Skip to content
1981
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2051-7041
  • E-ISSN: 2051-705X

Abstract

Discussions of the intersection of art museums and socio-economics have become an increasingly provocative topic both in the art and museum worlds and the fields of urban studies and cultural studies. However, there has yet to be a comprehensive theoretical framework in the twenty-first century that considers this interplay across an international field. I examine Hong Kong’s M+ Museum, which is one of the cultural facilities comprising the West Kowloon Cultural District, a development conceived in the late 1990s following Hong Kong’s handover to China in 1997. How has M+ manoeuvred through the twin pressures to be socio-economically promising and strategically prudent within a delicate balance between culture and politics? I argue that M+ negotiates a nuanced interplay of soft power, museum governance, collection strategy and architectural design, ultimately manifesting what I term the Bilbao Effect 2.0. Literature on the Bilbao Effect within art and museum studies considers its cultural and architectural impact and within urban studies and cultural studies, focuses on the tension between institutional identity and social constructs. However, when placed into an historical and interdisciplinary model that accounts for an art museum’s quest for cultural autonomy and social, economic and political ambitions, it becomes apparent that the Bilbao Effect 2.0 is a nuanced and expanded iteration, reflecting the tug-of-war on a global stage.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00096_1
2024-06-27
2026-04-11

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bilbao Ría 2000 (n.d.), ‘What is Bilbao Ría 2000?’, https://www.bilbaoria2000.org/en/bilbao-ria-2000/what-is-bilbao-ria-2000/. Accessed 1 September 2023.
  2. Bishop, Claire (2013), Radical Museology, or, What’s ‘Contemporary’ in Museums of Contemporary Art, London: Koenig Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradsher, Keith (2006), ‘Hong Kong halts plans for arts center’, New York Times, 22 February, E1, https://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/22/arts/design/hong-kong-halts-plans-for-arts-center.html. Accessed 2 October 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Camara, Ery (2005), ‘The Franchise museum: An instrument of cultural colonization’, Learning from the Bilbao Guggenheim, Reno: University of Nevada.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cembalest, Robin (1991), ‘Everywhere except Antarctica’, ARTnews, 90:9, pp. 39–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Chin, Wan (2008), Hong Kong’s Cultural Policy: Hong Kong and her Culture, Hong Kong: Arcadia Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Chow, Vivienne (2013), ‘A series of unfortunate events: The past and present of West Kowloon Cultural District’, in W. Mathias (ed.), Cultural Vision, Hong Kong: Zuni Icosahedron E+E, pp. 19–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Duncan, Carol (1995), Civilizing Rituals: Inside Public Art Museums, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Evans, Graeme (2001), Cultural Planning: An Urban Renaissance?, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Faires, Nancy D. (2007), ‘This is not a museum: The Guggenheim Museum Bilbao’, Ph.D. thesis, Reno: University of Nevada.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Forster, Kurt D. (1998), Frank O. Gehry Guggenheim Bilbao Museoa, Stuttgart: Edition Axel Menges.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Franklin, Adrian (2016), ‘Journeys to the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao: Towards a revised Bilbao Effect’, Annals of Tourism Research, 59:7, pp. 79–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Gómez, María V. (1998), ‘Reflective images: The case of urban regeneration in Glasgow and Bilbao’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22:5, pp. 106–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Guilbaut, Serge (1983), How New York Stole the Idea of Modern Art: Abstract Expressionism, Freedom, and the Cold War, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Koon, Yeewon (2022), ‘Where are we now? M+ and the uncertain future of Hong Kong’, October, 180, spring, pp. 150–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Krauss, Rosalind (1990), ‘The cultural logic of the late capitalist museum’, October, 54, autumn, pp. 3–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Krens, Thomas (2004), ‘The Art Museum as a Global Institution’, 17 November, transcript, Asia Cultural Co-operation Forum, Hong Kong, https://www.accf.org.hk/archive/2004/transcript/eng_openforum4.pdf. Accessed 1 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Legislative Council (LegCo) (2005), ‘Paper for the House Committee Meeting: Proposed overseas duty visit by the Subcommittee on the West Kowloon Cultural District Development’, WKCD–163, LC Paper No. CB(1) 1874/04–05, Hong Kong, https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr04-05/english/hc/sub_com/hs02/papers/hs02cb1-wkcd163-e.pdf. Accessed 1 September 2023.
  19. Legislative Council (LegCo) on West Kowloon Cultural District (WKCD) Development (2008), ‘M+ in West Kowloon Cultural District’, WKCD–546, Hong Kong, https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr04-05/english/hc/sub_com/hs02/papers/hs020524wkcd-546-e.pdf. Accessed 28 January 2023.
  20. Legislative Council (LegCo) (2012), W Panel on Home Affairs and Panel on Development: Joint Subcommittee to Monitor the Implementation of the West Kowloon Cultural District (WKCD) Project (2012), ‘Planning and development of M+’, LC Paper No. CB(2)17727/11–12(03), Hong Kong, https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr11-12/english/panels/wkcd/papers/wkcd0423cb2-1727-3-e.pdf. Accessed 1 September 2023.
  21. Legislative Council (LegCo) Panel on Planning, Lands and Works (1999), ‘Minutes of meeting held on Thursday, 18 November 1999, at 10:45am in Conference Room A of the Legislative Council Building’, LC Paper No. CB(1)1065/99-00, Hong Kong, https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr99-00/english/panels/plw/minutes/pl181199.pdf. Accessed 4 February 2023.
  22. M+ Official Website (n.d.), ‘Home page’, https://www.mplus.org.hk/en/. Accessed 1 September 2023.
  23. McAndrew, Clare (2009), Globalisation and The Art Market: Emerging Economies and The Art Trade in 2008, Helvoirt: The European Fine Art Foundation, p. 33.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Mitchell, Timothy (1991), Colonising Egypt, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Morris, Jane (2017), ‘The Guggenheim Bilbao, 20 years later: How a museum transformed a city – and why the “Bilbao Effect” has been impossible to replicate’, Artnet, 12 October, https://news.artnet.com/art-world/the-bilbao-effect-20th-anniversary-1111583. Accessed 31 January 2024.
  26. Nye, Joseph Samuel (2004), Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, New York: Public Affairs.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Nye, Joseph Samuel (2023), Soft Power and Great Power Competition: Shifting Sands in the Balance of Power between the United States and China, Cham: Springer Nature Singapore.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. People’s Panel on West Kowloon (2007), ‘Statement on the Recommendation Report of the Consultative Committee on the Core Arts and Cultural Facilities of the West Kowloon Cultural District’, 21 October, Hong Kong, https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr04-05/chinese/hc/sub_com/hs02/papers/hs021023wkcd-427-c.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2023.
  29. Plaza, Beatriz (2006), ‘The return on investment of the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30:2, pp. 452–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Plaza, Beatriz and Haarich, Silke N. (2009), ‘Museums for urban regeneration? Exploring conditions for their effectiveness’, Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 2:3, pp. 259–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Raffel, Suhanya (2021), ‘What is The Making of M+?’, in H. G. Master (ed.), The Making of M+, London: Thames & Hudson Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Research Office Legislative Council (RO LegCo) Secretariat (2015), Four Pillars and Six Industries in Hong Kong: Review and Outlook, Research Brief Issue No. 3 2014–2015, Hong Kong, https://www.legco.gov.hk/research-publications/english/1415rb03-four-pillars-and-six-industries-in-hong-kong-review-and-outlook-20150209-e.pdf. Accessed 1 September 2023.
  33. Romoli, Giorgio (1998), ‘Gehry in Bilbao: A different interpretation’, L’Achitecttura, February, pp. 121–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Subcommittee on West Kowloon Cultural District Development (WKCDD) (2007), Recommendation Report of Consultation Committee on the Core Arts and Cultural Facilities of the West Kowloon Cultural District, WKCD-398, Hong Kong, https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr04-05/english/hc/sub_com/hs02/papers/hs020912wkcd-398-e.pdf. Accessed 28 January 2023.
  35. The Professional Commons (2007), ‘A West Kowloon for the people: Research report on the West Kowloon cultural district development’, 11 December, Hong Kong, https://www.procommons.org.hk/documents/WKCD_Report--full%20report.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2023.
  36. Tsai, Chaoyi (2004), The Global Guggenheim Effect, Taipei: Art & Collection Group Publishing Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Tung, Chee-hwa (1998), ‘The 1998 Policy Address’, 7 October, https://www.policyaddress.gov.hk/pa98/english/high.htm. Accessed 28 January 2023.
  38. van Bruggen, Coosje (1998), Frank O. Gehry: Guggenheim Museum Bilbao, New York: Guggenheim Museum Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Vigneron, Frank (2017), ‘Hong Kong’s M+: A museum of visual culture at a time of political unrest’, Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art, 4:1, pp. 83–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Wu, Jianru (2013), ‘Lars Nittve’, LEAP, 20:4, pp. 63–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhou, Ying and Choi, Desmond (2019), ‘West Kowloon, Hong Kong: A transport-oriented development with culture’, in K. Christiaanse, N. Hanakata and A. Gasco (eds), The Grand Project: Understanding the Making and Impact of Urban Megaprojects, Rotterdam: NAi, pp. 148–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Zulaika, Joseba (1997), Crónica de una seducción: el Museo Guggenheim Bilbao, Madrid: Editorial Nerea.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Zulaika, Joseba (2005), ‘Desiring Bilbao: The krensification of the museum and its discontents’, Learning from the Bilbao Guggenheim, Reno: University of Nevada.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00096_1
Loading
Bilbao Effect 2.0: The Making of M+
Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art 11, 13 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1386/jcca_00096_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00096_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00096_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): art museums; cultural policy; Hong Kong; museum collection; museum governance; soft power; starchitecture; urban regeneration

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test