Precarious, fragile and temporary interactions between the public sculpture collection of Santo Tirso and its non-specialized audience | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2055-2823
  • E-ISSN: 2055-2831

Abstract

The following article depicts ongoing research from the project Quiet Dialogues, part of a Ph.D. thesis in artistic education in the Faculty of Fine Arts of the University of Porto. Quiet Dialogues is a project that aims to map, explore and materialize the interactions that occur between the passer-by audience of the city and the International Museum of Contemporary Sculpture of Santo Tirso. The project’s resulting map will be in a public online archive showcasing all the interactions collected during the research. As the museum displays its artworks in the public space, this research explores three behavioural categories the audience may react towards the artwork. They are as follows: a mental relationship (a stand-off with the memory), a physical relationship (using the sculpture as shelter or support) and a playful interaction (using the sculpture as a game or in a ludic approach).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jaws_00018_1
2020-09-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agamben, G.. ( 2009), O que é o contemporâneo? e outros ensaios (trans. V. N. Honesco.), Chapecó:: Argos;.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arendt, H.. ( 1997), A condição humana, Rio de Janeiro:: Forense Universitária;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barthes, R.. ( 2015), O Grau Zero da Escrita, Lisbon:: Edições 70;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baudrillard, J.. ( 1991), Simulacros e Simulações, Lisbon:: Relógio D’Água;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Benjamin, W.. ( 2012), Sobre Arte, Técnica, Linguagem e Política, Lisbon:: Relógio D’Água;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Birrell, R.. ( 2009;), ‘ The headless artist: An interview with Thomas Hirschhorn on the friendship between art and philosophy, precarious theatre and the Bijlmer Spinoza-festival. ’, Art & Research, 3:1, pp. 110.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Borriaud, N.. ( 2002), Relational Aesthetics, Dijon:: Les presses du réel;.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Eco, U.. ( 2016), Obra Aberta, Lisbon:: Relógio D’Água;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ferreira, Â.. ( 2008), SESRIEM – Poço das Seis Correias, Santo Tirso:: International Museum of Contemporary Sculpture;.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Foucault, M.. ( 1966), Arqueologia do Saber, Lisbon:: Edições 70;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Guimarães, S., and Hirschhorn, T.. ( 2018), Conversation between Thomas Hirschhorn and Sandra Guimarães, http://www.thomashirschhorn.com/conversation-between-thomas-hirschhorn-and-sandra-guimaraes/. Accessed 7 September 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Machado, D.. ( 2018;), ‘ Vandalizada obra de Cabrita Reis, artista diz que “também é arte”. ’, Jornal de Notícias, 2 July, https://www.jn.pt/artes/vandalizada-obra-de-cabrita-reis-em-santo-tirso-mas-artista-diz-que-isso-tambem-e-arte-9536837.html. Accessed 7 September 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Morsch, C.. ( 2016;), ‘ Numa Encruzilhada de Quatro Discursos. Mediação e educação na Documenta 12: entre Afirmação, Reprodução, Desconstrução e Transformação. ’, Periódico Permanente, 6, pp. 132.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Pringle, E.. ( 2009;), ‘ The artist-led pedagogic process in the contemporary art gallery: Developing a meaning making framework. ’, Journal of Art & Design Education, 28:2, pp. 17482.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rancière, J.. ( 2010), O Espectador Emancipado, Lisbon:: Orfeu Negro;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Rebouças, M. M.. ( 2013;), ‘ Museu de Arte Contemporânea de Serralves: Projectos com Escolas. ’, Palíndromo, 10:5, pp. 1538.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Reis, P. C.. ( 2001), Uma Escultura Para Santo Tirso, Santo Tirso:: International Museum of Contemporary Sculpture;.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Rogoff, I.. ( 2005;), ‘ Looking away: Participations in visual culture. ’, in G. Butt. (ed.), After Criticism: New Responses to Art and Performance, Oxford:: Blackwell Publishing Ltd;, pp. 11734.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Rogoff, I.. ( 2018;), ‘ Looking away: Participations in visual culture. ’, A escultura que se metamorfoseou em Santo Tirso, Santo Tirso TV , 28 June, https://www.santo-tirso.tv/artigo/1/4128/a-escultura-que-se-metamorfoseou-em-santo-tirso/. Accessed 7 September 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Silvano, F.. ( 2017), Antropologia do Espaço, Lisboa:: Documenta;.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sontag, S.. ( 2009), Against Interpretation, and Other Essays, London:: Penguin Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Staccioli, M.. ( 1996), Scultura Santo Tirso 96, Santo Tirso:: International Museum of Contemporary Sculpture;.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sternfeld, N.. ( 2013;), ‘ Playing by the rules of the game participation in the post-representative museum. ’, GuMMA Papers, 1, pp. 17.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Teixeira Lopes, J.. ( 2007;), ‘ Políticas culturais públicas: uma proposta para o nosso tempo. ’, paper presented in La Sociología Y Los Nuevos Retos – A Socioloxía E Os Novos Retos – IV Congreso Astur-galaico de Socioloxía, A Coruña, 23–24 March, Servizo de Publicacións;, p. 71.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Costa, Rita. ( 2020;), ‘ Precarious, fragile and temporary interactions between the public sculpture collection of Santo Tirso and its non-specialized audience. ’, Journal of Arts Writing by Students, 6:2, pp. 95111, https://doi.org/10.1386/jaws_00018_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jaws_00018_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jaws_00018_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error