Skip to content
1981
Volume 12, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN: 2051-7041
  • E-ISSN: 2051-705X

Abstract

This article examines the intersection of ritual practices and urban transformation in Shanghai, specifically focusing on the sacrificial burning of paper offerings by residents of vanishing lilong neighbourhoods. It underscores the significance of fire and rituals as transformative elements in spiritual and communal life, highlighting their role in connecting the living with ancestors and fostering community bonds. Despite modern regulations limiting these practices, rituals continue, albeit in more discreet forms. The study argues that the selective preservation and commercialization of Shanghai’s history prioritize certain narratives, erasing the lived experiences of ordinary people. By exploring the social and symbolic meanings of these rituals, the article suggests that they serve as farewells to a disappearing way of life, reflecting broader themes of loss, memory and identity amidst rapid urban change. Partly drawing on personal experiences, the author discusses the notion of spiritual drift, where urban transformation results in dislocation and necessitates new forms of community. Ultimately, the research highlights the importance of maintaining a living culture that connects people and remains relevant to contemporary life, rather than merely preserving the past as a static constellation of symbols.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00128_1
2025-11-26
2026-04-17

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abbas, A. (2002), ‘Play it again Shanghai: Urban preservation in the global era’, in M. Gandelsonas (ed.), Shanghai Reflections: Architecture, Urbanism, and the Search for an Alternative Modernity, New York: Princeton Architectural Press, pp. 3655.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ai, J. (2011), ‘“Selecting the refined and discarding the dross”: The post-1990 Chinese leadership’s attitude towards cultural tradition’, in P. Daly and T. Winter (eds), Routledge Handbook of Heritage in Asia, London: Routledge, pp. 12936.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aota (2024), ‘Past-oriented and future-oriented frames of familiarity: Aesthetic experience in everyday environments’, Contemporary Aesthetics, 22, https://contempaesthetics.org/2024/08/27/past-oriented-and-future-oriented-frames-of-familiarity-aesthetic-experience-in-everyday-environments/. Accessed 18 July 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Anon. (2009), interviewed by the author, Shanghai, 16 July.
  5. Anon. (2017), interviewed by the author, Shanghai, 22 May.
  6. Anon. (2020), interviewed by the author, Shanghai, 11 November.
  7. Anon. (2021), interviewed by the author, Shanghai, 16 February.
  8. Capella Shanghai Official Website (n.d.), ‘Home page’, Capella Shanghai, https://capellahotels.com/en/capella-shanghai. Accessed 12 March 2025.
  9. Dai, J. (1997), ‘Imagined nostalgia’, boundary 2, 24:3, pp. 14361, https://doi.org/10.2307/303710.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Debord, G. ([1970] 2004), Society of the Spectacle, London: Rebel Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ding, J. and Zhong, X. (2020), ‘Shanghai lilong: From everyday life to conceived space’, in M. Gibert-Flutre and H. Imai (eds), Asian Alleyways: An Urban Vernacular in Times of Globalization, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 13958, https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048544011-008.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Eliade, M. (1961), The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion, New York: Harper Torchbook.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fei, X., Hamilton, G. G. and Wang, Z. (1992), From the Soil, the Foundations of Chinese Society: A Translation of Fei Xiaotong’s Xiangtu Zhongguo, with an Introduction and Epilogue, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gao, L. (2025), ‘Yi wenhua zhi ming, hui Nanjing xin pian – “Wendu chuntie hui wan jia” huodong qimu!’ (‘In the name of culture, a new chapter is being drawn for Nanjing – the “Spring Scrolls of the City of Literature Confer Kindness to Ten Thousand Homes” event has begun!’), Jiaohuidian Xinwen, 20 January, https://jhd.xhby.net/share-webui/detail/s678e5395e4b0595c185fe7f2. Accessed 10 March 2025.
  15. Geertz, C. (1973), The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. González Martínez, P. (2019), ‘From verifiable authenticity to verisimilar interventions: Xintiandi, Fuxing SOHO, and the alternatives to built heritage conservation in Shanghai’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 25:10, pp. 105572, https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1557235.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Haapala, A. (1998), ‘Strangeness and familiarity in the urban environment’, in A. Haapala (ed.), The City as Cultural Metaphor: Studies in Urban Aesthetics, vol. 4, Lahti: International Institute of Applied Aesthetics Series, pp. 10825.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Haapala, A. (2005), ‘On the aesthetics of everyday: Familiarity, strangeness, and the meaning of place’, in A. Light and J. M. Smith (eds), The Aesthetics of Everyday Life, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 3955.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Harte, D. (2017), ‘Shanghai cosmopolis: Negotiating the branded city’, Critical Arts: A South-North Journal of Cultural & Media Studies, 31:6, pp. 7691, https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2017.1405450.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. He, S. and Wu, F. (2005), ‘Property-led redevelopment in post-reform China: A case study of Xintiandi redevelopment project in Shanghai’, Journal of Urban Affairs, 27:1, pp. 123, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2166.2005.00222.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jacobs, J. (1961), The Death and Life of Great American Cities, New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jiang, J. (2015), An Era without Memories, London: Thames and Hudson.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson, L. (2025), interviewed by the author, Shanghai, 9 May.
  24. Li, J. (2015), Shanghai Homes: Palimpsests of Private Life, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu, C. (2014), ‘Encountering the dilemma of change in the architectural and urban history of Shanghai’, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 73:1, pp. 11836, https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2014.73.1.118.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lu, H. (1999), Beyond the Neon Lights: Everyday Shanghai in the Early 20th Century, Berkeley, CA, Los Angeles, CA and London: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Luxury Travel Networking (2017), ‘Capella Shanghai, Jian Ye Li celebrates grand opening’, Luxury Travel Networking, 30 October, https://luxtravelnet.com/capella-shanghai-jian-ye-li-celebrates-grand-opening/. Accessed 12 March 2025.
  28. Mayer, M. and Pawlik, K. (2023), ‘Politics of memory, heritage and diversity in modern China’, Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 52:2, pp. 13962, https://doi.org/10.1177/18681026231204890.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. O’Connor, K. (2012), ‘Shanghai modern: Replaying futures past’, Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, 4:1, pp. 1534, https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.12415.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ren, X. (2008), ‘Forward to the past: Historical preservation in globalizing Shanghai’, City and Community, 7:1, pp. 2343, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2007.00239.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ren, X. (2014), ‘The political economy of Urban Ruins: Redeveloping Shanghai’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38:3, pp. 108191, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12119.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ryckmans, P. (1989), ‘The Chinese attitude towards the past’, Papers on Far Eastern History, 39, pp. 116.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Scott, J. L. (2007), For Gods, Ghosts and Ancestors: The Chinese Tradition of Paper Offerings, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sweeney, J. A. (2008), ‘Unearthing the god of place: Locating space/place in the discourse(s) on Tudi Gong’, East West Connections, 8:1, pp. 1134.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Tianshu, P. and Zhijun, L. (2011), ‘Place matters: An ethnographic perspective on historical memory, place attachment, and neighborhood gentrification in post-reform Shanghai’, Chinese Sociology & Anthropology, 43:4, pp. 5273, https://doi.org/10.2753/csa0009-4625430403.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tuan, Y. (1974), Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Turner, V. (1969), The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Van Gennep, A. (1909), The Rites of Passage, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Vermander, B., Hingley, L. and Zhang, L. (2018), Shanghai Sacred: The Religious Landscape of a Global City, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wolf, A. P. (1974), ‘Gods, ghosts, and ancestors’, in A. P. Wolf (ed.), Religion and Ritual in Chinese Society, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 13182.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhou, X. (2022), Wenxue Duihua (Literary Dialogue), Nanjing: Nanjing Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhou, X. (2024), interviewed by the author, Nanjing, 7 November.
  43. Zhou, X. (2025), interviewed by the author, Nanjing, 15 February.
  44. Zuo, M. (2021), ‘China moves to ban burning joss paper to cut pollution and help the environment but many say it disrespects tradition’, South China Morning Post, 26 March, https://www.scmp.com/news/people-culture/article/3127005/china-moves-ban-burning-joss-paper-cut-pollution-and-help. Accessed 14 January 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00128_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00128_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test