Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Digital Media & Policy
  4. Volume 14, Issue 2
  5. Article
Emerging Debates on Internet Platform Policy and Regulation in Latin America
  • ISSN: 2516-3523
  • E-ISSN: 2516-3531

Abstract

In the rise of video-on-demand (VOD) services, Netflix is a prominent actor, expanding its operations in Latin America while regulators remain evasive. Its power concentration motivated research from different perspectives, while its role as a policy actor remains under-investigated. Therefore, this article engages in the political economy of communication to investigate how Netflix uses power to build an image of an expert able to provide policy recommendations to Latin America. We combine qualitative document analysis, participant observation and semi-structured expert interviews to assess Netflix’s strategy to consolidate as a policy actor in Latin America. The findings revealed Netflix’s attempts to legitimize itself as a promotor of inclusion and diversity without the need for regulation while connecting with the leading institutions promoting a policy discourse according to its interests. The enlargement of Netflix’s agency through knowledge production and connection with policy entrepreneurs raises concerns about power concentration and constraints of cultural policies.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • State Research Agency (AEI)
© 2023 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00124_1
2023-07-18
2024-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Albornoz, L. A.. ( 2020;), ‘ Netflix en tiempos de coronavirus. ’, Revista de Occidente, 472, pp. 87–104.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Albornoz, L. A., and García Leiva, M. T.. (eds) ( 2019), Audiovisual Industries and Diversity: Economics and Policies in the Digital Era, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Albornoz, L. A., and García Leiva, M. T.. ( 2022;), ‘ Netflix originals in Spain: Challenging diversity. ’, European Journal of Communication, 37:1, pp. 63–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Albornoz, L. A., and Krakowiak, F.. (forthcoming 2023;), ‘ Netflix’s first decade of presence in Latin America. ’, in P. Bouquillion,, C. Ithurbide, and T. Mattelart. (eds), Digital Platforms and Global South, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Ambulante ( 2021;), ‘ Ambulante y Netflix anuncian el Fondo #Miradas. ’, Ambulante , 19 April, https://www.ambulante.org/2021/04/ambulante-y-netflix-anuncian-el-fondo-miradas/. Accessed 25 October 2022.
  6. Asmar, A.,, Raats, T., and Van Audenhove, L.. ( 2023;), ‘ Streaming difference(s): Netflix and the branding of diversity. ’, Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies, 18:1, pp. 24–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Van Audenhove, L., and Donders, K.. ( 2019;), ‘ Talking to people III: Expert interviews and elite interviews. ’, in M. Puppis,, H. Van den Bulck,, K. Donders, and L. Van Audenhove. (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research, Cham:: Springer International Publishing;, pp. 179–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Baladron, M., and Rivero, E. A.. ( 2019;), ‘ Video-on-demand services in Latin America: Trends and challenges towards access, concentration and regulation. ’, Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 10:1, pp. 109–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bingham, A. J., and Witkowsky, P.. ( 2022;), ‘ Deductive and inductive approaches to qualitative data analysis. ’, in C. Vanover,, P. Mihas, and J. Saldaña. (eds), Analyzing and Interpreting Qualitative Data: After the Interview, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage Publications;, pp. 133–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Birkinbine, B. J.,, Gómez, R., and Wasko, J.. ( 2017;), ‘ Conclusion: Reflections on media power. ’, in B. J. Birkinbine,, R. Gómez,, and J. Wasko. (eds), Global Media Giants, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 477–483.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. EconomiaNaranja.gov ( 2022), Sandbox Audiovisual, Bogotá:: Ministry of Culture;, https://www.economianaranja.gov.co/sandbox-audiovisual/. Accessed 25 October 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Elkins, E.. ( 2021;), ‘ Streaming diplomacy: Netflix’s domestic politics and foreign policy. ’, in D. Y. Jin. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Digital Media and Globalization, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 150–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Evens, T., and Donders, K.. ( 2018), Platform Power and policy in Transforming Television Markets, Cham:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Falicov, T. L.. ( 2007;), ‘ Programa Ibermedia: Co-production and the cultural politics of constructing an Ibero-American audiovisual space. ’, Spectator, 27:2, pp. 21–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Fernandes, M. R.. ( 2022a;), ‘ The end of an era? The decrease of the EU influence in Ibero-American digital media policy discourses. ’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, online first, https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2022.2147517.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Fernandes, M. R.. ( 2022b), in-person interview with Víctor Herreruela, coordinator of Ibermedia programme, 24 May.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Fernandes, M. R.,, Donders, K., and Loisen, J.. ( 2022;), ‘ Ibermedia as a collaborative space for film co-production policy? A stakeholder analysis on decision-making processes. ’, Communication & Society, 35:2, pp. 137–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Ferrer-Roca, N.. ( 2020;), ‘ The political economy of the hobbit labour dispute: Global Hollywood, national interests and film policy. ’, Political Economy of Communication, 8:1, pp. 18–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. García Canclini, N.. ( 2019), Ciudadanos reemplazados por algoritmos, Bielefeld:: Bielefeld University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. García Leiva, M. T., and Albornoz, L. A.. ( 2020;), ‘ VOD service providers and regulation in the European Union: An audiovisual diversity approach. ’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 27:3, pp. 267–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. García Leiva, M. T.,, Albornoz, L. A., and Gómez, R.. ( 2021;), ‘ Netflix and the transnationalization of the audiovisual industry in the Ibero-American space. ’, Comunicación y Sociedad, 18, pp. 1–18, https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v2021.8238.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Gómez, R., and Muñoz Larroa, A.. ( 2023;), ‘ Netflix in Mexico: An example of the tech giant’s transnational business strategies. ’, Television & New Media, 24:1, pp. 88–105.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. González, L.. ( 2020;), ‘ Los 20 años del Programa Ibermedia: Consolidación y nuevas dinámicas de cooperación para el cine iberoamericano. ’, Revista EPTIC, 22:3, pp. 26–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Grece, C., and Jiménez Pumares, M.. ( 2021), Film and TV Content in VOD Catalogues 2021 Edition, Strasbourg:: European Audiovisual Observatory;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. INCAA (National Institute of Cinema and Audiovisual Arts, Argentina) ( 2022), Políticas audiovisuales: Experiencias internacionales. Regulación de servicios digitales e incentivos a la producción, Buenos Aires:: INCAA;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Iordache, C.. ( 2021;), ‘ Netflix in Europe: Four markets, four platforms? A comparative analysis of audiovisual offerings and investment strategies in four EU states. ’, Television and New Media, 23:7, pp. 721–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Iordache, C.,, Raats, T., and Afilipoaie, A.. ( 2021;), ‘ Transnationalisation revisited through the Netflix Original: An analysis of investment strategies in Europe. ’, Convergence, 28:1, pp. 236–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Kuhn, A., and Westwell, G.. ( 2012;), ‘ Transnational cinema. ’, A Dictionary of Film Studies, , 1st ed.., Oxford:: Oxford University Press;, p. 432.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lobato, R.. ( 2019), Netflix Nations: The Geography of Digital Distribution, New York:: New York University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Lobato, R., and Lotz, A. D.. ( 2020;), ‘ Imagining global video: The challenge of Netflix. ’, Journal of Cinema and Media Studies, 59:3, pp. 132–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lotz, A. D.. ( 2021;), ‘ In between the global and the local: Mapping the geographies of Netflix as a multinational service. ’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 24:2, pp. 195–215.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Lotz, A. D.,, Eklund, O., and Soroka, S.. ( 2022;), ‘ Netflix, library analysis, and globalization: Rethinking mass media flows. ’, Journal of Communication, 72:4, pp. 511–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. De Marchi, L., and Ladeira, J. M.. ( 2019;), ‘ Cultural diversity and regulation in Brazil: The debate about the on-demand audiovisual market. ’, in L. A. Albornoz, and M. T. García Leiva. (eds), Audiovisual Industries and Diversity: Economics and Policies in the Digital Era, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 169–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Mastrini, G., and Krakowiak, F.. ( 2021;), ‘ Netflix in Argentina: Accelerated expansion and little local production. ’, Comunicación y Sociedad, 18, pp. 1–23, https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v2021.7915.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Mattelart, A.. ( 2002), Geopolítica de la cultura, Santiago and Montevideo:: LOM Ediciones and Ediciones Trilce;.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Mattelart, A.. ( 2011;), ‘ New international debates on culture, information, and communication. ’, in J. Wasko,, G. Murdock, and H. Sousa. (eds), The Handbook of Political Economy of Communications, Malden, MA:: Blackwell Publishing;, pp. 501–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Milligan, M.. ( 2022;), ‘ LatinX in animation, Netflix announce spark animation grant fellow. ’, Animation Magazine, 16 February.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Mosco, V.. ( 2009), The Political Economy of Communication, , 2nd ed.., London:: Sage Publications;.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Muñoz Larroa, A.. ( 2019;), ‘ Industrial organization of online video on demand platforms in North America: Between diversity and concentration. ’, The Political Economy of Communication, 7:2, pp. 79–104.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Murdock, G., and Golding, P.. ( 2016;), ‘ Political economy and media production: A reply to Dwyer. ’, Media, Culture and Society, 38:5, pp. 763–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Netflix ( 2021a;), ‘ Environmental, Social & Governance Report 2021. ’, Netflix , 6 January, http://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://s22.q4cdn.com/959853165/files/doc_downloads/2022/03/30/2021-SASB-Report-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2023.
  42. Netflix ( 2021b;), ‘ About Netflix: Building a legacy of inclusion. ’, Netflix , https://about.netflix.com/en/programs. Accessed 25 October 2022.
  43. Netflix ( 2023;), letter to shareholders, Q4 2022. , 19 January.
  44. Observacom ( 2018;), ‘ Audiovisual OTT services on the internet: To regulate or to deregulate?. ’, YouTube , 18 September, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOOztmFHkpw. Accessed 20 January 2023.
  45. Olavarría, D.,, Luzardo, A., and Mateo-Berganza Díaz, M. M.. ( 2021), Behind the Camera: Creativity and Investment for Latin America and the Caribbean: Learnings from Conversations with Key Players in the Audiovisual Sector, Washington, DC:: IDB;.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Ranaivoson, H.. ( 2019;), ‘ Online platforms and cultural diversity in the audiovisual sectors: A combined look at concentration and algorithms. ’, in L. A. Albornoz, and M. T. García Leiva. (eds), Audiovisual Industries and Diversity: Economics and Policies in the Digital Era, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 68–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Reyes, M. S.. ( 2019;), ‘ Netflix is investing in public policy abroad to enable an international push. ’, Insider, 13 August, https://www.businessinsider.com/netflix-focuses-on-public-policy-strategy-abroad-2019-8?r=US&IR=T. Accessed 20 September 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Shin, S. Y., and Throsby, D.. ( 2022;), ‘ Cultural diversity and cultural trade: Theory and an application to the motion picture industry. ’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, online first, pp. 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2022.2053959.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Smith, S. L.,, Pieper, K.,, Choueiti, M.,, Yao, K.,, Case, A.,, Hernandez, K., and Moore, Z.. ( 2021), Inclusion in Netflix Original US Scripted Series & Films: Executive Summary, Los Angeles, CA:: USC Annenberg and Netflix;.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. UNESCO ( 2019), Desafíos y asimetrías regulatorias de los servicios audiovisuales en Internet. ¿Qué hacer?, Montevideo:: UNESCO;.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. UNWTO ( 2021), Cultural Affinity and Screen Tourism: The Case of Internet Entertainment Services, Madrid:: UNWTO;.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Wasko, J.. ( 2005;), ‘ Studying the political economy of media and information. ’, Comunicação e Sociedade, 7, pp. 25–48, https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.7(2005).1208.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Wasko, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ From global media giants to global internet giants. ’, in L. A. Albornoz, and M. T. García Leiva. (eds), Audiovisual Industries and Diversity: Economics and Policies in the Digital Era, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 68–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Wasko, J.,, Murdock, G., and Sousa, H.. (eds) ( 2011), The Handbook of Political Economy of Communications, Malden, MA:: Blackwell Publishing;.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Wayne, M. L., and Castro, D.. ( 2021;), ‘ SVOD Global expansion in cross-national comparative perspective: Netflix in Israel and Spain. ’, Television and New Media, 22:8, pp. 896–913.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Fernandes, Marina Rossato, and Albornoz, Luis A.. ( 2023;), ‘ Netflix as a policy actor: Shaping policy debate in Latin America. ’, Journal of Digital Media & Policy, Special Issue: ‘Emerging Debates on Internet Platform Policy and Regulation in Latin America’, 14:2, pp. 249–68, https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00124_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00124_1
Loading
Netflix as a policy actor: Shaping policy debate in Latin America
Journal of Digital Media & Policy 14, 249 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00124_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00124_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00124_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): audio-visual policy; diversity; Latin America; media regulation; policy discourse; political economy; power; VOD

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error