The governance of digital switchover of terrestrial television in the European Union: The role of policy framing | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2516-3523
  • E-ISSN: 2516-3531

Abstract

Digital switchover of (DSO) of terrestrial broadcasting constitutes one of the most critical moments of policy change in Europe because it offered a unique opportunity of reconceptualising public media space for the next era of communication. The promise of a plural and public service oriented broadcast policy legitimized efforts of citizens investing in digitization, provided public acceptance and approval to the changes set to terminate analogue television. This article explores the policy framing of the switchover process in the European Union. It finds that DSO was constructed around overly technical and economic frames in the policy, a strategy, which allowed building an argument of neutrality of technology and hence of the steps policy-makers were making. This construction did not address the exclusion and side-lining of the social and political consequences of free-to-air reduction. The article argues that this practice provided a low-conflict policy process led by the European Commission between 2005 and 2015 and showcased a paradox on European spectrum policy. The article further argues that the governance of digitalization of Europe’s screens presents a case of highly complex low-salience regulatory policy, which means muted participation of citizens and limited public debate. Ultimately, this strategy undermines democratic practice and meaningful transparency in European policy-making as it eliminates deliberations on what constitutes public interest in the 21st media context. The analyses of communication DSO policy as a matter of polity situate well with European media governance scholarship.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp.10.1.67_1
2019-03-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jdmp/10/1/jdmp.10.1.67.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp.10.1.67_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ala-Fossi, M., and Bonet, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Who’s afraid of a pan-European spectrum policy? The EU and the battles over the UHF broadcast band. ’, International Journal of Communication, 12:0, p. 22.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbé, E.,, Herranz-Surrallés, A., and Natorski, M.. ( 2015;), ‘ Contending metaphors of the European Union as a global actor: Norms and power in the European discourse on multilateralism. ’, Journal of Language and Politics, 14:1, pp. 1840.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Borah, P.. ( 2011;), ‘ Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. ’, Journal of Communication, 61:2, pp. 24663.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carta, C.. ( 2015;), ‘ The swinging “we”: Framing the European Union international discourse. ’, Journal of Language and Politics, 14:1, pp. 6586.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chong, D., and Druckman, J. N.. ( 2007;), ‘ Framing theory. ’, Annual Review of Political Science, 10:1, pp. 10326, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Daviter, F.. ( 2007;), ‘ Policy framing in the European Union. ’, Journal of European Public Policy, 14:4, pp. 65466.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Daviter, F.. ( 2011), Policy Framing in the European Union, London:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Delaere, S., and Cullell-March, C.. ( 2014;), ‘ Radio spectrum policy in the EU: Concepts, trends, issues. ’, in K. Donders,, C. Pauwels, and J. Loisen. (eds), Palgrave Handbook of European Media Policy, New York:: Palgrave;, pp. 36081.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dijk, van T.. ( 2009;), ‘ Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. ’, in R. Wodak, and M. Meyer. (eds), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, Los Angeles:: SAGE USA;, pp. 6284.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Druckman, J.. ( 2001;), ‘ The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. ’, Political Behavior, 23:3, pp. 22556, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015006907312. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. EBU ( 2002;), ‘ Media with a purpose: public service broadcasting in the digital age. ’, The Report of the Digital Strategy Group of the European Broadcasting Union, Geneva:: European Broadcasting Union;, https://www.ebu.ch/CMSimages/en/DSG_final_report_E_tcm6-5090.pdf. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. EBU ( 2015a;), ‘ European Broadcasting Union, press release, Broadcasters applaud WRC-15 decision securing future of free-to-air broadcasting. ’, Geneva:: European Broadcasting Union (EBU);, https://www.ebu.ch/news/2015/11/broadcasters-applaud-wrc-15-decision. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. EBU ( 2015b;), ‘ Response to Lamy Report public consultation on 700MHz spectrum band, available in organisations’ contributions. ’, Brussels:: European Commission;, https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/results-lamy-report-public-consultation-700mhz-spectrum-band. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Entman, R. M.. ( 1993;), ‘ Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. ’, Journal of Communication, 43:4, pp. 5158.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Entman, R. M.. ( 2003;), ‘ Cascading activation: Contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. ’, Political Communication, 20:4, pp. 41532, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244176. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Entman, R. M.. ( 2004), Projections of Power, Chicago:: University of Chicago Press;, http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/P/bo3637444.html. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. EU Policy Briefing ( 2015;), ‘ European Union, policy briefing – radio spectrum – a key resource for the digital single market. ’, Strasbourg:: European Parliament;, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2015)554170. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. European Commission (EC) ( 2015c;), ‘ Results of the Lamy Report public consultation on 700 MHz spectrum band. ’, Brussels:: European Commission;, https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/results-lamy-report-public-consultation-700mhz-spectrum-band. Accessed 2 August 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. European Commission (EC) ( 2017;), ‘ Decision (EU) 2017/899 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 on the use of the 470-790 MHz frequency band in the Union OJ L 138. ’, 25 May, pp. 13137.
  20. Fairclough, N.. ( 1992), Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fairclough, N.. ( 2013;), ‘ Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. ’, Critical Policy Studies, 7:2, pp. 17797.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fischer, F.. ( 2003), Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices, Oxford and New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Fossum, J. E., and Schlesinger, P. R.. ( 2007;), ‘ The European Union and the public sphere: A communicative space in the making?. ’, in J. E. Fossum, and P. R. Schlesinger. (eds), The European Union and the Public Sphere: A Communicative Space in the Making?, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 121.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Freedman, D.. ( 2010;), ‘ Media policy silences: The hidden face of communications decision making. ’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15:3, pp. 34461, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161210368292. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ginosar, A.. ( 2013;), ‘ Media governance: A conceptual framework or merely a buzz word?. ’, Communication Theory, 23:4, pp. 35674, https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12026. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Gormley, W. T.. ( 1986;), ‘ Regulatory issue-networks in a federal system. ’, Polity, 18:4, pp. 595620.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Grimmer, J., and Stewart, B. M.. ( 2013;), ‘ Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. ’, Political Analysis, 21:3, pp. 131.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Harcourt, A.. ( 2002;), ‘ Engineering Europeanization: The role of the European institutions in shaping national media regulation. ’, Journal of European Public Policy, 9:5, pp. 73655.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Harcourt, A., and Radaelli, M.. ( 1999;), ‘ Limits to EU technocratic regulation?. ’, European Journal of Political Research, 35:1, pp. 10722.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hsieh, H. F., and Shannon, S.. ( 2005;), ‘ Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. ’, Qualitative Health Research, 15:9, pp. 127788.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hulst, M. van, and Yanow, D.. ( 2016;), ‘ From policy “frames” to “framing”: Theorizing a more dynamic, political approach. ’, The American Review of Public Administration, 46:1, pp. 92112, https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014533142. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. International Telecommunications Union (ITU) ( 2012;), ‘ Digital dividend: Insights for spectrum decisions. ’, Geneva:: http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/tech/digital_broadcasting/Reports/DigitalDividend.pdf. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. International Telecommunications Union (ITU) ( 2015a;), ‘ International Telecommunication Union, press release: World radiocommunication conference allocates spectrum for future innovation – Conference outcomes to spur long-term investments in ICT industry. ’, World Radiocommunication Conference Allocates Spectrum for Future Innovation Conference Outcomes to Spur Long-Term Investments in ICT Industry, Geneva, 2–27 November, http://www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/press_releases/2015/56.aspx#.XEHGsS2X9Vo. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. International Telecommunications Union (ITU) ( 2015b;), ‘ A licensing toolkit for DTTB and MTV services. ’, Geneva:: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Spectrum-Broadcasting/Documents/Publications/Licensing%20Toolkit%20-%20DTTB.pdf. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Iosifidis, P.. ( 2010;), ‘ Pluralism and funding of Public Service Broadcasting across Europe. ’, in P. Iosifidis. (ed.), Reinventing Public Service Communication: European Broadcasters and Beyond, Basingstoke:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 2335.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Irion, K., and Valcke, P.. ( 2015;), ‘ Cultural diversity in the digital age: EU competences, policies and regulations for diverse audiovisual and online content. ’, in E. Psychogiopoulou. (ed.), Cultural Governance and the European Union: Protecting and Promoting Cultural Diversity in Europe, Basingstoke:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 7590.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lamy, P.. ( 2015), Report to the European Commission: Results of the Work of the High Level Group on the Future Use of the UHF Band (470-790 MHz), Brussels:: European Commission;, https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/news/public-consultation-lamy-report-future-use-uhf-tv-broadcasting-band. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Laver, M.,, Benoit, K., and Garry, J.. ( 2003;), ‘ Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. ’, American Political Science Review, 97:2, pp. 31131.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Lentz, R. G.. ( 2011;), ‘ Regulation as linguistic engineering. ’, in R. Mansell, and M. Raboy. (eds), The Handbook of Global Media and Communication Policy, Oxford:: Wiley-Blackwell;, pp. 43248.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Linström, M., and Willemien, M.. ( 2012;), ‘ Qualitative news frame analyses: A methodology. ’, Communitas, 17, pp. 2138.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Loisen, J.,, Pauwels, C., and Donders, K.. ( 2013;), ‘ Mainstreaming EU cultural policies internally and externally: Caught between subsidiarity and global subsidiarity?. ’, in M. E. Price,, S. G. Verhulst, and L. Morgan. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Media Law, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 6586.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Majone, G.. ( 1999;), ‘ The regulatory state and its legitimacy problems. ’, West European Politics, 22:1, pp. 124.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Massaro, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Radio spectrum regulation as a matter of international affairs: Discussing the effectiveness of the European Union at world radiocommunication conferences. ’, Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 20:5, pp. 37398, https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-09-2017-0049. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Michalis, M.. ( 2016a;), ‘ New networks, old market structures? The race to next generation networks in the EU and calls for a new regulatory paradigm. ’, in S. Simpson,, M. Puppis, and H. van den Bulck. (eds), European Media Policy for the Twenty-First Century: Assessing the Past, Setting Agendas for the Future, London and New York:: Routledge, La Vergne, MyiLibrary;, pp. 13961, http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=892986. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Michalis, M.. ( 2016b;), ‘ Radio spectrum battles: Television broadcast vs. wireless broadband and the future of PSB. ’, International Journal of Digital Television, 7:3, pp. 34762.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Princen, S.. ( 2007;), ‘ Agenda-setting in the European Union: A theoretical exploration and agenda for research. ’, Journal of European Public Policy, 14:1, pp. 2138.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Princen, S.. ( 2011;), ‘ Agenda-setting strategies in EU policy processes. ’, Journal of European Public Policy, 18:7, pp. 92743, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.599960. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rashid, I., and Simpson, S.. ( 2016;), ‘ Global civil society activism and the public interest in the debate on the future shape of spectrum. ’, presented at the 2016 UK Political Studies Association Conference, Brighton, 21–23 March, http://usir.salford.ac.uk/38392/. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Rhinard, M.. ( 2010), Framing Europe: The Policy Shaping Strategies of the European Commission, Dordrecht:: Republic of Letters Publishing;.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Sarikakis, K.. ( 2007;), ‘ The place of media and cultural policy in the EU. ’, in K. Sarikakis. (ed.), Media and Cultural Policy in the European Union, Amsterdam and New York:: Rodopi;, pp. 1322.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Sarikakis, K.. ( 2009;), ‘ Defending communicative spaces: The remits and limits of the European parliament. ’, The International Journal for Communication Studies, 67:2, pp. 15572.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Sarikakis, K.. ( 2012;), ‘ Securitisation and legitimacy in global media governance: Spaces, jurisdictions and tensions. ’, in I. Volkmer. (ed.), Handbook of Global Media Research: Handbooks in Communication and Media, Malden, MA:: Wiley-Blackwell;, pp. 14356.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sarikakis, K., and Rodriguez-Amat, J.. ( 2014;), ‘ Intellectual property law change and process: The case of Spanish Ley Sinde as policy laundering. ’, First Monday, 19:3, https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4854/3847. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Simpson, S.,, Puppis, M., and Bulck, H. van den. ( 2016;), ‘ Contextualising media policy in the twenty first century. ’, in S. Simpson,, M. Puppis, and H. van den Bulck. (eds), European Media Policy for the Twenty-First Century: Assessing the Past, Setting Agendas for the Future, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 122, http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=892986. Accessed 30 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Starks, M.. ( 2013), The Digital Television Revolution: Origins to Outcomes, London:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Stoker, G.. ( 1998;), ‘ Governance as theory: Five propositions. ’, International Social Science Journal, 50:1, pp. 1728.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Streeter, T.. ( 1996), Selling the Air: A Critique of the Policy of Commercial Broadcasting in the United States, Chicago:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Streeter, T.. ( 2013;), ‘ Policy, politics, and discourse. ’, Communication, Culture & Critique, 6:4, pp. 488501.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Taylor, C.. ( 1995), Philosophical Arguments, Cambridge and London:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Wodak, R., and Carta, C.. ( 2015;), ‘ Discourse analysis, policy analysis, and the borders of EU identity. ’, Journal of Language and Politics, 14:1, pp. 117.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Yu, P. K.. ( 2010;), ‘ The political economy of data protection. ’, Chicago-Kent Law Review, 84:3, pp. 777801.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Rozgonyi, K.. ( 2019;), ‘ The governance of digital switchover of terrestrial television in the European Union: The role of policy framing. ’, Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 10:1, pp. 6787, doi: 10.1386/jdmp.10.1.67_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp.10.1.67_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp.10.1.67_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error