London:: Arnold;.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gavrilos, D.. ( 2002;), ‘ Epic encounters: Culture, media, and U.S. interests in the Middle East, 1945-2000. ’, Journal of Communication Inquiry, 26:3, pp. 33941.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Giltin, T.. ( 1980), The Whole World Is Watching, California:: University of California Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Greer, C.. ( 2007;), ‘ News media, victims and crime. ’, in P. Davies,, P. Francis, and C. Greer. (eds), Victims, Crime and Society, London:: Sage;, pp. 2049.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hakam, J.. ( 2009;), ‘ The “cartoons controversy”: A critical discourse analysis of English-language Arab newspaper discourse. ’, Discourse and Society, 20:1, pp. 3357.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Himelboim, I., and Limor, Y.. ( 2008;), ‘ Media perception of freedom of press: A comparative international analysis of 242 codes of ethics. ’, Journalism, 9:3, pp. 23565.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hippler, J., and Lueg, A.. (eds) ( 1995), The Next Threat: Western Perception of Islam, London:: Pluto;.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ho, W.-Y.. ( 2009;), ‘ Danish cartoon controversy in the Chinese context: Transnational Islam and public visibility of Hong Kong Muslims. ’, Cont Islam, 3:3, pp. 27593.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Humphrey, M.. ( 2007;), ‘ Culturalising the abject: Islam, law and moral panic in the West. ’, Australian Journal of Social Issues, 42:1, pp. 925.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Huntington, S. P.. ( 1993;), ‘ The clash of civilizations?. ’, Foreign Affairs, 72:Summer, pp. 2249.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Huntington, S. P.. ( 1996), The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, New York:: Simon and Schuster;.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hussain, A. J.. ( 2007;), ‘ The media’s role in a clash of misconceptions: The case of the Danish Muhammad cartoon. ’, Harvard Journal of International Press/Politics, 12:4, pp. 11230.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ismail, A.. ( 2010;), ‘ Making sense of a barrier: U.S. news discourses on Israel’s dividing wall. ’, Journal of Communication Inquiry, 34:1, pp. 85108.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kabir, S. N.,, Alkaff, S., and Bourk, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Iconizing “Muslim Terrorism” in a British newspaper and popular perception. ’, Muslim Minority Affairs, 38:2, pp. 17997.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kabir, S. N., and Bourk, M.. ( 2012;), ‘ Representing Islam and Muslims in New Zealand newspapers. ’, Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 32:3, pp. 32438.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kabir, S. N., and Hamid, M.. ( 2015;), ' Muslims in Western media: New Zealand newspapers’ construction of 2006 terror plot at Heathrow Airport and beyond. ', Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 35:4, pp. 46985.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kairys, D.. ( 1982;), ‘ Freedom of speech 1. ’, in D. Kairys. (ed.), The Politics of Law, New York:: Basic Books;, SSRN-id727903, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=727903. Accessed 2 March 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kellner, D.. ( 2004;), ‘ 9/11, spectacles of terror, and media manipulation. ’, Critical Discourse Studies, 1:1, pp. 4164.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kellner, D.. ( 2007;), ‘ Bush speaks and the politics of lying: Presidential rhetoric in the “war on terror”. ’, Presidential Studies Quarterly, 37:4, pp. 62245.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kumar, D.. ( 2012), Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, Chicago, IL:: Haymarket Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Loto, R.,, Hodgetts, D.,, Chamberlain, K.,, Nikora, L.,, Karapu, R., and Barnett, A.. ( 2006;), ‘ Pasifika in the news: The portrayal of Pacific peoples in the New Zealand press. ’, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16:2, pp. 10018.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Merskin, D.. ( 2004;), ‘ The construction of Arabs as enemies: Post-September 11 discourse of George W. Bush. ’, Mass Communication and Society, 7:2, pp. 15775.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Miller, D.. ( 2006;), ‘ Propaganda and the “terror threat” in the UK. ’, in E. Poole, and J. E. Richardson. (eds), Muslim and the News Media, London:: I. B. Tauris;, pp. 4552.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Mishra, S.. ( 2008;), ‘ Islam and democracy comparing post-9/11 representations in the U.S. Prestige Press in the Turkish, Iraqi, and Iranian contexts. ’, Journal of Communication Inquiry, 32:2, pp. 15578.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Murphy, J. G.. ( 1997;), ‘ Freedom of expression and the arts. ’, Arizona State Law Journal, 29, pp. 54968.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. O’Shaughnessy, M.. ( 1999), Media and Society: An Introduction, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Peterson, M. A.. ( 2007;), ‘ Making global news: “Freedom of speech” and “Muslim rage” in U.S. journalism. ’, Cont Islam, 1, pp. 24764.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Poole, E.. ( 2002), Reporting Islam: Media Representations of British Muslims, London:: I. B. Tauris;.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Poole, E.. ( 2006;), ‘ The effects of September 11 and the war in Iraq on British newspaper coverage. ’, in E. Poole, and J. E. Richardson. (eds), Muslims and the News Media, London:: I. B. Tauris;, pp. 89102.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Reeves, M.. ( 2000), Muhammad in Europe, New York:: New York University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rehnquist, W.. ( 1973;), ‘ Civility and freedom of speech. ’, Indiana Law Journal, 49:1, pp. 17.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Richardson, J. E.. ( 2001;), ‘ British Muslims in the Broadsheet Press: A challenge to cultural hegemony?. ’, Journalism Studies, 2:2, pp. 22142.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Richardson, J. E.. ( 2004), (Mis)Representating Islam: The Racism and Rhetoric of Broadsheet Newspapers, Amsterdam:: John Benjamins Publishing Company;.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Rostbøll, C. F.. ( 2009;), ‘ Autonomy, respect and arrogance in Danish cartoon controversy. ’, Political Theory, 37:5, pp. 62348.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Rostbøll, C. F.. ( 2011;), ‘ Freedom of expression, deliberation, autonomy respect. ’, European Journal of Political Theory, 10:1, pp. 521.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Said, E.. ( 1978), Orientalism, New York:: Pantheon;.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Said, E.. ( 1981), Covering Islam: How the Media and the Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World, New York:: Pantheon;.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Scheufele, D. A.. ( 2000;), ‘ Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. ’, Mass Communication and Society, 3:2–3, pp. 297316.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Semmerling, T. J.. ( 2008;), ‘ Those “evil” Muslim! Orientalist fear in the narratives of the war on terror. ’, Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 28:2, pp. 20723.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Shehata, A.. ( 2007;), ‘ Facing the Muhammad cartoons: Official dominance and event-driven news in Swedish and American elite press. ’, International Journal of Press/Politics, 12:4, pp. 13153.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Sorabjee, S. J.. ( 1994;), ‘ Freedom of expression and censorship: Some aspects of the Indian experience. ’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 45:Winter, pp. 32742.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Steien, S.. ( 2008;), ‘ “Almost at war”: The Mohammed cartoon controversy in Norwegian media. ’, Conflict and Communication Online, 7:1, pp. 114, http://www.cco.regener-online.de/2008_1/pdf/steien.pdf. Accessed 12 November 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Vernon, R.. ( 1996;), ‘ John Stuart Mill and pornography: Beyond the harm principle. ’, Ethics, 106:3, pp. 62132.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Walker, M.. ( 2006;), ‘ Europe’s Mosque hysteria. ’, The Wilson Quarterly, 30:2, pp. 1422.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jammr_00028_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error