Skip to content
1981
China–Africa Language and Cultural Exchange
  • ISSN: 2040-199X
  • E-ISSN: 1751-7974

Abstract

This study explores how Egyptian audiences interpret Sino-Egyptian cultural content in livestreams featuring imperial tomb symbolism from both Egypt and China. Using Hall’s encoding/decoding model, this article examines how viewers negotiate meaning, compare traditions and construct cultural understanding in a digital, cross-cultural setting. Data were collected in 2025 through written interviews, participant observation and digital trace analysis among Egyptian learners of Chinese. Results show that audiences actively identified both shared themes – especially beliefs about the afterlife – and cultural distinctions, such as Egypt’s emphasis on individual immortality vs. China’s focus on lineage and social continuity. Viewers used comparative strategies to map similarities, build equivalences and deepen interpretation. Interactive livestream features such as chat, Q&A and visual presentations encouraged collaborative meaning-making and interpretive community formation. Overall, the study demonstrates how digital media can enable reflective, participatory engagement with cultural heritage and highlights the active role of audiences in shaping cross-cultural understanding.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • 2023 Major Project of International Chinese Education Research ‘Research on the cultivation of local Chinese teachers serving the improvement of the dissemination and influence of Chinese culture’ (Award 23YH08A)
  • 2023 National Social Science Fund Project of China ‘Research on the international communication effect of original video content of “China stories” by mainstream media’ (Award 23BXW091)
This article is Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The CC BY licence permits commercial and noncommercial reuse. To view a copy of the licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jams_00147_1
2026-03-31
2026-04-15

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jams/17/3/jams.17.3.255_Wu.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/jams_00147_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Airoldi, Massimo and Rokka, Joonas (2022), ‘Algorithmic consumer culture’, Consumption Markets & Culture, 25:5, pp. 41128, https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2022.2084726.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baines, John and Cao, Dazhi (2024), ‘Material, spatial, and social contexts of early writing: Egypt and China’, in M. Betrò, M. Friedrich and C. Michel (eds), The Ancient World Revisited: Material Dimensions of Written Artefacts, Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter, pp. 71127.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barbieri-Low, Anthony J. (2021), Ancient Egypt and Early China: State, Society, and Culture, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bødker, Henrik (2016), ‘Stuart Hall’s encoding/decoding model and the circulation of journalism in the digital landscape’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33:5, pp. 40923, https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1227862.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cadiogan, Airah (2011), ‘Decoding “the new order”: Audience interpretations of the 20th Philippine Advertising Congress television commercials’, Plaridel Journal of Communication, Media, and Society, 8:2, pp. 3552, https://doi.org/10.52518/2011.8.2-02cdgn.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Callahan, Clark, Church, Scott Haden, King, Jesse and Elinzano, Maureen (2019), ‘Snapchat usage among minority populations’, Journal of Media and Religion, 18:1, pp. 112, https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2019.1639404.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. CGTN (2023), ‘China and Egypt: Ancient civilizations and cultural exchange’, CGTN, 18 May, https://news.cgtn.com/news/2023-05-18/China-and-Egypt-Ancient-civilizations-and-cultural-exchange-1jU9fTFlB8Q/index.html. Accessed 25 October 2025.
  8. Chen, Guo-Ming (2012), ‘The impact of new media on intercultural communication in global context’, China Media Research, 8:2, pp. 110.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Diehl, William C. and Prins, Esther (2008), ‘Unintended outcomes in Second Life: Intercultural literacy and cultural identity in a virtual world’, Language and Intercultural Communication, 8:2, pp. 10118, https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470802139619.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ding, Jin, Ratz, Christoph and Bergman, Manfred Max (2022), ‘What do we see when looking at China’s engagements in Africa? An analysis of mainstream academic perspectives’, Journal of Contemporary China, 31:135, pp. 398411, https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2021.1966898.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. El-kasrawy, Samar, Mlay, Gladstone and Beshay, Amany (2023), ‘Analyzing the trends of the Chinese outbound tourism market as an emerging prospect for Egypt and Tanzania: A comparative study’, The Scientific Journal of the Faculty of Tourism and Hotels, Alexandria University, 20:2, pp. 2344, https://doi.org/10.21608/thalexu.2024.252335.1116.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Espiritu, Belinda Flores (2011), ‘Transnational audience reception as a theater of struggle: Young Filipino women’s reception of Korean television dramas’, Asian Journal of Communication, 21:4, pp. 35572, https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2011.580852.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fraser, Trisnasari, Crooke, Alexander Hew Dale and Davidson, Jane W. (2021), ‘“Music has no borders”: An exploratory study of audience engagement with YouTube music broadcasts during COVID-19 lockdown, 2020’, Frontiers in Psychology, 12, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643893.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fuchs, Christian (2023), ‘A Marxist-Humanist perspective on Stuart Hall’s communication theory’, Theory and Society, 52:6, pp. 9951029, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-023-09524-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gong, Yushu, Yan, Haiying and Ge, Yinghui (2009), Sumeier, Aiji ji Zhongguo Guwenzi Bijiao Yanjiu (The Ancient Writing Systems from Sumer, Egypt and China – A Comparative Perspective), Beijing: Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hall, Stuart (1973), Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse, Birmingham: Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hall, Stuart (1997), ‘The spectacle of the other’, in S. Hall (ed.), Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, London: Sage, pp. 22390.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hammersley, Martyn and Atkinson, Paul (2007), Ethnography: Principles in Practice, 3rd ed., London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Huynh, T. Tu (2020), ‘“Dear friends”: From people’s cultural exchange to people’s cultural production’, African and Asian Studies, 19:1–2, pp. 3359, https://doi.org/10.1163/15692108-12341445.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Inun, Luluk Ilma, Sari, Nur Rovida Femila and Zuhriyah, Luluk Fikri (2025), ‘Preaching in marginal spaces: Audience reception of Gus Miftah’s da’wah through Stuart Hall’s encoding-decoding approach’, Syiar: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam, 5:1, pp. 3546, https://doi.org/10.54150/syiar.v5i1.645.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Katz, Elihu and Liebes, Tamar (1990), ‘Interacting with “Dallas”: Cross cultural readings of American TV’, Canadian Journal of Communication, 15:1, pp. 4566, https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.1990v15n1a538.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Langer, Christian (2018), ‘The concept of “frontier” in New Kingdom Egypt: A comparative approach to the spatiality of ideology’, in G. Chantrain and J. Winand (eds), Time and Space at Issue in Ancient Egypt, Hamburg: Widmaier, pp. 4769.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Langer, Christian (2021), Egyptian Deportations of the Late Bronze Age: A Study in Political Economy, Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Langer, Christian (2023), ‘Chinese archaeology in Egypt: Between eurocentrism, de-westernisation and decolonisation’, in V. C. M. Chan, Y.-F. Hui, D. Hui and K. Vafadari (eds), Heritage Conservation and China’s Belt and Road Initiative, London: Routledge, pp. 12142.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Langer, Christian and Zhao, Kexin (2025), ‘The Nile and the Yellow River: Comparative studies between ancient Egypt and China’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 35:2, pp. 30516, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0959774324000349.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, Jingfang, Adnan, Hamedi Mohd and Gong, Jiankun (2023), ‘Exploring cultural meaning construction in social media: An analysis of Liziqi’s YouTube channel’, Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23:4, pp. 112, https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v23i4.237.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lomborg, Stine and Kapsch, Patrick Heiberg (2020), ‘Decoding algorithms’, Media, Culture & Society, 42:5, pp. 74561, https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719855301.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mulinda, Charles Kabwete (2015), ‘On cultural and academic exchanges between China and African countries’, International Journal of Asian Social Science, 5:4, pp. 24556, https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1/2015.5.4/1.4.245.256.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Murphy, Patrick D. (2005), ‘Fielding the study of reception: Notes on “negotiation” for global media studies’, Popular Communication, 3:3, pp. 16780, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15405710pc0303_2.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ni, Yuwei (2024), ‘Navigating intercultural communication in the media landscape: Challenging stereotypes and cultivating critical perspectives – Hall model as the framework’, Digital Society, 3:2, n.pag., https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-024-00126-x.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Nowak, Jakub (2016), ‘Internet meme as meaningful discourse: Towards a theory of multiparticipant popular online content’, Central European Journal of Communication, 9:1, pp. 7389, https://doi.org/10.19195/1899-5101.9.1(16).5.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pillai, Poonam (1992), ‘Rereading Stuart Hall’s encoding/decoding model’, Communication Theory, 2:3, pp. 22133, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1992.tb00040.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Poo, Mu-chou (2005), Enemies of Civilization: Attitudes toward Foreigners in Ancient Mesopotamia, Egypt, and China, New York: SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Pronzato, Riccardo (2024), ‘Enacting algorithms through encoding and decoding practices’, Italian Sociological Review, 14:10S, pp. 53152, https://doi.org/10.13136/isr.v14i10S.739.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ridell, Seija (2021), ‘From Hey, you there! to Got you: Re-materializing the encoding/decoding model in the computationally mediated city’, Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 18:4, pp. 41320, https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2021.1995617.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Russo, Angelina (2011), ‘Transformations in cultural communication: Social media, cultural exchange, and creative connections’, Curator: The Museum Journal, 54:3, pp. 32746, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2011.00095.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Shaw, Adrienne (2017), ‘Encoding and decoding affordances: Stuart Hall and interactive media technologies’, Media, Culture & Society, 39:4, pp. 592602, https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717692741.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Shuter, Robert (2012), ‘Intercultural new media studies: The next frontier in intercultural communication’, Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 41:3, pp. 21937, https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2012.728761.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sihombing, Lambok Hermanto and Harahap, Aris Masruri (2019), ‘Pencak Dor in the cyber world: An analysis of comments on YouTube’, Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture, 11:2, pp. 17787, https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v11i2.19901.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sun, Degang and Abdrabou, Aml Ali (2021), ‘The development of China-Arab cultural exchanges: Opportunities and challenges in the Belt & Road era’, BRIQ Belt & Road Initiative Quarterly, 2:4, pp. 2442.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Thomas, James and Harden, Angela (2008), ‘Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews’, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8:1, n.pag., https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Tomaselli, Keyan (2016), ‘Encoding/decoding, the transmission model and a court of law’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 19:1, pp. 5970, https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877915599611.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. de Wildt, Lars, Grusauskaite, Kamile and Aupers, Stef (2024), ‘Encoding/decoding entertainment media’, in N. D. Bowman (ed.), Entertainment Media and Communication, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 85100.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Winter, Tim (2019), Geocultural Power: China’s Quest to Revive the Silk Roads for the Twenty-First Century, Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Wu, Shangwei and Bergman, Tabe (2019), ‘An active, resistant audience – but in whose interest?’, Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 16:1, pp. 10729.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Wu, Shuang and Machmudi, Yon (2024), ‘The development trend of Belt and Road Initiative in Egypt’, Journal of Middle East and Islamic Studies, 11:3, https://doi.org/10.7454/meis.v11i3.189.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Xinhua (2025), ‘World insights: China-Egypt practical cooperation yields fruitful outcomes’, Xinhua, 9 July, https://english.news.cn/20250709/f8078b4cc245446b970440864328ed21/c.html. Accessed 25 October 2025.
  48. Yan, Grace and Santos, Carla Almeida (2012), ‘Repositioning Chinese tourism media studies: A sociocultural perspective’, in H. Xiao (ed.), Contemporary Perspectives on China Tourism, London: Routledge, pp. 16476.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Zaid, Bouziane (2014), ‘Audience reception analysis of Moroccan public service broadcasting’, Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication, 7:3, pp. 284309, https://doi.org/10.1163/18739865-00703003.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jams_00147_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jams_00147_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test