Skip to content
1981
image of Balance and impartiality in public service news: The BBC’s news framing of the 2023 Israel–Gaza war

Abstract

This study analyses how the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) framed and sourced news during the first three weeks of the 2023 Israel–Gaza war (7–28 October 2023), utilizing a framing approach to assess impartiality. Building on quantitative content analyses, it compares twenty cross-party and party-specific frames, as well as variations in the utilization of sources in the BBC’s ‘Israel–Gaza war’ section. The analyses reveal minimal disparities in the use of cross-party positive frames between the Palestinian and Israeli sides, with the human-interest frame being the most prevalent. However, the use of cross-party negative frames was partial to Israel, with a substantially higher frequency of criminality and terrorism frames in Palestinian narratives, despite some references to Israel’s violations. Party-specific frames favouring Israel were markedly more prominent than those favouring Palestine, while Palestinian concerns were marginalized. The BBC cited Israeli political and citizen sources more frequently than Palestinian sources, whereas Palestinian medical sources were cited more often than Israeli ones.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jammr_00105_1
2025-04-26
2026-04-13

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anon. (2023a), ‘Israel threatens ban of BBC for its refusal to call Hamas terrorists’, The Business Standard, 21 October, https://www.tbsnews.net/hamas-israel-war/israel-threatens-ban-bbc-its-refusal-call-hamas-terrorists-723270. Accessed 24 October 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anon. (2023b), ‘The BBC is under fire for its coverage of the Israel-Hamas war: Rightly so’, Times of Israel, 3 November, https://www.timesofisrael.com/the-bbc-is-under-fire-for-its-coverage-of-the-israel-hamas-war-rightly-so/. Accessed 24 October 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anon. (2023c), ‘BBC drops “militant” as default description for Hamas’, Financial Times, https://www.ft.com/content/20b5466e-d690-4e00-828e-5f364e22f1c5. Accessed 24 October 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Anon. (2023d), ‘BBC stops calling Hamas “militants” by default after backlash’, The Telegraph, 20 October, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/10/20/bbc-no-longer-describe-hamas-militants-backlash/. Accessed 24 October 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Anon. (2023e), ‘Sunak promises Israel “unqualified support in face of evil”: But makes no mention of Gaza’s plight’, The Guardian, 14 October, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/14/sunak-promises-israel-unqualified-support-in-face-of-evil-but-fails-to-mention-plight-of-gaza. Accessed 24 October 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Aalberg, Toril, Van Aelst, Peter and Curran, James (2010), ‘Media systems and the political information environment: A cross-national comparison’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15:3, pp. 25571, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161210367422.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Abdul Rehman, Fatima and Jebril, Nael (2023), ‘The portrayal of non-western sports hosts in international media: A comparative analysis of BBC, Al Jazeera English and RT’s coverage of the 2022 FIFA World Cup’, International Communication Gazette, online first, https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485231219128.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Al Jazeera English (2023), ‘As Israel pounds Gaza, BBC journalists accuse broadcaster of bias’, 23 November, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/11/23/as-israel-pounds-gaza-bbc-journalists-accuse-broadcaster-of-bias. Accessed 24 October 2024.
  9. Al Jazeera English (2024), ‘Israel-Gaza War in maps and charts: Live tracker’, 30 September, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/longform/2023/10/9/israel-hamas-war-in-maps-and-charts-live-tracker. Accessed 24 October 2024.
  10. Altheide, David L. (2006), ‘Terrorism and the politics of fear’, Cultural Studies? Critical Methodologies, 6:4, pp. 41539, https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708605285733.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Amer, Mohammed Mosheer A. (2022), ‘“BBC and New York Times” coverage of the May 2021 Israeli onslaught on Gaza: A critical discourse analysis’, International Journal of English Linguistics, 12:5, pp. 118, https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijel/article/view/0/47455. Accessed 14 February 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Barkho, Leon (2007), ‘Unpacking the discursive and social links in BBC, CNN and Al Jazeera Middle East reporting’, Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, 1:1, pp. 1129, https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr.1.1.11_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Barkho, Leon (2008), ‘The BBC’s discursive strategy and practices vis-à-vis the Palestinian–Israeli conflict’, Journalism Studies, 9:2, pp. 278294, https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701848337.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Barkho, Leon (2011), ‘The discursive and social paradigm of Al Jazeera English in comparison and parallel with the BBC’, Communication Studies, 62:1, pp. 2340, https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2011.535408.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bello, Umar (2014), ‘Ideology in reporting the “operation cast lead”, a transitivity analysis of the Arab News and New York Times reports’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3:3, pp. 20210, http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.3p.202.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Berelson, Bernard (1952), Content Analysis in Communication Research, New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. British Broadcasting Corporation (2006), Report of the Independent Panel for The BBC Governors on Impartiality of BBC Coverage of the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict, https://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/our_work/govs/panel_report_final.pdf. Accessed 24 October 2024.
  18. British Broadcasting Corporation (2021), BBC Annual Report and Accounts (2020/21), https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/bbc-annual-report-and-accounts-for-202021. Accessed 24 October 2024.
  19. British Broadcasting Corporation (2023a), BBC Annual Report and Accounts 2022/23, https://www.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/documents/ara-2022-23.pdf. Accessed 24 October 2024.
  20. British Broadcasting Corporation (2023b), ‘How the dead are counted in Gaza’, 16 November, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67347201. Accessed 24 October 2024.
  21. British Broadcasting Corporation (2023c), ‘Gaza sees heaviest night of Israeli bombardment since start of war’, 29 October, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67248320. Accessed 24 October 2024.
  22. British Broadcasting Corporation (2023d), ‘BBC defends policy not to call Hamas “terrorists” after criticism’, October, https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-67076341. Accessed 24 October 2024.
  23. British Broadcasting Corporation (2024), ‘Section 4: Impartiality – Introduction’, 14 May, https://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/guidelines/impartiality. Accessed 24 October 2024.
  24. British Broadcasting Corporation Trust (2007), From Seesaw to Wagon Wheel: Safeguarding Impartiality in the 21st Century (report), http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/18_06_07impartialitybbc.pdf. Accessed 24 October 2024.
  25. British Broadcasting Corporation Trust (2012), A BBC Trust Report on the Impartiality and Accuracy of the BBC’s Coverage of the Events Known as the ‘Arab Spring’ (report), http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/our_work/editorial_standards/impartiality/arab_spring.html. Accessed 24 October 2024.
  26. Chalaby, Jean K. (1998), The Invention of Journalism, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Curran, James, Iyengar, Shanto, Lund, Anker Brink and Salovaara-Moring, Inka (2009), ‘Media system, public knowledge and democracy: A comparative study’, European Journal of Communication, 24, pp. 526, https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323108098943.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. D’Angelo, Paul (2002), ‘News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman’, Journal of Communication, 52:4, pp. 87088, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02578.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Deprez, Annelore and Raeymaeckers, Karin (2010), ‘Framing the first and second intifada: A longitudinal quantitative research design applied to the Flemish press’, European Journal of Communication, 25:1, pp. 323, https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323109354225.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Deuze, Mark (2005), ‘What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology reconsidered’, Journalism, 6:4, pp. 44264, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905056815.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. De Vreese, Claes H. (2005), ‘News framing: Theory and typology’, Information Design Journal, 13, pp. 5162, https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. De Vreese, Claes H. and Lecheler, Sophie (2016), ‘Framing theory’, in G. Mazzoleni, K. G. Barnhurst, K. Ikeda, R. C. M. Maia and H. Wessler (eds), The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, The Wiley-Blackwell-ICA International Encyclopedias of Communication, Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 40413, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc121.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Donsbach, Wolfgang and Klett, Bettina (1993), ‘Subjective objectivity: How journalists in four countries define a key term of their profession’, International Communication Gazette, 51:1, pp. 5383, https://doi.org/10.1177/001654929305100104.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Downey, John, Deacon, David, Golding, Peter, Oldfield, Ben and Wring, Dominic (2006), The BBC’s Reporting of the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict, Loughborough: Loughborough University, https://hdl.handle.net/2134/3158. Accessed 24 October 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. El-Affendi, Abdelwahab (2024), ‘The futility of genocide studies after Gaza’, Journal of Genocide Research, online first, pp. 17, https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2024.2305525.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Elmasry, Mohamad Hamas (2009), ‘Death in the Middle East: An analysis of how the New York Times and Chicago Tribune framed killings in the second Palestinian intifada’, Journal of Middle East Media, 5:1, pp. 146, https://www.qu.edu.qa/SiteImages/static_file/qu/conference/jmem2017/Vol/5/En/Death%20in%20the%20Middle%20East.pdf. Accessed 14 February 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Elmasry, Mohamad Hamas, Shamy, Alaa El, Manning, Peter, Mills Andrew and Auter, Philip J. (2013), ‘Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabiya framing of the Israel–Palestine conflict during war and calm periods’, International Communication Gazette, 75:8, pp. 75068, https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048513482545.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Elsheikh, D., Jebril, N. and Jackson, D. (2024a), ‘Democratising the media: Media reform and the future of journalism in Egypt’, in N. Jebril and M. A. Abunajela (eds), Media and Democracy in the Middle East, London: Routledge, pp. 13047.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Elsheikh, Dalia, Jebril, Nael and Jackson, Daniel (2024b), ‘Assessing media roles in Egypt: A journalistic perspective on liberal media functions’, Journal of Applied Journalism and Media Studies, online first, pp. 120, https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00143_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Engelbert, Jiska and McCurdy, Patrick (2011), Capitalising on the plasticity of impartiality: The BBC and the 2009 Gaza appeal’, Critical Discourse Studies, 8:3, pp. 183201, https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2011.586227.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Entman, Robert M. (1993), ‘Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm’, Journal of Communication, 43:4, pp. 5158, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Entman, Robert M. (2007), ‘Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power’, Journal of Communication, 57:1, pp. 16373, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Entman, Robert M. (2010), ‘Media framing biases and political power: Explaining slant in news of Campaign 2008’, Journalism, 11:4, pp. 389408, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884910367587.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Esser, Frank, de Vreese, Claes H., Strömbäck, Jesper, van Aelst, Peter, Aalberg, Toril, Stanyer, James, Lengauer, Günther, Berganza, Rosa, Legnante, Guido, Papathanassopoulos, Stylianos, Salgado, Susana, Sheafer, Tamir and Reinemann, Carsten (2012), ‘Political information opportunities in Europe: A longitudinal and comparative study of 13 television systems’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17:3, pp. 24774, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212442956.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Flood, C., Hutchings, S., Miazhevich, G. and Nickels, H. (2010), ‘BETWEEN IMPARTIALITY AND IDEOLOGY: The BBC’s paradoxical remit and the case of Islam-related television news’, Journalism Studies, 12:2, pp. 22138, https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2010.507934.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Gamson, William A. (1992), Talking Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Gamson, William A. and Modigliani, Andre (1989), ‘Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach’, American Journal of Sociology, 95:1, pp. 137, https://doi.org/10.1086/229213.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Gans, Herbert J. (1980), Deciding What’s News, New York: Vintage Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Goffman, Erving (1974), Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Harrison, Jackie and Wessels, Bridgette (2005), ‘A new public service communication environment? Public service broadcasting values in the reconfiguring media’, New Media and Society, 17:6, pp. 83453, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444805058172.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Iosifidis, Petros (ed.) (2010), Reinventing Public Service Communication: European Broadcasters and Beyond, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Iyengar, Shanto (1991), Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Jebril, Nael (2013), ‘Is watchdog journalism satisfactory journalism? A cross-national study of public satisfaction with political coverage’, Reuters Institute, University of Oxford, May, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2018-01/Is%20Watchdog%20Journalism%20Satisfactory%20Journalism.pdf. Accessed 24 October 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Jebril, Nael and Abunajela, Mohammed-Ali (2024), Media and Democracy in the Middle East, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Jebril, Nael and El Bouzidi, Mohammed (2022), ‘Framing the Yellow Vests protests in the French press’, Journalism Practice, 18:5, pp. 121736, https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2022.2086159.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Kieran, Matthew (1998), ‘Objectivity, impartiality and good journalism’, in M. Kieran (ed.), Media Ethics, London: Routledge, pp. 2336.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Lecheler, Sophie and De Vreese, Claes H. (2019), News Framing Effects, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Lombard, Matthew, Snyder-Duch, Jennier and Bracken, Cheryl C. (2002), ‘Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability’, Human Communication Research, 28:4, pp. 587604, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. McNair, Brian (1998), The Sociology of Journalism, London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. McQuail, Denis (2005), Mass Communication Theory, 5th ed., London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. McQuail, Denis (2010), McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Mellado, Claudia, Hallin, Daniel, Cárcamo, Luis, Alfaro, Rodrigo, Jackson, Daniel, Humanes, María Luisa, Marquez-Ramırez, Mireya, Mick Jacques, Mothes Cornelia, I-Hsuan LIN Christi, Lee Misook, Alfaro Amaranta, Isbej Jose, Ramos Andrés (2021), ‘Sourcing pandemic news: A cross-national computational analysis of mainstream media coverage of COVID-19 on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram’, Digital Journalism, 9:9, pp. 126185, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1942114.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Miladi, Noureddine and Miladi, Aaya (2023), ‘Digital media and the war of narratives in reporting the Palestinian–Israeli conflict’, in N. Miladi (ed.), Global Media Coverage of the Palestinian–Israeli Conflict, London: I.B. Tauris, pp. 1130.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Montgomery, Martin (2006), ‘Broadcast news, the live “two-way” and the case of Andrew Gilligan’, Media, Culture & Society, 28:2, pp. 23359, https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706061683.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Patterson, Thomas E. (1998), ‘The political roles of the journalist’, in D. Graber, D. McQuail and P. Norris (eds), The Politics of News: The News of Politics, Washington, DC: CQ Press, pp. 2339.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Philo, Greg and Berry, Mike (2004), Bad News from Israel, Glasgow: Pluto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Philo, Greg and Berry, Mike (2006), ‘Bad news and public debate about the Israel-Palestine conflict’, in E. Poole and J. E. Richardson (eds), Muslims and the News Media, New York: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Philo, Greg and Berry, Mike (2011), More Bad News from Israel, Glasgow: Pluto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Reese, Stephen D. (1990), ‘The news paradigm and the ideology of objectivity: A socialist at The Wall Street Journal’, Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7:4, pp. 390409, https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039009360187.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Reliefweb (2023), ‘Initial reporting on the ongoing Israeli retaliatory attacks on Gaza: (Reporting Period, 728 October 2023) based on preliminary documentation’, 13 November, https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/initial-reporting-ongoing-israeli-retaliatory-attacks-gaza-reporting-period-7-28-october-2023-based-preliminary-documentation-enar. Accessed 24 October 2024.
  71. Richardson, John E. and Barkho, Leon (2009), ‘Reporting Israel/Palestine: The verbal and visual rhetoric of BBC journalism’, Journalism Studies, 10:5, pp. 594622, https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700802653057.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Schudson, Michael (1978), Discovering the News, New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Schudson, Michael (2001), ‘The objectivity norm in American journalism’, Journalism, 2:2, pp. 14970, https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490100200201.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Semetko, Holli A. and Valkenburg, Patti M. (2000), ‘Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news’, Journal of Communication, 50:2, pp. 93109, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Skovsgaard, Morten, Albæk, Erik, Bro, Peter and De Vreese, Claes H. (2013), ‘A reality check: How journalists’ role perceptions impact their implementation of the objectivity norm’, Journalism, 14:1, pp. 2242, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912442286.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Starkey, Guy (2007), Balance and Bias in Journalism: Representation, Regulation and Democracy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Stevoli, Margherita (2020), ‘Famine as a collateral damage of war’, Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies, 11:1, pp. 16386, https://doi.org/10.1163/18781527-01101001.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Thomas, Luckmann (2011), ‘Reconstructions of “Reality?” The coverage of the Gaza withdrawal in the British media’, Journalism Studies, 12:4, pp. 52238, https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2011.571818.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Thomas, Ryan J. and Hindman, Elizabeth Blanks (2012), ‘“People will die because of the BBC”: British newspaper reaction to the BBC Gaza appeal decision’, Journalism, 13:5, pp. 572588, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911431539.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Tracey, Michael (1998), The Decline and Fall of Public Service Broadcasting, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. TRT World (2023), ‘BBC reporters accuse broadcaster of pro-Israel bias in Palestine coverage’, 24 November, https://www.trtworld.com/middle-east/bbc-reporters-accuse-broadcaster-of-pro-israel-bias-in-palestine-coverage-15956278. Accessed 24 October 2024.
  82. Tuchman, Gaye (1972), ‘Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity’, American Journal of Sociology, 77:4, pp. 66079, https://doi.org/10.1086/225193.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Tumber, Howard and Prentoulis, Marina (2005), ‘Journalism and the making of a profession’, in H. De Burgh (ed.), Making Journalists, London: Routledge, pp. 5874.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Vliegenthart, Rens (2012), ‘Framing in mass communication research: An overview and assessment’, Sociology Compass, 6:12, pp. 93748, https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12003.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin, Berry, Mike, Garcia-Blanco, Iñaki, Bennett, Lucy and Cable, Jonathan (2017), ‘Rethinking balance and impartiality in journalism? How the BBC attempted and failed to change the paradigm’, Journalism, 18:7, pp. 781800, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916648094.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Westerståhl, Jörgen (1983), ‘Objective news reporting: General premises’, Communication Research, 10:3, pp. 40324, https://doi.org/10.1177/009365083010003007.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jammr_00105_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jammr_00105_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test