The ethics of the everyday: Mauritian morning talk radio as a space for democratic engagement

References

1. Ahmed, S. (2004), The Cultural Politics of Emotion, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ahmed, S. (2018), ‘Complaint as feminist pedagogy’, Annual Review of Critical Psychology, Special Issue: ‘Sex and Power in the University’, 15, pp. 15–26, https://discourseunit.com/annual-review/arcp-15-sex-and-power-in-the-university-2018/. Accessed 10 October 2022.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bakardjieva, M. (2009), ‘Subactivism: Lifeworld and politics in the age of the internet’, The Information Society, 25:2, pp. 91–104.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bickford, S. (2011), ‘Emotion talk and political judgment’, The Journal of Politics, 73:4, pp. 1025–37.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bird, S. E. (2003), The Audience in Everyday Life: Living in a Media World, New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Carpentier, N. and Cleen, B. de (2007), ‘Bringing discourse theory into media studies: The applicability of discourse theoretical analysis (DTA) for the study of media practices and discourses’, Journal of Language and Politics, 6:2, pp. 265–93.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Carpentier, N. and Doudaki, V. (2018), ‘An introduction to power, multidirectionality and contingency: Political struggles over representation, decision-making and technology’, Comunicazioni Sociali, 1, pp. 3–8.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Carpentier, N. and van Brussel, L. (2012), ‘On the contingency of death: A discourse-theoretical perspective on the construction of death’, Critical Discourse Studies, 9:2, pp. 99–115.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chouliaraki, L. (2011), ‘“Improper distance”: Towards a critical account of solidarity as irony’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 14:4, pp. 363–81.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chouliaraki, L. (2016), ‘Cosmopolitianism’, in J. Gray and L. Ouelette (eds), Media Studies, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chouliaraki, L. and Orgad, S. (2011), ‘Proper distance: Mediation, ethics, otherness’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 14:4, pp. 341–45.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Couldry, N. (2004), ‘Theorising media as practice’, Social Semiotics, 14:2, pp. 115–32.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Couldry, N. (2010), Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics after Neoliberalism, London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Degerman, D. (2018), ‘Review: Anger and forgiveness: Resentment, generosity, and justice’, Contemporary Political Theory, 17, pp. 9–12.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Flyvbjerg, B. (2012), ‘Making social science matter’, in G. Papanagnou (ed.), Social Science and Policy Challenges: Democracy, Values, and Capacities, Paris: UNESCO Publishing, pp. 25–56.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fraser, N. (1990), ‘Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy’, Social Text, 25–26, pp. 56–80.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Freedom House (2022), ‘Freedom in the world 2022: Mauritius’, https://freedomhouse.org/country/mauritius/freedom-world/2022. Accessed 12 January 2023.
18. Habermas, J. (1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hyden, G. and Leslie, M. (2007), ‘Communications and democratization in Africa’, in G. Hyden, M. Leslie and F. F. Ogundimu (eds), Media and Democracy in Africa, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 1–27.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Karppinen, K., Moe, H. and Svensson, J. (2008), ‘Habermas, Mouffe and political communication: A case for theoretical eclecticism’, Javnost – The Public, 15:3, pp. 5–21.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Livingstone, S. and Lunt, P. (1994), Talk on Television: Audience Participation and Public Debate, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Loos, E. and Ivan, L. (2018), ‘Visual ageism in the media’, in L. Ayalon and C. Tesch-Römer (eds), Contemporary Perspectives on Ageism, International Perspectives on Aging, vol. 19, Cham: Springer, pp. 163–76.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Mercea, D., Iannelli, L. and Loader, B. D. (2015), ‘Protest communication ecologies’, Information, Communication & Society, 19:3, pp. 279–89.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Moeller, S. (1999), Compassion Fatigue: How the Media Sell Disease, Famine, War and Death, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Mouffe, C. (1993), The Return of the Political, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Mouffe, C. (2005), The Democratic Paradox, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Nussbaum, M. (2016), Anger and Forgiveness: Resentment, Generosity, and Justice, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Pantti, M. K. (2019), ‘Journalism and witnessing’, in K. Wahl-Jorgensen and T. Hanitzsch (eds), The Handbook of Journalism Studies, 2nd ed., ICA Handbook Series, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 151–64.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Powell, A. and Nash, V. (2013), ‘Beyond rational games: An analysis of the “ecology of values” in internet governance debates’, Communication, Culture & Critique, 6:4, pp. 616–33.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Ryfe, D. M. (2017), ‘A practice approach to the study of news production’, Journalism, 19:2, pp. 217–33.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Shotter, J. and Tsoukas, H. (2014), ‘Performing phronesis: On the way to engaged judgment’, Management Learning, 45:4, pp. 377–96.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Shroufi, O. and Cleen, B. de (2022), ‘Far-right intellectual discourse about populism: The case of the German Institut für Staatspolitik’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 29:2, pp. 330–51, https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2022.2066154.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Silverstone, R. (2003), ‘Proper distance: Towards an ethics for cyberspace’, in G. Liestol, A. Morrison and T. Rasmussen (eds), Digital Media Revisited: Theoretical and Conceptual Innovations in Digital Domains, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 469–90.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Srinivasan, A. (2018), ‘The aptness of anger’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 26:2, pp. 123–44.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Stupart, R. (2022), ‘Anger and the investigative journalist’, Journalism, 24:11, pp. 2341–58.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Voltmer, K. and Kraetzschmar, H. (2015), ‘Investigating the media and democratisation conflicts: Research design and methodology of media, conflict and democratisation (MeCoDEM)’, working paper, http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/117317/. Accessed 12 January 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019), Emotions, Media and Politics, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. and Pantti, M. (2021), ‘Introduction: The emotional turn in journalism’, Journalism, 22:5, pp. 1147–54.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Wasserman, H. (2021), The Ethics of Engagement: Media, Conflict, and Democracy in Africa, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Wiesslitz, C. and Ashuri, T. (2011), ‘“Moral journalists”: The emergence of new intermediaries of news in an age of digital media’, Journalism, 12:8, pp. 1035–51.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Willems, W. (2023), ‘The reproduction of canonical silences: Re-reading Habermas in the context of slavery and the slave trade’, Communication, Culture & Critique, 16:1, pp. 17–24.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Zelizer, B., Boczkowski, P. J. and Anderson, C. W. (2022), The Journalism Manifesto, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]