Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art
  4. Volume 7, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 7, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN: 2051-7041
  • E-ISSN: 2051-705X

Abstract

This article analyses the practice of Handshake 302, an art collective based in Shenzhen, as an exemplary case of the recent development of urban public art in China in which public participation has become central. Defining itself as an experimental public art project, Handshake 302 adopts an interdisciplinary, open-ended, collaborative and socially conscious approach in designing its various participatory tactics. Advocating that ‘art should belong to everyone who contributes to the city’, it has charged itself with the task of creating opportunities to enable people of disparate backgrounds ‘to participate in art activities and unleash their creativity’. In practice, it embraces a wide range of forms/ methods to engage urban residents of Shenzhen, involving them in art making, exhibitions, research, workshops, dialogues, tours and field trips, among others, with the mission of enabling ordinary people to engage with creative activities that deal with Shenzhen’s diverse urban spaces. Discussing key programmes carried out by Handshake 302, I posit that urban public art has become an expanded field for critically minded art professionals to initiate grassroots urban interventions and social innovations and the working of this art collective sheds light on this new artistic and civic movement that can be called socially engaged participatory public art.

© 2020 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00025_1
2020-12-01
2025-03-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anon. ( 2015;), ‘ Shenzhen “Two Museums” are expected to be open next year and will become a new landmark. ’, BBS Zhulong, 3 February, https://bbs.zhulong.com/102010_group_3000051/detail19199557/. Accessed 30 February 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Archdaily ( 2016;), ‘ Museum of Contemporary Art & Planning Exhibition. ’, 28 November, https://www.archdaily.com/800332/museum-of-contemporary-art-and-planning-exhibition-coop-himmelb-l-au. Accessed 30 February 2020.
  3. Arendt, Hannah. ( 1958), The Human Condition, Chicago, IL:: The University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Biesta, Gert. ( 2012;), ‘ Becoming public: Public pedagogy, citizenship and the public sphere. ’, Social & Cultural Geography, 13:7, pp. 683–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cartier, Carolyn. ( 2002;), ‘ Transnational urbanism in the reform-era Chinese city: Landscapes from Shenzhen. ’, Urban Studies, 39:9, pp. 1513–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Certeau, Michel de. ( 1984), The Practice of Everyday Life, Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Chung, Him. ( 2010;), ‘ Building an image of villages-in-the-city: A clarification of China’s distinct urban spaces. ’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32:2, pp. 421–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Dong, Qi. ( 2019), Contemporary Public Art Planning, Practice, and Theory in China, Beijing:: China Architecture & Building Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Gaskin, Sam. ( 2016;), ‘ Art in Shenzhen. ’, Ocula Magazine, 25 October, https://ocula.com/magazine/reports/art-in-shenzhen/#!. Accessed 8 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Handshake 302 ( 2017;), ‘ What does art teach us about history?. ’, Weixin, 28 November, https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/6Jq3gDQsH-_Idx9TopGDDg. Accessed 8 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Handshake 302 ( 2019a;), ‘ Handshake 302 artist residency recruitment. ’, WEMP, 16 February, https://wemp.app/posts/7a1e36b4-8b50-43a0-b8e8-2b09c2ce42ce. Accessed 8 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Handshake 302 ( 2019b;), ‘ Futian CBD: Shenzhen’s meta-cultural geography. ’, Weixin, 18 June, https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/MqLolFIfPcIkGRWTOo0zQg. Accessed 30 February 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Handshake 302 ( 2019c;), ‘ Hakka cultural geography in Shenzhen. ’, WEMP, 26 June, https://wemp.app/posts/b329f14f-5e3d-41f4-a64d-815b90ca9965?utm_source=latest-posts. Accessed 30 February 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Holmes, Brian. ( 2012;), ‘ Eventwork: The fourfold matrix of contemporary social movements. ’, in N. Thompson. (ed.), Living as Form: Socially Engaged Art from 1991-2011, Cambridge:: MIT Press;, pp. 72–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Horkheimer, Max. ( 1982), Critical Theory: Selected Essays, New York:: Continuum;.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Jacob, Mary Jane. ( 1995;), ‘ An unfashionable audience. ’, in S. Lacy. (ed.), Mapping the Terrain: New Genre Public Art, Seattle:: Bay Press;, pp. 50–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Jiang, Zhefeng, and Zhang, Song. ( 2017), Contemporary Urban Public Art Value and Its Data Applications, Beijing:: China Light Industry Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Jin, Xiangbo, and Pan, Li. ( 2016), Local Remodeling: The Challenge and Crisis of Public Art, Shanghai:: Shanghai University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kester, Grant. ( 2005;), ‘ Conversation pieces: The role of dialogue in socially-engaged art. ’, in Z. Kucor, and S. Leung. (eds), Theory in Contemporary Art Since 1985, Oxford:: Blackwell;, pp. 76–100.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Lim, William S. W.. ( 2012), Incomplete Urbanism: A Critical Urban Strategy for Emerging Economies, Singapore:: World Scientific Publishing;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Lin, Qi. ( 2013;), ‘ In the best possible taste?. ’, China Daily, 21 September, http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2013-09/21/content_16982271.htm. Accessed 14 January 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. LOFT ( 2018;), ‘ Follow the anthropologist to rediscover Shenzhen: Lao Ma’s “Urban Flesh and Bones”. ’, 13 December, http://www.sohu.com/a/281663252_695210. Accessed 30 January 2020.
  23. Lu, Carol Yinghua. ( 2010;), ‘ Little movements. ’, Yishu: Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art, 9:5, pp. 86–100.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Lu, Fusheng. ( 2009;), ‘ Inaugural editorial. ’, Public Art, 1:1, p. 2.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Luo, Lilan. ( 2019;), ‘ Shenzhen Bay Public Art Season invites you to enjoy art sculptures. ’, Shenzhen Special Zone Daily, p. A07.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Morris-Suzuki, Tessa, and Shuge Wei. ( 2018;), ‘ Epilogue: Improvising the future. ’, in T. Cliff,, T. Morris-Suzuki, and S. Wei. (eds), The Living Politics of Self-Help Movements in East Asia, Singapore:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 215–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. O’Donnell, Mary Ann. ( 2017;), ‘ Handshake 302. ’, https://maryannodonnell.files.wordpress.com/2017/12/e68fa1e6898b302e4bb8be7bb8d.pdf. Accessed 30 January 2020.
  28. O’Donnell, Mary Ann. ( 2018;), ‘ Every day is a “Performance”. ’, 10 February, https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/Dqft5O3gpgew3mfkhKumuQ. Accessed 9 March 2020.
  29. O’Donnell, Mary Ann. ( 2019;), ‘ The Handshake 302 village hack residency: Chicago, Shenzhen, and the experience of assimilation. ’, in F. Ray,, J. Ren, and B. Wissink. (eds), The City in China: New Perspectives on Contemporary Urbanism, Bristol:: Bristol University Press;, pp. 125–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. O’Donnell, Mary Ann,, Wong, Winnie, and Bach, Jonathan. (eds) ( 2017;), ‘ Introduction: Experiments, exceptions, and extensions. ’, in Learning from Shenzhen: China’s Post-Mao Experiment from Special Zone to Model City, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;, pp. 1–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Qian, Yang. ( 2019;), ‘ How Shenzhen’s urban village advocates are learning from failure. ’, Sixth Tone, 28 October, www.sixthtone.com/news/1004711/how-shenzhens-urban-village-advocates-are-learning-from-failure. Accessed 8 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Ran Dian ( 2016;), ‘ Creativity in Shenzhen. ’, 28 July, http://www.randian-online.com/np_city_guide/creativity-in-shenzhen/. Accessed 8 March 2020.
  33. Shelwell, Bronwen. ( 2016;), ‘ Shenzhen’s quest for artistic identity. ’, that's, 17 May, https://www.thatsmags.com/shenzhen/post/13534/shenzhen-s-quest-for-artistic-identity. Accessed 8 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Shenzhen Investigation & Research Institute ( 2013;), ‘ Shenzhen Museum of Contemporary Art and Urban Planning exhibition will become Shenzhen’s new landmark and cultural symbol. ’, 16 September, http://www.chinaasc.org/news/88076.html. Accessed 30 February 2020.
  35. Shen Zhen News ( 2019;), ‘ Grand opening of the first Shenzhen Bay public art season. ’, 7 November, http://inanshan.sznews.com/content/2019-11/07/content_22607887.htm. Accessed 8 January 2020.
  36. Sun, Zhenhua. ( 2018), The History of Chinese Contemporary Sculpture, Beijing:: China Youth Publishing Group;.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Valjakka, Minna, and Wang, Meiqin. (eds) ( 2018;), ‘ Engagement with the urban: Visual arts as a form of cultural activism in contemporary China. ’, in Visual Arts, Representations and Interventions in Contemporary China, Amsterdam:: Amsterdam University Press;, pp. 13–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang, Hongyi. ( 2014), Introduction to Public Art, Beijing:: China Academy of Art Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang, Meiqin. ( 2019), Socially Engaged Art in Contemporary China: Voices from Below, New York and London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, Jing. ( 2020), The Other Digital China: Nonconfrontational Activism on the Social Web, Cambridge:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, Zhong. ( [2007] 2014), Introduction to Public Art, Beijing:: Peking University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Wu, Fulong, and Zhang, Jingxing. ( 2007;), ‘ Planning the competitive city-region: The emergence of strategic development plan in China. ’, Urban Affairs Review, 42:5, pp. 714–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Zheng, Bo. ( n.d.), SEACHINA: Socially Engaged Art in Contemporary China, http://seachina.net/seachina-intro.html. Accessed 2 August 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Zheng, Jane. ( 2017;), ‘ Contextualizing public art production in China: The urban sculpture planning system in Shanghai. ’, Geoforum, 82, pp. 89–101.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang, Meiqin. ( 2020;), ‘ Walking the city: Handshake 302 and reinventing public art in Shenzhen. ’, Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art, 7:2&3, pp. 177–200, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jcca_00025_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00025_1
Loading
Walking the city: Handshake 302 and reinventing public art in Shenzhen
Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art 7, 177 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1386/jcca_00025_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00025_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00025_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): human togetherness; public participation; social innovation; socially engaged participatory public art; urban intervention; walking

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test