Skip to content
1981
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2052-6695
  • E-ISSN: 2052-6709

Abstract

Abstract

This article offers a series of reflections upon the complex relationship of painting with time. The introduction sets out a trajectory from modernism to postmodernism. Painting’s physical immediacy was prized by modernists, but that immediacy was also subject to a logic of historical development: a disjuncture that was challenged by postmodern critics. As we move towards the contemporary period, understanding of our relationship with time has altered, according to various theorizations by David Harvey, Fredric Jameson and Paul Virilio. The introduction draws upon Nagel and Wood’s notion of ‘anachronism’ as means to consider painting’s relationship with time as non-linear; but it also proposes, as do the following contributions, that painting’s engagement with time is not merely theoretical, but is a matter of continual day-to-day practice.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jcp.4.1.171_1
2018-04-01
2024-10-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jcp.4.1.171_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): anachronism; criticism; modernism; painting; postmodernism; time
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error