Addressing platform power: The politics of competition policy | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Digital Media & Policy
  4. Volume 11, Issue 3
  5. Article
Regulating digital platform power
  • ISSN: 2516-3523
  • E-ISSN: 2516-3531

Abstract

Digital platforms elude legal and regulatory frameworks traditionally used to address market power, speech and disinformation issues. One of the dominant policy responses to addressing these issues involves reforming competition policy to better manage digital platform markets. This case study examines how stakeholders, including tech giants, their competitors, regulators and advocacy groups, deploy competition policy to address platform power in a series of 2019–20 US congressional hearings on the subject, with implications for the wider global debate. The article traces the politics underlying these debates, which manifests in variations in stakeholders’ definitions of platform power and their proposed solutions, reflecting tensions over the role of the state in managing markets and in addressing non-economic concerns associated with digital platforms. The article concludes with a consideration of what this politics implies for policy interventions aimed at addressing platform power.

© 2020 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00029_1
2020-11-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ali, C., and Puppis, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ When the watchdog neither barks nor bites: Communication as a power resource in media policy and regulation. ’, Communication Theory, 28:3, pp. 270–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Arceneaux, N., and Schmitz Weiss, A.. ( 2010;), ‘ Seems stupid until you try it: Press coverage of Twitter, 2006–9. ’, New Media & Society, 12:8, pp. 1262–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, C. E.. ( 2007), Media Concentration and Democracy: Why Ownership Matters, New York:: Cambridge University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Barwise, P., and Watkins, L.. ( 2018;), ‘ The evolution of digital dominance: How and why we got to GAFA. ’, in M. Moore, and D. Tambini. (eds), Digital Dominance: The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple, New York:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 21–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Buch-Hansen, H., and Wigger, A.. ( 2011), The Politics of European Competition Regulation: A Critical Political Economy Perspective, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Cammaerts, B., and Mansell, R.. ( 2020;), ‘ Digital platform policy and regulation: Toward a radical democratic turn. ’, International Journal of Communication, 14, pp. 134–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Cohen, A.. ( 2019;), ‘ Written testimony of Adam Cohen, Director, Economic Policy, Google LLC; House Judiciary Committee; Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law Subcommittee: Online platforms and market power, part 2: Innovation and entrepreneurship. ’, US House of Representatives, 16 July, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU05/20190716/109793/HHRG-116-JU05-Wstate-CohenA-20190716.pdf. Accessed 12 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Daru, K.. ( 2020;), ‘ Testimony of Kirsten Daru, Chief Privacy Officer and General Counsel for Tile, Inc. on online platforms and market power, part 5: Competitors in the digital economy, before the House Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law. ’, US House of Representatives, 17 January, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU05/20200117/110386/HHRG-116-JU05-Wstate-DaruK-20200117-U1.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Electronic Frontier Foundation ( 2019;), ‘ Electric Frontier Foundation statement for the record. ’, US House of Representatives, 16 July, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU05/20190716/109793/HHRG-116-JU05-20190716-SD022.pdf. Accessed 11 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Evens, T., and Donders, K.. ( 2018), Platform Power and Policy in Transforming Television Markets, Cham:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Fischer, F.. ( 2003), Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Flew, T.,, Martin, F., and Suzor, N.. ( 2019;), ‘ Internet regulation as media policy: Rethinking the question of digital communication platform governance. ’, Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 10:1, pp. 33–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Freedman, D.. ( 2010;), ‘ Media policy silences: The hidden face of communications decision making. ’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15:3, pp. 344–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Furman, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ Prepared testimony for the hearing: Online platforms and market power, part 3: The role of data and privacy in competition. ’, US House of Representatives, 18 October, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU05/20191018/110098/HHRG-116-JU05-Wstate-FurmanJ-20191018.pdf. Accessed 11 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Gillespie, T.. ( 2010;), ‘ The politics of “platforms”. ’, New Media & Society, 12:3, pp. 347–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gillespie, T.. ( 2018), Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media, New Haven and London:: Yale University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L.. ( 1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago, IL:: Aldine;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hendrickson, C., and Galston, W. A.. ( 2017;), ‘ Big technology firms challenge traditional assumptions about antitrust enforcement. ’, The Brookings Institution, December 6, https://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2017/12/06/big-technology-firms-challenge-traditional-assumptions-about-antitrust-enforcement/. Accessed 19 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoffmann, A. L.,, Proferes, N., and Zimmer, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Making the world more open and connected: Mark Zuckerberg and the discursive construction of Facebook and its users. ’, New Media & Society, 20:1, pp. 199–218.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Holt, J.. ( 2011), Empires of Entertainment: Media Industries and the Politics of Deregulation, 1980–1996, New Brunswick, NJ:: Rutgers University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Holt, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ A history of broadcast regulations: Principles and perspectives. ’, in A. Bodroghkozy. (ed.), A Companion to the History of American Broadcasting, Oxford:: Wiley Blackwell;, pp. 169–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. House Judiciary ( 2019a;), ‘ Hearings: Online platforms and market power, part 1: The free and diverse press. ’, US House Committee On The Judiciary, 11 June, https://judiciary.house.gov/calendar/eventsingle.aspx?EventID=2260. Accessed 11 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. House Judiciary ( 2019b;), ‘ House Judiciary Committee launches bipartisan investigation into competition in digital markets. ’, US House Committee On The Judiciary, 3 June, https://judiciary.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2051. Accessed 11 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Hubbard, S.. ( 2019;), ‘ Testimony of Sally Hubbard, Director of Enforcement Strategy, Open Markets Institute, before the House Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial and Antitrust Law: Online platforms and market power, part 1: The free and diverse press. ’, US House of Representatives, 11 June, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU05/20190611/109616/HHRG-116-JU05-Wstate-HubbardS-20190611.pdf. Accessed 22 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Iosifidis, P., and Andrews, L.. ( 2019;), ‘ Regulating the internet intermediaries in a post-truth world: Beyond media policy?. ’, International Communication Gazette, 82:3, https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519828595. Accessed 22 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Khan, L.. ( 2017;), ‘ Amazon’s antitrust paradox. ’, Yale Law Journal, 126, 31 January, pp. 710–805.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Khan, L.. ( 2019;), ‘ The separation of platforms and commerce. ’, Columbia Law Review, 119:4, pp. 973–1098.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Kimmelman, G.. ( 2019;), ‘ Testimony of Gene Kimmelman President and CEO Public Knowledge before the United States House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law. ’, US House of Representatives, 11 June, http://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU05/20190611/109616/HHRG-116-JU05-Wstate-KimmelmanG-20190611.pdf. Accessed 8 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Layton, R.. ( 2019;), ‘ Data and privacy inquiry: Control points in technology and policy: Statement before the House Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law: Online platforms and market power, part 3: The role of data and privacy in competition. ’, US House of Representatives, 18 October, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU05/20191018/110098/HHRG-116-JU05-Wstate-LaytonR-20191018.pdf. Accessed 11 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Leonhardt, D.. ( 2018;), ‘ The monopolization of America. ’, New York Times, 25 November.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lunt, P., and Livingstone, S.. ( 2011), Media Regulation: Governance and the Interests of Citizens and Consumers, London:: Sage;.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. McChesney, R. W.. ( 2013), Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism Is Turning the Internet Against Democracy, New York:: The New Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Mejias, U. A., and Couldry, N.. ( 2019;), ‘ Datafication. ’, Internet Policy Review, 8:4, pp. 1–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Moore, M., and Tambini, D.. ( 2018), Digital Dominance: The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Nadler, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ Statement of the Honorable Jerrold Nadler, Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary, for hearing on online platforms and market power, part II: Effects on entrepreneurship and innovation, before the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law. ’, US House of Representatives, 16 July, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU05/20190716/109793/HHRG-116-JU05-MState-N000002-20190716.pdf. Accessed 9 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Napoli, P.. ( 2019;), ‘ Defining data. ’, Intermedia, 47:4, pp. 36–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Napoli, P. M.. ( 2015;), ‘ Social media and the public interest: Governance of news platforms in the realm of individual and algorithmic gatekeepers. ’, Telecommunications Policy, 39:9, pp. 751–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Napoli, P. M., and Caplan, R.. ( 2017;), ‘ Why media companies insist they’re not media companies, why they’re wrong, and why it matters. ’, First Monday, 22:5, doi: 10.5210/fm.v22i15.7051.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Net Marketshare ( 2017;), ‘ Search engine market share. ’, https://tinyurl.com/y5yv3da9. Accessed 1 December 2017.
  40. Nieborg, D. B., and Poell, T.. ( 2018;), ‘ The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. ’, New Media & Society, 20:11, pp. 4275–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Ohlhausen, M. K.. ( 2019;), ‘ Written statement of proposed testimony, Maureen K. Ohlhausen, partner, Baker Botts L.L.P., hearing on online platforms and market power, part 2: Innovation and entrepreneurship. ’, US House of Representatives, 16 July, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU05/20190716/109793/HHRG-116-JU05-Wstate-OhlhausenM-20190716.pdf. Accessed 12 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Perault, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ Testimony of Matt Perault, Director of Public Policy, Facebook. ’, US House of Representatives, 16 July, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU05/20190716/109793/HHRG-116-JU05-Wstate-PeraultM-20190716.pdf. Accessed 12 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Perrin, N.. ( 2019;), ‘ Facebook-Google duopoly won’t crack this year. ’, eMarketer inc, 4 November, https://www.emarketer.com/content/facebook-google-duopoly-won-t-crack-this-year. Accessed 22 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Pitofsky, D.. ( 2019;), ‘ US House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law hearings on online platforms and market power, part 1: The free and diverse press: Remarks of David Pitofsky, General Counsel, News Corp. ’, US House of Representatives, 11 June, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU05/20190611/109616/HHRG-116-JU05-Wstate-PitofskyD-20190611.pdf. Accessed 11 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Popiel, P.. ( 2018;), ‘ The tech lobby: Tracing the contours of new media elite lobbying power. ’, Communication, Culture and Critique, 11:4, pp. 566–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Reed, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ Testimony of Morgan Reed, President, ACT: The App Association, before the US House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law. ’, US House of Representatives, 16 July, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU05/20190716/109793/HHRG-116-JU05-Wstate-ReedM-20190716.pdf. Accessed 12 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Schreuers, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ Statement of Matt Schruers, Vice President for Law and Policy, Computer and Communications Industry Association: Online platforms and market power, part 1: The free and diverse press, Committee on the Judiciary, US House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law. ’, US House of Representatives, 11 June, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU05/20190611/109616/HHRG-116-JU05-Wstate-SchruersM-20190611.pdf. Accessed 12 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Spence, P.. ( 2020;), ‘ Written testimony of Patrick Spence, Chief Executive Officer, Sonos, Inc., House Judiciary Committee, Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law Subcommittee. ’, US House of Representatives, 17 January, http://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU05/20200117/110386/HHRG-116-JU05-Wstate-SpenceP-20200117.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Streeter, T.. ( 2013;), ‘ Policy, politics, and discourse. ’, Communication, Culture & Critique, 6:4, pp. 488–501.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Stucke, M. E.. ( 2013;), ‘ Is competition always good?. ’, Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 1:1, pp. 162–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Stucke, M. E., and Ezrachi, A.. ( 2019;), ‘ Written statement for the record by Maurice E. Stucke and Ariel Ezrachi for a hearing before the US House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law titled online platforms and market power, part III: The role of data and privacy in competition. ’, US House of Representatives, 18 October, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU05/20191018/110098/HHRG-116-JU05-20191018-SD010.pdf. Accessed 12 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Stucke, M. E., and Grunes, A. P.. ( 2016), Big Data and Competition Policy, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Valletti, T.. ( 2019;), ‘ Testimony of Tommaso Valletti, Ph.D., Professor of Economics Imperial College Business School Imperial College London before the House Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law on online platforms and market power, part 3: The role of data and privacy in competition. ’, US House of Representatives, 18 October, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU05/20191018/110098/HHRG-116-JU05-Wstate-VallettiT-20191018.pdf. Accessed 11 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Van den Bulck, H.. ( 2012;), ‘ Tracing media policy decisions: Of stakeholders, networks and advocacy coalitions. ’, in M. E., Price,, S. Verhulst, and L. Morgan. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Media Law, London:: Routledge;, pp. 17–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. van Dijck, J.,, Nieborg, D., and Poell, T.. ( 2019;), ‘ Reframing platform power. ’, Internet Policy Review, 8:2, pp. 1–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. van Dijck, J.,, Poell, T., and de Waal, M.. ( 2018), The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. van Dijk, T. A.. ( 2009;), ‘ Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. ’, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2:1, pp. 62–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Warner, B.. ( 2019;), ‘ Written statement for the record by Brian Warner for a hearing before The House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law titled online platforms and market power, part 2: Innovation and entrepreneurship. ’, US House of Representatives, 16 July, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU05/20190716/109793/HHRG-116-JU05-20190716-SD015.pdf. Accessed 12 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Wu, T.. ( 2018), The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the New Gilded Age, New York:: Columbia Global Reports;.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Zuboff, S.. ( 2019), The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the Frontier of Power, New York:: Public Affairs;.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Popiel, Pawel. ( 2020;), ‘ Addressing platform power: The politics of competition policy. ’, Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 11:3, pp. 341–360, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00029_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00029_1
Loading
Addressing platform power: The politics of competition policy
Journal of Digital Media & Policy 11, 341 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00029_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00029_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00029_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): communications policy; competition policy; digital markets; digital platforms; platform governance; regulation

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error