A drift in conversation: Across hierarchies and beyond boundaries

References

1. Anon. (2014), ‘Conversation theory’, 17 September, Communication theory.org, https://www.communicationtheory.org/conversation-theory/. Accessed 24 April 2024.
2. Acconia and Thyssen-Bornemisza Museum (2018), ‘Art and sustainability’, Sustainability for all, 29 January, https://www.activesustainability.com/sustainable-development/art-and-sustainability/?_adin=02021864894. Accessed 24 April 2024.
3. Adcock, Craig (1992), ‘Conversational drift: Helen Mayer Harrison and Newton Harrison’, Art Journal, 51:2, pp. 35–45.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Beuys, Joseph and Kuoni, Carin (1990), Energy Plan for the Western Man: Joseph Beuys in America: Writings by and Interviews with the Artist, New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Biggs, Iain (2010), ‘Deep mapping as an essaying of place’, Iain Biggs, the Bartlett School of Architecture, London, UK, 9 July, http://www.iainbiggs.co.uk/text-deep-mapping-as-an-essaying-of-place/. Accessed 24 April 2024.
6. Bijvoet, Marga (1997), Art as Inquiry: Toward New Collaborations between Art, Science, and Technology, New York: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bolt, Barbara (2019), ‘The magic is in handling’, in E. Barrett and B. Bolt (eds), Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry, London and New York: Bloomsbury, pp. 27–34.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Buser, Michael (2013), ‘Thinking through non-representational and affective atmospheres in planning theory and practice’, Planning Theory, 13:3, pp. 227–43.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cadman, Louisa (2009), ‘Autonomic non-representational theory/non-representational geographies’, in N. Thrift and R. Kitchin (eds), The International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Volume 7, Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 456–63.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cameron, Duncan, Osborne, Colin, Horton, Peter and Sinclair, Mark (2015), A Sustainable Model for Intensive Agriculture, Sheffield: Grantham Center for Sustainable Futures, University of Sheffield, https://grantham.sheffield.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/A-sustainable-model-for-intensive-agriculture-Grantham-Centre-briefing-note-December-2015.pdf. Accessed 2 August 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Charney, Leo (1998), Empty Moments, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cooking Sections (2015), ‘Info’, 12 August, http://www.cooking-sections.com/info. Accessed 7 January 2025.
13. Debord, Guy (2006), ‘Theory of the derive’, in K. Knabb (ed.), Situationist International Anthology, Berkeley, CA: Bureau of Public Secrets, pp. 62–66.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Department of Fine Arts, University of Colorado (1990), What Follows: Helen and Newton Harrison, Boulder, CO: University of Colorado.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Douglas, Anne and Fremantle, Chris (2016), ‘What poetry does best: The Harrisons. Poetics of being and acting in the world’, in H. M. Harrison, N. Harrison, P. Kruse, and A. Douglas (eds), The Time of the Force Majeure: After 45 Years Counterforce Is on the Horizon, Munich, London and New York: Prestel Verlag, pp. 455–60.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Douglas, Anne and Fremantle, Chris (2023), ‘Thinking with the Harrisons: What does now demand?’, Field: A Journal of Socially-engaged Art Criticism, 23, pp. 1–29, https://field-journal.com/issue-23/thinking-with-the-harrisons-what-does-now-demand. Accessed 2 August 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Forskål, Petrus (1775), ‘Descriptiones Animalium, Avium, Amphibiorum, Piscium, Insectorum, Vermium; quae in Itinere Orientali Observavit Petrus Forskål’, Post Mortem Auctoris editit Carsten Niebuhr, Adjuncta est materia Medica Kahirina. Mölleri, Hafniae https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/2088059. Accessed 30 July 2024.
18. Fowkes, Maja and Fowkes, Reuben (2008), ‘The ecology of post-socialism and the implications of sustainability for contemporary art’ in M. Jordan and M. Miles (eds), Art and Theory After Socialism, Bristol: NBN International, pp. 101–10.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fox, Nick J. and Alldred, Pam (2018), ‘Mixed methods, materialism and the micropolitics of the research-assemblage’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21:2, pp. 191–204.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fremantle, Chris, Douglas, Anne and Haley, David (2008), ‘Research: Knowledge and method: Reflections on Helen Mayer Harrison, Newton Harrison and David Haley’s practice’, seminar delivered art Bright Sparks, London, https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/247070/research-knowledge-and-method-reflections-on-helen-mayer-harrison-newton-harrison-and-david-haleys-practice. Accessed 24 April 2024.
21. Garoian, Charles R. (2012), ‘Sustaining sustainability: The pedagogical drift of art research and practice’, Studies in Art Education, 53:4, pp. 283–301.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Harrison, Newton (2019), ‘Helen Harrison: 1927–2018’, Leonardo, 52:3, pp. 321–22, https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_01754. Accessed 24 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
23. The Harrison Studio (2016), ‘The Lagoon Cycle’, 4 May, https://theharrisonstudio.net/the-lagoon-cycle-1974-1984-2. Accessed 24 April 2024.
24. Harrison, Helen Mayer and Harrison, Newton (1985), The Lagoon Cycle, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Harrison, Helen Mayer and Harrison, Newton (1993), ‘Shifting positions toward the earth: Art and environmental awareness’, Leonardo, 26:5, pp. 371–77, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1576031. Accessed 24 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Harrison, Helen Mayer, Harrison, Newton, Kruse, Petra and Reschke, Kai (2016), The Time of the Force Majeure: After 45 Years Counterforce Is on the Horizon, Munich, London and New York: Prestel Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Heartney, Eleanor (1995), ‘Ecopolitics/ecopoetry: Helen and Newton Harrison’s environmental talking cure’, in N. Felshin (ed.), But Is It Art? The Spirit of Art as Activism, Seattle, WA: Bay Press, pp. 141–64.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Ingram Allen, Jane (2008), ‘A marriage made on earth: Helen Mayer Harrison and Newton Harrison’, Public Art Review, 19:2(38), pp. 28–30.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kester, Grant H. (2004), Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kline, Ronald R. (2015), The Cybernetics Moment: Or Why We Call Our Age the Information Age, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Larson, Kay (1980), ‘Watering wholes’, Village Voice, 14 April.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Lavery, Carl (2018), ‘Rethinking the Dérive’, Performance Research, 23:7, pp. 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2018.1557011.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Lyotard, Jean-François (1984), Driftworks, New York: Semiotext.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Marcus, Greil (2002), ‘The long walk of the situationist international’, in T. McDonough (ed.), Guy Debord and the Situationist International: Texts and Documents, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Nevada Museum of Art (2014), ‘Helen Mayer and Newton Harrison: The lagoon cycle collection CAE1209’, https://www.nevadaart.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/CAE1209-Finding-Aid.pdf. Accessed 24 April 2024.
36. Nisbet, James (2017), ‘Contemporary environmental art’, in U. K. Heise, J. Christensen and J. Niemann (eds), The Routledge Companion to the Environmental Humanities, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 317–28.
    [Google Scholar]
37. The Otolith Group (2023), ‘About’, 28 May, https://otolithgroup.org. Accessed 7 January 2025.
38. School of the Visual Arts, University College (1994), Littoral: New Zones for Critical Art Practice Conference, Salford, UK, 8–11 September.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Schröder, Andressa (2020), ‘The integrative potentials of arts-based research for the study of culture: A reflection on the Lagoon Cycle by Helen Mayer Harrison and Newton Harrison’, in D. Bachmann-Medick, J. Kugele and A. Nünning (eds), Futures of the Study of Culture: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Global Challenges, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 169–81, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110669398-011.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Soil Association (2024), ‘Government must better protect soils for true food security’, 22 March, https://www.soilassociation.org/news/2024/march/22/government-must-better-protect-soils-for-true-food-security/#:~:text=We%20depend%20on%20soil%20for%20almost%20all%20%2D%2095%25%20%2D%20of,times%20faster%20than%20it’s%20formed. Accessed 2 August 2024.
41. Spirn, Anne Whiston (2016), ‘Helen and Newton Harrison: The art of inquiry, manifestation, and enactment’, in H. M. Harrison, N. Harrison, P. Kruse and K. Reschke (eds), The Time of Force Majeure: After 45 Years Counterforce Is on the Horizon, Munich: Prestel Verlag, pp. 434–38.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Sullivan, Graeme (2005), Art Practice as Research: Inquiry in Visual Arts, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Szerszynski, Bronislaw (2018), ‘Drift as a planetary phenomenon’, Performance Research, 23:7, pp. 136–44, https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2018.1558436.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Thornbury, Scott and Slade, Diane (2006), Conversation: From Description to Pedagogy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Thrift, Nigel (2008), Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect, Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Wark, McKenzie (2008), 50 Years of Recuperation of the Situationist International, New York: Temple Hoyne Buell Center for the Study of American Architecture.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Warren, Martin (2006), Features of Naturalness in Conversation, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: J Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Whyte, David (2016), ‘Seeking language large enough’, transcript, 7 April, On Being with Krista Tippett, https://onbeing.org/programs/david-whyte-seeking-language-large-enough/#transcript. Accessed 2 August 2024.
49. Wollen, Peter (2004), Paris/Manhattan: Writings on Art, New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Biggs, Iain (2011), ‘The spaces of “deep mapping”: A partial account’, Journal of Arts & Communities, 2:1, pp. 5–25, https://intellectdiscover.com/content/journals/10.1386/jaac.2.1.5_1. Accessed 24 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Dewsbury, John-David (2003), ‘Witnessing space: Knowledge without contemplation’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 35:11, pp. 1907–32.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Polanyi, Michel and Sen, Amartya (2009), The Tacit Dimension, Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]