Skip to content
1981
Class and Theatre
  • ISSN: 2634-1123
  • E-ISSN: 2634-1131

Abstract

This article argues that class is not simply an economic or occupational category but a deeply embodied, affective and sticky identity, which is performatively produced and reproduced through repetition, imitation and everyday modes of being. The article theorizes the performative formation of sticky classed identities, with a particular focus on the classing of the unconscious. The first section proposes a new understanding of the ideological formation of the neuroscientific unconscious (rather than the repressive psychoanalytic unconscious in Althusser’s model of interpellation). The following section examines the specific ways in which the unconscious is ‘classed’ (in terms of the role of different capitals, the formation of groups, the force of stereotypes and cultural representations, performances of self and the production of tastes and desires). The final section critiques dominant policy frameworks in the arts and cultural and creative industries – particularly those centred on meritocracy and social mobility – for failing to address the embedded and unconscious ways in which class is produced and maintained. The article argues that even though it may be obscured, class remains an enduring and influential aspect of personal identity, with significant impacts in terms of individuals’ lives, self-perception and social interactions and arrangements.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • AHRC (Award AH/W005999/1)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jclc_00063_1
2025-12-29
2026-04-17

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alma Economics (2023), What Works to Increase Equality of Access to Culture for Lower Socio-Economic Groups: Evidence Review and Scoping Research, London: Department for Culture, Media & Sport.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Althusser, Louis ([1970] 2012), ‘Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes towards an investigation)’, in S. Žižek (ed.), Mapping Ideology, London and New York: Verso, pp. 10040.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Arts Council England (2013), Great Art and Culture for Everyone: 10-Year Strategic Framework, 2010–2020, rev. 2nd ed., Manchester: Arts Council England.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Arts Council England (2021), Let’s Create: Strategy 2020–2030, Manchester: Arts Council England, https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/lets-create/strategy-2020-2030. Accessed 28 October 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Arts Council England (2022), Let’s Create Delivery Plan 2021–2024, Manchester: Arts Council England, https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/lets-create/delivery-plan-2021-2024/delivery-plan-2021-24. Accessed 28 October 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Arts Council England (2024), Let’s Create Delivery Plan 2024–2027, Manchester: Arts Council England, https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/lets-create/delivery-plan-2024-2027. Accessed 28 October 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Beswick, Katie (2020), ‘Feeling working class: Affective class identification and its implications for overcoming inequality’, Studies in Theatre and Performance, 40:3, pp. 26574, https://doi.org/10.1080/14682761.2020.1807194.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bourdieu, Pierre ([1984] 2010), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (trans. R. Nice), London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brabin, Tracy, De Piero, Gloria and Coombes, Sarah (2017), Acting Up Report: Labour’s Inquiry into Access and Diversity in the Performing Arts: Executive Summary, London: Office of Tom Watson MP, https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/campaigncountdown/pages/1157/attachments/original/1502347365/Acting-Up-Executive-Summary.pdf?1502347365. Accessed 28 October 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Brook, Orian, O’Brien, David and Taylor, Mark (2018), ‘Panic! It’s an arts emergency: Social class, taste and inequalities in the creative industries’, CREATE, 16 April, https://createlondon.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Panic-Social-Class-Taste-and-Inequalities-in-the-Creative-Industries1.pdf. Accessed 2 March 2025.
  11. Brook, Orian, O’Brien, Dave and Taylor, Mark (2020), Culture is Bad for You, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Brook, Orian, Miles, Andrew, O’Brien, Dave and Taylor, Mark (2023), ‘Social mobility and “openness” in creative occupations since the 1970s’, Sociology, 54:4, pp. 789810, https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221129953.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Butler, Judith (2006), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Comunian, Roberta, Dent, Tamsyn, O’Brien, Dave, Read, Tessa and Wreyford, Natalie (2023), Making the Creative Majority: A Report for the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Creative Diversity on ‘What Works’ to Support Diversity and Inclusion in Creative Education and the Talent Pipeline, with a Focus on the 16+ Age Category, n.p.: APPG for Creative Diversity, https://www.kcl.ac.uk/cultural/projects/creative-majority-education. Accessed 2 March 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Friedman, Sam and Laurison, Daniel (2020), The Class Ceiling: Why It Pays to Be Privileged, Bristol and Chicago, IL: Policy Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Geary, Paul (2020), ‘The production of taste: Ecologies, intersections, implications’, Studies in Theatre and Performance, 40:3, pp. 28091, https://doi.org/10.1080/14682761.2020.1807193.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hood, Bruce (2012), The Self Illusion: Why There is No You Inside Your Head, London: Constable.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kahneman, Daniel ([2011] 2012), Thinking, Fast and Slow, London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lyotard, Jean-François ([1979] 1984), The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi), Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mlodinow, Leonard (2012), Subliminal: The New Unconscious and What It Teaches Us, London and New York: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Oakley, Kate, Laurison, Daniel, O’Brien, Dave and Friedman, Sam (2017), ‘Cultural capital: Arts graduates, spatial inequality, and London’s impact on cultural labor markets’, American Behavioral Scientist, 61:12, pp. 151031, https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217734274.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. O’Brien, Dave, Laurison, Daniel, Miles, Andrew and Friedman, Sam (2016), ‘Are the creative industries meritocratic? An analysis of the 2013 British labour force survey’, Cultural Trends, 25:2, pp. 11631, https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2016.1170943.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Prum, Richard O. (2023), Performance All the Way Down: Genes, Development, and Sexual Difference, Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sandel, Michael J. ([2020] 2021), The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good?, London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Savage, Mike, Devine, Fiona, Cunningham, Niall, Taylor, Mark, Li, Yaojun, Hjellbrekke, Johs, Le Roux, Brigitte, Friedman, Sam and Miles, Andrew (2013), ‘A new model of social class? Findings from the BBC’s Great British Class Survey Experiment’, Sociology, 47:2, pp. 21950, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513481128.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Skeggs, Beverley (2004), Class, Self, Culture, London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Tomlin, Liz (2020), ‘Why we still need to talk about class’, Studies in Theatre and Performance, 40:3, pp. 25164, https://doi.org/10.1080/14682761.2020.1807213.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Turner, Robert (2015), ‘Ritual action shapes our brains: An essay in neuroanthropology’, in M. Bull and J. P. Mitchell (eds), Ritual, Performance and the Senses, London and New York: Bloomsbury, pp. 3144.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Wetherell, Margaret (2012), Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding, London and Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Wright, Erik O. ([1985] 2023), Classes, London and New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Žižek, Slavoj ([1989] 2008), The Sublime Object of Ideology, London and New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Žižek, Slavoj ([1999] 2008), The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology, London and New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jclc_00063_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test