Skip to content
1981
Emerging Debates on Internet Platform Policy and Regulation in Latin America
  • ISSN: 2516-3523
  • E-ISSN: 2516-3531

Abstract

This article discusses policy and regulation of internet platforms in Latin America. It first addresses how internet platformization brings back to the political agenda the centrality of communication public policy and communication governance at a global scale. The article presents some global policy concerns on internet governance, while also analysing the regional specificities. It offers an overview of the tradition of communication policies in Latin America, to show continuities and shifts in the debates on internet governance highlighting key aspects, including the peripheral positioning and recognition of power asymmetries, and the role of states and the participation of society in the discussions. The presentation also portrays some of the current regulatory debates in the region and identifies at least three different approaches (and their pitfalls): taxation perspective; platform funding initiatives and content moderation regulatory projects under debate which, in many cases, jeopardize human right principles. Finally, an overview of the six articles comprised in this Special Issue is presented.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00118_2
2023-07-18
2025-04-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jdmp/14/2/jdmp.14.2.135_Bizberge.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00118_2&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Altamirano, F.. ( 2020;), ‘ Intelectuales, exilio y comunicación en el Instituto Latinoamericano de Estudios Transnacionales (ILET) (1975–1984). ’, Revista de la Red Intercátedras de Historia de América Latina Contemporánea, 13, pp. 25078.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Badillo, A.,, Mastrini, G., and Marenghi, P.. ( 2015;), ‘ Teoría crítica, izquierda y políticas públicas de comunicación: El caso de América Latina y los gobiernos progresistas. ’, Comunicación y sociedad, nueva ép., 24, pp. 95126, http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0188-252X2015000200005. Accessed 17 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Becerra, M.. ( 2015), De la concentración a la convergencia. Políticas de medios en Argentina y América Latina, Buenos Aires:: Paidós;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Birkinbine, B.,, Gómez, R., and Wasko, J.. (eds) ( 2017), Global Media Giants, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bizberge, A.. ( 2021;), ‘ El audiovisual en Internet y las tensiones para regular el ecosistema digital. ’, in S. Marino. (ed.), El Audiovisual Ampliado II: Tradiciones, estrategias, dinámicas y big data Argentina, Buenos Aires:: Editorial USAL;, pp. 1958.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bizberge, A.. ( 2022;), ‘ Las Estrategias de negocio de las plataformas de video en Argentina para el acceso a contenidos digitales en pandemia (2020–2021). ’, ZER: Revista de Estudios de Comunicación = Komunikazio Ikasketen Aldizkaria, 27:53, pp. 16587, https://doi.org/10.1387/zer.23817.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Braman, S.. ( 2004), The Emergent Global Information Policy Regime, New York:: Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cammaerts, B., and Mansell, R.. ( 2020;), ‘ Digital platform policy and regulation: Toward a radical democratic turn. ’, International Journal of Communication, 14, pp. 13554.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cortés, C.. ( 2014), La gobernanza de Internet: La trampa de las formas, Buenos Aires:: CELE;.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. De Moraes, D.. ( 2011;), ‘ La cruzada de los medios en América Latina. ’, Gobiernos -progresistas y políticas de comunicación, Buenos Aires:: Paidós;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dussel, E.. ( 2007), Materiales para una política de la liberación, Mexico City:: Plaza y Valdes;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Freedman, D.. ( 2008), The Politics of Media Policy, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Frías Barroso, Z.,, González Balderrama, C.,, Serrano Calle, S., and Pérez Martínez, J.. ( 2016;), ‘ Un nuevo ecosistema digital. ’, in Martínez J. Pérez, and Barroso Z. Frías. (eds), Las reglas del juego en el ecosistema digital: Level Playing Field, Barcelona:: Ariel;, pp. 115.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fox, E., and Waisbord, S.. ( 2002), Latin Politics, Global Media, Austin, TX:: University of Texas Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gillespie, T.. ( 2017;), ‘ Regulation of and by platforms. ’, in E. J. Burgess,, T. Poell, and A. Marwick. (eds), Handbook of Social Media, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage Publications;, pp. 25478.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gómez Germano, G.. ( 2011;), ‘ Gobiernos progresistas y políticas públicas de comunicación: Una aproximación regional para provocar la reflexión. ’, in E. Koschützke, and E. Gerber. (eds), Progresismo y políticas de comunicación: Manos a la obra, Buenos Aires:: Fundación Friedrich Ebert;, pp. 1532.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gómez, R.. ( 2013;), ‘ Media reform in Latin America: Experiences and debates of communication public policies. ’, The Political Economy of Communication, 1:1, pp. 12228.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gómez, R.. ( 2022;), ‘ Challenges of media governance and media policy in Latin America: In the context of media reform battles. ’, in S. Ganter, and H. Badr. (eds), Media Governance: A Cosmopolitan Critique, Cham:: Springer International Publishing;, pp. 5980.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Innis, H.. ( 2006), The Bias of Communication, , 2nd ed.., Toronto:: Toronto University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Iosifidis, P.. ( 2011), Global Media and Communication Policy, Basingstoke and New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Iosifidis, P., and Andrews, L.. ( 2020;), ‘ Regulating the internet intermediaries in a post-truth world: Beyond media policy?. ’, International Communication Gazette, 82:3, pp. 21130, https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519828595.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. ITU ( 2005;), ‘ Cumbre Mundial de la Sociedad de la Información. ’, Documentos Finales, Geneva:: ITU;, https://www.itu.int/net/wsis/outcome/booklet-es.pdf. Accessed 14 January 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jin, D. Y.. ( 2015), Digital Platforms, Imperialism and Political Culture, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Karanicolas, M.. ( 2020;), ‘ Squaring the circle between freedom of expression and Platform Law (2020). ’, 20 Pittsburgh Journal of Technology Law & Policy, 177, https://doi.org/10.5195/tlp.2020.236.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Katzenbach, C., and Ulbricht, L.. ( 2022;), ‘ Gobernanza Algorítmica. ’, Revista Latinoamericana de Economía Y Sociedad Digital, 8:4, https://doi.org/10.53857/cwyi6959.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kitchin, R., and Lauriault, G.. ( 2018), Data and the City, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kitzberger, P.. ( 2014;), ‘ Medios y política democrática en América Latina: ¿ha llegado la hora de las reformas?. ’, in A. Bizberge, and A. Goldstein. (eds), Dossier n° 14, Observatorio Latinoamericano, Instituto de Estudios de América Latina y el Caribe (IEALC), Buenos Aires:: Facultad de Ciencias Sociales and UBA;, pp. 6677, http://iealc.sociales.uba.ar/observatorio-latinoamericano/observatorio-latinoamericano-no-14-medios-y-gobiernos-latinoamericanos-en-el-siglo-xxi-las-tensiones-de-una-compleja-relacion-agosto-2014/. Accessed 14 January 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mastrini, G., and Becerra, M.. ( 2006), Periodistas y Magnates: Estructura y concentración de las industrias culturales en América Latina, Buenos Aires:: Prometeo Libros;.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mastrini, G.,, de Charras, D., and Fariña, C.. ( 2013;), ‘ Nuevas formas de regulación internacional y su impacto en el ámbito latinoamericano. ’, in G. Mastrini,, A. Bizberge, and D. De Charras. (eds), Las políticas de comunicación en el siglo XXI, Ciudad de Buenos Aires:: La Crujia;, pp. 4467.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. McChesney, R.. ( 2013), Digital Disconnect, New York:: New Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Napoli, P., and Caplan, R.. ( 2017;), ‘ Why media companies insist they’re not media companies, why they’re wrong, and why it matters. ’, First Monday, 22:5, https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/7051/6124. Accessed 14 January 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pickard, R. G., and Pickard, V.. ( 2017), Essential Principles for Contemporary Media Policymaking (Informe sin número), Oxford:: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism and University of Oxford;, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/research/files/Essential%2520Principles%2520for%2520Contemporary%2520Media%2520and%2520Communications%2520Policymaking.pdf. Accessed 20 January 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Pickard, V.. ( 2022;), ‘ Democratizing the platforms: Promises and perils of public utility regulation. ’, 19 August, https://waccglobal.org/democratizing-the-platforms-promises-and-perils-of-public-utility-regulation/. Accessed 15 January 2023.
  34. Poell, T.,, Nieborg, D., and Duffy, B.. ( 2021), Platforms and Cultural Production, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Pohle, J., and Thiel, T.. ( 2020;), ‘ Digital sovereignty. ’, Internet Policy Review, 9:4, https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1532.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Segura, S., and Linares, A.. ( 2022;), ‘ Democratic governance of media and public communication: Latin American participatory institutions created in the 21st century. ’, in S. Ganter, and H. Badr. (eds), Media Governance: A Cosmopolitan Critique, Berlin:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 20529.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Segura, S., and Waisbord, S.. ( 2016;), ‘ Media movements. ’, Civil Society and Media Policy Reform in Latin America, Chicago, IL:: Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Sinclair, J.. ( 1999), Latin American Television: A Global View, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Snircek, N.. ( 2018), Capitalismo de plataformas, Buenos Aires:: Caja Negra Editora;.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Solis, B.. ( 2016), Comunicación: Memoria de un campo: Entrevistas de Marios Kaplun a los padres fundadores, Mexico City:: Tintable;.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) ( 2022;), ‘ Guidelines for regulating digital platforms: A multistakeholder approach to safeguarding freedom of expression and access to information. ’, Internet for Trust: Towards Guidelines for Regulating Digital Platforms for Information as a Public Good, UNESCO;: Paris:, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000384031.locale=en. Accessed 15 January 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. van Dijck, J.,, Nieborg, D., and Poell, T.. ( 2019;), ‘ Reframing platform power. ’, Internet Policy Review, 8:2, https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1414.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. van Dijck, J.,, Poell, T., and De Waal, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ The platform society as a contested concept. ’, in The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World, New York:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 730.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Verhulst, S., and Price, M.. ( 2013;), ‘ Introduction. ’, in M. Price,, S. Verhlust, and L. Morgan. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Media Law, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 17.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Voelsen, D.. ( 2019;), ‘ Cracks in the internet’s foundation: The future of the internet’s infrastructure and global internet governance (Research Paper No. 14). Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik. ’, German Institute for International and Security Affairs, SWP Research Paper, 2019/RP 14, 15 November, https://doi.org/10.18449/2019RP14.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Waisbord, S.. ( 2013), Vox Populista: Medios, periodismo, democracia, Barcelona:: Gedisa;.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Winseck. D.. ( 2020;), ‘ Vampire squids, “the broken internet” and platform regulation. ’, Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 11:3, pp. 24182, https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00025_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Wu, T.. ( 2018;), ‘ Is the First Amendment obsolete?. ’, 117 MICH. L. REV. 547, https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol117/iss3/4. Accessed 18 January 2023.
  49. Zuboff, S.. ( 2019), The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, New York:: Public Affairs;.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00118_2
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test