Skip to content
1981
Volume 16, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2040-199X
  • E-ISSN: 1751-7974

Abstract

Social media activism among the youth has been on the increase in Ghana and Africa. In the context of Ghana, the article interrogates the level of involvement of social media and its use by the youth as they relate to freedom of expression; participation in elections; socialization and job opportunities; and the devices used to connect to the internet. This study applied the survey method that randomly sampled 9024 youth across ten geopolitical regions of Ghana. It analysed data using both positivist and contextual analytic lenses after critiquing the relevant literature. The critiques teased out the key questions investigated with findings and discussions providing nuanced outcomes. It emerged that social media promotes freedom of expression and participation in elections; social relations and job opportunities among the youth in Ghana. The findings also reveal a certain paradox of social media and youth involvement in sociopolitical affairs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jams_00118_1
2024-05-09
2024-10-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barbour, H. S., Bradshaw, A., Fleischer, G., McCall, G. and Fonalledas, Z. (2013), Growth and Opportunity Project, Republican National Committee (RNC), https://www.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/RNCreport03182013.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chitanana, T. and Mutsvairo, B. (2019), ‘The deferred “democracy dividend” of citizen journalism and social media: Perils, promises and prospects from the Zimbabwean experience’, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 14:1, pp. 6680.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J. and Parkin, M. (2014), ‘US congressional campaign communications in an internet age’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 24:1, pp. 2044.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dzisah, W. S. (2018), ‘Social media and elections in Ghana: Enhancing democratic participation’, African Journalism Studies, 39:1, pp. 2747.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dzisah, W. S. (2020), ‘Social media and participation in Ghana’s 2016 elections’, in M. N. Ndlela and W. Mano (eds), Social Media and Elections in Africa: Theoretical Perspectives and Election Campaigns, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 97118.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Essoungou, A. M. (2010), ‘A social media boom begins in Africa: Using mobile phones, Africans join the global conversation’, Africa Renewal, December, https://www.un.org/africarenewal/magazine/december-2010/social-media-boom-begins-africa. Accessed July 2023.
  7. Feldman, O. and Kawakami, K. (1991), ‘Media use as predictors of political behaviour: The case of Japan’, Political Psychology, 12:1, pp. 6580.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gagliardone, I. (2016), The Politics of Technology in Africa: Communication, Development, and Nation-Building in Ethiopia, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Global Digital Agency (2018), ‘Digital in 2018: World’s internet users pass the 4 billion mark’, we are social, 30 January, https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2018/01/global-digital-report-2018/. Accessed 10 March 2023.
  10. Habermas, J. ([1962] 1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hwang, J. (2016), ‘The social construction of a gentrifying neighborhood: Reifying and redefining identity and boundaries in inequality’, Urban Affairs Review, 52:1, pp. 98128.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. International Telecommunications Union [ITU] (2020), ‘Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2020’, 25 May, https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/FactsFigures2020.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2023.
  13. Internet World Statistics (2023), Internet users statistics for Africa, http://internetworldstats.com/stats1.htm. Accessed 28 May 2023.
  14. Kalton, G. (2011), Introduction to Survey Sampling, London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kamau, S. C. (2017), ‘Democratic engagement in the digital age: Youth, social media and participatory politics in Kenya’, Communicatio, 43:2, pp. 12846.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kellner, D. (2000), ‘Habermas, public sphere and democracy: A critical intervention’, in L. E. Hanne (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas, Peru, IL: Open Court, pp. 25988.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Khosravinik, M. (2018), ‘Social media techno-discursive design, affective communication and contemporary politics’, Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11:1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-018-0226-y.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Loader, B. D. and Mercea, D. (2011), ‘Networking democracy? Social media innovations and participatory politics’, Information, Communication, Society, pp. 75769.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. McQuail, D. (1983), Mass Communication Theory, London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J. and Matsa, K. E. (2015), ‘Millennials and political news: Social media – the local TV for the next generation?’, Pew Research Center, 1 June, https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2015/06/01/millennials-political-news/. Accessed 10 March 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mochtar, H. (2014), ‘Public participation and political culture: A case study of voting behavior in Jombang regency’, Open Journal of Political Science, 4:4, pp. 24449.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mutsvairo, B. and Sirks, L. A. (2015), ‘Examining the contribution of social media in reinforcing political participation in Zimbabwe’, Journal of African Media Studies, 7:3, pp. 32944.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ndlela, M. N. (2020), ‘Young people, social media and political participation, the limits of discursive (in) civility in the Kenyan context’, in M. N. Ndlela and W. Mano (eds), Social Media and Elections in Africa. Challenges and Opportunities, vol. 2, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Singleton Jr., R. A. and Straits, B. C. (2010), Approaches to Social Research, 5th ed., New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Strandberg, K. (2013), ‘A social media revolution or just a case of history repeating itself? The use of social media in the 2011 Finnish parliamentary elections’, New Media & Society, 15:8, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812470612.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Suminas, A. and Mierzecka, A. (2014), ‘Political information sources for young citizens: A case study of Lithuanian youth information behaviour’, Informacijos Mokslai, 70, pp. 2544.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Tang, G. and Lee, F. L. (2013), ‘Facebook use and political participation: The impact of exposure to shared political information, connections with public political actors, and network structural heterogeneity’, Social Science Computer Review, 31:6, https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313490625.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Velez, K. M. (2022), ‘Inaugural addresses, framing theory, and the impact on American perceptions of the presidency’, MA thesis, Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/9491. Accessed 6 March 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Westling, M. (2007), ‘Expanding the public sphere: The impact of Facebook on political communication’, http://www.thenewvernacular.com/projects/facebookandpolitical communication.pdf. Accessed 8 March 2023.
  30. Willems, W. (2016), ‘Social media, platform power and (mis) information in Zambia’s recent elections’, Africa, 30 August, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/africaatlse/2016/08/30/social-media-platform-power-and-misinformation-in-zambias-recent-elections/. Accessed 10 March 2023.
  31. Zhang, W., Johnson, T. J., Seltzer, T. and Bichard, S. L. (2010), ‘The revolution will be networked: The influence of social networking sites on political attitudes and behaviour’, Social Science Computer Review, 28:1, pp. 7592.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jams_00118_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jams_00118_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error