The context of medium specificity: From Riegl to Greenberg | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2052-6695
  • E-ISSN: 2052-6709

Abstract

By the mid-1960s the notion of medium specificity had come to define that which was most insular and protectionist about painting, with the idea of medium specificity entirely synonymous with the formalist criticism of Clement Greenberg. As such, the richness of the term, and its historical situatedness, was lost behind a particular defence of the virtues of modernist painting. This article attempts to draw out the history and nuances of medium specificity: to trace its development within an extended body of speculation – commonly termed formalist – in order to re-open a discussion, too often sidestepped within contemporary discourse, as to the relationship that exists between the work of art and that which the work of art can claim to bear witness to.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jcp_00003_1
2019-10-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arnold, D. and Iversen, M. (2003), Art and Thought, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell, C. (1913), Art, London: Chatto and Windus.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bois, Y.-A. (1993), Painting as Model, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Buchloh, Benjamin H. D. (2000), Neo-Avantgarde and Culture Industry: Essays on European and American Art from 1955 to 1975, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Burcharth, L. and Graw, I. (eds) (2016), The Medium in the Post-Medium Condition, Berlin: Sternberg Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Costello, D. (2007), ‘Greenberg’s Kant and the fate of aesthetics in contemporary art theory’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 65:2, pp. 21728.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Duve, T. De (1996), Clement Greenberg: Between the Lines, Paris: Dis Voir.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fisherman, S. (1963), The Interpretation of Art: Essays on the Art Criticism of John Ruskin, Walter Pater, Clive Bell, Roger Fry, and Herbert Read, Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Foster, H. (1996), The Return of the Real, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fried, M. (1998), Art & Objecthood, London: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fry, R. (1899), Bellini, London: At the Sign of the Unicorn.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fry, R. (1920), Vision and Design, London: Chatto & Windus.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fry, R. (1924), The Artist and Psycho-Analysis, London: Hogarth Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Greenberg, C. ([1939] 1986), ‘Avant-garde and kitsch’, in J. O’Brian (ed.), Clement Greenberg: The Collected Essays and Criticism, Volume. I, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 522.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Greenberg, C. ([1940] 1986), ‘Towards a newer Laocoön’, in J. O’Brian (ed.), Clement Greenberg: The Collected Essays and Criticism, Volume I, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 2337.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Greenberg, C. ([1960] 1993), ‘Modernist painting’, in J. O’Brian (ed.) Clement Greenberg: The Collected Essays and Criticism, Volume IV, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 8593.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Guilbaut, S. (ed.) (1990), Reconstructing Modernism: Art in New York, Paris, and Montreal 1945-64, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Harrison, C. (1993), Conceptual Art & Painting: Further Essays on Art and Language, Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jones, C. (2005), Eyesight Alone, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Krauss, R. (ed.) ([1993] 2000), ‘Agnes Martin/The Cloud’, in Bachelors, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 7589.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Krauss, R. (2011), Under Blue Cup, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lessing, G. E. ([1766] 1962), Laocoön: An Essay Upon the Limits of Poetry and Painting (trans. E. A. McCormick), Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Olin, M. (1989), ‘Forms of respect: Alois Riegl’s concept of attentiveness’, The Art Bulletin, 71:2, pp. 5171.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Osborne, P. (2013), Anywhere or Not at All: Philosophy of Contemporary Art, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Platt, S. N. (1986), Modernism in the 1920s, Michigan: UMI Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Potts, A. (2000), Flesh and Ideal: Winckelmann and the Origins of Art History, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Rampley, M. (2013), The Vienna School of Art History: Empire and the Politics of Scholarship, 1847-1918, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Reed, C. (1996), The Roger Fry Reader, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Riegl, A. ([1893] 1992), Problems of Style: Foundations for a History of Ornament (trans. E. Kain), Princeton: Princeton University.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Staff, C. (2013), After Modernist Painting: The History of a Contemporary Practice, London: I.B. Taurus and Co. Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Vasari, G. ([1550] 2005), Lives of the Most Excellent Painters, Sculptors and Architects (trans. J. F. Mineola), New York: Dover Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Winckelmann ([1764] 1873), The History of the Art of Antiquity (trans. G. H. Lodge), Boston: James R. Osgood and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Wölfflin, H. ([1915] 1932), Principles of Art History: The Problem of the Development of Style in Later Art (trans. M. D. Hottinger), New York: Dover Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Wollheim, R. (1974), On Art and the Mind, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Wollheim, R. (1995), On Formalism and its Kinds, Barcelona: Antoni Tapies Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Wood, C. S. (2000), The Vienna School Reader: Politics and Art Historical Method in the 1930s, New York: Zone Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Palin, Tom (2019), ‘The context of medium specificity: From Riegl to Greenberg’, Journal of Contemporary Painting, 5:2, pp. 253272, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jcp_00003_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jcp_00003_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jcp_00003_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error