Skip to content
1981
Class and Film, Part 1
  • ISSN: 2634-1123
  • E-ISSN: 2634-1131

Abstract

At first glance, seems to be another example of a type of reality television that is often criticised as ‘voyeuristic’, ‘tasteless’ or transgressing bourgeois boundaries of shame. In this article, however, I want to show how class differences that play a vital part in reality television, are made invisible with great effort and translated into questions of ‘authenticity’, ‘privacy’ and supposedly classless forms of ‘desire’. The argument is developed in three steps. First, I outline my theoretical approach, which combines a material and symbolic understanding of class. Building on this, I will show that the connection between seemingly ‘private’ and ‘intimate’ spheres of life and the fabrication of class, which is central to , is based on a structural relationship. In the third section, I analyse in more detail, suggesting that the programme can be read as the (doomed) notion of a seemingly ‘classless’ society. This is where the class politics of the show (and, more broadly, of contemporary neo-liberal imaginaries since New Labour) can be found.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jclc_00032_1
2024-01-18
2026-03-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ‘Aina & Mal’ (2016), A. O’Neill, A. Pyke and P. Newton (dirs), Naked Attraction, Season 1 Episode 1 (25 July, UK: Channel 4).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrejevic, Mark (2002), ‘The work of being watched: Interactive media and the exploitation of selfdisclosure’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19:2, pp. 23048.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barone, Chuck (1999), ‘Bringing classism into the race & gender picture’, Race, Gender & Class, 6:3, pp. 532.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Berlant, Lauren (2011), Cruel Optimism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Biressi, Anita and Heather, Nunn (2008), ‘The class politics of lifestyle television’, in G. Palmer (ed.), Exposing Lifestyle Television: The Big Reveal, London and New York: Ashgate, pp. 1524.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Blair, Tony (1999), ‘Labour conference: Tony Blair’s full speech’, The Guardian, 28 September, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/1999/sep/28/labourconference.labour14. Accessed 13 March 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Blair, Tony and Schröder, Gerhard (1999), ‘Europe: The third way/Die Neue Mitte’, working paper, Johannesburg: Friedrich Ebert Foundation, South Africa Office, https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/suedafrika/02828.pdf. Accessed 14 October 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bourdieu, Pierre (1984), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, Wendy (2015), Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution, New York: Zone Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Butler, Scott M., Smith, Nicole K., Collazo, Erika, Caltabiano, Lucia and Herbenick, Debby (2015), ‘Pubic hair preferences, reasons for removal, and associated genital symptoms: Comparisons between men and women’, Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12:1, pp. 4858, https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12763.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Coll, Sami (2016), ‘Power, knowledge, and the subjects of privacy: Understanding privacy as the ally of surveillance’, Information, Communication & Society, 17:10, pp. 125063.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Davies, William (2016), ‘The new neoliberalism’, New Left Review, 101, September–October, pp. 12134.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Eva, Illouz (2007), Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism, Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Friedrich, Sebastian (2017), ‘Für eine “Neue Klassenpolitik”’, ak – analyse & kritik – Zeitung für linke Debatte und Praxis, 627, May, p. 1.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Glick, Elisa (2000), ‘Sex positive: Feminism, queer theory, and the politics of transgression’, Feminist Review, 64:1, pp. 1945.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Google (2019), ‘Google privacy’, https://privacy.google.com/intl/en/take-control.html?categories_activeEl=sign-in. Accessed 22 February 2019. [no longer available.]
  17. Habermas, Jürgen (1990), Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft, Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hartley, John (1999), ‘Democratainment: Television and cultural citizenship’, in The Uses of Television, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 15488.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Illouz, Eva (1997), Consuming the Romantic Utopia, Love and the Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kemper, Andreas and Weinbach, Heike (2009), Klassismus: Eine Einführung, Münster: Unrast.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lorey, Isabell and Neundlinger, Klaus (2012), Kognitiver Kapitalismus, Wien: Turia & Kant.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mayhew, Les and Smith, David (2016), ‘An investigation into inequalities in adult lifespan’, Cass Business School, Faculty of Actuarial Science and Insurance, City University London, https://ilcuk.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ILC-UK-An-investigation-into-inequalities-in-adult-lifespan.pdf. Accessed 17 March 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Mirowski, Philip (2013), Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown, London and New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. O’Sullivan, Tim (2005), ‘From television lifestyle to lifestyle television’, in D. Bell and J. Hollows (eds), Ordinary Lifestyle: Popular Media, Consumption and Taste, Maidenhead: Open University Press, pp. 2135.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Piketty, Thomas (2014), Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Seier, Andrea (2008), ‘Fernsehen der Mikropolitiken: Televisuelle Formen der Selbstführung’, in H. Loreck and K. Mayer (eds), Visuelle Lektüren: Lektüren des Visuellen, Berlin: Textem, pp. 293302.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Snyder-Mackler, Noah, Sanz, Joaquïn, Kohn, Jordan N., Brinkworth, Jeccica F., Morrow, Shauna, Shaver, Amanda O., Grenier, Jean-Christophe, Pique-Regi, Roger, Johnson, Zachary P., Wilson, Mark E., Barreiro, Luis B. and Tung, Jenny (2016), ‘Social status alters immune regulation and response to infection in macaques’, Science, 354, pp. 104145, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah3580.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Vercellone, Carlo (2007), ‘From formal subsumption to general intellect: Elements for a Marxist reading of the thesis of cognitive capitalism’, Historical Materialism, 15:1, pp. 1336.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jclc_00032_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): authenticity; class; dating; intimacy; Naked Attraction; privacy; television
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test