Skip to content
1981
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2051-7041
  • E-ISSN: 2051-705X

Abstract

Digital technologies such as digital production and online marketplaces have generated revenue growth and sustained work in the music and game creative industries. However, there is little research on how digital technologies impact contemporary craft. Here we present the results of a twenty-month AHRC research project which explored the role of digital technologies for craft in China and the United Kingdom. The research was undertaken prior to the mass adoption of online tools such as videoconferencing, which became necessary due to enforced social distancing during the recent pandemic. It provides an account of the craft ecosystems in China and the United Kingdom as they started to embrace digital technologies – ecosystems which inevitably evolved with craftmakers’ enforced migration online. This article reports on mixed-methods research stakeholder surveys, workshops and quick ethnographic studies conducted to capture how digital technologies were used across the craft making journey from through to . Comparing the differences and similarities between China and the United Kingdom enables us to better understand the potential of digital technologies for craft. For example, live streaming, an emerging digital technology at the time of the research, was already a popular way for craftmakers to engage broad audiences in China, whilst UK craftmakers tended to use personal websites, e-mails and newsletters. Craftmakers’ knowledge has necessarily shifted to encompass the digital, often at the expense of precious making time. On the one hand, digital tools and processes of the Fourth Industrial Revolution have transformed many craft skills from making by hand to making by computer; on the other hand, social media and online marketplaces have changed the relationship between craftmakers and consumers and may shape which crafts flourish in the future.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • UK Arts and Humanities Research Council (Award AH/S003401/1)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00093_1
2024-06-27
2024-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adamson, G. (2010), The Craft Reader, London: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander, C. (1964), Notes on the Synthesis of Form, vol. 5, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bazalgette, P. (2017), ‘Independent review of the creative industries’, UK Government, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/649980/Independent_Review_of_the_Creative_Industries.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2024.
  4. Bunnell, K. (2004), ‘Craft and digital technology’, World Craft Council 40th Annual Conference, Metsovo, 2 May, http://repository.falmouth.ac.uk/537/1/craft%20and%20digital%20technology.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chittenden, T. (2018), ‘Printed pots and computerized coils: The place of 3D printing in ceramic practice’, Craft Research, 9:1, pp. 940.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Development Commissioner – Handicrafts (2020), ‘Development commissioner (Handicrafts) Ministry of Textiles Government of India, craft processes and other details of 32 crafts’, Ministry of Textiles, Govt. of India, http://www.handicrafts.nic.in/CmsUpload/2039201602393132%20craft%20process.pdf. Accessed 29 October 2020.
  7. Golsteijn, C., Hoven, E. V. D., Frohlich, D. and Sellen, A. (2014), ‘Reflections on craft research for and through design’, in T. Olsson and E. Þ. Hvannberg (eds), NordiCHI '14: The 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 26–30 October, Helsinki, Finland, New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Handwerker, P. W. (2001), Quick Ethnography: A Guide to Rapid Multi-Method Research, Lanham, MD and Plymouth: Rowman Altamira.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Howe, T. and Dillon, P. (2001), ‘Cultural niche and the contexts of craft, design and fine art’, The Design Journal, 4:3, pp. 5057.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Loh, P., Burry, J. and Wagenfeld, M. (2016), ‘Reconsidering Pye’s theory of making through digital craft practice: A theoretical framework towards continuous designing’, Craft Research, 7:2, pp. 187206.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Pink, S. and Morgan, J. (2013), ‘Short-term ethnography: Intense routes to knowing’, Symbolic Interaction, 36:3, pp. 35161.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Spilsbury, M. (2018), ‘Who makes? An analysis of people working in craft occupations’, UK: Crafts Council, 1 February, https://www.craftscouncil.org.uk/documents/892/Who_makes_2018.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2024.
  13. UNESCO (2009), ‘Framework for cultural statistics’, United Nations, https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/unesco-framework-for-cultural-statistics-2009-en_0.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2024.
  14. Zhan, X., Walker, S., Hernandez-Pardo, R. and Evans, M. (2017), ‘Craft and sustainability: Potential for design intervention in crafts in the Yangtze River Delta, China’, The Design Journal, 20:sup1, pp. S291934.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Zoran, A. (2015), ‘Hybrid craft: Showcase of physical and digital integration of design and craft skills’, in R. F. Malina and P. Grant-Ryan (eds), SIGGRAPH '15: Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference, Los Angeles, CA, 9–13 August, New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00093_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00093_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error