Skip to content
1981
Volume 11, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2040-199X
  • E-ISSN: 1751-7974

Abstract

Studies of (new) media and social change should strive to introduce causality into the analysis. Studies relying on quantitative data tend to provide either too simplistic explanations or just point to correlations while qualitatively based studies tend to be so particularistic that the potential for generalizing findings from specific cases is negligible. In this article, it is argued that proper accounts should strive to suggest causal connections between social change and media practices – not by resorting to unrealistic cover law-explanations but by identifying and analysing social mechanisms. Done properly, such analyses would: heed acting subjects; explain these practices through expositions of the minute steps that link A and B; and be realistic accounts – both in the sense of being based on ‘thick’ descriptions and of being easily recognizable when compared to what is actually happening in everyday life.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (CC-BY), which allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article as long as the author is attributed, the article is not used for commercial purposes, and the work is not modified or adapted in any way.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jams.11.2.143_1
2019-06-01
2024-06-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jams.11.2.143_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Botswana; causality; change; media practices; social mechanisms; theory
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error