Skip to content
1981
Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2052-6695
  • E-ISSN: 2052-6709

Abstract

The paintings by Filippo Caramazza were made during years of protracted expectation of the major retrospective of paintings: . Delay was caused by significant debate between major receiving institutions as to their responsibilities when exposing provocative imagery to public view. Potential for misjudgement was a foremost concern in planning publications and installations. As if to manage a sense of deprivation, Caramazza imaginatively substitutes the real paintings, currently withheld, as postcard re-presentations, as if to mark their existence . The faithful painterly address to detail of image and technique suggest his reverence for the presence of the original works without attempting to replicate their powerful impression. The passive form of copying, a ‘humble address’ to the original paintings, stands in contrast with the authoritative nature of the institutional debate. Much of the concern with public reception of the paintings focused on issues raised by the contemporary ‘Black Lives Matter’ movement and references to the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) within Guston’s work. Effectively the museums decided to acknowledge but defuse problematic content. This article takes the view that the politics of Guston’s paintings address sociopolitical and personal issues generally, as well as formal painterly issues in contemporary American painting. Taking these ideas further, Caramazza’s paintings offer an opportunity to consider how museums shape critical and theoretical narratives in the construction of displays and a consideration of how painting may act as a critical witness.

© 2023 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jcp_00056_1
2024-06-04
2026-04-17

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ashton, Dore (1976), Yes, But...: A Critical Study of Philip Guston, New York: Viking Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Benjamin, Walter ([1970] 1982), ‘The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction’, in H. Arendt (ed.), Illuminations (trans. H. Zohn), London: Fontana Press, pp. 217–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Benjamin, Walter (1985), ‘Moscow diary’, October, 35:winter, pp. 4–135.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Benjamin, Walter (2007a), ‘Travel scenes, picture postcards’, in U. Marx, G. Schwarz, M. Schwarz and E. Wizisla (eds), Walter Benjamin’s Archive: Images, Texts, Signs (trans. E. Leslie), London: Verso, pp. 171–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Benjamin, Walter (2007b), ‘Physiognomy of the thingworld, Russian toys’, in U. Marx, G. Schwarz, M. Schwarz and E. Wizisla (eds), Walter Benjamin’s Archive: Images, Texts, Signs (trans. E. Leslie), London: Verso, pp. 73–105.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, Kate (2021), ‘“Artists imagine that museums are brave: They’re not”: Glenn Ligon on his new show, Philip Guston, and how institutions can do better’, artnet, 18 November, https://news.artnet.com/art-world/glenn-ligon-interview-2036127. Accessed 27 October 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Colucci, Emma (2022), ‘“Philip Guston Now” is an unintentionally perfect satire of contemporary liberal cultural politics’, Filthy Dreams, 23 May, https://filthydreams.org/2022/05/23/philip-guston-now-is-an-unintentionally-perfect-satire-of-contemporary-liberal-cultural-politics/. Accessed 27 October 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cooper, Harry (2002), ‘Recognizing Guston (in four slips)’, October, 99:winter, pp. 97–129.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cooper, Harry (2020a), ‘Guston, then: Telling tales’, in Philip Guston Now, exhibition catalogue, Washington, DC: Distributed Art Publishers and National Gallery of Art (D.A.P.), pp. 5–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cooper, Harry (2020b), ‘Marlborough man’, in Philip Guston Now, exhibition catalogue, Washington, DC: Distributed Art Publishers and National Gallery of Art (D.A.P.), pp. 83–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Crimp, Douglas (1995), On The Museum’s Ruins, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Dean, Tacita (2020), ‘Guston head’, in Philip Guston Now, exhibition catalogue, Washington, DC: Distributed Art Publishers and National Gallery of Art (D.A.P.), pp. 80–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Derrida, Jacques ([1980] 1987), ‘Envois’, in The Postcard from Socrates to Freud and Beyond (trans. A. Bass), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–256.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Derrida, Jacques (1994), Specters of Marx (trans. P. Kamuf), London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Didi-Huberman, George (2004), ‘Foreword, knowledge: Movement (the man who spoke to butterflies)’, in P.-A. Michaud (eds), Aby Warburg and the Image in Motion (trans. S. Hawkes), New York: Zone Books, pp. 7–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Didi-Huberman, George (2017), The Surviving Image, Phantoms of Time and Time of Phantoms, Aby Warburg’s History of Art (trans. H. Mendelsohn), Pennsylvania, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Goodman, Jonathan (2022), ‘The Guston Foundation: The maintenance of Philip Guston’s legacy’, The Brooklyn Rail, October, https://brooklynrail.org/2022/10/artonic/The-Guston-Foundation-The-Maintenance-of-Philip-Gustons-Legacy. Accessed 22 October 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hancock, Trenton Doyle (2020), ‘Drawing for conspirators, 1930’, in Philip Guston Now, exhibition catalogue, Washington, DC: Distributed Art Publishers and National Gallery of Art (D.A.P.), pp. 15–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Handel Street Projects (2022), ‘Filippo Caramazza: Guston Reloaded’, press release, 10 June–16 September, http://handelstreetprojects.com/filippo-caramazza-guston-reloaded. Accessed 12 September 2022.
  20. Joselit, David (2016), ‘Marking, scorings, storing, and speculating (on time)’, in I. Graw and E. Lajer-Burcharth (eds), Painting Beyond Itself: The Medium in the Post-Medium Condition, Berlin: Sternberg Press, pp. 11–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Kuspit, Donald (2012), ‘Dennis Adams, Kent fine art’, Artforum, 51:3, https://www.artforum.com/events/dennis-adams-194984/. Accessed 22 October 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Liebman, Joshua (2022), ‘Guston is treated with contempt: Philip Guston Now reviewed’, The Spectator, 20 August, https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/guston-is-treated-with-contempt-philip-guston-now-reviewed/#:~:text=Philip%20Guston%20is%20hard%20to,his%20approach%20altogether%20too%20winsome. Accessed 22 October 2022.
  23. Ligon, Glen (2020), ‘In the hood’, in Philip Guston Now, exhibition catalogue, Washington, DC: Distributed Art Publishers and National Gallery of Art (D.A.P.), pp. 117–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Malraux, André ([1954] 1978), The Voices of Silence: Man and his Art (Abridged from The Psychology of Art) (trans. S. G., Bollingen), vol. 24, Princeton, IN: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Malraux, André (1967), Museum without Walls, London: Martin Secker & Warburg Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Marcus, J. S. (2022), ‘Controversially postponed Philip Guston show finally gets going: How has it changed?’, The Art Newspaper, 26 April, https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2022/04/26/controversially-postponed-philip-guston-shows-finally-get-going. Accessed 22 October 2022.
  27. Marx, Karl and Engels, Frederick (1968), ‘Theses against Feuerbach’, in Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Selected Works, London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 28–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. McKee, Renée (ed.) (1982), ‘Philip Guston talking’, in Philip Guston: Paintings 1969–1980, exhibition catalogue, 13 October–12 December, London: Whitechapel Art Gallery, pp. 49–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Mckee, Renée (ed.) (2004), ‘Philip Guston talking: A lecture given by Philip Guston at the University of Minnesota in March 1978’, in Philip Guston, exhibition catalogue, 22 January–21 February, London: Timothy Taylor Gallery, pp. 21–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Phillips, Steve (2022), ‘America is built on a racist social contract: It’s time to tear it up and start anew’, The Guardian, 22 October, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/oct/22/america-racist-social-contract-start-anew-steve-phillips. Accessed 22 October 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Rosenberg, Harold (1974), ‘Conversations, Philip Guston and Harold Rosenberg: Guston’s recent paintings’, Boston University Journal, 22:3, pp. 43–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Sillman, Amy (2020), ‘From garbage cans to god’, in Philip Guston Now, exhibition catalogue, Washington, DC: Distributed Art Publishers and National Gallery of Art (D.A.P.), pp. 63–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Slifkin, Robert (2011a), ‘The tragic image: Action painting refigured’, Oxford Art Journal, 34:2, pp. 227–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Slifkin, Robert (2011b), ‘Philip Guston’s Return to Figuration and the “1930s Renaissance” of the 1960s’, The Art Bulletin, 93:2, pp. 220–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Suchin, Peter (2022), ‘Filippo Caramazza: Guston Reloaded’, Art Monthly, 458, July–August, p. 27.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jcp_00056_1
Loading
‘Thingly’ forms in Guston Reloaded: Filipo Caramazza at Handel Street Projects
Journal of Contemporary Painting 9, 203 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1386/jcp_00056_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jcp_00056_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jcp_00056_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): appropriation; dynamogram; Klansmen; miniatures; museum; photography; postcards

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test