The place and challenges of Human Rights Impact Assessments in Latin American internet regulatory futures

References

1. Abrahams, Desirée, and Wyss, Yann. ( 2010), Guide to Human Rights Impact Assessment and Management, Washington, DC:: International Business Leaders Forum, International Finance Corporation and el Global Compact de las Naciones Unidas;.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Acerbi, Marcelo,, Sánchez-triana, Ernesto,, Enríquez, Santiago,, Tiffer-sotomayor, Ruth,, Luisa, Ana,, Lima, Gomes, and Clemente-fern, Pilar. ( 2014;), ‘ Environmental Impact Assessment Systems in Latin America and the Caribbean. ’, in IAIA14 Conference Proceedings, Viña del Mar, Chile, 8–11 April, Viña del Mar:: IAIA;, p. 6.
   [Google Scholar]
3. ADC ( 2019), ¿Quién Defiende Tus Datos?, Buenos Aires:: Asociación por los Derechos Civiles;.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Álvarez Ugarte, Ramiro, and Krauer, Laura. ( 2020), El Sector TICs y Derechos Humanos: Hacia Un Marco Conceptual de Las Evaluaciones de Impacto En DDHH, Buenos Aires:: Centro de Estudios para la Libertad de Expresión;.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Article One ( 2018a), Human Rights Impact Assessment: Facebook in Indonesia, Executive Summary, New York:: Article One;.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Article One ( 2018b), Human Rights Impact Assessment: Facebook in Sri Lanka, Executive Summary, New York:: Article One;.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Article One and Wikimedia Foundation ( 2020), Assessing the Human Rights Impacts of Wikimedia Free Knowledge Projects, New York:: Article One and Wikimedia Foundation;.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bader, Christine. ( 2016;), ‘ Human rights “intrapreneurs”: Challenges and keys to success. ’, in D. Baumann-Pauly, and J. Nolan. (eds), Business and Human Rights, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 154–60.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Banfield, Jessica,, Barbolet, Adam,, Goldwyn, Rachel, and Killick, Nick. ( 2005), Conflict-Sensitive Business Practice: Guidance for Extractive Industries, London:: International Alert;.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Becker, H. A., and Vanclay, Frank. (eds) ( 2003), The International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment: Conceptual and Methodological Advances, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA:: Edward Elgar Publishing;.
    [Google Scholar]
11. de Beco, Gauthier. ( 2009;), ‘ Human Rights Impact Assessments. ’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 27:2, pp. 139–66, https://doi.org/10.1177/016934410902700202.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bittle, Steven, and Snider, Laureen. ( 2013;), ‘ Examining the Ruggie report: Can voluntary guidelines tame global capitalism?. ’, Critical Criminology, 21:2, pp. 177–92, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-013-9177-4.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Blakley, Jill A. E., and Franks, Daniel M.. ( 2021), Handbook of Cumulative Impact Assessment, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA:: Edward Elgar Publishing;.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Boele, Richard, and Crispin, Christine. ( 2013;), ‘ What direction for human rights impact assessments?. ’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 31:2, pp. 128–34, https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.771005.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bradlow, Daniel. ( 2020;), ‘ Reforming responsibly: Why governments should assess the human rights impacts of economic reforms. ’, SouthViews No. 193, 30 April, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3592219. Accessed 4 June 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Braithwaite, John, and Drahos, Peter. ( 2000), Global Business Regulation, Cambridge and New York:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
17. BSR ( 2018), Human Rights Impact Assessment: Facebook in Myanmar 1, New York:: Business for Social Responsibility;.
    [Google Scholar]
18. BSR ( 2022), Human Rights Due Diligence of Meta’s Impacts in Israel and Palestine in May 2021. Insights and Recommendations, New York:: Business for Social Responsibility;.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Burchell, Robert W.. ( 1994), Development Impact Assessment Handbook, Washington, DC:: Urban Land Institute;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Bynoe, Ian, and Spencer, Sarah. ( 1999), Mainstreaming Human Rights: In Whitehall and Westminster, London:: Institute for Public Policy Research;.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Carozza, Paolo G.. ( 2003;), ‘ From conquest to constitutions: Retrieving a Latin American tradition of the idea of human rights. ’, Human Rights Quarterly, 25:2, pp. 281–313.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Carrillo, Arturo J., and Jackson, Matías. ( 2022;), ‘ Follow the leader? A comparative law study of the EU’s general data protection regulation’s impact in Latin America. ’, ICL Journal, 16:2, pp. 177–262, https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2021-0037.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Castañeda, Alejandra, and Ugarte, Ramiro Álvarez. ( 2020), Human Rights Impact Assessments: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities for ICT Sector Adoption, Buenos Aires:: Centro de Estudios en Libertad de Expresión y Acceso a la Información;.
    [Google Scholar]
24. CIDH ( 2013), Libertad de Expresión e Internet, Washington, DC:: Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos;.
    [Google Scholar]
25. CIDH ( 2017;), Estándares Para Una Internet Libre, Abierta e Incluyente. Informe temático. , INF.17/17, Washington, DC:: Relatoría Especial para la Libertad de Expresión de la CIDH;.
    [Google Scholar]
26. CIDH ( 2019a), Business and Human Rights: Inter-American Standards, OEA/Ser.L/V/II CIDH/REDESCA/INF.1/19, Washington, DC:: Inter-American Commission of Human Rights;.
    [Google Scholar]
27. CIDH ( 2019b), Business and Human Rights: Inter-American Standards, OEA/Ser.L/V/II CIDH/REDESCA/INF.1/19, Washington, DC:: Inter-American Commission of Human Rights;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Corkery, Allison, and Isaacs, Gilad. ( 2020;), ‘ Human Rights Impact Assessments and the politics of evidence in economic policymaking. ’, International Journal of Human Rights, 24:9, pp. 1268–89.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Coze, Agnes Saborio, and Nava, Alejandro Flores. ( 2009;), ‘ Review of environmental impact assessment and monitoring of aquaculture in Latin America. ’, FAO, Environmental Impact Assessment and Monitoring of Aquaculture, FAO, Fisheris and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 527, Rome:: FAO;, pp. 395–454.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Croft, Jeremy. ( 2000), Whitehall and the Human Rights Act 1998, London:: Constitution Unit at UCL;.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Darrow, Mac, and Tomas, Amparo. ( 2005;), ‘ Power, capture, and conflict: A call for human rights accountability in development cooperation. ’, Human Rights Quarterly, 27:2, pp. 471–538, https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2005.0015.
    [Google Scholar]
32. De Hert, Paul. ( 2012;), ‘ A human rights perspective on privacy and data protection impact assessments. ’, in D. Wright, and P. De Hert. (, eds.), Privacy Impact Assessment, London and New York:: Springer;, pp. 33–76.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Del Campo, Agustina. ( 2022;), ‘ Platform oversight: Lessons learned amidst pervasive dissensus. ’, CELE working paper, Buenos Aires:: Centro de Estudios en Libertad de Expresión y Acceso a la Información;.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Deonandan, Kalowatie, and Morgan, Jennifer. ( 2016;), ‘ Extractive industries and the global human rights regime for business: The Marlin Human Rights Impact Assessment. ’, in K. Deonandan, and M. L. Dougherty. (eds), Mining in Latin America: Critical Approaches to the New Extraction, New York and London:: Routledge;, pp. 160–81.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Derechos Digitales ( 2022), ¿Quién Defiende Tus Datos? Chile 2021–2022, Santiago:: Derechos Digitales;.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Drewry, Jonathan,, Shandro, Janis, and Winkler, Mirko S.. ( 2017;), ‘ The extractive industry in Latin America and the Caribbean: Health impact assessment as an opportunity for the health authority. ’, International Journal of Public Health, 62:2, pp. 253–62.
    [Google Scholar]
37. European Commission ( 2020), Digital Services Act, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-services-act-package. Accessed 4 June 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Gertler, Paul J.,, Martinez, Sebastian,, Premand, Patrick,, Rawlings, Laura B., and Vermeersch, Christel M. J.. ( 2016), Impact Evaluation in Practice, Washington, DC:: World Bank Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Glasson, John. ( 1998), Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment, Hoboken, NJ:: Taylor and Francis;.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Glendon, Mary Ann. ( 2003;), ‘ The forgotten crucible: The Latin American influence on the universal human rights idea. ’, Harvard Human Rights Journal, 16:27, pp. 27–39.
    [Google Scholar]
41. GNI ( 2020a;), ‘ The GNI Principles. ’, Global Network Initiative, https://globalnetworkinitiative.org/gni-principles/. Accessed 18 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
42. GNI ( 2020b;), ‘ Increasing transparency on human rights due diligence and impact assessments by GNI company members. ’, Global Network Initiative, 15 May, https://globalnetworkinitiative.org/increasing-transparency-on-human-rights-due-diligence-and-impact-assessments-by-gni-company-members. Accessed 17 August 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
43. González Cavazos, Alejandro. ( 2019;), ‘ Mining in Mexico: Lessons from an ex ante community-based HRIA on the right to water, the right to health and the right to a healthy environment. ’, in N. Götzmann. (ed.), Handbook on Human Rights Impact Assessment, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA:: Edward Elgar Publishing;, pp. 188–204.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Gostin, Lawrence,, Mann, Jonathan M., and Gostin, Larry. ( 1994;), ‘ Towards the development of a Human Rights Impact Assessment for the formulation and evaluation of public health policies. ’, Health and Human Rights, 1:58, pp. 58–80, https://doi.org/10.2307/4065262.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Gotzmann, Nora. ( 2014;), ‘ Human rights and impact assessment: Conceptual and practical considerations in the private sector context. ’, Matters of Concern Human Rights Research Paper No. 2014/2, Copenhagen:: Danish Institute for Human Rights;.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Götzmann, Nora,, Vanclay, Frank, and Seier, Frank. ( 2016;), ‘ Social and Human Rights Impact Assessments: What can they learn from each other?. ’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 34:1, pp. 14–23, https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2015.1096036.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Gramsci, Antonio. ( 1971), Selection from the Prison Notebooks, New York:: International Publishers;.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Harrison, James. ( 2011;), ‘ Human rights measurement: Reflections on the current practice and future potential of Human Rights Impact Assessment. ’, Journal of Human Rights Practice, 3:2, pp. 162–87, https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/hur011.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Hoff, Anneloes. ( 2019;), ‘ Dutch child labour due diligence law: A step towards mandatory human rights due diligence. ’, OHRH, 10 June, https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/dutch-child-labour-due-diligence-law-a-step-towards-mandatory-human-rights-due-diligence. Accessed 17 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Hunt, Alan, and Wickham, Gary. ( 1994), Foucault and Law: Towards a Sociology of Law as Governance, London:: Pluto Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Jelin, Elizabeth. ( 1994;), ‘ The politics of memory: The human rights movements and the construction of democracy in Argentina. ’, Latin American Perspectives, 21:2, pp. 38–58.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Jerolmack, C., and Khan, S.. ( 2014;), ‘ Talk is cheap: Ethnography and the attitudinal fallacy. ’, Sociological Methods & Research, 43:2, pp. 178–209, https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114523396.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Khoury, Stefanie. ( 2016), Corporate Human Rights Violations: Global Prospects for Legal Action, , 1st ed.., London and New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Kinley, David, and Tadaki, Junko. ( 2003;), ‘ From talk to walk: The emergence of human rights responsibilities for corporations at international law. ’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 44:4, pp. 931–1024.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Kuhndt, Michael,, von Geibler, Justus, and Herrndorf, Martin. ( 2006), Assessing the ICT Sector Contribution to the Millennium Development Goals: Status Quo Analysis of Sustainability Information for the ICT Sector, Wuppertal Report No. 3, Wuppertal:: Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy;.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Lazer, David M. J.,, Baum, Matthew A.,, Benkler, Yochai,, Berinsky, Adam J.,, Greenhill, Kelly M.,, Menczer, Filippo,, Metzger, Miriam J.,, Nyhan, Brendan,, Pennycook, Gordon,, Rothschild, David,, Schudson, Michael,, Sloman, Steven A.,, Sunstein, Cass R.,, Thorson, Emily A.,, Watts, Duncan J., and Zittrain, Jonathan L.. ( 2018;), ‘ The science of fake news. ’, Science, 359:6380, pp. 1094–96, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Lindblad Kernell, Emil. and Cathrine Bloch Veinberg ( 2020), Guidance on Human Rights Impact Assessments on Digital Activities, Copenhagen:: The Danish Institute for Human Rights;.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Maclay, Colin Miles. ( 2010), ‘Can the Global Network Initiative embrace the character of the net?’ in R. Deibert,, J. Palfrey,, R. Rohozinski, and J. Zittrain. (eds), Access Controlled, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;, pp. 39–43.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Maher, Rajiv. ( 2019), ‘ Managerialism in business and rights: Lessons on the social impacts of a collaborative Human Rights Impact Assessment of a contested mine in Chile’, in M. Mullen,, D. Polomski,, T. Soares,, J. Cassineiro,, M. D’Cruz, and V. Hongsathavij. (eds), Navigating a New Era of Business and Human Rights. , Selaya:: Article 30 and Mahidol University;, pp. 63–69.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Mares, Radu. ( 2019;), ‘ Securing human rights through risk-management methods: Breakthrough or misalignment?. ’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 32:3, pp. 517–35.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Marsden, Chris,, Meyer, Trisha, and Brown, Ian. ( 2020;), ‘ Platform values and democratic elections: How can the law regulate digital disinformation?. ’, Computer Law & Security Review, 36:2020, pp. 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105373.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Marsden, Christopher T.. ( 2011), Internet Co-Regulation: European Law, Regulatory Governance and Legitimacy in Cyberspace, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Massarani, Tarek F.,, Drakos, Margo Tatgenhorst, and Pajkowska, Joanna. ( 2007;), ‘ Extracting corporate responsibility: Towards a Human Rights Impact Assessment. ’, Cornell International Law Journal, 40: Winter, p. 37.
    [Google Scholar]
64. McCorquodale, Robert. ( 2017;), ‘ Human rights due diligence in law and practice: Good practices and challenges for business enterprises. ’, Business and Human Rights Journal, 2, pp. 195–224.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Medeiros, Francis Augusto,, and Bygrave, Lee A.. ( 2015;), ‘ Brazil’s Marco Civil Da Internet: Does it live up to the hype?. ’, Computer Law & Security Review, 31:1, pp. 120–30.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Meta ( 2022), Meta Response: Israel and Palestine Due Diligence Exercise, Menlo Park, CA:: Meta;.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Miretski, Pini Pavel, and Bachmann, Sascha-Dominik. ( 2012;), ‘ The UN “norms on the responsibility of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights”: A requiem. ’, Deakin Law Review, 17:1, p. 5, https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art68.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Morales, Luis F. Beltrán,, García-Rodríguez, Felipe,, Cota, Daniel Luch,, Díaz, German Ponce, and Unda, Victor Sevilla. ( 2007;), ‘ Economic development, environmental conflicts and citizen participation in Latin America. ’, International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1:9, pp. 449–51.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Observacom ( 2020), Estándares Para Una Regulación Democrática de Las Grandes Plataformas Que Garantice La Libertad de Expresión En Línea y Una Internet Libre y Abierta, Montevideo:: Observacom;.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Owens, Jenny,, and Sykes, Richard. ( 2005;), ‘ The International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association social responsibility working group and human rights. ’, International Social Science Journal, 57, s1, pp. 131–41, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.2009.00712.x.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Paust, Jordan J.. ( 2001;), ‘ Human rights responsibilities of private corporations. ’, Vanderbilt Journal of Trasnational Law, 35, 2002, pp. 801–25.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Ramiro, Mónica Arenas. ( 2022;), ‘ Data protection in Latin America. ’, in Research Handbook on Privacy and Data Protection Law, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA:: Edward Elgar Publishing;, pp. 140–59.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Ratner, Steven R.. ( 2001;), ‘ Corporations and human rights: A theory of legal responsibility. ’, Yale Law Journal, 111:2001, pp. 443–545.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Rees, Caroline, and Davis, Rachael. ( 2016;), ‘ Salient human rights issues: When severe risks to people intersect with risks to business. ’, in D. Baumann-Pauly, and J. Nolan. (eds), Business and Human Rights: From Principle to Practice, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 165–68.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Rights & Democracy ( 2011), Human Rights Impact Assessments, Montreal:: International Center for Human Rights and Democratic Development;.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Rosanvallon, Pierre. ( 2008), Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust, Cambridge and New York:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Ruggie, John. ( 2007), Human Rights Impact Assessments: Resolving Key Methodological Questions, A/HRC/4/74, Geneve:: Human Rights Council;.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Ruggie, John. ( 2008), Protect, Respect and Remedy: A Framework for Business and Human Rights. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, A/HRC/8/5, Geneva:: Human Rights Council;.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Ruggie, John. ( 2011), Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework, HR/PUB/11/04, New York:: Human Rights Council;.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Samway, M.. ( 2016;), ‘ The Global Network Initiative: How can companies in the information and communications technology industry respect human rights?. ’, Business and Human Rights Resource Center;, 9 May, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/the-global-network-initiative-how-can-companies-in-the-information-and-communications-technology-sector-respect-human-rights/. Accessed 17 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Shamir, Ronen. ( 2004;), ‘ Between self-regulation and the Alien Tort Claims Act: On the contested concept of corporate social responsibility. ’, Law & Society Review, 38:4, pp. 635–64, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.00062.x.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Sikkink, Kathryn. ( 1993;), ‘ Human rights, principled issue-networks, and sovereignty in Latin America. ’, International Organization, 47:3, pp. 411–41.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Simons, Penelope,, and Macklin, Audrey. ( 2014), The Governance Gap Extractive Industries, Human Rights, and the Home State Advantage, , 1st ed.., London and New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Sissons, Miranda, and Warofka, Alex. ( 2020;), ‘ An update on Facebook’s human rights work in Asia and around the world. ’, About Facebook, 12 May, https://about.fb.com/news/2020/05/human-rights-work-in-asia/. Accessed 17 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Small, Mario Luis. ( 2009;), ‘ “How many cases do I need?”: On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. ’, Ethnography, 10:1, pp. 5–38.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Statista Digital Market Outlook ( 2022;), ‘ Leading markets worldwide in 2022, by social media advertising spending (in million US dollars). ’, https://www.statista.com/outlook/dmo/digital-advertising/social-media-advertising/worldwide. Accessed 17 April 2023.
87. Sullivan, David. ( 2016), Business and Digital Rights: Taking Stock of the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights in the ICT Sector, Johannesburg:: Association for Progressive Communications;.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Takahashi, Saul. ( 2019;), ‘ Seizen-Setsu and the inadequacy of voluntary frameworks. ’, in M. Mullen,, D. Polomski,, T. Soares,, J. Cassineiro,, M. D’Cruz, and V. Hongsathavij. (eds), Managerialism in Business and Rights: Lessons on the Social Impacts of a Collaborative Human Rights Impact Assessment of a Contested Mine in Chile, Selaya:: Article 30 and Mahidol University, n.pag;.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Telefónica ( 2019;), ‘ Global human rights policy: Approved by the board of directors of Telefónica S.A. on at its meeting of May 29, 2019. ’, https://www.telefonica.com/es/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2021/08/human-rights-policy-telefonica-may-2019.pdf. Accessed 17 April 2023.
90. UN-ESC ( 1990), Global Consultation on the Right to Development as a Human Right. Report Prepared by the Secretary General Persuant to Commission on Human Rights Resolution 1989/45, E/CN.4/1990/9/Rev.1, Geneva:: Economic and Social Council;.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Waldron, Jeremy. ( 1999), Law and Disagreement, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Watchirs, Helen. ( 2002;), ‘ Review of methodologies: Measuring human rights implementation. ’, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 30:4, pp. 716–33.
    [Google Scholar]
93. Weissbrodt, David. ( 2005;), ‘ Business and human rights. ’, University of Cincinnati Law Review, 74:2005, pp. 55–74.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Wright, David, and De Hert, Paul. (eds) ( 2012), Privacy Impact Assessment, Dordrecht:: Springer Netherlands;.
    [Google Scholar]
95. Álvarez Ugarte, Ramiro. ( 2023;), ‘ The place and challenges of Human Rights Impact Assessments in Latin American internet regulatory futures. ’, Journal of Digital Media & Policy, Special Issue: ‘Emerging Debates on Internet Platform Policy and Regulation in Latin America’, 14:2, pp. 169–85, https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00120_1
    [Google Scholar]