Power grab in a pandemic: Media, lawfare and policy in Myanmar | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Digital Media & Policy
  4. Volume 13, Issue 1
  5. Article
Special Issue: ‘(Re)Iterations, Transgressions, Recognition: Politics and Practices of Media Policies in South Asia’
  • ISSN: 2516-3523
  • E-ISSN: 2516-3531

Abstract

The 1 February 2021 coup d’etat in Myanmar did more than force the country’s journalists and other media makers to operate under extreme conditions to continue their work, and win back the space for freedom of expression and the press lost to them. The coup also provoked a massive cultural shift, and the country’s independent media are playing a key role. After a half century of military dictatorship, a decade of much-lauded democratic opening (2011–20) prior to the coup had ushered in game-changing developments to the media landscape. Yet since the coup, the junta and its appointed State Administrative Council (SAC) have inflicted the kinds of brutalities in response to peaceful protesters that the military has used for decades with impunity against the country’s ethnic minorities, all justified, they claim, to ensure ‘the rule of law’ and ‘law and order’. The SAC has also attempted complete control over Myanmar’s media, cutting off at various times nearly all internet and mobile access. This included Facebook, Twitter and other apps, thereby silencing the country’s independent media or forcing them into forms of self-censorship, hiding or exile, and allowing only a military-controlled narrative of unfolding events through military- and state-run media. Yet the independent media sector has not only survived, it has proven to be a key voice in efforts to thwart the regime’s attempts to control public mediated space. This article explores the various approaches to media policy-making in Myanmar during the COVID-19 pandemic and the aftermath of the coup, as employed by the military, the elected but later overthrown National League for Democracy government, various key components of the pro-democracy forces, and international aid and advocacy organizations working to increase freedom of expression and the press. It draws from interviews with key media policy-makers, journalists, academics and free expression advocates, and analyses of content from the (now) junta-controlled and other key documents. It explores the various approaches taken and lessons learned by key stakeholders working to control or change public discourse and freedom of expression and the press in the country.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00087_1
2022-03-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) ( 2021;), ‘ ANFREL releases 2020 Myanmar general elections final observation mission report. ’, 17 May, https://anfrel.org/anfrel-releases-2020-myanmar-general-elections-final-observation-mission-report/. Accessed 17 May 2021.
  2. AP ( 2021;), ‘ Jailed US journalist in Myanmar slapped with new charge. ’, 5 October, https://www.khaosodenglish.com/news/international/2021/10/05/jailed-us-journalist-in-myanmar-slapped-with-new-charge/. Accessed 28 February 2022.
  3. BNI Multimedia Group ( 2020;), ‘ BNI Multimedia Group’s open letter to the State Counsellor and President. ’, 7 April, https://www.bnionline.net/en/news/bni-multimedia-groups-open-letter-state-counsellor-and-president. Accessed 28 February 2022.
  4. Brooten, L.. ( 2020;), ‘ When media fuel the crisis: Fighting hate speech and communal violence in Myanmar. ’, in J. Matthews, and E. Thorsen. (eds), Media, Journalism and Disaster Communities, Cham, Switzerland:: Springer;, pp. 215–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Canefe, N.. ( 2020;), ‘ New faces of statelessness: The Rohingya exodus and remapping of rights. ’, in N. Chowdhory, and B. Monhanty. (eds), Citizenship, Nationalism and Refugeehood of Rohingyas in Southern Asia, Singapore:: Springer;, pp. 197–216.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Chakravartty, P., and Roy, S.. ( 2013;), ‘ Media pluralism redux: Towards new frameworks of comparative media studies “beyond the West”. ’, Political Communication, 30:3, pp. 349–70, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737429. Accessed 10 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Chakravartty, P., and Sarikakis, K.. ( 2006), Media Policy and Globalization, Edinburgh:: Edinburgh University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Chatterjee, P.. ( 2001;), ‘ On civil and political society in postcolonial democracies. ’, in S. Kaviraj, and S. Khilnani. (eds), Civil Society: History and Possibilities, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;, pp. 165–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheesman, N.. ( 2015a), Opposing the Rule of Law: How Myanmar’s Courts Make Law and Order, , Kindle ed.., Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheesman, N.. ( 2015b;), ‘ That signifier of desire, the rule of law. ’, Social Research, 82:2, pp. 267–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Comaroff, J., and Comaroff, J.. (eds) ( 2006a;), ‘ Preface. ’, in Law and Disorder in the Postcolony, Chicago:: The University of Chicago Press;, pp. vii–x.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Comaroff, J., and Comaroff, J.. (eds) ( 2006b;), ‘ Law and disorder in the postcolony: An introduction. ’, in Law and Disorder in the Postcolony, Chicago:: The University of Chicago Press;, pp. 1–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Facebook ( 2018;), ‘ Removing Myanmar military officials from Facebook. ’, 28 August, https://about.fb.com/news/2018/08/removing-myanmar-officials/. Accessed 30 September 2018.
  14. Freedman, D.. ( 2015;), ‘ Media policy fetishism. ’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 32:2, pp. 96–111.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Frontier ( 2021;), ‘ Journalism goes local as the junta shackles national media. ’, 28 May, https://www.frontiermyanmar.net/en/journalism-goes-local-as-the-junta-shackles-national-media/. Accessed 28 February 2022.
  16. Hlaing, Z.. ( 2021;), ‘ Myanmar media in the time of pandemic, election and coup. ’, in Media Reporting of Elections in Asia: Issues, Challenges and Lessons, Bangkok, Thailand:: Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL);, pp. 33–53, https://anfrel.org/media-reporting-of-elections-in-asia-issues-challenges-and-lessons/. Accessed 2 May 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hlaing, Z.. ( 2021;), Zoom interview with the author. , 16 July.
  18. Jordt, I.,, Than, T., and Lin, S. Y.. ( 2021), How Generation Z Galvanized a Revolutionary Movement Against Myanmar’s 2021 Military Coup, Singapore:: ISEAS and the Yusof Ishak Institute;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kyaw, M.. ( 2021), telephone interview with the author , 10 March.
  20. Latt, T. Z.. ( 2021;), ‘ The role of independent media under the coup junta in Burma. ’, presentation delivered at Chiang Mai University;, Chiang Mai, Thailand:, 29 April.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. McCargo, D.. ( 2003), Media and Politics in Pacific Asia, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. McElhone, J. M.. ( 2021;), ‘ COVID-19’s impact on media operations in Myanmar: Part 2 of a Media Development Investment Fund (MDIF) survey. ’, Media Development Investment Fund , 31 January, https://www.mdif.org/mmp-survey-part-2/. Accessed 2 February 2021.
  23. McElhone, J. M., and Brooten, L.. ( 2019;), ‘ Whispered support: Two decades of international aid for independent journalism and free expression. ’, in L. Brooten,, J. M. McElhone, and G. Venkiteswaran. (eds), Myanmar Media in Transition: Legacies, Challenges and Change, Singapore:: ISEAS;, pp. 95–130.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Mizzima ( 2021;), ‘ Statement by independent media. ’, 25 February, https://www.mizzima.com/article/statement-independent-media. Accessed 3 March 2021.
  25. Mozur, P.. ( 2018;), ‘ A genocide incited on Facebook, with posts from Myanmar’s military. ’, New York Times, 5 October, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/15/technology/myanmar-facebook-genocide.html. Accessed 30 October 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Naing, A. C.. ( 2021;), telephone interview with the author. , 18 May.
  27. Peck, G.. ( 2021;), ‘ Myanmar court sentences US journalist to 11 years in jail. ’, 12 November, AP News , https://apnews.com/article/myanmar-journalists-statutes-3b723f3e5adb593750d00856b060465e. Accessed 28 February 2022.
  28. Progressive Voice Myanmar ( 2020;), ‘ A nation left behind: Myanmar’s weaponization of COVID-19. ’, 2 June, https://progressivevoicemyanmar.org/2020/06/02/a-nation-left-behind-myanmars-weaponization-of-covid-19/. Accessed 13 August 2020.
  29. Sein, T.. ( [2011] 2019;), ‘ President of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar U. Thein Sein addresses the first Pyidaungsu Hluttaw First Regular Session on March 30, 2011. ’, in Y. Htut. (ed.), Myanmar’s Political Transition and Lost Opportunities (2010–2016), Singapore:: ISEAS;, pp. 227–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) ( 2018;), ‘ Report of the international independent fact-finding mission on Myanmar. ’, United Nations General Assembly A/HRC/39/64;, 12 September, https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/FFM-Myanmar/A_HRC_39_64.pdf. Accessed 1 September 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Venkiteswaran, G.,, Thein, Y. Y., and Kyaw, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ Legal changes for media and expression: New reforms, old controls. ’, in L. Brooten,, J. M. McElhone, and G. Venkiteswaran. (eds), Myanmar Media in Transition: Legacies, Challenges and Change, Singapore:: ISEAS;, pp. 59–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Win, S.. ( 2021;), Zoom interview with the author. , 23 April.
  33. Brooten, Lisa. ( 2022;), ‘ Power grab in a pandemic: Media, lawfare and policy in Myanmar. ’, Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 13:1, pp. 9–24, https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00087_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00087_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): authoritarianism; censorship; coup d’etat; COVID-19 pandemic; exile media; media policy; social media

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error