The virtual mask: The dark underbelly of digital anonymity and gender identity construction in Turkey

References

1. Abokhodair, N., Abbar, S., Vieweg, S. and Mejova, Y. (2016), ‘Privacy and Twitter in Qatar: Traditional values in the digital world’, Proceeding of the WebSci, 16:1, pp. 66–77.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aresta, M., Pedro, L., Santos, C. and Moreira, A. (2015), ‘Portraying the self in online contexts: Context-driven and user-driven online identity profiles’, Contemporary Social Science, 10:1, pp. 70–85.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ayish, M. and Al Najjar, A. (2019), ‘“Arab Millennials” articulation of identity in cyberspace: A study of three MENA YouTubers’, Arab Media & Society, 10 October, https://www.arabmediasociety.com/arab-millennials-articulation-of-identity-in-cyberspace-a-study-of-three-mena-youtubers/. Accessed 25 March 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bailey, E. R., Matz, S. C., Youyou, W. and Iyengar, S. S. (2020), ‘Authentic self-expression on social media is associated with greater subjective well-being’, Nature Communications, 11:1, pp. 1–9.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. and Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002), ‘Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the internet’, Journal of Social Issues, 58:1, pp. 33–48.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Barnes, S. B. (1999), ‘Ethical issues for a virtual self’, in S. J. Drucker and G. Gumpert (eds), Real Law @ Virtual Space, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton, pp. 371–98.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bowker, N. I. (2001), ‘Understanding online communities through multiple methodologies combined under a postmodern research endeavour’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2:1, pp. 1–26.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bussey, K. (2011), ‘Gender identity development’, in S. Schwartz, K. Luyckx and V. Vignoles (eds), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research, New York: Springer, pp. 2–48.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Butler, J. (1990), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cover, R. (2012), ‘Performing and undoing identity online: Social networking, identity theories and the incompatibility of online profiles and friendship regimes’, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 18:2, pp. 177–93.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992), ‘Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues’, Health Care Women International, 13:3, pp. 313–21.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Eklund, L., von Essen, E., Jonsson, F. and Johansson, M. (2022), ‘Beyond a dichotomous understanding of online anonymity: Bridging the macro and micro level’, Sociological Research Online, 27:2, pp. 486–503.
    [Google Scholar]
13. El Asmar, F. (2020), ‘Claiming and reclaiming the digital world as a public space: Experiences and insights from feminists in the Middle East and North Africa’, Oxfam International, 16:2, pp. 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ellison, N. B., Blackwell, L., Lampe, C. and Trieu, P. (2016), ‘“The question exists, but you don’t exist with it”: Strategic anonymity in the social lives of adolescents’, Social Media + Society, 2:4, pp. 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
15. El-Sadda, H. (2010), ‘Arab women bloggers: The emergence of literary counter publics’, Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication, 3:3, pp. 312–32.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Giddens, A. (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Goffman, E. (1978), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, London: Harmondsworth.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Goffman, E. (2009), Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, Chicago, IL: Touchstone Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gürkan, H. (2019), ‘The experiences of women professionals in the film industry in Turkey: A gender-based study’, Acta Univ: Sapientiae, Film and Media Studies, 16:1, pp. 205–19.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gürkan, H. and Serttaş, A. (2023), ‘Beauty standard perception of women: A reception study based on Foucault’s truth relations and truth games’, Information & Media, 96:2, pp. 21–39.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Haimson, O. L., Liu, T., Zhang, B. Z. and Corvite, S. (2021), ‘The online authenticity paradox: What being “authentic” on social media means, and barriers to achieving it’, Human Computer Interaction, 5:CSCW2, pp. 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Herrera, L. (2012), ‘Youth and citizenship in the digital age: A view from Egypt’, Harvard Educational Review, 82:3, pp. 333–52.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hongladarom, S. (2011), ‘Personal identity and the self in the online and the offline world’, Minds and Machines, 21:4, pp. 533–48.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hum, N. J., Chamberlin, P. E., Hambright, B. L., Portwood, A. C., Schat, A. C., and Bevan, J. L. (2011), ‘A picture is worth a thousand words: A content analysis of Facebook profile photographs’, Computers in Human Behavior, 27:5, pp. 1828–33.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Huray, P. L. (1990), Authenticity in Performance: Eighteenth Century Case Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Jakala, M. and Berki, E. (2013), Communities, Communication, and Online Identities, Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Jarvandi, R. (2014), ‘Presenting Muslim gender on the internet: A study of Iranian Muslim youth on Facebook’, Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 4:1, pp. 658–69.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kang, R., Brown, S. and Kiesler, S. (2013), ‘Why do people seek anonymity on the internet? Informing policy and design’, in W. E. Mackay (ed.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France, 27 April–2 May, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 2657–66.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Katz, J. E. and Crocker, E. T. (2015), ‘Skype in daily life: General patterns, emerging uses, and concerns: Mobile and digital communication’, in J. R. Carvalheiro and A. T. Serrano (eds), Public Private, Covilhã: LabCom Books, pp. 5–23.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kennedy, H. (2006), ‘Beyond anonymity, or future directions for internet identity research’, New Media and Society, 8:6, pp. 859–76.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kim, Y. Y. and Kim, M. H. (2017), ‘The impact of social factors on excessive online game usage, moderated by online self-identity’, Cluster Computing, 20:1, pp. 569–82.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Krippendorff, K. (2004), Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kugelman, M. (2012), ‘Social media in Pakistan: Catalyst for communication not change’, NOREF Report, 15 August, https://reliefweb.int/report/pakistan/social-media-pakistan-catalyst-communication-not-change. Accessed 13 March 2023.
34. Larsson, A. O. (2018), ‘The news user on social media: A comparative study of interacting with media organizations on Facebook and Instagram’, Journalism Studies, 19:15, pp. 2225–42.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Leung, A. (2014), ‘Anonymity as identity: Exploring collective identity in anonymous cyberactivism’, International Journal of Technology, Knowledge & Society, 9:2, pp. 173–84.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lindgren, S. (2018), Digital Media & Society, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Lipinski, T. A. (2002), ‘To speak or not to speak: Developing legal standards for anonymous speech on the internet’, Informing Science, 5:1, pp. 95–111.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Livingstone, S. (2008), ‘Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression’, New Media & Society, 10:3, pp. 393–411.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Malhotra, N. K. (2004), Marketing Research an Applied Orientation, 4th ed., New York: Pearson Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Marwick, A. E. (2005), ‘Selling yourself: Online identity in the age of a commodified internet’, master’s thesis, Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Marwick, A. E. and Boyd, D. (2011), ‘I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience’, New Media & Society, 13:1, pp. 114–33.
    [Google Scholar]
42. McIntosch, A. J. and Prentice, R. C. (1999), ‘Affirming authenticity: Consuming cultural heritage’, Annols of Tourism Research, 26:3, pp. 589–612.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Mellado, C. and Hermida, A. (2021), ‘The promoter, celebrity, and joker roles in journalists’ social media performance’, Social Media + Society, 7:1, pp. 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Merchant, G. (2006), ‘Identity, social networks and online communication’, E- Learning, 3:2, pp. 235–44.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Miller, H. and Arnold, J. (2003), ‘Self in web homepages: Gender, identity, and power in cyberspace’, in G. Riva and C. Galimberti (eds), Towards CyberPsychology: Mind, Cognitions and Society in the Internet Age, Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 73–94.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Noakes, T. and Noakes, T. (2021), ‘Distinguishing online academic bullying: Identifying new forms of harassment in a dissenting emeritus professor’s case’, Heliyon, 7:2, pp. E06326–13.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Ruiz-Cabrera, S. and Gürkan, H. (2023), ‘Effects of Turkish cultural products on its foreign policy toward Africa: Turkish TV series as an example of soft power in Kenya, Mozambique, and Senegal’, Profesional de la información, 32:2, pp. 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Sabbagh, K., Mourad, M., Kabbara, W., Shehadi, R. T. and Samman, H. (2012), Understanding the Arab Digital Generation, New York: Booz & Company.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Salam, R. (2022), ‘In a world where you can be anyone: An investigation into the gendered social practices of Pakistani Facebook users’, Gender Issues, 39:3, pp. 253–74.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Shedletsky, L. J. and Aitken, J. E. (2004), Human Communication on the Internet, Boston, MA: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Subrahmanyam, K., Greenfield, P. M. and Tynes, B. (2004), ‘Constructing sexuality and identity in an online teen chat room’, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25:6, pp. 651–66.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Subrahmanyam, K. and Smahel, D. (2011), Digital Youth: The Role of Media in Development, New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
53. TAM (2019), ‘Gender-based violence against Palestinian women in the digital space’, TAM, November, https://7amleh.org/storage/Violating%20Network%2027.11.pdf. Accessed 10 October 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Taylor, C. (1992), The Ethics of Authenticity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Thurlow, C., Lendal, L. and Tomic, A. (2004), Computer Mediated Communication, London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Warschauer, M., Said, G. R. and Zohry, A. (2007), ‘Language choice online: Globalization and identity online’, in B. Danet and S. C. Herring (eds), The Multilingual Internet: Language, Internet, and Communication Online, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 303–18.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Waterloo, S. F., Baumgartner, S. E., Peter, J. and Valkenburg, P. M. (2018), ‘Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp’, New Media & Society, 20:5, pp. 1813–31.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Whitaker, B. (2011), Unspeakable Love: Gay and Lesbian Life in the Middle East, London: Saqi Books.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Williams, J. P. (2006), ‘Authentic identities: Straightedge subculture, music, and the internet’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35:2, pp. 173–200.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Zayer, L. T., Sredl, K., Parmentier, M. A. and Coleman, C. (2012), ‘Consumption and gender identity in popular media: Discourses of domesticity, authenticity, and sexuality’, Consumption Markets & Culture, 15:4, pp. 333–57.
    [Google Scholar]